Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered question first ministerially corrected answering member label attachment file name title previous answer version answering member constituency answering member printed answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1421958

registered interest
date	10/02/2022
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	National School Breakfast Programme
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment he has made of the reasons for the National School Breakfast Programme not reaching its target of 2,500 schools by January 2022; and if he will make a statement.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	122573
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 02/03/2022 answer text <p>The government is committed to supporting school breakfast provisions. Accordingly, it is investing up to £24 million to extend the National School Breakfast Programme until July <ins class="ministerial">2023</ins><del class="ministerial">2022</del>. This funding will support up to 2,500 schools in disadvantaged areas, meaning that thousands of children from low-income families will be offered free nutritious breakfasts to better assist their attainment, wellbeing and readiness to be taught.</p><p>As of 22 December 2021, 1,245 schools signed up for the programme, and 847 schools placed food orders. The government will continue to work with its supplier, Family Action<strong>,</strong> to monitor relevant data and consider suitable occasions to share more information on the programme as it progresses.</p><p>Despite the number of challenges faced by schools due to the COVID-19 outbreak, the department has noted positive levels of interest in the programme. The enrolment process for the programme is still underway. The department has extended free breakfast provision beyond April 2022, allowing schools to receive free provisions until the end of July 2022. As a result, any school signing up to the programme now is still able to benefit from two terms worth of free food.</p> answering member constituency Colchester answering member printed Will Quince question first answered 02/03/2022 11:41:37 question first ministerially corrected 11/03/2022 12:39:44 answering member 4423 label Biography information for Will Quince previous answer version 51533 answering member constituency Colchester answering member printed Will Quince answering member 4423 label Biography information for Will Quince
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

1421154

registered interest
date	09/02/2022
answering body	Department of Health and Social Care
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health and Social Care
answering dept sort name	Health and Social Care
hansard heading	Lymphoedema
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many people in the UK have been diagnosed with lymphoedema in the UK in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	Strangford
tabling member printed	Jim Shannon
uin	121749
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2022 answer text <p>NHS Digital have provided a count of patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of Lymphoedema, recorded for each year from 2016-17 to <del class="ministerial">2021-21</del> <ins class="ministerial">2020-21 </ins>(inclusive).</p><p>The data represents activity in NHS Hospitals in England and English NHS-commissioned activity in the independent sector.</p><p>It is important to note that in any given year a patient will only be counted once, but it is possible that the same patient may be counted in multiple years.</p><p> </p><p><ins class="ministerial"><table><tbody><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Year</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Number of patients</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2016/17</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">20,521</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2017/18</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">22,928</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2018/19</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">26,394</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2019/20</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">29,688</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2020/21</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">25,512</ins></p></td></tr></tbody></table></ins></p><p>Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), NHS Digital</p> answering member constituency Lewes answering member printed Maria Caulfield question first answered 21/02/2022 09:29:45 question first ministerially corrected 21/02/2022 10:10:31 answering member 4492 label Biography information for Maria Caulfield previous answer version 51598 answering member constituency Lewes answering member printed Maria Caulfield answering member 4492 label Biography information for Maria Caulfield
tabling member	4131 label Biography information for Jim Shannon

1421182

registered interest
date	09/02/2022
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	National Tutoring Programme
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if his Department will exercise the right set out in the National Tutoring Programme contract with Randstad to require additional granularity in the breakdown of tutoring packages delivered by region; and if he will make a statement.
tabling member constituency	Houghton and Sunderland South
tabling member printed	Bridget Phillipson
uin	121731
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2022 answer text <p>The department will continue to monitor and take targeted action in areas with low levels of tutoring. A second application round for tutoring organisations in November was designed to increase capacity in these areas. These organisations are now in post and active, focused on increasing capacity and delivery in these areas from January 2022. For example, in the North East there were previously three accredited tutoring organisations, this has <ins class="ministerial">increased to nine</ins> <del class="ministerial">doubled to six</del>, making tutoring far more accessible to schools and increasing capacity. Randstad has bespoke communication plans for each region, the department continues to refine these with Randstad so that all useful channels, including local press, are fully engaged.</p><p>National participation data has been published for the first term of this year; the department has committed to publish participation data on a regular basis to explain the programme's progress. Regional delivery is reviewed regularly for operational purposes and to ensure supply is available where it is needed, and the department is considering the practicalities of publishing regional data.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Worcester answering member printed Mr Robin Walker question first answered 21/02/2022 16:07:28 question first ministerially corrected 28/02/2022 15:16:44 answering member 4091 label Biography information for Mr Robin Walker previous answer version 50727 answering member constituency Worcester answering member printed Mr Robin Walker answering member 4091 label Biography information for Mr Robin Walker
tabling member	4046 label Biography information for Bridget Phillipson

1421183

registered interest
date	09/02/2022
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	National Tutoring Programme
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to the National Tutoring Programme contract with Randstad, whether the current breakdown of tutoring packages reflects the minimum requirements in the contract for tutoring packages to be delivered as set out, that is (a) South East five per cent; (b) London eight per cent; (c) North West seven per cent; (d) East of England four per cent; (e) West Midlands six per cent; (f) South West three per cent; (g) Yorkshire & the Humber five per cent; (h) East Midlands four per cent and (i) North East 3 per cent.
tabling member constituency	Houghton and Sunderland South
tabling member printed	Bridget Phillipson
uin	121732
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2022 answer text <p>The department will continue to monitor and take targeted action in areas with low levels of tutoring. A second application round for tutoring organisations in November was designed to increase capacity in these areas. These organisations are now in post and active, focused on increasing capacity and delivery in these areas from January 2022. For example, in the North East there were previously three accredited tutoring organisations, this has <ins class="ministerial">increased to nine</ins> <del class="ministerial">doubled to six</del>, making tutoring far more accessible to schools and increasing capacity. Randstad has bespoke communication plans for each region, the department continues to refine these with Randstad so that all useful channels, including local press, are fully engaged.</p><p>National participation data has been published for the first term of this year; the department has committed to publish participation data on a regular basis to explain the programme's progress. Regional delivery is reviewed regularly for operational purposes and to ensure supply is available where it is needed, and the department is considering the practicalities of publishing regional data.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Worcester answering member printed Mr Robin Walker question first answered 21/02/2022 16:07:28 question first ministerially corrected 28/02/2022 15:16:52 answering member 4091 label Biography information for Mr Robin Walker previous answer version 51924 answering member constituency Worcester answering member printed Mr Robin Walker answering member 4091 label Biography information for Mr Robin Walker
tabling member	4046 label Biography information for Bridget Phillipson

1420698

registered interest
date	08/02/2022
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Reoffenders: Convictions
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many serious further offence notifications resulted in a conviction, by each type of offence, in each year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Croydon North
tabling member printed	Steve Reed
uin	120773
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2022 answer text <p>The table <del class="ministerial">below</del><ins class="ministerial">attached</ins> sets out the total number of notifications – that is, where an offender has been charged with a qualifying offence - followed by the resulting SFO convictions, by SFO offence, for notifications submitted to NOMS/HMPPS between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2020.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2010/11</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2011/12</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2012/13</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2013/14</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2014/15</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2015/16</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2016/17</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2017/18</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2018/19</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>2019/20</strong></del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>Total SFO notifications</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>485</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>466</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>489</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>507</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>477</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>558</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>685</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>678</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>577</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>536</strong></del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>Total SFO convictions [1]</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>257</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>253</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>270</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>274</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>254</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>301</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>347</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>353</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>339</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>271</strong></del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Murder</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">50</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">67</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">51</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">59</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">46</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">41</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">56</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">80</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">97</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">74</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Attempted murder/ Conspiracy to commit murder</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">12</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">13</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">16</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">15</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">14</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">24</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">15</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">20</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">30</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">18</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Manslaughter</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">18</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">15</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">16</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">23</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">12</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">16</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">34</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">32</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">34</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">25</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Attempted Rape/Rape /Assault by penetration including on a child under 13</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">101</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">77</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">93</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">80</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">89</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">107</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">119</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">101</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">69</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">54</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Arson with intent to endanger life</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">8</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">8</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">7</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">10</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">9</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">12</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">8</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">17</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">11</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">14</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Kidnapping /Abduction/False imprisonment</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">2</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">14</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">16</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">19</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">21</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">9</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">21</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">22</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">14</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">13</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Death involving driving or vehicle taking</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">8</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">6</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">5</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">8</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">5</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">9</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">7</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">11</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">19</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">13</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Other serious sexual/violent offences [2]</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">58</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">53</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">66</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">60</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">58</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">83</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">87</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">70</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">65</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">60</del></p></td></tr></tbody></table><ol><li><del class="ministerial">Time period for conviction data relates to the date of SFO notification to HMPPS not the date of conviction.</del></li><li><del class="ministerial">“Other serious sexual/violent offences” refer to other serious violent or sexual offences which carry a maximum custodial penalty of more than 10 years.</del></li><li><del class="ministerial">The data only includes convictions for serious further offences that have been notified to the national SFO Team, HMPPS.</del></li><li><del class="ministerial">The data provided are provisional subject to change when any outstanding cases are concluded at court.</del></li><li><del class="ministerial">Conviction data also includes cases where the offender committed suicide or died prior to the trial, where the judicial process concluded that they were responsible.</del></li><li><del class="ministerial">The data for April 2010 to March 2014 has been updated, and may differ to the original publication due to data cleansing, re-categorising and re-grouping.</del></li><li><del class="ministerial">Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording systems, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</del></li></ol> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse question first answered 21/02/2022 10:51:40 question first ministerially corrected 28/03/2022 09:03:37 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse attachment 1 file name 2022-02-21 120773.xlsx title Table previous answer version 51730 answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
tabling member	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed

1420739

registered interest
date	08/02/2022
answering body	Wales Office
answering dept id	28
answering dept short name	Wales
answering dept sort name	Wales
hansard heading	National Insurance Contributions: Newport West
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, what recent discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the impact of the National Insurance contribution rise on (a) households and (b) employers in Newport West constituency.
tabling member constituency	Newport West
tabling member printed	Ruth Jones
uin	120925
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/02/2022 answer text <p>I have regular discussions with my Cabinet colleagues on a range of issues, including National Insurance contributions (NICs).</p><p> </p><p>The Government is committed to responsible management of the public finances. That is why the Government has taken the tough but responsible decision to increase taxes, introducing a UK-wide 1.25% Health and Social Care Levy based on NICs, in order to fund a significant increase in permanent spending on the NHS and social care. <ins class="ministerial">There is a significant Union dividend for Wales within this levy, meaning that Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will benefit by around 15% more than is generated from their residents, equivalent to around £300 million every year on average.</ins></p><p> </p><p>Regarding the impact on households; NICs is progressive, the Primary Threshold means that the lowest earners do not pay any NICs. The highest earning 15% will pay over half the revenues raised by the Levy and 6.1 million people earning less than the Primary Threshold (equivalent to £9,880 a year in 2022-23) will not pay the Levy.</p><p> </p><p>Regarding the impact on businesses; while it is fair that businesses contribute, as they benefit from having a healthy workforce, big businesses will pay the most. 70% of the money raised from business will come from the biggest 1% of employers (those with at least 250 employees). Just under 40% of all employers with employer NICs/Levy liabilities (630,000 employers) are expected not to pay the Levy due to the Employment Allowance. The next 42% of businesses (675,000 employers) will face an average increase of £475 per year, less than 1% of their overall wage bill.</p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire answering member printed Simon Hart question first answered 14/02/2022 12:39:05 question first ministerially corrected 18/02/2022 09:44:37 answering member 3944 label Biography information for Simon Hart previous answer version 50799 answering member constituency Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire answering member printed Simon Hart answering member 3944 label Biography information for Simon Hart
tabling member	4716 label Biography information for Ruth Jones

1420809

registered interest
date	08/02/2022
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Social Security Benefits: Disqualification
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of exempting people from sanctions if there is evidence of severe mental health or associated risk of self harm.
tabling member constituency	Glasgow South West
tabling member printed	Chris Stephens
uin	120811
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2022 answer text <p><del class="ministerial">We are fully committed to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which we ratified in 2009, and the progressive realisation of rights for disabled people that it sets out. The UK has some of the strongest equalities legislation in the world, including the Equality Act 2010, and we will continue to make sure that these rights are protected.The UK has a proud record of furthering the rights of disabled people. The principles of the UN Convention are at the heart of our approach. We continue to reform and modernise our public services and welfare system to ensure that disabled people are able to participate in every aspect of society.The UK’s 2021 report demonstrates our ongoing commitment across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to support disabled people, through legislation, policies and programmes that tackle the barriers faced by disabled people to realise their full participation and inclusion in society. The Government’s response was submitted to the UNCRPD Committee in 2021, and published on GOV.UK with accessible formats in December 2021 and can be found <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/disabled-peoples-rights-the-uks-2021-report-on-select-recommendations-from-the-uncrpd-periodic-review" target="_blank">here</a>.The UK Government’s recently published National Disability Strategy has been a milestone in this respect, with over 100 practical commitments which are being delivered to improve the everyday lives of disabled people.</del></p><p><ins class="ministerial">Those who are not expected to look for work, such as those with severe health conditions, including mental health, are not subject to work search or work availability requirements.</ins></p><p> </p><p><ins class="ministerial">Work Coaches engage at an individual level with them and are committed to tailoring support for specific individual needs, including agreeing realistic and structured steps to encourage claimants into or towards the labour market where conditionality requirements are regularly reviewed to ensure that they remain appropriate for the claimant. This would include tailoring to reflect any mental health or associated self-harm issues the claimant raised.</ins></p><p> </p><p><ins class="ministerial">Sanctions are only applied where a claimant fails to comply with a mandatory requirement set out in their claimant commitment such as a failure to attend an appointment. When considering whether a sanction is appropriate, a Decision Maker will take all the claimant’s individual circumstances, including any health conditions or disabilities and any evidence of good reason, into account before deciding whether a sanction is warranted.</ins></p><p> </p> answering member constituency Mid Sussex answering member printed Mims Davies question first answered 21/02/2022 13:31:54 question first ministerially corrected 21/02/2022 14:28:15 answering member 4513 label Biography information for Mims Davies previous answer version 51832 answering member constituency Norwich North answering member printed Chloe Smith answering member 1609
tabling member	4463 label Biography information for Chris Stephens

1421088

registered interest
date	08/02/2022
answering body	Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
answering dept id	201
answering dept short name	Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
answering dept sort name	Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
hansard heading	UK Endorsement Board
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the article in The Times ‘Standards board ‘looks like a cabal’’, published on 7 February, whether they plan to investigate the report that the UK Endorsement Board intended to use Martin Moore QC for legal advice “behind the scenes” despite an acknowledged conflict of interest which prevented him from being formally instructed.
tabling member printed	Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted
uin	HL6075
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 17/02/2022 answer text <p>The organisations referred to in these questions - the UK Endorsement Board (UKEB), the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) – are responsible for procuring their own legal advice. The FRC which <del class="ministerial">facilities</del><ins class="ministerial">facilitates</ins> the UKEB is an arm’s length body which reports annually to the Department on how it has carried out responsibilities under its remit. The ICAEW is an independent organisation.</p><p> </p><p>The issue of whether to publish legal advice is for the respective organisations to consider.</p> answering member printed Lord Callanan question first answered 17/02/2022 10:40:28 question first ministerially corrected 14/03/2022 11:42:45 answering member 4336 label Biography information for Lord Callanan previous answer version 51483 answering member printed Lord Callanan answering member 4336 label Biography information for Lord Callanan
tabling member	4562 label Biography information for Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted

1421089

registered interest
date	08/02/2022
answering body	Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
answering dept id	201
answering dept short name	Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
answering dept sort name	Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
hansard heading	UK Endorsement Board
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will publish the documents referred to in the article in The Times ‘Standards board ‘looks like a cabal’’, published on 7 February.
tabling member printed	Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted
uin	HL6076
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 17/02/2022 answer text <p>The organisations referred to in these questions - the UK Endorsement Board (UKEB), the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) – are responsible for procuring their own legal advice. The FRC which <del class="ministerial">facilities</del><ins class="ministerial">facilitates</ins> the UKEB is an arm’s length body which reports annually to the Department on how it has carried out responsibilities under its remit. The ICAEW is an independent organisation.</p><p> </p><p>The issue of whether to publish legal advice is for the respective organisations to consider.</p> answering member printed Lord Callanan question first answered 17/02/2022 10:40:28 question first ministerially corrected 14/03/2022 11:42:59 answering member 4336 label Biography information for Lord Callanan previous answer version 51486 answering member printed Lord Callanan answering member 4336 label Biography information for Lord Callanan
tabling member	4562 label Biography information for Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted

1421090

registered interest
date	08/02/2022
answering body	Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
answering dept id	201
answering dept short name	Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
answering dept sort name	Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
hansard heading	Company Accounts
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Henley on 5 March 2018 (HL5587) and to the article in The Times ‘Standards board ‘looks like a cabal’’, published on 7 February, what assessment they have made of whether legal advice obtained from Martin Moore QC for (1) the Financial Reporting Council, or (2) the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, has been (a) properly obtained, (b) independent, and (c) suitable for determining matters of public interest.
tabling member printed	Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted
uin	HL6077
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 17/02/2022 answer text <p>The organisations referred to in these questions - the UK Endorsement Board (UKEB), the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) – are responsible for procuring their own legal advice. The FRC which <del class="ministerial">facilities</del><ins class="ministerial">facilitates</ins> the UKEB is an arm’s length body which reports annually to the Department on how it has carried out responsibilities under its remit. The ICAEW is an independent organisation.</p><p> </p><p>The issue of whether to publish legal advice is for the respective organisations to consider.</p> answering member printed Lord Callanan question first answered 17/02/2022 10:40:28 question first ministerially corrected 14/03/2022 11:43:08 answering member 4336 label Biography information for Lord Callanan previous answer version 51487 answering member printed Lord Callanan answering member 4336 label Biography information for Lord Callanan
tabling member	4562 label Biography information for Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted