Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1672031
human indexable true more like this
published true more like this
registered interest false more like this
answer date less than 2023-12-05more like thismore than 2023-12-05
date less than 2023-11-21more like thismore than 2023-11-21
date tabled less than 2023-11-21more like thismore than 2023-11-21
ddp created less than 2023-11-21T21:36:42.750Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T21:36:42.750Z
answering body
Restoration and Renewal Client Board more like this
question status Tabled more like this
answering dept id 213 more like this
answering dept short name Restoration and Renewal Client Board more like this
answering dept sort name Restoration and Renewal Client Board more like this
ddp modified
less than 2023-11-22T18:05:32.034Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-22T18:05:32.034Z
less than 2023-11-29T18:26:16.606Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-29T18:26:16.606Z
hansard heading Palace of Westminster: Repairs and Maintenance more like this
house id 2 more like this
identifier HL458 more like this
legislature
25277
parliament number 58 more like this
question first answered
remove filter
question text To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker, following the professional and technical advice received by both Houses that a partial decant is both more risky and expensive than a full decant, why a partial decant is still being considered as an option for Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster. more like this
session
2023/24 more like this
session number 4 more like this
tabling member printed
Earl Attlee remove filter
title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2023/24 HL458 more like this
type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
uin HL458 more like this
version 2 more like this
written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
answer answer
creator
3425
label Biography information for Earl Attlee more like this
publisher 25277
tabling member
3425
label Biography information for Earl Attlee more like this