Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

479552
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-17more like thismore than 2016-03-17
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Air Force: Cadets more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if his Department will reconsider its decision to withdraw Volunteer Gliding Squadrons provision for Air Cadets in Wales. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 31578 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-03-22more like thismore than 2016-03-22
answer text <p>No. Cadets from all Welsh cadet units will still have the opportunity to fly gliders.</p><p>Volunteer Gliding Squadrons (VGS) due to disband are 634 Squadron currently based at St Athan and 636 Squadron currently based at Swansea. The intention is that these will be offset by an expansion of 1 Air Experience Flight at St Athan and that VGS in the West of England will become regional hubs.</p><p>The reduced VGS footprint will allow resources to be focused on the remaining Squadrons. This will enable more suitable infrastructure to be built and maintained that supports the Air Cadet Organisation more fully. The key development across the estate over time will be to provide new overnight accommodation and training facilities that safely allows cadets and adult instructors, over full residential weekends, to carry out gliding alongside flying related ground training including gliding simulators, funded by the RAF Charitable Trust. This should improve access to such activities for those that are located further from VGS sites.</p><p>Volunteers at affected Volunteer Gliding Squadrons will be offered opportunities to fill other posts within the Air Cadet Organisation dependent upon their own transferable skills and their personal preferences.</p>
answering member constituency Canterbury more like this
answering member printed Mr Julian Brazier more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-22T16:36:10.47Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-22T16:36:10.47Z
answering member
77
label Biography information for Sir Julian Brazier more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this
459354
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-10more like thismore than 2016-03-10
answering body
Department for Energy and Climate Change more like this
answering dept id 63 more like this
answering dept short name Energy and Climate Change more like this
answering dept sort name Energy and Climate Change more like this
hansard heading Electricity: Republic of Ireland more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, whether she plans to take forward talks on reaching an intergovernmental agreement with Ireland on expanding electricity interconnection capacity in response to the conclusions of the National Infrastructure Commission's report on Smart Power, published in March 2016. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 30686 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-03-16more like thismore than 2016-03-16
answer text <p>The Government is ambitious for the market to deliver an increase in electricity interconnection capacity where projects demonstrate value for money and provide benefits to consumers. We are primarily focused on facilitating developer-led delivery. Already one interconnection project to Ireland, Greenlink, has been approved by Ofgem in the first round of cap and floor applications. More projects, including to Ireland, can apply to Ofgem’s second cap and floor application window which opens this month.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Northamptonshire more like this
answering member printed Andrea Leadsom more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-16T12:51:07.967Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-16T12:51:07.967Z
answering member
4117
label Biography information for Andrea Leadsom more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this
459355
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-10more like thismore than 2016-03-10
answering body
Department for Energy and Climate Change more like this
answering dept id 63 more like this
answering dept short name Energy and Climate Change more like this
answering dept sort name Energy and Climate Change more like this
hansard heading Renewable Energy: Republic of Ireland more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, with reference to the Memorandum of Understanding on renewable energy trade agreed between the UK and Ireland in January 2013, what progress has been made on reaching an intergovernmental agreement with Ireland. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 30685 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-03-16more like thismore than 2016-03-16
answer text <p>We recognise the benefits of cooperation mechanisms and of opening our renewable support schemes to foreign generation in principle. This is why we signed the Memorandum of Understanding with Ireland. Whilst we have yet to agree with Ireland on any particular project, we remain open to new proposals.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Northamptonshire more like this
answering member printed Andrea Leadsom more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-16T12:45:00.32Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-16T12:45:00.32Z
answering member
4117
label Biography information for Andrea Leadsom more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this
449537
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-01more like thismore than 2016-02-01
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Wales more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average length of time to wait is for a reconsideration of a benefit decision by (a) his Department and (b) a tribunal hearing in (i) Ogmore and (ii) Wales in the latest period for which figures are available. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 25037 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-09more like thismore than 2016-02-09
answer text <p>The published statistics in relation to Employment and Support Allowance reconsideration clearance times in the Great Britain are in the link below:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/mandatory-reconsiderations-of-dwp-benefit-decisions-data-to-october-2014" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/mandatory-reconsiderations-of-dwp-benefit-decisions-data-to-october-2014</a></p><p> </p><p>The information requested in relation to other benefit reconsiderations is not readily available and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>The latest information from Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for appeal clearance times for the areas that cover Ogmore, Wales and the UK in the period April – September 2015, is as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Area<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>Waiting Time (Weeks)</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cardiff</p></td><td><p>16.6</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Port Talbot</p></td><td><p>18.5</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wales</p></td><td><p>17.7</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><em>Source: HMCTS MI System Feb 16</em> Note: The data is normally registered to the venue nearest to the appellant’s home address. Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service cannot retrieve data based on the appellant’s actual address, but can produce reports detailing the numbers of cases that were dealt with at one of its Regional centres. The majority of appellants living in the Ogmore area have their appeals heard in the Cardiff venues, though some may be heard in Port Talbot.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p>
answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-09T15:17:32.087Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-09T15:17:32.087Z
answering member
4105
label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this
449538
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-01more like thismore than 2016-02-01
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Wales more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of personal independence payment appeals were successful in (a) Ogmore and (b) Wales in the latest period for which figures are available. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 25036 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-09more like thismore than 2016-02-09
answer text <p>The First-tier Tribunal – Social Security and Child Support (SSCS) administered by HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service, hears appeals against Department for Work and Pensions’ decisions on a range of benefits including Personal Independence Payment (PIP).</p><p> </p><p>The majority of appellants living in the Ogmore area have their SSCS appeals heard in the Cardiff venues though some may be heard in Port Talbot.</p><p> </p><p>The following table provides information on the proportion of PIP appeals which were decided in favour of the appellant in Cardiff and Port Talbot venues and in Wales between July and September 2015 (the latest period for which figures are available).</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p>Percentage of PIP appeals found in favour of the appellant</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Cardiff</p></td><td><p>Port Talbot</p></td><td><p>Wales</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July – September 2015</p></td><td><p>75%</p></td><td><p>75%</p></td><td><p>73%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Note: SSCS data are recorded by the office that dealt with the case, and if the case went to oral hearing, the location of the Tribunal hearing is normally the hearing venue nearest to the appellant’s home address. Data cannot be retrieved based on the appellant’s actual address but can be produced detailing the numbers of cases that were dealt with at one of our Regional centres or heard at a specific venue.</p><p> </p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data available.</p>
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-09T17:52:17.407Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-09T17:52:17.407Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this
447669
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-01-26more like thismore than 2016-01-26
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Fraud: Criminal Investigation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, pursuant to the Answer of 20 January 2016 to Question 22432, by what measure the Director of the Serious Fraud Office judges whether there is a significant public interest element in a case. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 24101 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-03more like thismore than 2016-02-03
answer text <p>The Criminal Justice Act 1987 provides that “The Director may investigate any suspected offence which appears to him on reasonable grounds to involve serious or complex fraud.”</p><p>Each case is assessed on its own facts and merits.</p><p>The Statement of Principle sets out some of the factors that the Director will take into account when considering the matter for investigation. All of these will be considered, and there is no minimum requirement or measure in respect of the different factors.</p><p>Each on its own or taken in combination can establish sufficient grounds for the Director to decide that the case is sufficiently large, complex or of wide public interest that it should be dealt with by the Serious Fraud Office.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
grouped question UIN
24099 more like this
24102 more like this
24189 more like this
24190 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.397Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.397Z
answering member
4106
label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this
447670
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-01-26more like thismore than 2016-01-26
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Fraud: Criminal Investigation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, pursuant to the Answer of 20 January 2016 to Question 22432, what measure the Director of the Serious Fraud Office uses to judge actual or potential economic harm. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 24102 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-03more like thismore than 2016-02-03
answer text <p>The Criminal Justice Act 1987 provides that “The Director may investigate any suspected offence which appears to him on reasonable grounds to involve serious or complex fraud.”</p><p>Each case is assessed on its own facts and merits.</p><p>The Statement of Principle sets out some of the factors that the Director will take into account when considering the matter for investigation. All of these will be considered, and there is no minimum requirement or measure in respect of the different factors.</p><p>Each on its own or taken in combination can establish sufficient grounds for the Director to decide that the case is sufficiently large, complex or of wide public interest that it should be dealt with by the Serious Fraud Office.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
grouped question UIN
24099 more like this
24101 more like this
24189 more like this
24190 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.46Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.46Z
answering member
4106
label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this
447671
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-01-26more like thismore than 2016-01-26
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Fraud: Criminal Investigation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, pursuant to the Answer of 20 January 2016 to Question 22432, how the Director of the Serious Fraud Office measures the undermining of UK PLC commercial or financial interests in the (a) City of London and (b) UK. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 24099 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-03more like thismore than 2016-02-03
answer text <p>The Criminal Justice Act 1987 provides that “The Director may investigate any suspected offence which appears to him on reasonable grounds to involve serious or complex fraud.”</p><p>Each case is assessed on its own facts and merits.</p><p>The Statement of Principle sets out some of the factors that the Director will take into account when considering the matter for investigation. All of these will be considered, and there is no minimum requirement or measure in respect of the different factors.</p><p>Each on its own or taken in combination can establish sufficient grounds for the Director to decide that the case is sufficiently large, complex or of wide public interest that it should be dealt with by the Serious Fraud Office.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
grouped question UIN
24101 more like this
24102 more like this
24189 more like this
24190 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.34Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.34Z
answering member
4106
label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this
447672
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-01-26more like thismore than 2016-01-26
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Fraud: Criminal Investigation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, pursuant to the Answer of 20 January 2016 to Question 22432, what the figure is for high actual or potential loss listed in the Statement of Principle. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 24189 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-03more like thismore than 2016-02-03
answer text <p>The Criminal Justice Act 1987 provides that “The Director may investigate any suspected offence which appears to him on reasonable grounds to involve serious or complex fraud.”</p><p>Each case is assessed on its own facts and merits.</p><p>The Statement of Principle sets out some of the factors that the Director will take into account when considering the matter for investigation. All of these will be considered, and there is no minimum requirement or measure in respect of the different factors.</p><p>Each on its own or taken in combination can establish sufficient grounds for the Director to decide that the case is sufficiently large, complex or of wide public interest that it should be dealt with by the Serious Fraud Office.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
grouped question UIN
24099 more like this
24101 more like this
24102 more like this
24190 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.523Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.523Z
answering member
4106
label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this
447673
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-01-26more like thismore than 2016-01-26
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Fraud: Criminal Investigation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, pursuant to the Answer of 20 January 2016 to Question 22432, whether a case considered by the Serious Fraud Office must meet all Statement of Principle considerations. more like this
tabling member constituency Ogmore more like this
tabling member printed
Huw Irranca-Davies remove filter
uin 24190 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-03more like thismore than 2016-02-03
answer text <p>The Criminal Justice Act 1987 provides that “The Director may investigate any suspected offence which appears to him on reasonable grounds to involve serious or complex fraud.”</p><p>Each case is assessed on its own facts and merits.</p><p>The Statement of Principle sets out some of the factors that the Director will take into account when considering the matter for investigation. All of these will be considered, and there is no minimum requirement or measure in respect of the different factors.</p><p>Each on its own or taken in combination can establish sufficient grounds for the Director to decide that the case is sufficiently large, complex or of wide public interest that it should be dealt with by the Serious Fraud Office.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
grouped question UIN
24099 more like this
24101 more like this
24102 more like this
24189 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.57Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-03T12:08:46.57Z
answering member
4106
label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
tabling member
1476
label Biography information for Huw Irranca-Davies more like this