Foreign and Commonwealth Office<p>Officials in London have not met representatives from Tapol since 2013 and we have no record of meetings with ETAN. Officials in Jakarta last met Tapol in Jakarta in March 2018 and are planning to meet them again in November. During regular visits to Papua, embassy officials meet local government officials, civil society groups, businesses and local communities to discuss issues such as human rights, economic development and sustainable forest management.</p><p></p>Cities of London and WestminsterMark Field2018-11-12false2018-11-12T16:25:15.617Z16Foreign and Commonwealth OfficeForeign and Commonwealth Office2018-11-05Papua: Human Rights1House of CommonsTo ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, whether officials in (a) his Department and (b) the Indonesian Embassy have met the non-governmental organizations (i) Tapol and (ii) Etan to discuss human rights in West Papua.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds188246Department of Health and Social Care<p>The Female Genital Mutilation Enhanced Dataset is collected via the NHS Digital Clinical Audit Platform or CAP, which is an easy to use, intuitive, data submission tool that needs no specific training.</p><p> </p><p>NHS Digital has published clear guidance online to support National Health Service organisations, including primary care practices, to register to access CAP and to submit information on the system. In 2017, the process was simplified and streamlined to further support primary care practices to register on the CAP, and it was confirmed that the Senior Partner or Caldicott Guardian at a practice can submit the registration to access CAP.</p>ThurrockJackie Doyle-Price2018-11-12false2018-11-12T15:55:24.53Z17Health and Social CareHealth and Social Care2018-11-05Female Genital Mutilation1House of CommonsTo ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to ensure that Primary Care practices have the ability to submit securely information on patients that have been subjected to female genital mutilation to the statutory database.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds188271Treasury<p>Article 5(1)(a) and 1(b), subparagraphs (3) to (6) and subparagraph (9) in the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulations will become deficient after the UK’s exit from the EU. In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, it will be amended in accordance with Regulation 27(2) of the draft Markets in Financial Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.</p><p> </p><p>Article 9(5) will become deficient after the UK’s exit from the EU. In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal it will be amended in accordance with Regulation 27(4) of the draft Markets in Financial Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.</p><p> </p><p>Article 36 specifies a threshold which is expressed as an absolute number, so this will not be deficient after exit and is therefore not being amended.</p>SalisburyJohn Glen2018-11-15false2018-11-15T15:48:31.31Z14TreasuryTreasury2018-11-12Financial Services: EU Law1House of CommonsTo ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 6 November 2018 to Question 187143 on EU Internal Trade, how his Department plans to transpose provisions from EU law into UK law involving thresholds measuring the proportion of the entire market or a specified number of grouping of member states, in the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulations Article (a) 5(1)(a) and 1(b), subparagraphs (3) to (6) and subparagraph (9), (b) Article 9(5), (c) Article 14(5) and (d) Article 36(5) in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds190537Treasury<p>Articles 12 to 16 of the Commission Delegated Regulation amending MiFID 565/2017 will become deficient after the UK’s exit from the EU. In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, it will be amended in accordance with Regulation 40 of the draft Markets in Financial Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.</p>SalisburyJohn Glen2018-11-15false2018-11-15T15:52:12.237Z14TreasuryTreasury2018-11-12Financial Services: EU Law1House of CommonsTo ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 6 November 2018 to Question 187143 on EU Internal Trade, how his Department plans to transpose provisions from EU law into UK law involving thresholds measuring the proportion of the entire market or a specified number of grouping of member states, in Articles 12 to 16 of the Commission Delegated Regulation amending MiFID 565/2017 in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds190540Treasury<p>Article 5(1)(a) and (b)) of the Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/567 will become deficient after the UK’s exit from the EU. In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, it will be amended in accordance with Regulation 59(2) of the draft Markets in Financial Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.</p>SalisburyJohn Glen2018-11-15false2018-11-15T15:54:33.617Z14TreasuryTreasury2018-11-12Financial Services: EU Law1House of CommonsTo ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of his Department's written answer to parliamentary question 187143, how his Department plans to transpose provisions from EU law into UK law involving thresholds measuring the proportion of the entire market or a specified number of grouping of member states, in Article 5(1)(a) and (b)) of the Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/567 in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds190541Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs<p>Since 2013 Natural England has adopted a risk based approach to the frequency of monitoring sites, which varies according to a range of factors such as risk to the site and the stability of its ecology.</p><p> </p><p>Natural England continues to support and encourage its partners and major owners of sites of specific scientific interest (SSSI) in the work they do on SSSI monitoring. Natural England is also developing its approach to the monitoring of SSSIs, including use of new technologies such as remote sensing and greater partnership involvement. This work will form part of Natural England’s continued risk based approach to decide how frequently a site should be monitored and is intended to improve efficiency of SSSI monitoring.</p><p> </p>Suffolk CoastalDr Thérèse Coffey2018-11-20false2018-11-20T14:11:02.847Z13Environment, Food and Rural AffairsEnvironment, Food and Rural Affairs2018-11-12Sites of Special Scientific Interest1House of CommonsTo ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he plans to take to increase the proportion of sites of specific scientific interest monitored every six years.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds190542Foreign and Commonwealth Office<p>I raised demolitions with the Israeli Ambassador to the UK on 11 October; in particular urging Israel to reconsider plans to demolish the village of Khan al-Ahmar. Our Ambassador to Israel most recently raised this issue with the Israeli Attorney General on 3 November. We remain gravely concerned by these proposals and will continue to raise our concerns with the Israeli authorities. We also issued a statement on 10 September along with France, Germany, Spain and Italy reiterating our call to the Israeli Government not to go ahead with its plan to demolish the village – including its school – and displace its residents. On 31 July, the Foreign Secretary wrote to Prime Minister Netanyahu alongside the French, German Italian and Spanish Foreign Ministers to demonstrate the international community’s support for the village and urge the Israeli Government to reconsider their decision. We are aware that Israel has postponed the demolition of Khan al-Ahmar, in order to exhaust negotiations for negotiations for evacuation by agreement. We continue to urge the authorities not to go ahead with their plan to demolish the village.</p>North East BedfordshireAlistair Burt2018-11-20false2018-11-20T16:02:33.293Z16Foreign and Commonwealth OfficeForeign and Commonwealth Office2018-11-12Israel: Bedouin1House of CommonsTo ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what representations he has made to the Government of Israel on the negotiations regarding the status of Khan al-Ahmar; and with reference to the oral contribution of the Minister for the Middle East of 4 July 2018, Official Report column 323, what urgent steps he is taking to demonstrate the international community’s support for that community.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds190555Department of Health and Social Care<p>In 2017/18, NHS England commissioned NHS Benchmarking to collect data on current levels of provision for adults with an eating disorder across community and inpatient services for adults with an eating disorder including levels of investment, mapping of services, quantifying the workforce, understanding waiting times and distances travelled for inpatient care. The outputs were reported to NHS England in 2018, and are being used by NHS England to assess levels of geographical variation, and to model the cost and workforce implications of any future commitments to service improvements.</p>ThurrockJackie Doyle-Price2018-11-15false2018-11-15T16:52:13.343Z17Health and Social CareHealth and Social Care2018-11-12Eating Disorders1House of CommonsTo ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has undertaken a baseline audit of levels of (a) investment, (b) capacity and (c) in (i) inpatient and (ii) community services for adults with eating disorders.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds190565Department of Health and Social Care<p>All providers of National Health Service-funded healthcare services are expected to meet a range of national standards, other operational standards and quality requirements. These are set out in the NHS Standard Contract along with the consequences of breaches of these. In many cases, the consequence would be a financial sanction.</p><p> </p><p>Since April 2016, most NHS providers agreeing to meet financial control targets as part of the sustainability funding programme are exempt from such sanctions. However, any revenue withheld is reinvested in the local healthcare system.</p>WimbledonStephen Hammond2018-11-21false2018-11-21T14:47:35.687Z17Health and Social CareHealth and Social Care2018-11-13Hospitals: Standards1House of CommonsTo ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what evidence his Department holds on the effect on the quality of care of fines levied as a result of hospitals breaching targets; and whether he is taking steps to ensure that such fines do not detract from the provision of care to potentially affected populations.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds190930Department of Health and Social Care<p>Several different quality incentive schemes operate in the National Health Service.</p><p> </p><p>The Quality and Outcomes Framework is a voluntary pay for performance scheme within the general practitioner contract. It focuses upon improving the care of patients with one or more of 25 long term conditions. In 2018, NHS England undertook and published a Review of the Quality and Outcomes Framework which drew upon published evidence to evaluate its effectiveness and identify opportunities for reform. The recommendations made in the report are the subject of ongoing discussions with the General Practitioners Committee of the British Medical Association.</p><p> </p><p>The Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) and Quality Premium schemes are intended to drive improvement by providers, and are administered by clinical commissioning groups and NHS England. The indicators in both are routinely reviewed as part of the NHS Planning Round to ensure that the schemes reflect the latest clinical priorities.</p><p> </p><p>CQUIN has demonstrably helped secure improvements in certain areas: e.g. sepsis and venous thromboembolism management, hepatitis C treatment and staff flu vaccinations. However, we are also aware that some indicators have been less impactful, for example where we have pursued complex service changes or goals without a standard implementation method. The schemes are being reviewed with a view to changes in 2019/20.</p>GosportCaroline Dinenage2018-11-21false2018-11-21T14:43:31.11Z17Health and Social CareHealth and Social Care2018-11-13Health Services: Standards1House of CommonsTo ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the potential effectiveness of quality incentive schemes in improving the quality of care to patients.falseOxford EastAnneliese Dodds19093110011255