Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1655033
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2023-07-24more like thismore than 2023-07-24
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Migrants: Domestic Abuse more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to publish the evaluation of the Support for Migrant Victims pilot scheme. more like this
tabling member printed
The Lord Bishop of Gloucester more like this
uin HL9620 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-07-31more like thismore than 2023-07-31
answer text <p>In 2021 the Government awarded the charity Southall Black Sisters £1.4 million to run the Support for Migrant Victims (SMV) Scheme pilot. This was following the Government’s review (in 2020) of its response to migrant victims who have no recourse to public funds (NRPF). This funding has now been extended until March 2025.</p><p>The independent evaluation of the SMV Scheme considered the implementation and delivery of the pilot, the experiences and outcomes for those who accessed it, and how the pilot sat alongside existing support for migrant victims of domestic abuse. A total of 425 victims were supported during the pilot.</p><p>When we have carefully considered the findings, we will publish the evaluation in due course.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Murray of Blidworth more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-07-31T11:59:52.487Zmore like thismore than 2023-07-31T11:59:52.487Z
answering member
4950
label Biography information for Lord Murray of Blidworth more like this
tabling member
4540
label Biography information for The Lord Bishop of Gloucester more like this
1246781
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2020-10-27more like thismore than 2020-10-27
answering body
Department for International Trade more like this
answering dept id 202 more like this
answering dept short name International Trade more like this
answering dept sort name International Trade more like this
hansard heading Trade Agreements: Japan more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what geographic protection has been secured for (1) English products, (2) Northern Irish products, (3) Scottish products, and (4) Welsh products, in the Trade Agreement between the United Kingdom and Japan for a Comprehensive Economic Partnership. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth more like this
uin HL9620 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-09more like thismore than 2020-11-09
answer text <p>The new agreement includes all UK geographical indications in the previous agreement: Stilton Blue Cheese, Stilton White Cheese, West Country Farmhouse Cheddar, Scotch Whisky, Scottish Farmed Salmon, Irish Cream, and Irish Whiskey.</p><p> </p><p>New protected recognition for more iconic UK goods will be possible under the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), with the possibility to increase Geographical Indications (GIs) from seven under the terms of the previous agreement to around 70 as soon as next year. These could include English sparkling wine, Yorkshire Wensleydale and Welsh lamb, Arbroath Smokies, Jersey royal potatoes, Kentish ale, Cornish Clotted Cream, and Irish poteen.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Grimstone of Boscobel more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-09T13:32:19.17Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-09T13:32:19.17Z
answering member
4876
label Biography information for Lord Grimstone of Boscobel more like this
tabling member
4282
label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth more like this
943408
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2018-07-17more like thismore than 2018-07-17
answering body
Women and Equalities more like this
answering dept id 31 more like this
answering dept short name Women and Equalities more like this
answering dept sort name Women and Equalities more like this
hansard heading Employment: Discrimination more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether consideration has been given to amending the Equality Act 2010 so that employees who experience one off or recurring health conditions lasting less than 12 months are protected by that Act’s provisions. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Thomas of Winchester more like this
uin HL9620 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-07-26more like thismore than 2018-07-26
answer text <p>The Equality Act 2010 provides protection from discrimination for those that meet the definition of one or more of the protected characteristics covered by the Act and this includes conditions that might last less than 12 months but are likely to recur.</p><p> </p><p>We recognise that there are concerns that the protections offered by the Act may not be available to people with fluctuating mental health conditions, and this is one of the issues the Government is considering in its work on extending protection for those with mental health disorders.</p><p> </p><p>However, the Act is intended to provide protections from discrimination for employees who qualify as disabled, rather than general employment protection for those who experience episodes of ill health.</p><p> </p><p>A number of important statutory employment rights already apply to all workers as soon as they start work or once they have passed a qualifying period, including protection against unlawful deductions from wages and against unfair dismissal. This includes protection from unlawful sanctions by employers for legitimate sickness absences.</p><p> </p><p>Amending the Act in the way raised in the Question would therefore risk duplicating these existing protections, as well as significantly increasing the scope of the Act beyond its protection of disability.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-07-26T14:47:55.333Zmore like thismore than 2018-07-26T14:47:55.333Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
3785
label Biography information for Baroness Thomas of Winchester more like this