Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

671922
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2017-01-11
answering body
Northern Ireland Office more like this
answering dept id 21 more like this
answering dept short name Northern Ireland more like this
answering dept sort name Northern Ireland more like this
hansard heading Belfast Agreement more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the concept of parity of esteem as outlined in the Belfast Agreement 1998 applies to those members of the security forces who live in Great Britain and are currently facing investigation of incidents that took place in the civil unrest in Northern Ireland. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL4591 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-01-19more like thismore than 2017-01-19
answer text <p>First, I would like to make clear my admiration for the dedication, professionalism and courage shown by soldiers and police officers in Northern Ireland throughout the Troubles. As we made clear in our 2015 Northern Ireland manifesto, this Government will never forget the debt of gratitude we owe them and will never accept any form of equivalence between those who upheld democracy and the rule of law, and those who engaged in terrorism or other forms of paramilitary activity.</p><p> </p><p>This Government understands the concept of parity of esteem, as set out in the 1998 Belfast Agreement, as placing a general obligation on the UK Government to govern in the interests of the whole community and to treat people of different traditions fairly and with equal respect. In the Agreement it is clearly expressed and defined in relation to people living in Northern Ireland. As a general obligation there is no definition of particular circumstances in which it does or does not apply.</p><p> </p><p>The vast majority of the more than 250,000 men and women who served in the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the Armed Forces in Northern Ireland during the Troubles carried out their duties with exemplary professionalism. However, everyone is equal under the law and, where there is evidence of wrongdoing, this should be investigated.</p><p> </p><p>The current mechanisms for investigating the past do not reflect that 90 per cent of deaths in the Troubles were caused by terrorists and are disproportionately focussed on the actions of soldiers and police. That is why this Government supports the full and faithful implementation of the Stormont House Agreement to bring a new, balanced, proportionate and fair approach to dealing with Northern Ireland’s past.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Dunlop more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-01-19T11:43:54.467Zmore like thismore than 2017-01-19T11:43:54.467Z
answering member
4534
label Biography information for Lord Dunlop more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter
671155
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-01-10more like thismore than 2017-01-10
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Union Learning Fund more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government (1) how much money was paid to the Union Learning Fund last year, and in total since its inception; (2) which trade unions were provided with assistance from the fund last year; (3) how much was provided in each case; and (4) whether they have plans to end these payments or re-assess their efficacy. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL4556 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-01-20more like thismore than 2017-01-20
answer text <p>The Union Learning Fund (ULF) is administered by Unionlearn (the TUC's learning organisation). In the 2015-16 financial year, approximately £11m of funding was allocated to support the ULF.</p><p>As set out in the reply of 8 December 2015 to the Right Honourable Lord’s previous Parliamentary Question (HL3882) on this matter, the ULF was established in 1998 and funding has been provided by a number of different Departments. Between 1998-99 and 2006-07, around £70m of funding was allocated to support the ULF. Since 2006, the ULF has been administered by Unionlearn and around £116m in total has been distributed to ULF projects in respect of the financial years 2007-08 to 2015-16.</p><p>The total amount of funding received by all trade unions from the ULF for the financial year 2015-16 is set out in the table below.</p><p>The Department is currently in the process of finalising the grant agreement for Unionlearn and the ULF projects for the financial year 2017-18.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>ULF Funding 2015-16</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Union</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> Actual Amount Received 2015-16 </strong> <strong> £ </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AEGIS</p></td><td><p>247,495</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen</p></td><td><p>305,573</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Association of Teachers and Lecturers</p></td><td><p>122,615</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematograph and Theatre Union</p></td><td><p>130,530</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bakers and Allied Food Workers Union</p></td><td><p>349,793</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Britannia Staff Union</p></td><td><p>190,977</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Community</p></td><td><p>183,930</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Communication Workers Union</p></td><td><p>364,208</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EQUITY</p></td><td><p>119,712</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fire Brigades Union</p></td><td><p>505,317</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GMB Midlands</p></td><td><p>290,985</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GMB North West</p></td><td><p>230,056</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GMB Southern</p></td><td><p>396,720</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GMB Yorkshire &amp; North Derbyshire</p></td><td><p>306,367</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>National Association of Stable Staff</p></td><td><p>50,017</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>National Union of Journalists</p></td><td><p>71,736</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Public and Commercial Services Union</p></td><td><p>742,964</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Professional Footballers' Association</p></td><td><p>234,129</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Prison Officers' Association</p></td><td><p>702,404</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal College of Midwives</p></td><td><p>193,808</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal College of Nurses</p></td><td><p>170,149</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers</p></td><td><p>342,416</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists</p></td><td><p>188,914</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians (National)</p></td><td><p>254,702</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians (Anfield)</p></td><td><p>126,038</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians (Hinkley)</p></td><td><p>276,209</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unison National</p></td><td><p>554,859</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unison Northern</p></td><td><p>371,393</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unite</p></td><td><p>1,885,648</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unity</p></td><td><p>52,910</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United Road Transport Union</p></td><td><p>188,832</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers</p></td><td><p>743,088</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Staff Union West Bromwich Building Society</p></td><td><p>49,873</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-01-20T13:33:55.7Zmore like thismore than 2017-01-20T13:33:55.7Z
answering member
4270
label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter
671156
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-01-10more like thismore than 2017-01-10
answering body
Department for International Development more like this
answering dept id 20 more like this
answering dept short name International Development more like this
answering dept sort name International Development more like this
hansard heading BBC Media Action more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much has been paid to BBC Media Action in the last five years and for what particular purposes; whether evaluations by the Department for International Development found spending objectives have been achieved; and whether there are plans to continue these payments. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL4557 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-01-23more like thismore than 2017-01-23
answer text <p>In the five years to November 2016 the Government provided approximately £101 million directly to BBC Media Action, including £86 million from DFID and £15 million from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Conflict Stability and Security Fund. DFID also provided approximately £17 million subcontracted via other programmes.</p><p>The direct funding has included work to improve people’s access to health information, resilience to natural disasters and community dialogues to foster peace and accountability. DFID’s reviews of its global programme have assessed that objectives were exceeded, for example 92 million people in Africa and Asia have been reached through targeted radio and television programmes and public service advertisements designed to improve the health of mothers and their children. In 2016, 60% reported adopting healthier behaviours on issues such as antenatal care, breastfeeding and safe delivery.</p><p>The DFID global programme will end in 2017 but other programmes will continue beyond 2017. Future funding by HMG will be determined on a case by case basis and depend on robust value for money assessments.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bates more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-01-23T17:03:17.247Zmore like thismore than 2017-01-23T17:03:17.247Z
answering member
1091
label Biography information for Lord Bates more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter
671157
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-01-10more like thismore than 2017-01-10
answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept id 201 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
hansard heading Renewable Heat Incentive Scheme more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what the net costs of running and funding the domestic and non-domestic renewable heat incentive schemes were in (1) England, (2) Scotland and (3) Wales, each year since their inception, and what they expect this to cost in the next three years. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL4558 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-01-24more like thismore than 2017-01-24
answer text <p>The Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) scheme provides financial incentives to households and non-domestic consumers, including public bodies and charities, to help bridge the gap between the cost of renewable heating systems and conventional alternatives.</p><p>The non-domestic RHI scheme launched in November 2011 and the domestic RHI launched in April 2014. Both schemes are administered by Ofgem and are open to England, Wales and Scotland; however scheme costs are calculated collectively for Great Britain.</p><p> </p><p><strong><em>Table one: Scheme administration costs (amount paid to Ofgem to administer the scheme. The domestic set-up costs are included in the non-domestic figure)</em></strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Non-domestic</p></td><td><p>Domestic</p></td><td><p>Notes</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>£1.5m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>£4.8m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>£5m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>Includes domestic RHI preparation costs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>£7m</p></td><td><p>£4.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>£7.7m</p></td><td><p>£6.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>£6.8m</p></td><td><p>£5.3m</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong><em>Table two: Total subsidies paid (amount paid to scheme participants)</em></strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Non-domestic</p></td><td><p>Domestic</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>£2m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>£27m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>£52m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>£136m</p></td><td><p>£23m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>£295m</p></td><td><p>£77m</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong><em>Table three: Budget to fund subsidy payments to existing and future participants in both schemes to 2021</em></strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Budget</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>£430m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>£640m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>£780m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018-19</p></td><td><p>£900m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019-20</p></td><td><p>£1010m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020-21</p></td><td><p>£1150m</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-01-24T14:41:58.057Zmore like thismore than 2017-01-24T14:41:58.057Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter
671158
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-01-10more like thismore than 2017-01-10
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Pensioners: Health Services more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what are the current arrangements for quantifying and registering EU/EEA pensioners living in the UK and those close to pensionable age, for the purposes of reclaiming their healthcare costs from their home countries; what were the total costs and payments last year to those countries, and what are their plans to reform the UK counting system. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL4559 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-01-19more like thismore than 2017-01-19
answer text <p>Under the relevant European Union regulations, European Economic Area (EEA) countries and Switzerland are obliged to pay for the healthcare costs of those in receipt of state pension or other certain exportable benefits in their countries (based on pension and benefit eligibility, not nationality), but who live elsewhere in the EEA or Switzerland, including the United Kingdom.</p><p> </p><p>EEA state pensioners moving to the UK, unless insured by the Republic of Ireland, need to apply for an S1 form in their own country. Once issued, the form is registered by being sent to the Overseas Healthcare Team at the Department for Work and Pensions to be processed.</p><p> </p><p>EU rules set out the framework for determining which EEA country is ‘responsible’ for an individual under EU law. This is commonly referred to as ‘insurability’. The UK has a residency-based healthcare system which means that “insurability” is generally determined by residency (being “ordinarily resident”). Ordinarily resident means, broadly speaking, living in the UK on a lawful basis and properly settled for the time being, which would include EEA and Swiss residents below their respective state pensionable age but not in receipt of state pensions.</p><p> </p><p>We do not make payments to EEA member states for their state pensioners living in the UK but we claim from those member states for those in receipt of EEA member state pension. The table below provides information about how much was paid to the UK for individuals in receipt of state pension from another EEA country or Switzerland.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Austria</p></td><td><p>£166,179.94</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Belgium</p></td><td><p>£436,334.57</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bulgaria</p></td><td><p>£321,271.15</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cyprus</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Czech Republic</p></td><td><p>£32,419.18</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Denmark (Waiver)<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Estonia Waiver <sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Finland <sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>France</p></td><td><p>£434,456.14</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Germany</p></td><td><p>£1,115,260.40</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greece</p></td><td><p>£32,711.24</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hungary (Waiver) <sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Iceland</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ireland</p></td><td><p>£4,423,115.93</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Italy</p></td><td><p>£80,217.23</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Latvia</p></td><td><p>£930.95</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Liechtenstein</p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lithuania</p></td><td><p>£512,024.85</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Luxembourg</p></td><td><p>£39,428.73</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Malta (Waiver)<sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Netherlands</p></td><td><p>£2,604,068.06</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norway (Waiver)<sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>£0.00</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poland</p></td><td><p>£2,173,380.73</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portugal</p></td><td><p>£172,785.11</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Romania</p></td><td><p>£1,086.11</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Slovakia</p></td><td><p>£3,723.82</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Slovenia</p></td><td><p>£2,190.49</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Spain</p></td><td><p>£165,462.33</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sweden</p></td><td><p>£456,332.82</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Switzerland</p></td><td><p>£101,592.23</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>£13,274,972.02</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><em>Source:</em> Resource Accounting and Budgeting exercise. Totals are based on estimates of the costs of EEA healthcare claims made annually for the purposes of provisions made in the Department of Health accounts in accordance with Treasury resource accounting rules.</p><p> </p><p>Notes: Waiver is an agreed intentional relinquishment of healthcare costs between Member States.</p><p> </p><p><sup>1</sup> Denmark – Full waiver</p><p><sup>2</sup> Estonia and Norway – Waiver, excepting former Article 22.1c (patient referral) &amp; Article 55.1c (industrial injury) claims</p><p><sup>3</sup> Finland, Hungary and Malta – Waiver, excepting former Article 22.1c (patient referral) claims</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Since its inception in 2013, the Department of Health’s Visitor and Migrant NHS Cost Recovery Programme has been working to design and implement key improvements to ensure that those people who should pay for National Health Service care in England are identified and charged. The Department has also been working closely with the NHS to improve rates of recovery where these healthcare costs are the responsibility of other member states of the EEA via the European Health Insurance Card, S1 and S2 mechanisms.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-01-19T17:55:29.497Zmore like thismore than 2017-01-19T17:55:29.497Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter
671159
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-01-10more like thismore than 2017-01-10
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Pensioners: Health Services more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government (1) what are the current arrangements for quantifying the amount paid by the UK to the Republic of Ireland and by the Republic of Ireland to the UK for the healthcare costs of resident pensioners; (2) what were the amounts paid by the UK and the Republic of Ireland in the last three years; (3) how many UK and Irish pensioners are involved; and (4) when the system will next be reviewed. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL4560 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-01-24more like thismore than 2017-01-24
answer text <p>The basis on which pensioner figures are calculated was included in a letter of 11 July 2011 to Ireland’s Department of Health and Children. The relevant section of that letter is included below:</p><p> </p><p>“Reimbursement arrangements for 2010-2013</p><p> </p><p>For 2010-2013, we agreed that we would not pursue the use of another triennial survey, which otherwise would have been due. As an alternative arrangements, we have agreed that between 2010 and 2013, UK liability to Ireland (currently 40%) will fall, year on year, by 1.13%. This figure was agreed after both parties noted an average downward trend in UK liability for dual pensioners since the start of the bilateral agreement in 1971. As a result, UK liability will be 35.48% by 2013. Applying the same principle, Irish liability will stand at 4.44%. We agreed that such a deal would provide a logical and pragmatic approach; remove the need to enter negotiations about Department for Work and Pensions resource for a triennial survey (along with your equivalent), and see an end to protracted negotiations regarding pensioner numbers and categories of UK liability for those years.”</p><p> </p><p>This 1.13% reduction in United Kingdom liability was extended through to 2016, resulting in a current UK liability of 32.09% of UK pensioners living in Ireland.</p><p> </p><p>Following negotiations with Ireland, UK liability for 2016 was based on an estimated baseline number of 109,000 UK state pensioners and Ireland’s liability is based on being responsible for 3.15% of an estimated baseline number of 40,000 Irish state pensioners living in the UK.</p><p> </p><p>Discussions on new arrangements to determine respective pensioner numbers for 2017 will begin this year.</p><p> </p><p>The UK’s estimated income and expenditure for healthcare activity in the past three years as it relates to UK and Irish pensioners is in the table below:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>2015/16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Expenditure</p></td><td><p>£223,761,423</p></td><td><p>£200,591,178</p></td><td><p>£168,069,004</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Income</p></td><td><p>£6,707,569</p></td><td><p>£4,422,239</p></td><td><p>£4,423,115.93</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><em> </em></p><p><em>Source:</em> Resource Accounting and Budgeting exercise. Totals are based on estimates of the costs of European Economic Area healthcare claims made annually for the purposes of provisions made in the Department of Health accounts in accordance with Treasury resource accounting rules.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-01-24T14:43:22.737Zmore like thismore than 2017-01-24T14:43:22.737Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter
671160
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-01-10more like thismore than 2017-01-10
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Entry Clearances more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government why the decision has been taken not to publish the annual number of immigration entry clearance visas granted to (1) licensed sponsoring employers, and (2) educational establishments, in the UK. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL4561 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-01-24more like thismore than 2017-01-24
answer text <p>I am sorry but we cannot publish the annual number of immigration entry clearance visas granted to licensed sponsors and educational establishments in the UK due to commercial sensitivity, data protection and costs.</p><p> </p><p>Entry clearance visas are not granted to sponsoring employers or sponsoring educational establishments, but to individuals. Information relating to individual sponsors would be commercially sensitive and could inadvertently disclose individuals. Further, releasing such information could cause commercial damage to the sponsoring organisation.</p><p> </p><p>Matching data between licensed organisations and individuals recorded on case working systems overseas and in the UK is not automatic and would incur disproportionate cost. However total numbers of entry clearance visas granted under Tiers 2, 4 and 5 are already published as part of the regular quarterly Immigration statistics available from the .GOV.UK website.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-01-24T15:06:13.797Zmore like thismore than 2017-01-24T15:06:13.797Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter
646608
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-11-28more like thismore than 2016-11-28
answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Kids Company more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much of the £3 million grant received by Kids Company in July 2015 was (1) spent on staff wages, (2) returned to the Cabinet Office, and if so, on what dates, and (3) returned with interest if the funding was placed in a bank account with Kids Company. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL3626 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-12-15more like thismore than 2016-12-15
answer text <p>The return of the grant payment made to Kids Company in July 2015 is a matter for the Official Receiver. The Official Receiver's consideration is ongoing.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-12-15T17:18:32.853Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-15T17:18:32.853Z
answering member
4247
label Biography information for Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter
646609
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-11-28more like thismore than 2016-11-28
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Roads: Safety more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have considered making mandatory the wearing by under-19 year olds of high-visibility clothing while cycling or walking on the roads network after dark; and if so, with what result. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL3627 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-12-07more like thismore than 2016-12-07
answer text <p>The safety of vulnerable road users is a priority and we recommend that pedestrians and cyclists wear clothing that makes them sufficiently visible to other road users, especially in poor light and at night. However, wearing high visibility clothing is a matter of individual choice. Imposing additional regulations could lead to people choosing not to walk or cycle and would be difficult to enforce.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-12-07T12:04:18.937Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-07T12:04:18.937Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter
638604
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-11-18more like thismore than 2016-11-18
answering body
Northern Ireland Office more like this
answering dept id 21 more like this
answering dept short name Northern Ireland more like this
answering dept sort name Northern Ireland more like this
hansard heading Parades Commission more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Dunlop on 31 October (HL2454), whether the Parades Commission for Northern Ireland has the ability to make reference to human rights instruments such as the European Convention on Human Rights when making decisions. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Laird more like this
uin HL3355 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-11-28more like thismore than 2016-11-28
answer text <p>As a public authority, the Parades Commission has general obligations under public law; the discharge of those obligations is an operational matter for the Parades Commission, acting independently of Government.</p><p> </p><p>The Parades Commission determinations make regular reference to the European Convention on Human Rights. Details of all determinations are published on the Commission’s website at www.paradescommission.org.</p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Dunlop more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-11-28T14:44:46.73Zmore like thismore than 2016-11-28T14:44:46.73Z
answering member
4534
label Biography information for Lord Dunlop more like this
tabling member
2479
label Biography information for Lord Laird remove filter