Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

993599

registered interest
date	23/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Multinational Companies: Taxation
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue was lost to the public purse as a result of the exemption for regulatory capital in section 259N(3)(b) Chapter 8 Part 6A Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010 in each year since the introduction of that exemption.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	182824
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 26/10/2018 answer text <p>As a matter of corporation tax policy, with the aim of improving financial stability, the UK allows certain deductions for the costs of regulatory capital. The exemption referred to helps to ensure that the Hybrid and Other Mismatch Rules act in a way consistent with this policy. As such, there is no question of any tax revenue being “lost” as a result of the exemption.</p><p>It is not possible to provide details of the tax effect arising from the exemption for regulatory capital in section 259N(3)(b), Chapter 8, Part 6A of the Taxation (International and other Provisions) Act 2010.</p><p>The Hybrid and other mismatches regime came into force on 1 January 2017. The majority of corporation tax returns which will reflect the impact of these rules have not yet been received.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 26/10/2018 13:46:56 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds

993600

registered interest
date	23/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Corporation Tax
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the money to be accrued to the public purse as a result of the single payment method outlined in the proposed amendments to Schedule 3ZB to the Tax Management Act 1970 contained in Clause 37 of the draft Finance Bill.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	182825
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 26/10/2018 answer text <p>The level of revenue accrued to the public purse as a result of the single payment method outlined in the proposed amendments to Schedule 3ZB to the Tax Management Act 1970 is expected to be negligible. The UK already has comprehensive exit taxation rules, and the change is relatively minor and primarily of an administrative nature.</p><p> </p><p>More information can be found in the Tax Information and Impact Note published on 6 July 2018:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-the-corporation-tax-exit-charges" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-the-corporation-tax-exit-charges</a></p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 26/10/2018 13:49:18 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds

993615

registered interest
date	23/10/2018
answering body	Department of Health and Social Care
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health and Social Care
answering dept sort name	Health and Social Care
hansard heading	Dental Services: Contracts
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the tendering processes for NHS orthodontist services undertaken by Care Commissioning Groups, how many and what proportion of tender contracts have gone to (a) consultant-led and (b) non-consultant specialist-led orthodontic services.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	182833
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/10/2018 answer text <p>Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) are not responsible for commissioning dental services including orthodontic services. NHS England commissions such services directly.</p><p> </p><p>NHS England advises it does not hold information centrally on how many and what proportion of tender contracts have gone to consultant-led and non-consultant specialist-led orthodontic services or the proportion of contracts for National Health Service orthodontist services tendered by NHS England which go to orthodontists with wheelchair accessible premises.</p><p> </p><p>No estimate is therefore possible of the proportion of orthodontic services that have wheelchair accessible premises.</p> answering member constituency Winchester answering member printed Steve Brine grouped question UIN 182834 question first answered 31/10/2018 12:19:44 answering member 4067 label Biography information for Steve Brine
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds

993619

registered interest
date	23/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Social Enterprises: Tax Allowances
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what time targets have been set for HMRC for advance approval of Social Investment Tax Relief.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	182836
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 26/10/2018 answer text <p>Advance assurance applications for investments under the Social Investment Tax Relief (SITR) scheme are dealt with alongside advance assurance applications for investments under the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS), the Seed EIS (SEIS) and by Venture Capital Trusts, as well as statutory compliance statements under the SITR scheme, the EIS and SEIS.</p><p>There are no separate targets for responding to applications under the different schemes. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) aims to respond to over 80% of applications within 15 working days and 95% of applications within 40 working days. HMRC is currently responding to 88% of applications within 15 working days and 97% of applications within 40 working days.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 26/10/2018 13:48:35 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds

993622

registered interest
date	23/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Social Enterprises: Tax Allowances
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the cost to the public purse has been of Social Investment Tax Relief in each year since 2013.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	182837
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 26/10/2018 answer text <p>HMRC publishes annual statistics on funds raised through the Social Investment Tax Relief (SITR) scheme. The latest release is on GOV.UK at</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/enterprise-investment-scheme-seed-enterprise-investment-scheme-and-social-investment-tax-relief-statistics-may-2018" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/enterprise-investment-scheme-seed-enterprise-investment-scheme-and-social-investment-tax-relief-statistics-may-2018</a></p><p> </p><p>From the introduction of SITR in 2014-15, up to 2016-17, the annual costs of the relief are estimated to have been less than £5 million per year. Data for 2017-18 onwards are not yet available.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 26/10/2018 13:47:40 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds

993729

registered interest
date	23/10/2018
answering body	Department of Health and Social Care
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health and Social Care
answering dept sort name	Health and Social Care
hansard heading	Chemotherapy
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the rate of the use of intensive chemotherapy is in relation to cancer patient population by (a) type of cancer and (b) hospital trust.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	182862
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/10/2018 answer text <p>This information is not collected centrally.</p> answering member constituency Winchester answering member printed Steve Brine question first answered 31/10/2018 12:14:38 answering member 4067 label Biography information for Steve Brine
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds

988718

registered interest
date	16/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Capital Gains Tax
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he has made a comparative assessment of the effect on the revenue that has accrued to the public purse of other EU countries of the introduction of a deferred payment of capital gains tax for trusts ceasing to be resident or non-resident individuals who trade through a national branch or agency.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	180290
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2018 answer text <p>The introduction of a deferred payment of capital gains tax for trusts ceasing to be resident or non-resident individuals who trade through a national branch or agency (Clause 36 of the draft Finance Bill) is not expected to have any impact on the revenue accruing to the public purse of other EU countries.</p><p> </p><p>The effect of clause 36 is that those migrating trusts and non-resident individuals who defer capital gains tax as a result of the measure will still pay the same amount of tax in the UK, but over a longer period with interest charged on outstanding amounts.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 22/10/2018 16:03:07 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds

988719

registered interest
date	16/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Capital Gains Tax
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what has been the annual cost to the public purse of section 187 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 for each year since its introduction.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	180291
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2018 answer text <p>The Government does not hold data specifically on the annual cost of section 187 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. Information on the use of section 187 is reported to HMRC in tax returns, but the relevant data is not held in a centralised form, and the cost of gathering for statistical purposes is disproportionate.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 22/10/2018 15:53:31 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds

988721

registered interest
date	16/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much has accrued to the public purse each year as a result of the implementation of Chapter 8, Part 6A of the Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	180292
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2018 answer text <p>It is not possible to provide details of the tax effect arising from the introduction of the Hybrid and other Mismatch regime in Part 6A of the Taxation (International and other Provisions) Act 2010.</p><p> </p><p>The hybrid mismatch regime came into force on 1 January 2017. The majority of corporation tax returns which will reflect the impact of these rules have not yet been received.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 22/10/2018 15:58:30 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds

988722

registered interest
date	16/10/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Taxation: EU Law
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he has made a comparative assessment of the effect on the revenue that has accrued to the public purse of other EU countries of the implementation of Council Directive (EU) 2017/1852 on tax dispute resolution mechanisms in the European Union.
tabling member constituency	Oxford East
tabling member printed	Anneliese Dodds
uin	180293
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2018 answer text <p>No such comparative assessment has been undertaken.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 22/10/2018 16:05:10 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4657 label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds