Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

767353
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-09more like thismore than 2017-10-09
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Care Homes more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government in the light of research published by the BBC on 2 August estimating future shortfalls in care home places, what steps they are taking to ensure the sufficient provision of such places. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Ouseley more like this
uin HL1771 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-16more like thismore than 2017-10-16
answer text <p>High quality care is not just about care home beds. Of those aged 65 and over who need local authority support, 61% are cared for in their own home. Since 2010, there has been a growth in home care agencies of more than 2,900.</p><p> </p><p>We have given local authorities in England an extra £2 billion over the next three years to maintain access for our growing aging population and allow councils to sustain a diverse care market including care home places.</p><p> </p><p>In addition the Government has announced we will consult on plans to improve the social care system and to put it on a more secure financial footing.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-16T16:49:37.5Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-16T16:49:37.5Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
2170
label Biography information for Lord Ouseley more like this
764296
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-02more like thismore than 2017-10-02
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Surrogacy: Lone Parents more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord O’Shaughnessy on 19 September (HL1420), whether, under the proposed remedial order relating to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, single people who are unable to provide their own genetic material will be permitted to apply for a parental order following a surrogacy arrangement; and if not, what consideration they have taken of the potential discriminatory effects of this, in particular against infertile single women. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Barker more like this
uin HL1633 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-12more like thismore than 2017-10-12
answer text <p>Remedial orders have a very limited purpose, to correct incompatibilities identified in Human Rights legislation. In this case the remedial order is intended to correct the provision in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 that currently only permits couples to apply for a parental order following a surrogacy arrangement, which the High Court ruled was incompatible with Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The provision of the Act which requires an applicant to have provided their own gametes to bring about the pregnancy is unchanged by the ruling of the High Court.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-12T14:32:08.95Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-12T14:32:08.95Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
2501
label Biography information for Baroness Barker more like this
764297
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-02more like thismore than 2017-10-02
answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Sanitary Products: VAT more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many grants from the Tampon Tax Fund are yet to be agreed; and what is the timetable for completion of those agreements. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Barker more like this
uin HL1634 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-16more like thismore than 2017-10-16
answer text <p>The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport is managing 53 of the 70 grants awarded from the 2017/18 Tampon Tax Fund. Grant agreements have been finalised for 38 of those grants.</p><p> </p><p>The remaining grants are managed by the devolved administrations.</p><p> </p><p>Grant agreements are finalised and signed when the department and the recipient both agree to the terms and conditions so the end date for that process is not entirely within government's control.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-16T15:28:07.913Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-16T15:28:07.913Z
answering member
4247
label Biography information for Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
tabling member
2501
label Biography information for Baroness Barker more like this
764298
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-02more like thismore than 2017-10-02
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Supporting People Programme more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of withdrawing the Supporting People Programme in 2016 on (1) the diversion of patients from health to preventative social care services, and (2) the ability of vulnerable people to live independently at home. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham more like this
uin HL1635 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-16more like thismore than 2017-10-16
answer text <p>Since 2011, funding for local authorities (LAs) for Supporting People has been subsumed within the general grant to LAs. This is part of Government’s devolution policy, which allows LAs to manage funding according to local priorities. The Government believes this approach to local funding has proved successful in promoting increased freedom, flexibility, and local accountability, and has no plans to review it. Consequently, there has been no formal assessment of the impact of including Supporting People grant funding (or other formerly discrete grants) within the general grant.</p><p> </p><p>A suitable home can help people stay independent for longer; reduce and delay care costs; and allow people’s needs to be met more effectively. The Disabled Facilities Grant supports people on low-income to adapt their homes. It forms a major part of the Better Care Fund, and funding has almost doubled from £220 million in 2015-16 to £431 million in 2017-18. In addition to the Department for Communities and Local Government’s work to build more supported housing, the Department of Health is also contributing through its Care and Support Specialised Housing Fund, which will build over 6,000 new homes at a total cost of around £200 million.</p>
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-16T13:19:38.583Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-16T13:19:38.583Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
764299
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-02more like thismore than 2017-10-02
answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Telephones more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will make representations to Ofcom about the practice of telephone service providers terminating and transferring users’ numbers without their consent. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham more like this
uin HL1636 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-16more like thismore than 2017-10-16
answer text <p>The cancellation of services without consumer consent is prohibited and is a matter for Ofcom. Ofcom requires companies to get customer permission and consent to cancel and specifies the type of information that needs to be made available to the customer before this can take place. Ofcom also places a requirement on companies to keep records of the customer’s consent to cancel their service for 12 months.</p><p> </p><p>In addition to these strict requirements, Ofcom has imposed several important safeguards within the current cancellation process to minimise the opportunity for error to occur, including a requirement that the company must write to the customer letting them know of the imminent cancellation of their phone line before the cancellation can happen. The customer then has a 10-day period in which to stop the cancellation going ahead if they change their mind, or if there has been a mistake.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-16T15:27:20.367Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-16T15:27:20.367Z
answering member
4247
label Biography information for Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
764301
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-02more like thismore than 2017-10-02
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Ofwat: PwC more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have any plans to investigate any possible conflicts of interests created by PriceWaterhouseCooper acting as (1) an adviser to Ofwat’s 2014 Price Review, and (2) an auditor to six water companies. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL1638 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-11more like thismore than 2017-10-11
answer text <p>The Government currently has no plans to investigate any possible conflicts of interests in relation to role of Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) as adviser to the 2014 Price Review (PR14).</p><p> </p><p>Following a process of open competition, after which PwC was contracted as their PR14 delivery partner, Ofwat took steps to ensure that any potential conflicts of interest were identified and managed at all stages. The measures taken were over and above PwC’s normal processes to ensure robust ethical walls are in place.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Gardiner of Kimble more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-11T12:34:24.863Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-11T12:34:24.863Z
answering member
4161
label Biography information for Lord Gardiner of Kimble more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
764302
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-02more like thismore than 2017-10-02
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading General Lighthouse Authorities: Pay more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what (1) salary increases, (2) bonuses, and (3) other increases in remuneration, were given in each of the last seven years to (a) senior staff and directors, and (b) other staff, of each of the three General Lighthouse Authorities; and what is their assessment of the levels of responsibility or risk that justified any variation in those increases. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL1639 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-16more like thismore than 2017-10-16
answer text <p>Trinity House and the Commissioners of Northern Lighthouses follow the UK Government’s pay guidance. In the case of the Commissioners of Irish Lights, who are based in the Republic of Ireland, local market conditions are taken into account when arriving at their pay budget bid which is included in their corporate plans. All three General Lighthouse Authorities are required to comply with guidance issued by HM Treasury for the approval of senior pay.</p><p> </p><p>The General Lighthouse Fund Report and Accounts, which are laid before Parliament and published on gov.uk each year, includes a remuneration and staff report as well as the salaries of Chief Executives, Directors and Non-Executive Directors (where applicable) of all three General Lighthouse Authorities which also produce their own dedicated Report and Accounts.</p><p> </p><p>The details for other staff is attached.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Callanan more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-16T14:28:53.827Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-16T14:28:53.827Z
answering member
4336
label Biography information for Lord Callanan more like this
attachment
1
file name HL1639 - Salary increases for other staff in each of the General Lighthouse Authorities.docx more like this
title HL1639 - Table - General Lighthouse Authorities more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
764304
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-02more like thismore than 2017-10-02
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Iraq: Military Intervention more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their estimate of the number of civilians killed during the liberation of Mosul. more like this
tabling member printed
The Lord Bishop of Coventry more like this
uin HL1641 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-12more like thismore than 2017-10-12
answer text <p>UK airstrikes always follow the principles of international humanitarian law: necessity, proportionality, distinction between combatants and non-combatant civilians, and the prevention of unnecessary suffering. The complex and congested urban environment of Mosul presented particular challenges for those undertaking airstrikes as part of the Coalition support to forces on the ground against Daesh. Our rigorous targeting processes take into account the conditions on the ground, including the potential presence of a civilian population. We undertake a battle damage assessment after every airstrike. This assessment examines all the available records including video, and one of its roles is the identification of any collateral damage, including civilian casualties. If any such assessment indicated anything that should be scrutinised further, a full investigation would be undertaken, with appropriate resources allocated to it. Thus there is no requirement for a further evaluation of the deployment of UK airpower in the campaign against Daesh.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1642 more like this
HL1643 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-12T16:03:19.253Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-12T16:03:19.253Z
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
tabling member
4266
label Biography information for The Lord Bishop of Coventry more like this
764305
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-02more like thismore than 2017-10-02
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Iraq: Military Intervention more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to investigate unintended civilian casualties arising from UK participation in the US led coalition airstrikes to liberate Mosul; and if so, what resources they (1) have committed, and (2) intend to commit, to that investigation. more like this
tabling member printed
The Lord Bishop of Coventry more like this
uin HL1642 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-12more like thismore than 2017-10-12
answer text <p>UK airstrikes always follow the principles of international humanitarian law: necessity, proportionality, distinction between combatants and non-combatant civilians, and the prevention of unnecessary suffering. The complex and congested urban environment of Mosul presented particular challenges for those undertaking airstrikes as part of the Coalition support to forces on the ground against Daesh. Our rigorous targeting processes take into account the conditions on the ground, including the potential presence of a civilian population. We undertake a battle damage assessment after every airstrike. This assessment examines all the available records including video, and one of its roles is the identification of any collateral damage, including civilian casualties. If any such assessment indicated anything that should be scrutinised further, a full investigation would be undertaken, with appropriate resources allocated to it. Thus there is no requirement for a further evaluation of the deployment of UK airpower in the campaign against Daesh.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1641 more like this
HL1643 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-12T16:03:19.32Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-12T16:03:19.32Z
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
tabling member
4266
label Biography information for The Lord Bishop of Coventry more like this
764306
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2017-10-02more like thismore than 2017-10-02
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Iraq: Military Intervention more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they intend to take to evaluate the deployment of airpower in heavily populated areas following the liberation of Mosul. more like this
tabling member printed
The Lord Bishop of Coventry more like this
uin HL1643 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-12more like thismore than 2017-10-12
answer text <p>UK airstrikes always follow the principles of international humanitarian law: necessity, proportionality, distinction between combatants and non-combatant civilians, and the prevention of unnecessary suffering. The complex and congested urban environment of Mosul presented particular challenges for those undertaking airstrikes as part of the Coalition support to forces on the ground against Daesh. Our rigorous targeting processes take into account the conditions on the ground, including the potential presence of a civilian population. We undertake a battle damage assessment after every airstrike. This assessment examines all the available records including video, and one of its roles is the identification of any collateral damage, including civilian casualties. If any such assessment indicated anything that should be scrutinised further, a full investigation would be undertaken, with appropriate resources allocated to it. Thus there is no requirement for a further evaluation of the deployment of UK airpower in the campaign against Daesh.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1641 more like this
HL1642 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-12T16:03:19.367Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-12T16:03:19.367Z
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
tabling member
4266
label Biography information for The Lord Bishop of Coventry more like this