Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label attachment file name title
tabling member	label

Search

999728

registered interest
date	01/11/2018
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	Teachers: Qualifications
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate his Department has made of the number of unqualified teachers working in schools in (a) Dulwich and West Norwood, (b) London and (c) England.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	187097
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/11/2018 answer text <p>The attached table provides the full-time equivalent (FTE) number of unqualified[1] and qualified teachers in service in state funded schools in Dulwich and West Norwood parliamentary constituency, London region and England, as of November 2017.</p><p> </p><p>[1] An unqualified teacher in the local auhtority maintained sector is either a trainee working towards Qualified Teacher Status (QTS); an overseas trained teacher who has not exceeded the four years they are allowed to teach without having QTS; or an instructor who as a particular skill who can be employed for so long as a qualified teacher is not available.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton answering member printed Nick Gibb question first answered 06/11/2018 17:20:14 answering member 111 label Biography information for Nick Gibb attachment 1 file name 187097_table_unqualified_teachers.pdf title 187097_table_unqualified_teachers
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes

999729

registered interest
date	01/11/2018
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	Teachers: Qualifications
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate his Department has made of the proportion of unqualified teaching staff working in (a) maintained state schools, (b) academies and (c) free schools.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	187098
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/11/2018 answer text <p>The attached table provides the full-time equivalent teacher numbers and proportion of unqualified[1] teachers in service in (a) maintained state schools, (b) academies, (c) free schools in England, as of November 2017.</p><p>The figures above are publicly available in table 3a within the publication ‘School Workforce in England, November 2017’, available here:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/school-workforce-in-england-november-2017" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/school-workforce-in-england-november-2017</a>.</p><p> </p><p>[1] An unqualified teacher in the local authority maintained sector is either a trainee working towards Qualified Teacher Status (QTS); an overseas trained teacher who has not exceeded the four years they are allowed to teach without having QTS; or an instructor who as a particular skill who can be employed for so long as a qualified teacher is not available.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton answering member printed Nick Gibb question first answered 06/11/2018 17:28:19 answering member 111 label Biography information for Nick Gibb attachment 1 file name 187098_table_unqualified_teacher_school_type.pdf title 187098_table_unqualified_teachers_school_type
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes

999731

registered interest
date	01/11/2018
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	Teachers: Qualifications
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate his Department has made of the number of students in London schools taught by unqualified teachers in each year since 2012.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	187099
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/11/2018 answer text <p>The information requested is not held centrally.</p><p> </p><p>The Department collects pupil numbers from the pupil census ‘Schools, pupils and their characteristics’ and teacher numbers from the School Workforce Census ‘School Workforce in England’, but does not hold information on what pupils were taught by which teachers, qualified or unqualified.</p> answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton answering member printed Nick Gibb question first answered 09/11/2018 10:53:33 answering member 111 label Biography information for Nick Gibb
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes

997790

registered interest
date	30/10/2018
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	UK Border Force: Recruitment
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what progress has been made on the proposed increase of eight per cent in Border Force operational staff before 29 March 2018.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	185713
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 05/11/2018 answer text <p>Border Force will always ensure it has the necessary resources to keep the border secure and will respond flexibly to emerging requirements through ongoing assessments of operational needs.</p><p>Border Force has recruited a Readiness Task Force to provide operational resilience to the frontline and allow existing staff to undertake EU exit re-lated training. The c.300 multi-disciplinary Border Force officers will be fully deployed by the end of the year.</p><p>An additional c.600 Border Force officers are being recruited in 2018/19 to respond to the new requirements it will face as a result of EU Exit and to provide resilience at key locations.</p> answering member constituency Romsey and Southampton North answering member printed Caroline Nokes question first answered 05/11/2018 17:00:05 answering member 4048 label Biography information for Caroline Nokes
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes

997791

registered interest
date	30/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	UK Trade with EU: Borders
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the National Audit Office report entitled The UK border: preparedness for EU exit, published on 24 October 2018, what support the Government plans to provide to the estimated up to 250,000 traders who will be required to make border declarations for the first time after the UK leaves the EU.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	185714
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 05/11/2018 answer text <p>HMRC has published Technical Notices covering Customs, Excise and VAT procedures that would apply if no deal is reached and has written to 145,000 traders over the VAT threshold who currently only trade with the EU on no deal arrangements. A Partnership Pack has also been published on GOV.UK, which is designed for business representative groups to support businesses with what they would need to do under a no deal scenario.</p><p>The Government has engaged extensively with key providers of customs broker services to better understand their potential capacity challenges and has announced a package of measures to support the sector to grow, including an investment of £8 million to support broker training and increased automation. Later in the year we intend to provide more information on what people can do should they wish to make preparations for no deal and when they should do this.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 05/11/2018 17:34:14 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes

997794

registered interest
date	30/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Borders: ICT
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the National Audit Office report entitled The UK border: preparedness for EU exit, published on 24 October 2018, what assessment he has made of the implications for his Department's policies of the finding in that report that 11 out of 12 new or replacement border systems were at risk of not being delivered on time and to acceptable quality by 29 March 2018.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	185715
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 05/11/2018 answer text <p>All 12 critical IT systems set out in the National Audit Office report undergo significant scrutiny across government – including at a departmental level, by the Infrastructure and Projects Authority and by the Borders Delivery Group. Where programme risks exist, appropriate mitigation and contingency plans are in place. There is also significant cross-departmental working to ensure that the interdependencies between border systems and wider departmental policy is effectively managed.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 05/11/2018 17:30:38 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes

997795

registered interest
date	30/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	UK Trade with EU: Borders
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what progress his Department has made on developing the necessary (a) border infrastructure and (b) alternative customs systems needed in the case of the UK leaving the EU without a deal.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	185716
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 05/11/2018 answer text <p>HMRC has well-developed plans to ensure that on day one of a no deal scenario there will be a functioning customs, VAT and excise system.</p><p> </p><p>HMRC is already having extensive engagement with ports, airports and rail terminals on what would need to be in place at March 2019 and in the longer term. We are currently developing specific requirements around the physical infrastructure needed in each of the exit scenarios. In a no deal scenario, HMRC’s plans will allow for the border to operate without new infrastructure on day 1, and it is not placing new requirements on ports and airports to have infrastructure in place by day 1.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 05/11/2018 17:11:11 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes

997796

registered interest
date	30/10/2018
answering body	Department of Health and Social Care
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health and Social Care
answering dept sort name	Health and Social Care
hansard heading	NHS Trusts: Debts
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what estimates his Department has made of the outstanding debts of NHS trusts in (a) Dulwich and West Norwood, (b) Greater London and (c) England.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	185717
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 05/11/2018 answer text <p>The Department and entities within its accounting boundary report on the basis of European Union Adopted International Financial Reporting Standards as interpreted and adapted for the public sector by HM Treasury’s Financial Reporting Manual (FReM).</p><p> </p><p>Debt is not a specific classification of liability that is reported by entities including National Health Service trusts.</p><p> </p><p>To provide a total liability amount for NHS trusts, either current and payable within 12 months or non-current and due to be settled beyond 12 months from the end of the financial year, would therefore include items which the Department would not expect to be viewed as debt.</p><p> </p><p>For this reason the Department has interpreted the term debt to refer to outstanding balances on loans both with the Department and with Other Entities. The attached table identifies the total level of loans outstanding for NHS trusts as at 31 March 2018, on a current and non-current basis. As the question specifically refers to NHS trusts, detail for NHS foundation trusts has been omitted.</p><p> </p><p>Loans held with the Department are eliminated on consolidation to arrive at the Group’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. As part of presenting a consolidated set of accounts, all intra group activity (including income, expenditure, assets and liabilities generated by intra group trading) is eliminated, so as to not overstate the Group position. For individual NHS trusts these loans with the Department represent a debt but this is not the case in regards to the Group position presented in the Department’s Annual Report and Accounts as balances held and transactions related to the loans held are eliminated.</p> answering member constituency North East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Stephen Barclay question first answered 05/11/2018 16:45:39 answering member 4095 label Biography information for Steve Barclay attachment 1 file name PQ185717 Table NHS trust Debt.docx title PQ185717 attached table
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes

997410

registered interest
date	29/10/2018
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Offenders: Homelessness
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of the prison population were (a) homeless and (b) living in temporary or insecure accommodation before entering prison in each year since 2014.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	185073
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 01/11/2018 answer text <p>Table 1 below provides data on the number of prisoners that declared their accommodation status as of ‘No Fixed Abode’ on their reception into custody, April 2016 – March 2018. The data for 2014 and 2015 is not held.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Table 1</p></td><td colspan="3"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>2018 (Jan to March)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total prisoner receptions into custody (Basic Custody Screening Tool)</p></td><td><p>105,782</p></td><td><p>103,225</p></td><td><p>25,033</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of homeless prisoners</p></td><td><p>24,942</p></td><td><p>26,700</p></td><td><p>6,825</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Percentage</p></td><td><p>23.58%</p></td><td><p>25.87%</p></td><td><p>27.26%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Table 2 provides data on the number of prisoners who declared their accommodation as temporary/insecure on their reception into custody, April 2016 – March 2018. The data for 2014 and 2015 is not held.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Table 2</p></td><td colspan="3"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>2018 (Jan - March)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total prisoner receptions into custody (Basic Custody Screening Tool)</p></td><td><p>105,782</p></td><td><p>103,225</p></td><td><p>25,033</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Temporary / Insecure accommodation</p></td><td><p>6,408</p></td><td><p>5,543</p></td><td><p>1,264</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Percentage</p></td><td><p>6.06%</p></td><td><p>5.37%</p></td><td><p>5.05%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><em>Notes</em></p><ol><li><p>The Basic Custody Screening Tool (BCS) is completed on entry to custody for all prisoners. It therefore will include a mix of those received into custody on remand and those sentenced from court. Using just the BCS, there is no way to determine which of those received into custody on remand were released un-convicted, therefore it is important to stress that this data covers prisoners, and can’t be used to describe offenders, as some of those counted will ultimately not have been found guilty of any offence.</p></li><li><p>The BCS Part 1 is completed by the prison with no input from a Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) as they complete Part 2 of the BCS.</p></li><li><p>These questions from the BCS Part 1 are recorded as per the prisoner’s answers and are not assessed.</p></li><li><p>The total number of prisoners shown is for the number of fully completed BCS Part 1s for each year, based on the Reception Date for each prisoner.</p></li><li><p>A proportion of prisoners will enter custody multiple times each year and for this PQ all responses have been included as a prisoner may provide different answers to these questions over time.</p></li><li><p>These figures have not been checked over or confirmed by the statistics team.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Everyone should have a safe and suitable home to live; having somewhere to live gives people a stable platform from which to access health services, hold down a job and reduces the likelihood of them reoffending. Staff in both Community Rehabilitation Companies and the National Probation Service work together with local authorities and other providers of accommodation with the aim of ensuring all offenders under our supervision have accommodation especially when they are released from prison.</p><p> </p></li></ol> answering member constituency Penrith and The Border answering member printed Rory Stewart question first answered 01/11/2018 17:20:37 answering member 4137 label Biography information for Rory Stewart
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes

994588

registered interest
date	25/10/2018
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Tenancy Deposit Schemes
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to the news release entitled Nationwide highlights lottery of experiences on private tenancy deposits - and calls for more pragmatic approach, published by Nationwide Building Society on 20 October, what plans his Department has to ensure that deposits are returned in an efficient and timely manner as a result of that organisation's finding that 18 per cent of tenants wait more than three months for deposit returns.
tabling member constituency	Dulwich and West Norwood
tabling member printed	Helen Hayes
uin	183961
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 30/10/2018 answer text <p>Under the Housing Act 2004, all deposits taken with assured shorthold tenancies since 6 April 2007 must be protected in a Government-approved tenancy deposit scheme within 30 days. In the vast majority of cases the deposit can be returned promptly as the landlord and tenant are able to agree deductions from the deposit. Deposits should be returned within 10 days of the tenant requesting it if held in the insured scheme, and within 10 days of the landlord and tenant agreeing deductions in the custodial scheme. It can take longer if they cannot agree and need to use the free dispute resolutions services provided by the deposit schemes. Only 1.5 per cent of cases go to formal dispute. The YouGov survey referenced in the news release asked about the worst experience tenants had ever had and so is not representative of the normal experience for tenants.</p><p>The current system works well but we are reviewing whether improvements can be made to the deposit protection model through the Tenancy Deposit Protection Working Group. Nationwide is a member of the Working Group which will look at the process at the end of tenancy and dispute resolution, as well as exploring whether deposit passporting can improve affordability by helping tenants who have to pay a deposit to their new landlord before they receive their current deposit back.</p> answering member constituency South Derbyshire answering member printed Mrs Heather Wheeler question first answered 30/10/2018 13:32:03 answering member 4053 label Biography information for Mrs Heather Wheeler
tabling member	4510 label Biography information for Helen Hayes