Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label attachment file name title
tabling member	label

Search

512771

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Department for Transport
answering dept id	27
answering dept short name	Transport
answering dept sort name	Transport
hansard heading	A303
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government how planning is progressing for the dualling of the A303 from Stonehenge westward; when they expect construction to commence; how long construction will take; and what is the estimated cost of those works.
tabling member printed	Lord Brougham and Vaux
uin	HL7660
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/04/2016 answer text <p>Highways England is in the options phase of developing a solution for this section of the A303. It is intended that a public consultation on options will be held early in 2017 with a preferred route announced in the summer of 2017. Subject to the completion of the statutory process, work is expected to start in the first Road Investment Period, before April 2020. The exact timing of the construction phase is yet to be finalised along with the estimated cost of the works.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon question first answered 21/04/2016 11:30:10 answering member 4210 label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon
tabling member	3329 label Biography information for Lord Brougham and Vaux

512772

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
answering dept id	16
answering dept short name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
answering dept sort name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
hansard heading	Treaties
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many treaties to which the UK is a party would have to be renegotiated if the UK were to leave the EU.
tabling member printed	Lord Butler of Brockwell
uin	HL7661
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/04/2016 answer text <p>The process of withdrawing from the EU is untested and would contain numerous elements depending on the outcome of the negotiations with the rest of the EU that would follow a notification that the UK had decided to withdraw from the EU. There is little clarity on how this would work, including the number of treaties to which the UK is a party which would need to be renegotiated as a result. There are, for example, free trade agreements covering 53 markets to which the EU is party, which would need to be considered.</p> answering member printed Baroness Anelay of St Johns question first answered 27/04/2016 15:02:11 answering member 3474 label Biography information for Baroness Anelay of St Johns
tabling member	3337 label Biography information for Lord Butler of Brockwell

512773

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
answering dept id	16
answering dept short name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
answering dept sort name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
hansard heading	EU Enlargement
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anelay of St Johns on 7 March (HL6442), whether they support the application to join the EU of (1) Turkey, (2) Macedonia, (3) Montenegro, (4) Albania, and (5) Serbia.
tabling member printed	Lord Grocott
uin	HL7662
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/04/2016 answer text <p>We support all five countries' aspiration to join the EU as an important means to drive reform. Turkey’s accession process remains the most effective mechanism to support continuing reform in Turkey. In the Western Balkans, the prospect of EU membership is helping to build stability and promote cooperation on issues that matter to the UK, including organised crime and illegal migration. The strict conditionality of the enlargement process means that it takes many years for a country to complete accession negotiations, undertake reforms and achieve the progress needed to meet EU membership criteria. Any decision to enlarge the EU requires the unanimous agreement of the governments of all existing Member States and ratification in accordance with each country’s constitutional arrangements. In the case of the UK, under the European Union Act 2011 ratification cannot take place without an Act of Parliament to approve the new accession. We can therefore ensure that our requirements are respected in any future EU enlargement. The UK will insist that controls on free movement cannot be lifted until accession countries’ economies have converged much more closely with existing Member States.</p> answering member printed Baroness Anelay of St Johns question first answered 27/04/2016 15:03:09 answering member 3474 label Biography information for Baroness Anelay of St Johns
tabling member	276 label Biography information for Lord Grocott

512774

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Health Services: Warwickshire
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government why the South Warwickshire Clinical Commissioning Group is going ahead with its proposals to tender out its £227 million Out of Hospital Programme in the light of (1) the review of such contracts that is being conducted following the review by David Stout into the causes of the termination of the Uniting Care Partnership Contract, and (2) the criticism by the local acute Foundation Trust of that process.
tabling member printed	Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
uin	HL7663
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 26/04/2016 answer text <p>NHS England advises that it is reviewing how this type of contract is assured. We understand that South Warwickshire Clinical Commissioning Group’s procurement has been placed on hold until the appropriate assurance is in place.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton question first answered 26/04/2016 16:21:47 answering member 127 label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton
tabling member	2024 label Biography information for Lord Hunt of Kings Heath

512775

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Junior Doctors: Conditions of Employment
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government what changes they propose to make in the new contract for doctors in training in the light of the equality analysis undertaken under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010.
tabling member printed	Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
uin	HL7664
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/04/2016 answer text <p>The contract published on 31 March is a huge step forward for achieving fairness for all trainee doctors. For the first time junior doctors will be paid and rewarded solely on the basis of their own hard work and achievement and pay progression will be linked to level of training rather than arbitrarily to time served.</p><p> </p><p>All junior doctors should have the same terms and conditions – a level playing field – which is ultimately what employers and the British Medical Association (BMA) want and everyone deserves.</p><p> </p><p>When the Secretary of State published <em>the Equality Analysis on the new contract for doctors and dentists in training in the NHS (“Doctors”)</em> on the 31 March 2016 on the GOV.UK website he made it clear that, as a result of considering the Equality Analysis, in accordance with his duties and obligations, he had asked for a number of changes to the draft contract to address specific issues for certain groups with protected characteristics. This has been done and the contract has been duly amended. These changes included changes that benefited staff who work part time. The new contract is not discriminatory it ensures that all junior doctors receive equal pay for work of equal value. The BMA’s own lawyers have advised that nothing in the new contract is discriminatory. Nevertheless the equality duty is an ongoing duty and it is intended that monitoring will continue after the introduction of the new contract in accordance with the public sector equality duty in the Equality Act 2010.</p><p> </p><p>A copy of the Equality Analysis is attached.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton grouped question UIN HL7665 HL7666 HL7667 HL7668 question first answered 28/04/2016 13:54:06 answering member 127 label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton attachment 1 file name HL PQ 7664 Junior Doctors EIA - Final.pdf title Junior Doctors EIA
tabling member	2024 label Biography information for Lord Hunt of Kings Heath

512776

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Junior Doctors: Conditions of Employment
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government what mitigating actions they propose to take with regards to the new contract for doctors in training in the light of the equality analysis undertaken under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 showing that certain features of that contract will have an adverse impact on those who work part-time, who are predominantly women.
tabling member printed	Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
uin	HL7665
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/04/2016 answer text <p>The contract published on 31 March is a huge step forward for achieving fairness for all trainee doctors. For the first time junior doctors will be paid and rewarded solely on the basis of their own hard work and achievement and pay progression will be linked to level of training rather than arbitrarily to time served.</p><p> </p><p>All junior doctors should have the same terms and conditions – a level playing field – which is ultimately what employers and the British Medical Association (BMA) want and everyone deserves.</p><p> </p><p>When the Secretary of State published <em>the Equality Analysis on the new contract for doctors and dentists in training in the NHS (“Doctors”)</em> on the 31 March 2016 on the GOV.UK website he made it clear that, as a result of considering the Equality Analysis, in accordance with his duties and obligations, he had asked for a number of changes to the draft contract to address specific issues for certain groups with protected characteristics. This has been done and the contract has been duly amended. These changes included changes that benefited staff who work part time. The new contract is not discriminatory it ensures that all junior doctors receive equal pay for work of equal value. The BMA’s own lawyers have advised that nothing in the new contract is discriminatory. Nevertheless the equality duty is an ongoing duty and it is intended that monitoring will continue after the introduction of the new contract in accordance with the public sector equality duty in the Equality Act 2010.</p><p> </p><p>A copy of the Equality Analysis is attached.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton grouped question UIN HL7664 HL7666 HL7667 HL7668 question first answered 28/04/2016 13:54:06 answering member 127 label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton attachment 1 file name HL PQ 7664 Junior Doctors EIA - Final.pdf title Junior Doctors EIA
tabling member	2024 label Biography information for Lord Hunt of Kings Heath

512777

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Junior Doctors: Conditions of Employment
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government what mitigating actions they propose to take in the light of the equality analysis undertaken under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 showing that certain features of the new contract for doctors in training will have an adverse impact on women who take maternity leave.
tabling member printed	Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
uin	HL7666
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/04/2016 answer text <p>The contract published on 31 March is a huge step forward for achieving fairness for all trainee doctors. For the first time junior doctors will be paid and rewarded solely on the basis of their own hard work and achievement and pay progression will be linked to level of training rather than arbitrarily to time served.</p><p> </p><p>All junior doctors should have the same terms and conditions – a level playing field – which is ultimately what employers and the British Medical Association (BMA) want and everyone deserves.</p><p> </p><p>When the Secretary of State published <em>the Equality Analysis on the new contract for doctors and dentists in training in the NHS (“Doctors”)</em> on the 31 March 2016 on the GOV.UK website he made it clear that, as a result of considering the Equality Analysis, in accordance with his duties and obligations, he had asked for a number of changes to the draft contract to address specific issues for certain groups with protected characteristics. This has been done and the contract has been duly amended. These changes included changes that benefited staff who work part time. The new contract is not discriminatory it ensures that all junior doctors receive equal pay for work of equal value. The BMA’s own lawyers have advised that nothing in the new contract is discriminatory. Nevertheless the equality duty is an ongoing duty and it is intended that monitoring will continue after the introduction of the new contract in accordance with the public sector equality duty in the Equality Act 2010.</p><p> </p><p>A copy of the Equality Analysis is attached.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton grouped question UIN HL7664 HL7665 HL7667 HL7668 question first answered 28/04/2016 13:54:06 answering member 127 label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton attachment 1 file name HL PQ 7664 Junior Doctors EIA - Final.pdf title Junior Doctors EIA
tabling member	2024 label Biography information for Lord Hunt of Kings Heath

512778

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Junior Doctors: Conditions of Employment
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government what mitigating actions they propose to take in the light of the equality analysis undertaken under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 showing that certain features of the new contract for doctors in training will have an adverse impact on carers, who are disproportionately women.
tabling member printed	Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
uin	HL7667
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/04/2016 answer text <p>The contract published on 31 March is a huge step forward for achieving fairness for all trainee doctors. For the first time junior doctors will be paid and rewarded solely on the basis of their own hard work and achievement and pay progression will be linked to level of training rather than arbitrarily to time served.</p><p> </p><p>All junior doctors should have the same terms and conditions – a level playing field – which is ultimately what employers and the British Medical Association (BMA) want and everyone deserves.</p><p> </p><p>When the Secretary of State published <em>the Equality Analysis on the new contract for doctors and dentists in training in the NHS (“Doctors”)</em> on the 31 March 2016 on the GOV.UK website he made it clear that, as a result of considering the Equality Analysis, in accordance with his duties and obligations, he had asked for a number of changes to the draft contract to address specific issues for certain groups with protected characteristics. This has been done and the contract has been duly amended. These changes included changes that benefited staff who work part time. The new contract is not discriminatory it ensures that all junior doctors receive equal pay for work of equal value. The BMA’s own lawyers have advised that nothing in the new contract is discriminatory. Nevertheless the equality duty is an ongoing duty and it is intended that monitoring will continue after the introduction of the new contract in accordance with the public sector equality duty in the Equality Act 2010.</p><p> </p><p>A copy of the Equality Analysis is attached.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton grouped question UIN HL7664 HL7665 HL7666 HL7668 question first answered 28/04/2016 13:54:06 answering member 127 label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton attachment 1 file name HL PQ 7664 Junior Doctors EIA - Final.pdf title Junior Doctors EIA
tabling member	2024 label Biography information for Lord Hunt of Kings Heath

512779

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Junior Doctors: Conditions of Employment
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they accept the recommendation of the report of the equality analysis undertaken under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 that a number of steps be taken to amend the draft new contract for doctors in training to address the position of part-time doctors in order to advance equality of opportunity between men and women doctors.
tabling member printed	Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
uin	HL7668
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/04/2016 answer text <p>The contract published on 31 March is a huge step forward for achieving fairness for all trainee doctors. For the first time junior doctors will be paid and rewarded solely on the basis of their own hard work and achievement and pay progression will be linked to level of training rather than arbitrarily to time served.</p><p> </p><p>All junior doctors should have the same terms and conditions – a level playing field – which is ultimately what employers and the British Medical Association (BMA) want and everyone deserves.</p><p> </p><p>When the Secretary of State published <em>the Equality Analysis on the new contract for doctors and dentists in training in the NHS (“Doctors”)</em> on the 31 March 2016 on the GOV.UK website he made it clear that, as a result of considering the Equality Analysis, in accordance with his duties and obligations, he had asked for a number of changes to the draft contract to address specific issues for certain groups with protected characteristics. This has been done and the contract has been duly amended. These changes included changes that benefited staff who work part time. The new contract is not discriminatory it ensures that all junior doctors receive equal pay for work of equal value. The BMA’s own lawyers have advised that nothing in the new contract is discriminatory. Nevertheless the equality duty is an ongoing duty and it is intended that monitoring will continue after the introduction of the new contract in accordance with the public sector equality duty in the Equality Act 2010.</p><p> </p><p>A copy of the Equality Analysis is attached.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton grouped question UIN HL7664 HL7665 HL7666 HL7667 question first answered 28/04/2016 13:54:06 answering member 127 label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton attachment 1 file name HL PQ 7664 Junior Doctors EIA - Final.pdf title Junior Doctors EIA
tabling member	2024 label Biography information for Lord Hunt of Kings Heath

512780

registered interest
date	14/04/2016
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Hepatitis
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty’s Government when NHS England expects to publish its operational framework for hepatitis C.
tabling member printed	Lord Mancroft
uin	HL7669
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/04/2016 answer text <p>NHS England has already published its planning approach to implement National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended treatment during 2016/17. NHS England has committed to produce an operational framework for hepatitis C during 2016/17. This will set out NHS England’s commitment to improving outcomes in hepatitis C across England. The publication date for the document has not been set but we anticipate work to continue during the late spring and early summer.</p><p> </p><p>NICE Technology Appraisals (TA) 363, 364 and 365 require Operational Delivery Networks to prioritise treatment for patients with the highest unmet clinical need. The National Health Service commitment to 10,000 treatments in 2016/17 reflects the multi-year modelling used by NICE and published in conjunction with the recommendations for TA 364. The NICE recommendations note that treatment decisions are influenced by clinical characteristics such as level of liver damage, genotype, treatment history and comorbidities. The recommendations also record the advice of clinical experts to the committee that a realistic estimate of patients accessing treatment each year is between 7-10,000.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton grouped question UIN HL7670 question first answered 27/04/2016 12:41:42 answering member 127 label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton
tabling member	1833 label Biography information for Lord Mancroft