Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1671249
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2023-11-20more like thismore than 2023-11-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prison Sentences more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government how many people are currently in prison serving an imprisonment for public protection sentence who have been held for 10 years or more beyond their original tariff, broken down by the exact number of years over tariff. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL423 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-12-04more like thismore than 2023-12-04
answer text <p>On 16 October 2023, the Lord Chancellor announced he would be looking at options to curtail the licence period to restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences in line with recommendation 8 of the report by the Justice Select Committee (JSC), published on 28 September 2022.</p><p>These changes are being taken forward in the Victims and Prisoners Bill. The measures will make it quicker and easier to terminate an IPP licence (and therefore the IPP sentence as a whole) whilst balancing public protection considerations.</p><p>The new measure will:</p><ol><li>Reduce the qualifying period which triggers the duty of the Secretary of State to refer an IPP licence to the Parole Board for termination from ten years to three years;</li><li>Include a clear statutory presumption that the IPP licence will be terminated by the Parole Board at the end of the three-year qualifying period;</li><li>Introduce a provision that will automatically terminate the IPP licence two years after the three-year qualifying period, in cases where the Parole Board has not terminated the licence; and</li><li>Introduce a power to amend the qualifying period by Statutory Instrument.</li></ol><p> </p><p>The Lord Chancellor was persuaded by the Committee’s recommendation to reduce the qualifying licence period from 10 years to 5 years and is going further: reducing the period to 3 years. These amendments will restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences and provide a clear pathway to a definitive end to the licence and, therefore, the sentence.</p><p>In addition to these changes, the actions this Government are taking are working; the number of prisoners serving the IPP sentence who have never been released now stands at 1,269 as of September 2023, down from more than 6000 in 2012.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1: The tariff-expired Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) prisoner population at least 10 years over tariff, 30 September 2023.</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Time over tariff</p></td><td><p>Count</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>From 10 years to less than 11 years</p></td><td><p>132</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>From 11 years to less than 12 years</p></td><td><p>117</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>From 12 years to less than 13 years</p></td><td><p>128</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>From 13 years to less than 14 years</p></td><td><p>128</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>From 14 years to less than 15 years</p></td><td><p>94</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>From 15 years to less than 16 years</p></td><td><p>62</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>From 16 years to less than 17 years</p></td><td><p>21</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>From 17 years to less than 18 years</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>From 18 years to less than 19 years</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>684</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please note:</p><p>(1) The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-12-04T13:28:08.887Zmore like thismore than 2023-12-04T13:28:08.887Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1464854
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2022-05-23more like thismore than 2022-05-23
answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept id 208 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
hansard heading Jerusalem: Religious Freedom more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of religious freedom for (1) Christians, and (2) Muslims, in Jerusalem, especially during Jewish festivals. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Janke more like this
uin HL423 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-06-01more like thismore than 2022-06-01
answer text <p>The UK is committed to defending freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) for all, and promoting respect between different religious and non-religious communities. The UK condemns all attacks on the right to freedom of religion or belief. Israel is a thriving democracy, and has made clear its commitment to freedom of religion. We encourage the Israeli Government to do all it can to uphold the values of equality for all enshrined in its laws.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-01T16:03:15.85Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-01T16:03:15.85Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
4337
label Biography information for Baroness Janke more like this
1316930
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2021-05-20more like thismore than 2021-05-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Driving: Disqualification more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, in each of the last 10 years, how many drivers have successfully claimed 'exceptional hardship' when they have reached 12 penalty points and have therefore carried on driving. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL423 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-06-03more like thismore than 2021-06-03
answer text <p>HMCTS records case management information about circumstances where there are grounds for mitigating the normal consequences of a driving conviction, but does not categorise specific data under ‘exceptional hardship’. In the Crown and magistrates’ courts there were 83,581 cases with no disqualification due to mitigating circumstances for the period 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020.</p><p>Examples of exceptional hardship are loss of employment; impact of employment on others; impact on the health and safety of others; caring for elderly or disabled relatives; mortgage default or other financial loss.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-06-03T15:36:27.5Zmore like thismore than 2021-06-03T15:36:27.5Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
1170829
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2020-01-14more like thismore than 2020-01-14
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Immigration Controls: Airports more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how much has been spent on ePassport gates at UK airports over the last four years. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Scriven more like this
uin HL423 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-01-28more like thismore than 2020-01-28
answer text <p>Over the last 4 years (2016 to date), Border Force have installed 124 ePassport gates at costs in the region of £9.75m with ongoing support/service costs in the region of £5.3m</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-01-28T16:50:52.033Zmore like thismore than 2020-01-28T16:50:52.033Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
4333
label Biography information for Lord Scriven more like this
1156543
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2019-10-28more like thismore than 2019-10-28
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Brexit: Advertising more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how much they have spent on (1) motorway advertising, (2) newspaper advertisements, and (3) other public information campaigns, in the past 12 months, about preparing for the possibility of a no-deal Brexit. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Altmann more like this
uin HL423 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-10-31more like thismore than 2019-10-31
answer text <p>‘Get Ready for Brexit’ is a cross-government campaign using national advertising including TV, radio, press, digital and outdoor advertising. It also includes direct engagement and local elements including business preparedness events, ministerial visits and local authority activity.</p><p>The cost of the public information campaign will be published monthly on a rolling basis, as part of routine government transparency arrangements.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed The Earl of Courtown more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-10-31T16:12:08.027Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-31T16:12:08.027Z
answering member
3359
label Biography information for The Earl of Courtown more like this
tabling member
4533
label Biography information for Baroness Altmann more like this
747969
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-07-04more like thismore than 2017-07-04
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government, in the light of (1) the clearing of Leigh Day and three of its solicitors of all allegations of professional misconduct, and (2) reports of further allegations by a whistle-blower against that firm, concerning claims by Iraqi civilians of abuse by British troops, whether they intend to refer that firm to the National Crime Agency for investigation of any possible criminal conduct. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Blencathra more like this
uin HL423 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-18more like thismore than 2017-07-18
answer text <p>The Government is aware of the recent media allegations of misconduct by an apparent whistle-blower, but consider it premature to refer the matter to the National Crime Agency. As the NCA would likely investigate only if these allegations have not been examined by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, the Government will need to await publication of the Tribunal’s full, reasoned decision before deciding whether it is appropriate to refer the matter to the NCA.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-18T16:24:39.383Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-18T16:24:39.383Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
497
label Biography information for Lord Blencathra more like this