Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1505637
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-06more like thismore than 2022-09-06
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Slavery more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of section 68 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 on the rights of victims of modern slavery. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Coaker more like this
uin HL2211 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-21more like thismore than 2022-09-21
answer text <p>The Government remains committed to tackling the scourge of modern slavery.</p><p>Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combatting trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims (the “EU Trafficking Directive”) was adopted on 5 April 2011.</p><p>The Nationality and Borders Act provides legislative clarity to victims and decision makers on victims’ rights, including the entitlement to a recovery period and the circumstances in which confirmed victims may be granted permission to stay.</p><p>Section 68 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 disapplied the EU Trafficking Directive insofar as it was incompatible with provisions made by that Act.</p><p> </p><p>The provisions in Section 68 aim to ensure that if there is any provision within the EU Directive that operates on the same subject as the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, whether support for victims or otherwise, there is no confusion as to which applies.</p><p>The Government believes that that if there is any provision within the Directive that operates on the same subject as the 2022 Act, whether support for victims or otherwise, it is right that people are not confused as to which applies. More broadly, the Government does not believe that any of the Directive’s provisions have been given direct effect by a domestic court and so does not have effect as retained EU law.</p><p>This provision does not result in a diminution below the standards laid down in the EU Trafficking Directive, nor does section 68 remove any entitlements from victims. This legal clarification will not have an impact on victim identification, protection and support provided through the National Referral Mechanism.</p>
answering member printed Lord Sharpe of Epsom more like this
grouped question UIN HL2212 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-21T09:26:25.673Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-21T09:26:25.673Z
answering member
4888
label Biography information for Lord Sharpe of Epsom more like this
tabling member
360
label Biography information for Lord Coaker more like this
1348887
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-07-20more like thismore than 2021-07-20
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Coronavirus: Vaccination more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the efficacy of the (1) Sinovac, and (2) Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccines. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Helic more like this
uin HL2211 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-08-02more like thismore than 2021-08-02
answer text <p>The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has not assessed the efficacy of either vaccine.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Bethell more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-08-02T12:38:06.52Zmore like thismore than 2021-08-02T12:38:06.52Z
answering member
4708
label Biography information for Lord Bethell more like this
tabling member
4331
label Biography information for Baroness Helic more like this
1182888
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-04more like thismore than 2020-03-04
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Intestacy more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many estates of people that died (1) without known entitled relatives, and (2) without leaving a will, were referred to the Bona Vacantia Division of the Government Legal Department in (a) 2017–18, and (b) 2018–19; and how many of those were referred by local authorities. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town more like this
uin HL2211 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-17more like thismore than 2020-03-17
answer text <p>In 2017-2018 there were 2768 estates referred to the Bona Vacantia Division of the Government Legal Department of estates where people died without leaving known entitled relatives or a valid will of which 909 were referred by local authorities. There were 2 referrals of estates where the deceased died leaving a valid will which did not dispose of the entire of estate but without leaving known entitled relatives entitled to share in the undisposed residue, neither of which were referred by local authorities.</p><p> </p><p>In 2018-2019 there were 1971 estates referred to the Bona Vacantia Division of the Government Legal Department of which 575 were referred by local authorities. There were 3 referrals of estates where the deceased died leaving a valid will which did not dispose of the entire of estate but without leaving known entitled relatives entitled to share in the undisposed residue, none of which were referred by local authorities.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-17T11:35:14.12Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-17T11:35:14.12Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4159
label Biography information for Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town more like this
773010
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-10-18more like thismore than 2017-10-18
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Census more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to amend the list of nationalities specified for public answer in the 2021 census; and which nationalities are being considered for inclusion as part of any such plans. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL2211 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-11-01more like thismore than 2017-11-01
answer text <p>The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the Authority to reply, and will place a copy of their letter in the House library.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Young of Cookham more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-01T17:01:52.1Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-01T17:01:52.1Z
answering member
57
label Biography information for Lord Young of Cookham more like this
attachment
1
file name PQHL2211 v.02 (1) (1).pdf more like this
title UKSA response more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird more like this
598904
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-10-11more like thismore than 2016-10-11
answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept id 201 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
hansard heading Unified Patent Court more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government when the UK will ratify the Unified Patents Court Agreement. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara more like this
uin HL2211 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-10-24more like thismore than 2016-10-24
answer text <p>The result of the referendum has given rise to a number of issues concerning the UK’s future involvement in a unified patent system. I cannot yet confirm whether the UK will ratify the agreement on a Unified Patent Court but we are actively looking at options, considering the legal and political context.</p><p>As I stated at the recent Competitiveness Council, I hope to be able to provide more information when the Council next meets at the end of November.</p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-10-24T16:00:38.507Zmore like thismore than 2016-10-24T16:00:38.507Z
answering member
4284
label Biography information for Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
tabling member
4175
label Biography information for Lord Stevenson of Balmacara more like this
418619
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-09-14more like thismore than 2015-09-14
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Fuels: Tax Evasion more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much duty has been lost in each of the last five years as a result of fuel laundering in South Armagh. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL2211 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-09-21more like thismore than 2015-09-21
answer text <p>No specific assessment has been made of the loss of revenue specifically due to fuel laundering in South Armagh to the UK each year.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The government is committed to reducing revenue loss due to fuel duty fraud and HM Revenue and Customs works closely with the Revenue Commissioners in the Republic of Ireland and others to fight fuel fraud on a wide range of fronts. This includes regular exchange of information, joint operational activity and the recent implementation of an improved new marker for rebated fuel (which was also introduced in the Republic of Ireland).</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-09-21T11:49:47.917Zmore like thismore than 2015-09-21T11:49:47.917Z
answering member
4536
label Biography information for Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird more like this