| answer text |
<p>No one should be refused access to businesses or services because they legitimately
have an assistance dog.</p><p>Strong protection already exists in the Equality Act
2010, which places a duty on businesses and service providers to make reasonable adjustments
to improve disabled people’s access to goods and services so they are not placed at
a substantial disadvantage compared to non-disabled people. This reasonable adjustment
duty is an anticipatory duty, meaning that those who provide goods, facilities and
services to members of the public are expected to anticipate the reasonable adjustments
that disabled customers may require, including auxiliary aids.</p><p>The Equality
and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is the public body responsible for enforcing the
Equality Act. In 2017, the Commission published two pieces of guidance - a guide to
help businesses understand what they can do to meet their legal duties to assistance
dog owners, and a guide to help tourism businesses welcome people with access requirements.
The EHRC supports disabled individuals who have experienced discrimination to take
their cases to court.</p><p>In recent years, case law has strengthened the equalities
law for people with assistance dogs. There have been a number of significant cases
brought under the Equality Act involving assistance dogs, which have been successfully
litigated, for example, Bloch v Kassim (assistance dogs in taxis); Clutton and Williams
v Pen-y-Bryn Group (assistance dogs in restaurants); and McCafferty v Miah (assistance
dogs in shops). The Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS), the equalities and
human rights helpline, receives about 35,000 customer contacts a year, more than 60%
of which concern disability issues. The EASS can intervene directly with or assist
the complainant to take the case up with the relevant service provider in many cases,
including those involving assistance dogs.</p>
|
|
