Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1654767
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-07-20more like thismore than 2023-07-20
answering body
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities more like this
answering dept id 211 more like this
answering dept short name Levelling Up, Housing and Communities more like this
answering dept sort name Levelling Up, Housing and Communities more like this
hansard heading Independent Faith Engagement Review more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, pursuant to the Answer of 14 July 2023 to Question 192910 on Independent Faith Engagement Review, what oversight there is of the spending of the independent faith adviser. more like this
tabling member constituency Birmingham, Edgbaston more like this
tabling member printed
Preet Kaur Gill more like this
uin 195482 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-09-05more like thismore than 2023-09-05
answer text <p>The independent faith advisor's contract and payment terms were approved in the usual way.</p><p>The call for evidence questionnaire has been published on gov.uk page. The questions asked during interviews were not scripted.</p><p>In relation to the call for evidence, a broad range of individuals and organisations submitted responses.</p><p>As an Independent reviewer, Colin Bloom met with a with a wide range of stakeholders - including charities, organisations, academics and other sectoral experts and key individuals of all faiths and none - whom he deemed to have relevant insight into particular themes relevant to his report. Given the sensitive issues covered in his review, Colin Bloom was committed to preserving respondents' anonymity so they could speak freely. While these anonymised sources and external analysis have informed the review, the views and recommendations expressed are those of Mr Bloom.</p><p>As an Independent reviewer, Colin Bloom was free to meet with any individuals or organisations he chose to inform his review, with due consideration to existing official and Ministerial level engagement and communications.</p><p>In line with previous practice, a further breakdown of costings not be published.</p>
answering member constituency Bishop Auckland more like this
answering member printed Dehenna Davison more like this
grouped question UIN
195475 more like this
195476 more like this
195478 more like this
195479 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-09-05T15:31:04.163Zmore like thismore than 2023-09-05T15:31:04.163Z
answering member
4737
label Biography information for Dehenna Davison more like this
tabling member
4603
label Biography information for Preet Kaur Gill more like this
1015139
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-26more like thismore than 2018-11-26
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Surgery more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how the average cost to the NHS is calculated for an overnight stay in hospital for a patient that has undergone surgery; and what criteria are used to calculate that cost. more like this
tabling member constituency Huddersfield more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
uin 195482 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-04more like thismore than 2018-12-04
answer text <p>Whilst the information is not collected centrally in the format requested, NHS Improvement collect and publish reference costs data and the 2017/18 reference costs were published on 15 November.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wimbledon more like this
answering member printed Stephen Hammond more like this
grouped question UIN
195481 more like this
195483 more like this
195484 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-04T17:27:21.96Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-04T17:27:21.96Z
answering member
1585
label Biography information for Stephen Hammond more like this
tabling member
411
label Biography information for Mr Barry Sheerman more like this
47354
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-04-07more like thismore than 2014-04-07
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 6 March 2014, Official Report, column 940W, on railways: passengers, and to paragraph 4 of Annex 2 to the Tenth Report of the Transport Committee of Session 2010-12, High Speed Rail, HC 1185-i, what assessment he has made of whether an 80 per cent increase in seats on the West Coast Main Line by 2016 should create enough extra seats to deal with projected increase in passenger growth outlined in the Answer. more like this
tabling member constituency Eddisbury more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Stephen O'Brien more like this
uin 195482 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-04-29more like thismore than 2014-04-29
answer text <p><strong> </strong></p><p>The Department for Transport asked Network Rail to carry out an assessment of the 51M and RP2 proposals referred to in paragraph 4 of Annex 2 to the Tenth Report of the Transport Committee of Session2010-12, High Speed Rail, HC 1185-i. This assessment is available at:</p><p><a href="http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-review-of-strategic-alternatives/hs2-review-of-strategic-alternatives.pdf" target="_blank">http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-review-of-strategic-alternatives/hs2-review-of-strategic-alternatives.pdf</a>. Network Rail's assessment suggests that the additional capacity proposed by both 51M and RP2 would not match the demand growth on the route and would not solve the overcrowding on suburban services at the southern end of the route in the peak.</p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Scarborough and Whitby more like this
answering member printed Mr Robert Goodwill more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-04-29T12:00:00.00Zmore like thismore than 2014-04-29T12:00:00.00Z
answering member
1562
label Biography information for Sir Robert Goodwill more like this
tabling member
427
label Biography information for Mr Stephen O'Brien more like this