Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1122050
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-18more like thismore than 2019-04-18
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Government's ministerial equivalents and exemption directions in financial services for the (a) EU and (b) EEA, made on 11 April 2019 are a result of discussions with the EU on the EU's forthcoming equivalents and exemption directions. more like this
tabling member constituency Hayes and Harlington more like this
tabling member printed
John McDonnell more like this
uin 245571 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-25more like thismore than 2019-04-25
answer text <p>The Equivalence Directions made with respect to EU-adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (EU IFRS) deliver a commitment made by HM Treasury in November 2018. In the explanatory information for the Draft Official Listing of Securities, Prospectus and Transparency (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, published in November 2018, HM Treasury signalled its intention, in a no-deal scenario, to issue an equivalence decision with respect to EU IFRS in time for Exit day. This will ensure that issuers of securities in European Economic Area (EEA) states can continue to use EU IFRS to prepare financial statements for Transparency Directive requirements, and for the purposes of preparing a prospectus under the Prospectus Directive.</p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and the EU have decided to provide exemptions for central banks and certain public bodies under specific financial services regulations in the event that the UK withdraws from the EU without an agreement. This decision, in the Exemption Directions made with respect to EU bodies, was taken as a result of an exchange of letters between HM Treasury and the EU Commission specifically on this matter in January 2019.</p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and the EEA European Free Trade Association (EEA EFTA) countries of Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein have decided to provide exemptions for central banks and certain public bodies under specific financial services regulations in the event that the UK withdraws from the EU without an agreement. This decision, in the Exemption Directions made with respect to EEA bodies, was taken as a result of an exchange of letters between HM Treasury and the EEA EFTA countries specifically on this matter in April 2019.</p><p> </p><p>Both sets of exemptions are important for avoiding disruption to the financial services sector, and the businesses and individuals relying on it, in the event that the United Kingdom withdraws from the European Union without an agreement.</p>
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
grouped question UIN
245572 more like this
245573 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-25T13:05:36.74Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T13:05:36.74Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
178
label Biography information for John McDonnell more like this
1122055
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-18more like thismore than 2019-04-18
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions the Government has had with European Commission officials on the ministerial equivalents and exemption directions in financial services for the (a) EU and (b) EEA made on 11 April 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency Hayes and Harlington more like this
tabling member printed
John McDonnell more like this
uin 245572 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-25more like thismore than 2019-04-25
answer text <p>The Equivalence Directions made with respect to EU-adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (EU IFRS) deliver a commitment made by HM Treasury in November 2018. In the explanatory information for the Draft Official Listing of Securities, Prospectus and Transparency (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, published in November 2018, HM Treasury signalled its intention, in a no-deal scenario, to issue an equivalence decision with respect to EU IFRS in time for Exit day. This will ensure that issuers of securities in European Economic Area (EEA) states can continue to use EU IFRS to prepare financial statements for Transparency Directive requirements, and for the purposes of preparing a prospectus under the Prospectus Directive.</p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and the EU have decided to provide exemptions for central banks and certain public bodies under specific financial services regulations in the event that the UK withdraws from the EU without an agreement. This decision, in the Exemption Directions made with respect to EU bodies, was taken as a result of an exchange of letters between HM Treasury and the EU Commission specifically on this matter in January 2019.</p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and the EEA European Free Trade Association (EEA EFTA) countries of Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein have decided to provide exemptions for central banks and certain public bodies under specific financial services regulations in the event that the UK withdraws from the EU without an agreement. This decision, in the Exemption Directions made with respect to EEA bodies, was taken as a result of an exchange of letters between HM Treasury and the EEA EFTA countries specifically on this matter in April 2019.</p><p> </p><p>Both sets of exemptions are important for avoiding disruption to the financial services sector, and the businesses and individuals relying on it, in the event that the United Kingdom withdraws from the European Union without an agreement.</p>
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
grouped question UIN
245571 more like this
245573 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-25T13:05:36.803Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T13:05:36.803Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
178
label Biography information for John McDonnell more like this
1122057
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-18more like thismore than 2019-04-18
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Government received representations from the European Commission on the Government's ministerial equivalents and exemption directions in financial services for the EU and EEA, made on 11 April 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency Hayes and Harlington more like this
tabling member printed
John McDonnell more like this
uin 245573 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-25more like thismore than 2019-04-25
answer text <p>The Equivalence Directions made with respect to EU-adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (EU IFRS) deliver a commitment made by HM Treasury in November 2018. In the explanatory information for the Draft Official Listing of Securities, Prospectus and Transparency (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, published in November 2018, HM Treasury signalled its intention, in a no-deal scenario, to issue an equivalence decision with respect to EU IFRS in time for Exit day. This will ensure that issuers of securities in European Economic Area (EEA) states can continue to use EU IFRS to prepare financial statements for Transparency Directive requirements, and for the purposes of preparing a prospectus under the Prospectus Directive.</p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and the EU have decided to provide exemptions for central banks and certain public bodies under specific financial services regulations in the event that the UK withdraws from the EU without an agreement. This decision, in the Exemption Directions made with respect to EU bodies, was taken as a result of an exchange of letters between HM Treasury and the EU Commission specifically on this matter in January 2019.</p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and the EEA European Free Trade Association (EEA EFTA) countries of Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein have decided to provide exemptions for central banks and certain public bodies under specific financial services regulations in the event that the UK withdraws from the EU without an agreement. This decision, in the Exemption Directions made with respect to EEA bodies, was taken as a result of an exchange of letters between HM Treasury and the EEA EFTA countries specifically on this matter in April 2019.</p><p> </p><p>Both sets of exemptions are important for avoiding disruption to the financial services sector, and the businesses and individuals relying on it, in the event that the United Kingdom withdraws from the European Union without an agreement.</p>
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
grouped question UIN
245571 more like this
245572 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-25T13:05:36.85Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-25T13:05:36.85Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
178
label Biography information for John McDonnell more like this
1015201
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-26more like thismore than 2018-11-26
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to his oral contribution of 22 November 2018, Official Report column 1097, on the terms of the agreement that he has reached with the EU and EU equivalence on financial services not being withdrawn on a whim, what assurances he has received on the future notice period for withdrawal of such equivalence by the EU. more like this
tabling member constituency East Ham more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Timms more like this
uin 195459 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-29more like thismore than 2018-11-29
answer text <p>The political declaration states at Paragraph 39 on page 9, that both parties are committed to developing ‘…close and structured cooperation on regulatory and supervisory matters’. It goes on to note that this cooperation should ‘…include transparency and appropriate consultation in the process of adoption, suspension and withdrawal of equivalence decisions’. This means that the UK and EU have instructed negotiators to deliver a legal agreement by the end of 2020 which incorporates these principles in relation to equivalence in financial services, keeping in mind a joint commitment to preserve financial stability and market integrity.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-29T15:48:30.933Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-29T15:48:30.933Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
163
label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms more like this
1005780
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-12more like thismore than 2018-11-12
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 6 November 2018 to Question 187143 on EU Internal Trade, how his Department plans to transpose provisions from EU law into UK law involving thresholds measuring the proportion of the entire market or a specified number of grouping of member states, in the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulations Article (a) 5(1)(a) and 1(b), subparagraphs (3) to (6) and subparagraph (9), (b) Article 9(5), (c) Article 14(5) and (d) Article 36(5) in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 190537 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-15more like thismore than 2018-11-15
answer text <p>Article 5(1)(a) and 1(b), subparagraphs (3) to (6) and subparagraph (9) in the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulations will become deficient after the UK’s exit from the EU. In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, it will be amended in accordance with Regulation 27(2) of the draft Markets in Financial Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.</p><p> </p><p>Article 9(5) will become deficient after the UK’s exit from the EU. In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal it will be amended in accordance with Regulation 27(4) of the draft Markets in Financial Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.</p><p> </p><p>Article 36 specifies a threshold which is expressed as an absolute number, so this will not be deficient after exit and is therefore not being amended.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-15T15:48:31.31Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-15T15:48:31.31Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this
1005783
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-12more like thismore than 2018-11-12
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 6 November 2018 to Question 187143 on EU Internal Trade, how his Department plans to transpose provisions from EU law into UK law involving thresholds measuring the proportion of the entire market or a specified number of grouping of member states, in Articles 12 to 16 of the Commission Delegated Regulation amending MiFID 565/2017 in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 190540 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-15more like thismore than 2018-11-15
answer text <p>Articles 12 to 16 of the Commission Delegated Regulation amending MiFID 565/2017 will become deficient after the UK’s exit from the EU. In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, it will be amended in accordance with Regulation 40 of the draft Markets in Financial Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-15T15:52:12.237Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-15T15:52:12.237Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this
1005784
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-12more like thismore than 2018-11-12
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of his Department's written answer to parliamentary question 187143, how his Department plans to transpose provisions from EU law into UK law involving thresholds measuring the proportion of the entire market or a specified number of grouping of member states, in Article 5(1)(a) and (b)) of the Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/567 in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 190541 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-15more like thismore than 2018-11-15
answer text <p>Article 5(1)(a) and (b)) of the Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/567 will become deficient after the UK’s exit from the EU. In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, it will be amended in accordance with Regulation 59(2) of the draft Markets in Financial Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-15T15:54:33.617Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-15T15:54:33.617Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this
999500
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-01more like thismore than 2018-11-01
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many provisions in financial and related regulations which require transposition into UK law in the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal include thresholds measuring the proportion of (a) the entire EU market or (b) a specified number or grouping of member states. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 187143 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-06more like thismore than 2018-11-06
answer text <p>The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EUWA) repeals the European Communities Act 1972 on the day the UK leaves the EU and incorporates into UK domestic law the existing body of directly applicable EU law. The purpose of the EUWA is to provide a functioning statute book on the day we leave the EU.</p><p>In some instances, the retained EU law relating to financial services includes provisions that relate to thresholds measuring the proportion of the entire EU market or a specified number or grouping of member states. We are aware of four provisions in the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulations (MiFIR) (Article 5(1)(a) and 1(b), and subparagraphs (3)-(6) and subparagraph (9), Article 9(5), Article 14(5), Article 36(5)), five provisions in the Commission Delegated Regulation amending MiFID 565/2017 (Article 12 to 16) and one provision in the Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/567 (Article 5(1)(a) and (b)).</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-06T17:13:40.253Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-06T17:13:40.253Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this
794485
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-23more like thismore than 2017-11-23
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the extent to which the UK will be able to influence detailed regulation being developed from the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency East Ham more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Timms more like this
uin 115458 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-11-28more like thismore than 2017-11-28
answer text <p>The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II implements commitments made by the G20 in 2009 in light of the financial crisis. The UK achieved its key objectives in negotiations for MiFID II, which introduces changes that are necessary to support the effective functioning of financial markets.</p><p> </p><p>The detailed regulations under MiFID II, which take the form of delegated acts and regulatory technical standards, are largely complete ahead of their application on 3 January 2018. The UK authorities have been fully engaged in their development. The Chancellor has no plans to make a specific statement at this time.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency North East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Stephen Barclay more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-28T17:23:49.56Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-28T17:23:49.56Z
answering member
4095
label Biography information for Steve Barclay more like this
tabling member
163
label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms more like this
459328
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-10more like thismore than 2016-03-10
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Financial Services: EU Law remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the cost to UK firms of implementing Capital Requirement Directive IV. more like this
tabling member constituency St Albans more like this
tabling member printed
Mrs Anne Main more like this
uin 30666 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-03-18more like thismore than 2016-03-18
answer text <p>The Capital Requirements Directive IV (CRD IV) implements, in the EU, the prudential banking standards agreed by the international Basel Committee. The Government supports these global standards to ensure that we do not again face severe economic impacts as a result of inadequate banking regulation and would have implemented these with or without EU legislation.</p><p> </p><p>It is difficult to isolate the costs and benefits from other prudential banking measures introduced since the global financial crisis. And the benefits in particular are hard to capture as they take time to materialize. However, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) stated in its cost-benefit analysis carried out 2013 that ‘the CRDIV package is net beneficial to the UK economy.’</p><p> </p><p>Taking all of the prudential measures together, the PRA has estimated that the net economic benefit is £8.25bn per annum.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency West Worcestershire more like this
answering member printed Harriett Baldwin more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-18T12:01:18.693Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-18T12:01:18.693Z
answering member
4107
label Biography information for Dame Harriett Baldwin more like this
tabling member
1568
label Biography information for Mrs Anne Main more like this