Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1362692
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-10-22more like thismore than 2021-10-22
answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept id 208 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
hansard heading Jerusalem: USA more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the proposal by the government of the United States of America to reopen their consulate in East Jerusalem. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Hylton more like this
uin HL3346 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-11-05more like thismore than 2021-11-05
answer text <p>This is a matter for the US Government. The UK's position on Jerusalem is that the status of Jerusalem should be determined in a negotiated settlement, and ultimately the shared capital of both states.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-11-05T13:40:20.437Zmore like thismore than 2021-11-05T13:40:20.437Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
2018
label Biography information for Lord Hylton more like this
1189829
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-04-21more like thismore than 2020-04-21
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading NHS: Protective Clothing more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether all suppliers and potential providers of personal protective equipment within the UK have been used by the NHS. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
uin HL3346 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-27more like thismore than 2020-05-27
answer text <p>As of 15 May, over 13,000 businesses have contacted the Government with offers of help on supplying personal protective equipment (PPE). Many are related to the manufacture of PPE for the National Health Service and care sectors, a vast majority of which we are taking forward, predominantly from United Kingdom based companies but also including multinational companies. Some offers were not progressed due to financial and capability considerations.</p><p><br> The Department engages directly with potential manufacturers to qualify and prioritise the opportunity, based on availability of and access to raw supplies, lead-times to manufacture, and other commercial considerations. Product prototypes are submitted to a Technical Product Review process, to ensure they meet essential health, safety and quality standards for PPE. Financial due diligence and fraud prevention measures are also undertaken, after which the Department can contract with the manufacturer.</p><p> </p><p>Lord Deighton is leading the Government’s efforts to secure sufficient PPE and ensure this gets to where it is needed. He is also driving forward coordination of the end-to-end process design and manufacture of new domestic PPE supplies. As at 15 May, the Department has entered into contract and placed orders with eight manufacturers to provide millions of items of PPE products to the National Health Service and carers. The volumes will increase in the coming weeks.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Bethell more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-27T11:47:09.76Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-27T11:47:09.76Z
answering member
4708
label Biography information for Lord Bethell more like this
tabling member
1796
label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
792394
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-20more like thismore than 2017-11-20
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Railways: Sheffield more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, in preparation for the re-letting of the East Midlands Train franchise, what estimate they have made of the overall journey times for (1) a bi-mode train, and (2) an electric alternative, between London and Sheffield. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradshaw more like this
uin HL3346 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-04more like thismore than 2017-12-04
answer text <p>In 2016 Atkins, on behalf of the Department for Transport, undertook analysis on the business case for electrification and other route enhancements of the Midland Main Line route from Bedford north to Corby, Leicester, Nottingham and Sheffield. A copy of this is in the House library; Chapter 3 (pp 17-24) has the required timings for those journeys.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Sugg more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-04T17:32:49.293Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-04T17:32:49.293Z
answering member
4584
label Biography information for Baroness Sugg more like this
tabling member
2483
label Biography information for Lord Bradshaw more like this
638595
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-11-18more like thismore than 2016-11-18
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much money has been claimed under the Small Charitable Donations Act 2012 in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Barker more like this
uin HL3346 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-12-02more like thismore than 2016-12-02
answer text <p>The Government maintains close and constructive links with charity sector representatives and is in regular dialogue with the sector. HM Revenue and Customs has set up an outreach team which is particularly focused on responding to the needs of smaller charities.</p><p>This team regularly makes visits to small charities and has provided face-to-face presentations to over 650, raising awareness and helping charities to receive support through the Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme, as well as the full range of available tax reliefs to which they are entitled.</p><p> </p><p>Amounts claimed under the Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme since 2013 are £6 million in 2013/14, £21 million in 2014/15 and £26 million in 2015/16. Figures for 2016/17 are not currently available.</p><p> </p><p>The costs of administering the Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme and instances of malpractice are not available as they are included in the figures for the wider Gift Aid scheme, and cannot be separately extracted.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Young of Cookham more like this
grouped question UIN
HL3347 more like this
HL3348 more like this
HL3349 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-12-02T14:18:07.357Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-02T14:18:07.357Z
answering member
57
label Biography information for Lord Young of Cookham more like this
tabling member
2501
label Biography information for Baroness Barker more like this
426407
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-11-05more like thismore than 2015-11-05
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Roads: Safety more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of road safety awareness educational programmes in reducing accidents. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Browne of Belmont more like this
uin HL3346 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-11-17more like thismore than 2015-11-17
answer text <p>Road safety education includes a range of interventions including educational courses and publicity campaigns.</p><br /><p>The Department funds the THINK! road safety publicity campaign. We evaluate the campaign to ensure it is effective, that we continually improve performance; and that we ultimately deliver value for money for the taxpayer.</p><br /><p>Prior to each campaign we set communication objectives and key performance indicators. We measure progress against these by running surveys with our target audience before and immediately after the campaign. We have seen positive shifts in key performance indicators for the majority of our campaigns. All of our recent campaign evaluation reports are published on gov.uk<sup><sup>[1]</sup></sup>.</p><br /><p>In the long run, positive changes in key performance indicators on campaigns such as speeding, drink driving and seatbelts have correlated with fewer drivers exceeding the speed limit, fewer accidents involving drink driving and higher seatbelt wearing rates; and ultimately to fewer road casualties.</p><br /><p>Publicity campaigns are part of the solution to reduce road casualties and work best when used alongside enforcement and engineering interventions. Due to the multiple factors affecting casualties (weather, road conditions, traffic levels, the economy etc.) it is difficult to demonstrate a causal relationship with a specific intervention. However, in 2012 the department commissioned an independent agency to evaluate the impact drink drive campaigns have had on casualties. They used econometric modelling to estimate that over a 30 year period, drink drive communication campaigns have saved almost 2,000 lives and prevented over 10,000 serious injuries<sup><sup>[2]</sup></sup>.</p><br /><p>In 2013, the Transport Research Laboratory published<sup><sup>[3]</sup></sup> a review and synthesis of evidence on the effectiveness of pre-driver education and training for those under 17 years of age which was undertaken for the Coalition Government. The findings showed that very few interventions had been robustly evaluated and that the evidence base around pre-driver interventions was weak. The Government recently commissioned an evidence base review, to build on existing work, to help us to understand the effectiveness of a range of pre- and post-test behavioural and technological interventions for young drivers. The Government is currently also funding an evaluation of the effectiveness of speed awareness courses.</p><br /><p><sup><sup>[1]</sup></sup> https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/think-communication-activity</p><p><sup><sup>[2]</sup></sup> https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drink-drive-30-years-of-communication</p><p><sup><sup>[3]</sup></sup> https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249282/novice-driver-research-findings.pdf</p>
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-11-17T12:47:08.653Zmore like thismore than 2015-11-17T12:47:08.653Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3801
label Biography information for Lord Browne of Belmont more like this
167245
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-12-02more like thismore than 2014-12-02
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading DNA: Screening more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what are the minimum standards required for a personal genome service to be approved by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Mendelsohn more like this
uin HL3346 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-12-16more like thismore than 2014-12-16
answer text <p>Products used in direct-to-consumer testing services providing health-related information are regulated as <em>in vitro</em> diagnostic medical devices and are subject to European Union legislation that sets out minimum standards of safety and quality. The testing service itself is not subject to this legislation, only the products.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Manufacturers of <em>in vitro</em> diagnostic medical devices are required to register with the competent authority in the country where they are placing the device on the market. In the United Kingdom this is the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). In this registration a manufacturer declares that their devices are safe and meet all of the relevant requirements of the legislation including having evidence to support their performance claims. For some higher risk devices a manufacturer has to have its product checked before it is placed on the market. Such checks are undertaken by third-party conformity assessment bodies called notified bodies.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The role of the MHRA is to ensure that all medical devices placed on the UK market are compliant with the relevant legislation and to enforce this legislation on behalf of the Secretary of State. The MHRA fulfils this role by monitoring notified bodies (for higher risk devices) and operating the UK medical device vigilance system, which involves assessing and responding to safety concerns involving devices.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The MHRA does not have a role in assessing the additional costs or benefits of devices to the National Health Service and so has not done so in the case of the service offered by 23andMe.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Furthermore, under existing EU legislation, testing services are regulated in the country where the test is being performed. The tests offered by 23andMe are performed in laboratories that are based in the United States of America and as such are covered by US legislation.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Government has advised that no test will be 100% reliable, that 23andMe should be used with caution and that the information provided by 23andMe should not lead consumers to make any changes of medical significance, such as changes to medication, without first consulting their healthcare professional. If consumers need more information about the conditions listed in their results then they can visit the NHS Choices website for more information.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The MHRA discussed the 23andMe Personal Genome Service with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and shared information under the confidentiality commitment that is in place between the two agencies.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The MHRA also held discussions with 23andMe prior to them launching their product in the UK. In those discussions, 23andMe explained that the product being offered in the UK is different to their US product in that many of the drug responses, inherited conditions and genetic health risks that were of concern to the FDA have been removed. 23andMe also presented results of surveys with UK-based consumers of their existing service that demonstrated that 4% of people had a specific conversation with their general practitioner (GP) as a result of their test results but it is not known how many GP visits led to National Health Service treatment.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>In the context of those discussions, the MHRA also agreed with 23andMe that they would take part in an enhanced surveillance program. Such a program involves regular sharing of safety information that might not otherwise meet the threshold for reporting to the competent authority. This will allow the MHRA to have a more in depth look at the performance of the test in use and if this highlights any regulatory or safety issues then they will consider further action.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
grouped question UIN
HL3343 more like this
HL3344 more like this
HL3345 more like this
HL3347 more like this
HL3348 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-12-16T14:44:44.437Zmore like thismore than 2014-12-16T14:44:44.437Z
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
tabling member
4286
label Biography information for Lord Mendelsohn more like this