Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1675629
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-12-05more like thismore than 2023-12-05
answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept id 208 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
hansard heading Cyprus: Mediterranean Region more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, whether he has made an assessment of the potential contribution of Turkish Cypriot Muslims in Northern Cyprus to the UK’s strategic position in the eastern Mediterranean. more like this
tabling member constituency Bradford West more like this
tabling member printed
Naz Shah more like this
uin 5362 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-12-14more like thismore than 2023-12-14
answer text <p>In accordance with the rest of the international community, with the sole exception of Turkey, the UK does not recognise the self-declared &quot;Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus&quot; as an independent state. We do however engage with all parties, including Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriot communities, as well as faith communities, as part of the UK's commitment to stability and security in the region.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Aldershot more like this
answering member printed Leo Docherty more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-12-14T07:35:17.887Zmore like thismore than 2023-12-14T07:35:17.887Z
answering member
4600
label Biography information for Leo Docherty more like this
tabling member
4409
label Biography information for Naz Shah more like this
1464400
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-05-19more like thismore than 2022-05-19
answering body
Members Estimate Committee more like this
answering dept id 91 more like this
answering dept short name Members Estimate Committee more like this
answering dept sort name Members Estimate Committee more like this
hansard heading Representative Money more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Members Estimate Committee, how much Representative Money has been made available to elected Members who have not taken the Oath in each year between 2006 and 2022. more like this
tabling member constituency East Londonderry more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Gregory Campbell more like this
uin 5362 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-05-24more like thismore than 2022-05-24
answer text <p>The table below details how much Representative Money has been made available to elected Members who have not taken the Oath in each year between 2006 and 2022:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p>Representative Money allocations, 2005/06-2021/22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year</p></td><td><p>Main budget (£)</p></td><td><p>Travel budget (£)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005/06*</p></td><td><p>35,163.00</p></td><td><p>868.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2006/07</p></td><td><p>86,245.00</p></td><td><p>2,136.07</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2007/08</p></td><td><p>90,036.00</p></td><td><p>2,230.05</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008/09</p></td><td><p>93,639.00</p></td><td><p>2,319.26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009/10</p></td><td><p>94,482.00</p></td><td><p>2,340.13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010/11** (1 Apr-5 May)</p></td><td><p>9,277.00</p></td><td><p>229.78</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(6 May-31 Mar)</p></td><td><p>87,133.00</p></td><td><p>2,493.73</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>101,004.00</p></td><td><p>2,890.59</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>105,850.00</p></td><td><p>3,029.34</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>109,135.00</p></td><td><p>3,123.25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>112,076.00</p></td><td><p>3,207.58</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16 # (1 Apr-7 May)</p></td><td><p>11,511.00</p></td><td><p>329.45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(8 May-31 Mar)</p></td><td><p>87,783.00</p></td><td><p>1,898.90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>97,556.00</p></td><td><p>2,224.32</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18 $ (1 Apr-8 Jun)</p></td><td><p>18,737.00</p></td><td><p>431.41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(9 Jun-31 Mar)</p></td><td><p>130,970.00</p></td><td><p>2,901.64</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018/19</p></td><td><p>165,864.00</p></td><td><p>3,674.62</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019/20 ^ (1 Apr-11 Dec)</p></td><td><p>117,986.27</p></td><td><p>2,613.95</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(12 Dec-31 Mar)</p></td><td><p>48,243.74</p></td><td><p>1,200.05</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020/21</p></td><td><p>161,296.87</p></td><td><p>4,007.68</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021/22</p></td><td><p>162,265.31</p></td><td><p>4,021.01</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Notes:</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p>* from 1 November 2005-31 March 2006</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p>** general election year full year allocations based on 2005 and 2010</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p>general election results would have been:</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Main budget</p></td><td><p>Travel budget</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005 results</p></td><td><p>£96,747</p></td><td><p>£2,396.30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010 results</p></td><td><p>£96,374</p></td><td><p>£2,758.22</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p># general election year full year allocations based on 2010 and 2015</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p>general election results would have been:</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Main budget</p></td><td><p>Travel budget</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010 results</p></td><td><p>£113,867</p></td><td><p>£3,258.90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 results</p></td><td><p>£97,655</p></td><td><p>£2,112.46</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p>$ general election year full year allocations based on 2015 and 2017</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p>general election results would have been:</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Main budget</p></td><td><p>Travel budget</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 results</p></td><td><p>£99,116</p></td><td><p>£2,282.09</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 results</p></td><td><p>£161,500</p></td><td><p>£3,578.03</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p>^ general election year full year allocations based on 2015 and 2017</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p>general election results would have been:</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Main budget</p></td><td><p>Travel budget</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017 results</p></td><td><p>£169,345</p></td><td><p>£3,751.79</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019 results</p></td><td><p>£159,074</p></td><td><p>£3,956.92</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>This information can also be found on the App3 tab in the Excel spreadsheet (44 KB) accessed from the following link:<br><a href="https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01663/" target="_blank">https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01663/</a></p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Broxbourne more like this
answering member printed Sir Charles Walker more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-05-24T17:33:46.263Zmore like thismore than 2022-05-24T17:33:46.263Z
answering member
1493
label Biography information for Sir Charles Walker more like this
tabling member
1409
label Biography information for Mr Gregory Campbell more like this
1172031
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-01-20more like thismore than 2020-01-20
answering body
Department for International Trade more like this
answering dept id 202 more like this
answering dept short name International Trade more like this
answering dept sort name International Trade more like this
hansard heading Department for International Trade: Recruitment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, how many trade experts have been (a) recruited and (b) trained by her Department since its establishment. more like this
tabling member constituency Dundee East more like this
tabling member printed
Stewart Hosie more like this
uin 5362 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-01-23more like thismore than 2020-01-23
answer text <p>The Department has a strong core of trade policy officials which has grown significantly since July 2016 (from 45 to approximately 575 currently) and is continuing to grow. Trade Policy Group is also supported by around 70 lawyers and 90 analysts.</p><p> </p><p>The number of negotiators and the training they require is dependent on how many trade agreements are ongoing at any given time, the specific chapters in that negotiation and the complexity of that chapter. Negotiating teams will differ in sizes, with expertise relevant to the specific chapters of sectors.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth West more like this
answering member printed Conor Burns more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-01-23T17:44:54.133Zmore like thismore than 2020-01-23T17:44:54.133Z
answering member
3922
label Biography information for Sir Conor Burns more like this
tabling member
1514
label Biography information for Stewart Hosie more like this
752789
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-07-17more like thismore than 2017-07-17
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Southern: Standards more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, which of the 38 recommendations in the Gibb report his Department has decided not to implement. more like this
tabling member constituency Middlesbrough more like this
tabling member printed
Andy McDonald more like this
uin 5362 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-24more like thismore than 2017-07-24
answer text <p>Four recommendations made by Chris Gibb have not been accepted by the Department for Transport at this time. We are not currently reviewing off peak frequencies at low use stations, because a Thameslink consultation is under way. A recommendation to procure more Class 700 trains has not been accepted for commercial reasons. Chris Gibb also recommended a fares and ticketing review of Gatwick services. However, this is not consistent with Government fares policy. A recommendation to transfer specific routes to Transport for London requires further assessment.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-24T13:45:56.357Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-24T13:45:56.357Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4269
label Biography information for Andy McDonald more like this
387400
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-02more like thismore than 2015-07-02
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Special Educational Needs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the performance of local authorities in moving children with special education needs (SEN) statements onto Education, Health and Care plans under the new SEN Code of Practice. more like this
tabling member constituency Calder Valley more like this
tabling member printed
Craig Whittaker more like this
uin 5362 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-07more like thismore than 2015-07-07
answer text <p>From September 2014 local authorities in England were required to implement the Special Educational Need and Disability reforms.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Department for Education’s advice to local authorities on Transition to the new 0 to 25 special educational needs and disability system (March 2015) sets out the groups of children and young people whose statements must be reviewed and transferred where appropriate to Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans during 2014/15. This can be found here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/414952/SEND_Reforms_transitional_advice_March15.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/414952/SEND_Reforms_transitional_advice_March15.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Every local authority has published an individual Local Transition Plan setting out the timings for transfers to the new system. Figures returned by local authorities and published in the Special Educational Needs in England Statistical First Release in May 2015. This information can be found here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-special-educational-needs-sen" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-special-educational-needs-sen</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The department expects that young people who are currently receiving support as a result of a Learning Difficulty Assessment (LDA) and who remain in further education or training during the transition period will be issued with an EHC plan if they request and need one.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The department has provided extensive support to local authorities over the preparation of EHC plans, including the publication of guidance and the provision of training. As part of this we commissioned the Council for Disabled Children (CDC), to work with relevant professionals to produce guidance and training material on the transition to adult social care. CDC published ‘The role of social care in implementing the Children and Families Act 2014’ in March 2015. This can be found here: <a href="http://www.councilfordisabledchildren.org.uk/resources/the-role-of-social-care-in-implementing-the-children-and-families-act" target="_blank">http://www.councilfordisabledchildren.org.uk/resources/the-role-of-social-care-in-implementing-the-children-and-families-act</a>. The department is monitoring progress of transition in local areas closely, to determine what further support local authorities may need in order to undertake transfers effectively and to produce good quality EHC plans.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Children and Families Act 2014 requires all local authorities to publish a Local Offer of the services and support available to children and young people in their area with special educational needs and disabilities. Detailed requirements are set out in chapter 4 of the relevant statutory guidance, the 0-25 SEND code of practice (January 2015). This can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/send-code-of-practice-0-to-25</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>All local authorities have published a Local Offer. An important requirement of the Local Offer is that it should include the institutions offering provision for children and young people with SEN which the local authority would expect to draw upon. This will include specialist provision such as special schools, non-maintained special schools, independent special schools and specialist post-16 institutions which are either within the local area or where the local authority would expect to make placements. In addition, there is a statutory requirement to refer to the list of independent special schools and independent specialist colleges approved by the Secretary of State under Section 41 of the 2014 Act: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/section-41-secretary-of-state-approved-list" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/section-41-secretary-of-state-approved-list</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Responsibility for publishing and maintaining Local Offers lies with each local authority. The department is supporting local authorities to help make sure they meet all statutory requirements for their Local Offer, and that quality continues to improve.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>In addition to producing their Local Offer, local authorities are under a statutory duty to provide children, young people and parents with information, advice and support. The government has boosted the support available to families by investing £30 million over two years to ensure there are independent supporters available in every local authority area.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
answering member printed Edward Timpson more like this
grouped question UIN
5359 more like this
5360 more like this
5361 more like this
5509 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-07T16:28:03.72Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-07T16:28:03.72Z
answering member
1605
label Biography information for Edward Timpson more like this
tabling member
3940
label Biography information for Craig Whittaker more like this