Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1737393

registered interest
date	28/10/2024
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Homelessness
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many assessments for destitution her Department has made for people subject to No Recourse to Public Funds conditions in each of the last ten years.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	11303
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/10/2024 answer text <p>We do not routinely publish the information you have requested, and we are unable to provide this information, as it could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.</p><p>When an individual goes through the process of assessment for Change of Conditions, various No Recourse to Public Funds conditions are checked, with ‘destitution’ being one of these conditions.</p> answering member constituency Feltham and Heston answering member printed Seema Malhotra question first answered 31/10/2024 15:45:45 answering member 4253 label Biography information for Seema Malhotra
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1737446

registered interest
date	28/10/2024
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Draft Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to clause 2 of the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill, for what reason venues with a 100 person capacity will be excluded from full risk assessments.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	11312
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/10/2024 answer text <p>As a result of pre-legislative scrutiny, and extensive consultation in relation to proposals for the standard tier, the Government made significant changes to the Bill. This was to ensure public protection outcomes can be achieved whilst avoiding undue burdens on businesses and other organisations. This includes raising the standard tier threshold from 100 to 200.</p><p>Lowering the minimum threshold for the standard tier back to 100 would result in significant changes to the coverage of the Bill and increased costs to business. Government believes a threshold of 200 achieves an appropriate balance between protecting the public from the risk of physical harm and imposing burden on business, whilst continuing to deliver the Bill’s overall aims of increasing protective security and organisational preparedness across the UK.</p><p>We will continue to liaise with all relevant stakeholders as the Bill progresses.</p> answering member constituency Barnsley North answering member printed Dan Jarvis grouped question UIN 11313 11314 11315 question first answered 31/10/2024 15:47:22 answering member 4243 label Biography information for Dan Jarvis
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1737447

registered interest
date	28/10/2024
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Draft Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she has made an assessment of the effectiveness of the pilot implementation of provisions relating to the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill by local authorities.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	11313
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/10/2024 answer text <p>As a result of pre-legislative scrutiny, and extensive consultation in relation to proposals for the standard tier, the Government made significant changes to the Bill. This was to ensure public protection outcomes can be achieved whilst avoiding undue burdens on businesses and other organisations. This includes raising the standard tier threshold from 100 to 200.</p><p>Lowering the minimum threshold for the standard tier back to 100 would result in significant changes to the coverage of the Bill and increased costs to business. Government believes a threshold of 200 achieves an appropriate balance between protecting the public from the risk of physical harm and imposing burden on business, whilst continuing to deliver the Bill’s overall aims of increasing protective security and organisational preparedness across the UK.</p><p>We will continue to liaise with all relevant stakeholders as the Bill progresses.</p> answering member constituency Barnsley North answering member printed Dan Jarvis grouped question UIN 11312 11314 11315 question first answered 31/10/2024 15:47:22 answering member 4243 label Biography information for Dan Jarvis
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1737448

registered interest
date	28/10/2024
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Draft Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she plans to provide access to training for premises covered by the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	11314
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/10/2024 answer text <p>As a result of pre-legislative scrutiny, and extensive consultation in relation to proposals for the standard tier, the Government made significant changes to the Bill. This was to ensure public protection outcomes can be achieved whilst avoiding undue burdens on businesses and other organisations. This includes raising the standard tier threshold from 100 to 200.</p><p>Lowering the minimum threshold for the standard tier back to 100 would result in significant changes to the coverage of the Bill and increased costs to business. Government believes a threshold of 200 achieves an appropriate balance between protecting the public from the risk of physical harm and imposing burden on business, whilst continuing to deliver the Bill’s overall aims of increasing protective security and organisational preparedness across the UK.</p><p>We will continue to liaise with all relevant stakeholders as the Bill progresses.</p> answering member constituency Barnsley North answering member printed Dan Jarvis grouped question UIN 11312 11313 11315 question first answered 31/10/2024 15:47:22 answering member 4243 label Biography information for Dan Jarvis
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1737449

registered interest
date	28/10/2024
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Draft Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will consult Pool Reinsurance Limited on the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	11315
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/10/2024 answer text <p>As a result of pre-legislative scrutiny, and extensive consultation in relation to proposals for the standard tier, the Government made significant changes to the Bill. This was to ensure public protection outcomes can be achieved whilst avoiding undue burdens on businesses and other organisations. This includes raising the standard tier threshold from 100 to 200.</p><p>Lowering the minimum threshold for the standard tier back to 100 would result in significant changes to the coverage of the Bill and increased costs to business. Government believes a threshold of 200 achieves an appropriate balance between protecting the public from the risk of physical harm and imposing burden on business, whilst continuing to deliver the Bill’s overall aims of increasing protective security and organisational preparedness across the UK.</p><p>We will continue to liaise with all relevant stakeholders as the Bill progresses.</p> answering member constituency Barnsley North answering member printed Dan Jarvis grouped question UIN 11312 11313 11314 question first answered 31/10/2024 15:47:22 answering member 4243 label Biography information for Dan Jarvis
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1735627

registered interest
date	21/10/2024
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Police: Training
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 17 October 2024 to Question 8159 on Police: Training, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of introducing protective security measures for people from Hong Kong with BNO status.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	10089
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/10/2024 answer text <p>It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on individuals’ security arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.</p><p>We continually assess potential threats in the UK, and take protection of individuals’ rights, freedoms, and safety in the UK very seriously. Any attempt by any foreign power to intimidate, harass or harm individuals in the UK will not be tolerated and will be thoroughly investigated.</p><p>Any individuals who believe they are a victim of a crime should report their concerns to the Police.</p><p>Home Office officials work closely with the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, as well as other government departments, to ensure that the UK is a safe and welcoming place for both those who hold BN(O) (British National Overseas) status and other Hongkongers.</p> answering member constituency Barnsley North answering member printed Dan Jarvis question first answered 24/10/2024 14:43:26 answering member 4243 label Biography information for Dan Jarvis
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1735073

registered interest
date	17/10/2024
answering body	Department of Health and Social Care
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health and Social Care
answering dept sort name	Health and Social Care
hansard heading	HM Courts and Tribunals Service: NHS
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what financial contribution the NHS makes to the tribunal service.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	9716
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/10/2024 answer text <p>The HM Courts and Tribunals Service is funded primarily by the Ministry of Justice. Where the National Health Service is party to a tribunal where a fee is levied, for instance immigration and asylum, and other fee charging special tribunals, they will pay this in the usual way. We would not expect the NHS to be a significant source of income through these tribunal fees, however the HM Courts and Tribunals Service’s annual report and accounts do not provide the level of detail required to be able to provide a figure.</p> answering member constituency Bristol South answering member printed Karin Smyth question first answered 24/10/2024 09:36:41 answering member 4444 label Biography information for Karin Smyth
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1735074

registered interest
date	17/10/2024
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Housing Benefit: Housing Associations
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how much (a) housing benefit and (b) equivalent benefit as part of Universal Credit was paid to housing associations in each of the last three years.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	9717
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/10/2024 answer text <p>The information requested for Universal Credit is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>The information requested for Housing Benefit may be found by using the Detailed Housing Type and the Payment Destination fields in the “Housing Benefit - Data from April 2018” dataset in Stat-Xplore (<a href="https://stat-xplore.dwp.gov.uk/webapi/jsf/login.xhtml" target="_blank">Stat-Xplore - Log in (dwp.gov.uk)</a>). Guidance on how to use Stat-Xplore can be found here: <a href="https://stat-xplore.dwp.gov.uk/webapi/online-help/index.html" target="_blank">https://stat-xplore.dwp.gov.uk/webapi/online-help/index.html</a>. An account is not required to use Stat- Xplore; the ‘Guest Login’ feature gives instant access to the main functions.</p><p> </p><p>The Department is working towards developing these statistics internally so that we will be in a position to answer similar Parliamentary Questions in the future.</p> answering member constituency East Ham answering member printed Sir Stephen Timms question first answered 23/10/2024 11:17:47 answering member 163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1735083

registered interest
date	17/10/2024
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Housing Revenue Accounts
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if she will make an assessment of the potential impact of Housing Revenue Account borrowing on investment in council homes.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	9718
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/10/2024 answer text <p>We recognise the importance of borrowing for investment in new council homes. Local authorities have access to a preferential rate from the Public Works Loans Board to support housebuilding in the Housing Revenue Account. The preferential rate of gilts +0.4% is available until June 2025. The Government is committed to supporting councils to build their capacity and invest in new social rented homes.</p> answering member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich answering member printed Matthew Pennycook question first answered 23/10/2024 14:53:01 answering member 4520 label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle

1735181

registered interest
date	17/10/2024
answering body	Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
answering dept id	208
answering dept short name	Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
answering dept sort name	Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
hansard heading	Russia: Sanctions
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what assessment his Department has made of sanctioning (a) Leonard Blavatnik and (b) other Russian people under sanction in Ukraine but not in the UK.
tabling member constituency	Bermondsey and Old Southwark
tabling member printed	Neil Coyle
uin	9719
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/10/2024 answer text <p>The UK remains steadfast in our support to Ukraine. Together with our international partners, we have implemented the most severe package of sanctions ever imposed on a major economy. The UK alone has sanctioned more than 2,000 individuals and entities under the Russia sanctions regime. Just this week, we launched our largest ever ship specification package targeting Putin's Shadow Fleet.</p><p>We do not comment on future or individual designations. Furthermore, we do not comment on our partner's decisions on individual designations.</p> answering member constituency Cardiff South and Penarth answering member printed Stephen Doughty question first answered 23/10/2024 09:35:17 answering member 4264 label Biography information for Stephen Doughty
tabling member	4368 label Biography information for Neil Coyle