Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1170949
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-01-15more like thismore than 2020-01-15
answering body
Department for International Development more like this
answering dept id 20 more like this
answering dept short name International Development more like this
answering dept sort name International Development more like this
hansard heading Developing Countries: Education more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how much funding has been allocated from the public purse to support the fulfilment of the UN sustainable development goal of education for all girls and boys; and in which countries that funding was spent. more like this
tabling member constituency West Worcestershire more like this
tabling member printed
Harriett Baldwin more like this
uin 3741 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-01-23more like thismore than 2020-01-23
answer text <ol><li>The Prime Minister has publicly stated that education, particularly standing up for the right of every girl in the world to have 12 years of quality education, is a priority for the UK. Between 2009 and 2018, the Government spent £7.08 billion bilaterally from the public purse to support the fulfilment of the UN sustainable development goal on education. This does not include all multilateral spend. Between 2015 and 2019 DFID supported 14.8 million children to gain a decent education, of which at least 5.8 million were girls. UKAid is spent in the countries that need it the most. From 2015 to 2018, the largest number of children supported by DFID education programmes was in Africa, where the majority of out of school children live. Most of the children supported by DFID’s education programmes live in fragile states.</li></ol> more like this
answering member constituency Pendle more like this
answering member printed Andrew Stephenson more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-01-23T09:04:07.883Zmore like thismore than 2020-01-23T09:04:07.883Z
answering member
4044
label Biography information for Andrew Stephenson more like this
tabling member
4107
label Biography information for Dame Harriett Baldwin more like this
1151549
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-10-22more like thismore than 2019-10-22
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Hospitals: Construction more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to to the Answer of 8 October 2019 to Question 293621 on Hospitals: Construction, what estimate he has made of the amount of VAT that will be payable in relation to the 40 hospital building projects. more like this
tabling member constituency Bristol South more like this
tabling member printed
Karin Smyth more like this
uin 3741 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-10-28more like thismore than 2019-10-28
answer text <p>Funding in relation to the 40 hospital building projects and other capital schemes includes provision for VAT under current VAT rules and recovery will be assessed for each scheme in line with current guidelines. Our funding allocation for the Health Infrastructure Plan (HIP) has been built up by overall cost estimates of the schemes inclusive of VAT, however the amount of VAT that will be payable will be determined once schemes have been fully scoped.</p><p>The criteria used to arrive at the 21 projects covering 34 hospitals, identified to receive seed funding to kick start their schemes considered various aspects. The estates and facilities running costs were a factor, and backlog - in particular, Critical Infrastructure Risk (a subset of the highest risk elements of backlog with a potential for significant impact, e.g. fire safety). Other areas considered were unused and functionally unsuitable space and incidents having an impact on clinical services. Furthermore, the list was checked to ensure regions were fairly represented. All this took place with engagement through National Health Service regional teams taking their view on overall investment need and local prioritisation.</p>
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
grouped question UIN 3744 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-10-28T14:36:46.74Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-28T14:36:46.74Z
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
tabling member
4444
label Biography information for Karin Smyth more like this