Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1184596
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-12more like thismore than 2020-03-12
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons remove filter
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps he is taking to ensure that the provisions of (a) amendment to the promoters of tax avoidance schemes and (b) schedule 16 to the Finance (No.2) Act 2017 are used to secure penalties for promoters of loan charge schemes. more like this
tabling member constituency Midlothian more like this
tabling member printed
Owen Thompson more like this
uin 28630 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-20more like thismore than 2020-03-20
answer text <p>The Government and HMRC are determined to continue to tackle promoters of tax avoidance schemes. This includes using the Promoters of Tax Avoidance Schemes (POTAS) and Enablers penalty regimes to change behaviours of those promoting or enabling the sale and use of avoidance schemes.</p><p> </p><p>At the Budget, the Government announced that it will legislate in Finance Bill 2020‑21 to strengthen the Promoters of Tax Avoidance Schemes (POTAS) and the Enablers penalty regimes. This includes measures, which are designed to ensure that: HMRC are better able to issue stop notices to promoters of schemes that do not work; POTAS obligations are fulfilled by promoters including where they have tried to abuse corporate structures; and HMRC can obtain information about the enabling of abusive schemes as soon as they are identified.</p><p> </p><p>On 19 March HMRC published a new strategy for tackling promoters of tax avoidance schemes. This strategy outlines the range of policy, operational and communications interventions that are under way and being developed to drive those who promote tax avoidance schemes out of the market.</p>
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-20T07:51:24.007Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-20T07:51:24.007Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4482
label Biography information for Owen Thompson remove filter
1177731
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-02-11more like thismore than 2020-02-11
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons remove filter
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many promoters of loan charge schemes have been (a) charged and (b) fined in relation to their activities. more like this
tabling member constituency Midlothian more like this
tabling member printed
Owen Thompson more like this
uin 685 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-02-19more like thismore than 2020-02-19
answer text <p>A key part of HM Revenue &amp; Customs’ (HMRC) strategy in tackling promoters of disguised remuneration and other tax avoidance schemes is to change their behaviour so that they stop this activity altogether.</p><p> </p><p>HMRC have a range of legislative powers to tackle promoters, under three main regimes: Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS), Promoters of Tax Avoidance Schemes (POTAS), and the Enablers penalty. Penalties can be charged for various failures to comply with the requirements of these regimes. HMRC’s Counter-Avoidance directorate, created in 2013, is responsible for applying these penalties in cases of marketed tax avoidance.</p><p> </p><p>Fewer than five penalties have been charged under DOTAS by the Counter-Avoidance team since 2013. Before then a further 11 penalties were charged for more historic DOTAS failings.</p><p> </p><p>In addition, there are four litigation decisions received since 2017, all in relation to disguised remuneration (DR) avoidance arrangements, which confirmed HMRC’s view that the schemes are notifiable under the DOTAS regime. Penalty action is being considered in each case.</p><p> </p><p>No penalties have to date been issued under the POTAS or Enablers legislation. These regimes have had a positive impact in changing the behaviour of some promoters. As a result of HMRC’s concerted action under these regimes, a number of major promoters have now cooperated with HMRC and have either stopped selling schemes or ceased business altogether.</p>
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-02-19T13:32:26.61Zmore like thismore than 2020-02-19T13:32:26.61Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4482
label Biography information for Owen Thompson remove filter