Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1199417
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Private Education: Regulation more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government whey they suspended the Regulating Independent Educational Institutions consultation, rather than extending the timeframe for submissions; and what steps they are taking to ensure the (1) safety, and (2) education, of pupils who attend these institutions. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jones of Cheltenham remove filter
uin HL5005 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-10more like thismore than 2020-06-10
answer text <p>It is an important principle that consultations take account of the groups being consulted and are conducted in a way that enables interested parties to express their view. We were concerned that completing the consultation while many stakeholders had their operation disrupted by the COVID-19 outbreak may not fairly provide all stakeholders with an opportunity to respond as they would like, undermining the value of the consultation. The department therefore suspended the consultation before it was due to end. The department intends to reopen the consultation when stakeholders are less likely to be significantly affected by the COVID-19 outbreak. Responses received to date will be combined with responses received after the consultation reopens and fully reviewed after the consultation finally closes.</p><p>It is not yet appropriate to set a date for reopening the consultation as the situation in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak continues to change. Similarly, the consultation was not extended because it was not clear what date would be reasonable to conclude the consultation at this stage.</p><p>Ofsted continues to investigate potential illegal schools including consideration of new intelligence. Where appropriate, Ofsted have liaised with local authorities and other statutory bodies to consider whether there is appropriate action that should be taken, for example, to close settings where people are gathering illegally during the COVID-19 outbreak.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Berridge more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-10T16:59:28.26Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-10T16:59:28.26Z
answering member
4218
label Biography information for Baroness Berridge more like this
tabling member
248
label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this
1199418
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answering body
Department for International Trade more like this
answering dept id 202 more like this
answering dept short name International Trade more like this
answering dept sort name International Trade more like this
hansard heading Trade Agreements: USA more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with (1) local authorities, and (2) the food sector, about trade talks with the US; what assessment they have made the Chartered Institute for Environmental Health's call to slow down trade talks with the US to allow for proper consultation with (a) relevant stakeholders, and (b) food organisations, that are currently occupied with supporting communities to get through the COVID-19 crisis. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jones of Cheltenham remove filter
uin HL5006 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-16more like thismore than 2020-06-16
answer text <p>The Government is committed to a transparent trade policy and will continue engaging with stakeholders, including the food and drinks industry, throughout negotiations.</p><p>Our Strategic Trade Advisory Group (STAG) and Expert Trade Advisory Groups (ETAGs), including a dedicated Agri Food ETAG set up jointly with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, regularly discuss the proposed UK-US Free Trade Agreement.</p><p>Our trade talks with the US have been based on our negotiating objectives, published on 2 March 2020. The public consultation supporting these objectives was one of the largest in UK Government’s history, receiving nearly 160,000 responses.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Grimstone of Boscobel more like this
grouped question UIN HL5203 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-16T16:17:49.053Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-16T16:17:49.053Z
answering member
4876
label Biography information for Lord Grimstone of Boscobel more like this
tabling member
248
label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this
1199419
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Agnew of Oulton on 20 May (HL4003), whether "until July" indicates that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme will be in place in its current form up to and including 30 June; and whether "after July" indicates that they will introduce more flexibility to the furlough scheme from 1 July. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jones of Cheltenham remove filter
uin HL5007 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-16more like thismore than 2020-06-16
answer text <p>The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme will remain in its current form until 30 June, with flexible furloughing introduced from 1 July.</p><p> </p><p>From 1 July, employers can bring back to work employees that have previously been furloughed for any amount of time and any shift pattern, while still being able to claim a CJRS grant for their normal hours not worked. From 1 July, employers will also be able to agree any working arrangements with previously furloughed employees.</p><p> </p><p>The scheme will close to new entrants from 30 June, and from 1 July the scheme will only be available to employers that have previously used the scheme in respect of employees they have previously furloughed. From this point onwards, employers will only be able to furlough employees that they have furloughed for a full three-week period prior to 30 June. This means that the final date by which an employer can furlough an employee for the first time was 10 June, in order for the current three-week furlough period to be completed by 30 June.</p>
answering member printed Lord Agnew of Oulton more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-16T10:48:02.587Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-16T10:48:02.587Z
answering member
4689
label Biography information for Lord Agnew of Oulton more like this
tabling member
248
label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this
1199420
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Conditions of Employment: Pay more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord Agnew of Oulton on 26 May (HL4404), what support they will offer those people who have not been furloughed but have taken a voluntary temporary reduction in pay; whether they expect those for have taken voluntary temporary pay reductions to have entered into written agreements with their employers; and if not, what evidence they will require before these people can access any support. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jones of Cheltenham remove filter
uin HL5008 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-16more like thismore than 2020-06-16
answer text <p>Workers whose earnings fall due to a reduction in their work hours may become eligible for support through the welfare system, including through Universal Credit (UC). Existing UC claimants will normally receive a higher award as a result of a fall in earnings. For employed claimants this will be updated automatically using information from the PAYE system.</p><p> </p><p>The Government has announced a significant package of temporary welfare measures to support those on low incomes through the COVID-19 outbreak, including increasing the UC standard allowance by £20 per week.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Agnew of Oulton more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-16T10:52:33.637Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-16T10:52:33.637Z
answering member
4689
label Biography information for Lord Agnew of Oulton more like this
tabling member
248
label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this
1199421
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept id 201 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
hansard heading Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: Maternity Leave more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether people on maternity leave beyond the period of 39 weeks' statutory maternity pay are able to return to work before the intended end of their leave and then be furloughed; if so, whether they would need to give eight weeks' notice to return to work early in order to qualify for furlough arrangements; and if not; what assessment they have made of the disparity in circumstances for these women compared to those still in receipt of maternity pay who have to give eight weeks' notice before returning to work in order to be furloughed. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jones of Cheltenham remove filter
uin HL5009 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-15more like thismore than 2020-06-15
answer text <p>Employed mothers are required to take at least two weeks Statutory Maternity Leave (or four weeks of they are a factory worker) immediately after giving birth. Generally speaking, if an employed mother wishes to return to work before the end of her Maternity Leave (which is 52 weeks), she is required to give at least 8 weeks’ notice of the date that she intends to return to work, irrespective of whether she is on paid or unpaid Maternity Leave. However, the employer can agree to the employee returning on shorter or no notice.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Callanan more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-15T15:39:35.54Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-15T15:39:35.54Z
answering member
4336
label Biography information for Lord Callanan more like this
tabling member
248
label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this
1199422
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Ministerial Powers more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that both HMRC and the Treasury agree the wording of ministerial directions before they are issued to (1) avoid confusion, and (2) obviate the need to subsequent corrections. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jones of Cheltenham remove filter
uin HL5010 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-16more like thismore than 2020-06-16
answer text <p>The Treasury has recently issued a number of Directions under Section 76 of the Coronavirus Act 2020. These set out that HMRC are responsible for the payment and management of the amounts paid out under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) and the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS). These are distinct from Ministerial Directions, which are formal instructions from Ministers to proceed with a spending proposal where the Permanent Secretary has written to their Secretary of State expressing their concerns.</p><p> </p><p>In relation to the recent CJRS and SEISS Treasury Directions, as with all other aspects of tax policy, Treasury and HMRC officials work closely to deliver the priorities of Ministers.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Agnew of Oulton more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-16T10:53:10.6Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-16T10:53:10.6Z
answering member
4689
label Biography information for Lord Agnew of Oulton more like this
tabling member
248
label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this