Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

748259
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Biometrics more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether any community rehabilitation companies in England or Wales use bio-metric machines as a method of reporting for offenders. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 2745 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-12more like thismore than 2017-07-12
answer text <p>Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire and Rutland; and Staffordshire and West Midlands Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC) have piloted Biometric Reporting Kiosks. The pilot has involved stakeholder engagement with the National Probation Service and HM Courts Service in the area, and will be evaluated before it is implemented more widely.</p><p> </p><p>At the appropriate time, we will work closely with CRCs on their proposed plans to roll out Biometric Reporting Kiosks more widely. We continue to closely monitor and robustly manage providers to make sure they fulfil their contractual commitments to reduce reoffending, protect the public and provide value for money to the taxpayer.</p> more like this
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-12T16:41:04.883Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-12T16:41:04.883Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
748262
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Reoffenders: Homicide more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people have been murdered since February 2015 by offenders who at the time of the offence, were being supervised by community rehabilitation companies. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 2744 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-12more like thismore than 2017-07-12
answer text <p>A mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review is triggered where an offender under statutory probation supervision is charged with murder, manslaughter, rape or certain other serious violent or sexual offences. Not in all cases will the charge result in a conviction for an SFO.</p><p> </p><p>The table below provides the number of SFO reviews carried out by the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) and the National Probation Service (NPS) between 1 April 2016 and 31 March 2017.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Probation Provider</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015-2016</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016-2017</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire CRC</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bristol, Gloucestershire, Somerset and Wiltshire CRC</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cheshire and Greater Manchester CRC</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cumbria and Lancashire CRC</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire and Rutland CRC</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dorset, Devon and Cornwall CRC</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Durham Tees Valley CRC</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Essex CRC</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hampshire and Isle of Wight CRC</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Humberside, Lincolnshire, and North Yorkshire CRC</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kent, Surrey and Sussex CRC</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London CRC</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>29</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Merseyside CRC</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norfolk and Suffolk CRC</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northumbria CRC</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Yorkshire CRC</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Staffordshire and West Midlands CRC</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Thames Valley CRC</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wales CRC</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warwickshire and West Mercia CRC</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Yorkshire CRC</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>222</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>233</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>285</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>284</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>507</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>517</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>We are not able to answer from central records the question in the precise form asked. However, between 1 February 2015 and 31 Dec 2016, 46 offenders were convicted of murder, who at the time of the offence were subject to supervision by a Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC). This figure is subject to change as a number of other cases are still going through the legal process.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>The table below provides the number of SFOs carried out by the former Probation Trusts in England and Wales between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2014.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Probation Trust</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012-2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Avon and Somerset</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bedfordshire</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridgeshire</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cheshire</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cumbria</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Derbyshire</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Devon and Cornwall</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dorset</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Durham</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dyfed-Powys</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Essex</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gloucestershire</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greater Manchester</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>33</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gwent</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hampshire</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hertfordshire</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Humberside</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kent</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lancashire</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leicestershire and Rutland</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lincolnshire</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>89</p></td><td><p>89</p></td><td><p>75</p></td><td><p>88</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Merseyside</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norfolk</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Wales</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Yorkshire</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northamptonshire</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northumbria</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nottinghamshire</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Wales</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Yorkshire</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Suffolk</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Surrey</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sussex</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Thames Valley</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warwickshire</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Mercia</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Midlands</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Yorkshire</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wiltshire</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Totals</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>441</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>441</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>409</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>429</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p>
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
grouped question UIN
2737 more like this
2786 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-12T15:39:56.073Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-12T15:39:56.073Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
748268
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Community Rehabilitation Companies more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when the review on the functioning of community rehabilitation companies was completed; and what the main recommendations of that review were. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 2740 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-12more like thismore than 2017-07-12
answer text <p>We have carried out a comprehensive review of the probation system to make sure that it is reducing reoffending, protecting the public and preventing future victims. The review concluded in April and we are taking forward work to improve probation services as a result. We will provide an update shortly.</p> more like this
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-12T15:47:27.46Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-12T15:47:27.46Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
748266
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Community Rehabilitation Companies: Finance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether any community rehabilitation company in England and Wales received additional funding above the agreed contract in 2016-17. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 2738 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-12more like thismore than 2017-07-12
answer text <p>We have undertaken an overarching review of probation, looking at the standards we set for providers and how we hold them to account. We have already made some changes to how CRCs are paid so they can focus on activities that best rehabilitate offenders and keep society safe. The details of these changes are commercially sensitive, however relevant OJEU notices can be found at <a href="http://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:45770-2015:TEXT:EN:HTML&amp;tabId=4" target="_blank">http://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:45770-2015:TEXT:EN:HTML&amp;tabId=4</a></p> more like this
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-12T15:43:51.963Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-12T15:43:51.963Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
748267
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Reoffenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many serious further offence reviews were carried out in each community rehabilitation company area and for the National Probation Service in (a) 2015-16 and (b) 2016-17. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 2737 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-12more like thismore than 2017-07-12
answer text <p>A mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review is triggered where an offender under statutory probation supervision is charged with murder, manslaughter, rape or certain other serious violent or sexual offences. Not in all cases will the charge result in a conviction for an SFO.</p><p> </p><p>The table below provides the number of SFO reviews carried out by the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) and the National Probation Service (NPS) between 1 April 2016 and 31 March 2017.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Probation Provider</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015-2016</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016-2017</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire CRC</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bristol, Gloucestershire, Somerset and Wiltshire CRC</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cheshire and Greater Manchester CRC</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cumbria and Lancashire CRC</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire and Rutland CRC</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dorset, Devon and Cornwall CRC</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Durham Tees Valley CRC</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Essex CRC</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hampshire and Isle of Wight CRC</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Humberside, Lincolnshire, and North Yorkshire CRC</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kent, Surrey and Sussex CRC</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London CRC</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>29</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Merseyside CRC</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norfolk and Suffolk CRC</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northumbria CRC</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Yorkshire CRC</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Staffordshire and West Midlands CRC</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Thames Valley CRC</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wales CRC</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warwickshire and West Mercia CRC</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Yorkshire CRC</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>222</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>233</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>285</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>284</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>507</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>517</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>We are not able to answer from central records the question in the precise form asked. However, between 1 February 2015 and 31 Dec 2016, 46 offenders were convicted of murder, who at the time of the offence were subject to supervision by a Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC). This figure is subject to change as a number of other cases are still going through the legal process.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>The table below provides the number of SFOs carried out by the former Probation Trusts in England and Wales between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2014.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Probation Trust</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012-2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Avon and Somerset</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bedfordshire</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridgeshire</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cheshire</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cumbria</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Derbyshire</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Devon and Cornwall</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dorset</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Durham</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dyfed-Powys</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Essex</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gloucestershire</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greater Manchester</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>33</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gwent</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hampshire</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hertfordshire</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Humberside</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kent</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lancashire</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leicestershire and Rutland</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lincolnshire</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>89</p></td><td><p>89</p></td><td><p>75</p></td><td><p>88</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Merseyside</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norfolk</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Wales</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Yorkshire</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northamptonshire</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northumbria</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nottinghamshire</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Wales</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Yorkshire</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Suffolk</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Surrey</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sussex</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Thames Valley</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warwickshire</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Mercia</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Midlands</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Yorkshire</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wiltshire</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Totals</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>441</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>441</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>409</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>429</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p>
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
grouped question UIN
2744 more like this
2786 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-12T15:39:55.917Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-12T15:39:55.917Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
748269
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Debt Collection more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the report Taking control: the need for fundamental bailiff reform, published by a consortium of debt advice agencies in March 2017; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 2716 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-12more like thismore than 2017-07-12
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice is considering the report Taking Control: the need for fundamental bailiff reform.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Esher and Walton more like this
answering member printed Dominic Raab more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-12T15:52:42.27Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-12T15:52:42.27Z
answering member
4007
label Biography information for Dominic Raab more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
748234
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Terrorism: Victim Support Schemes more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what long-term assistance is available for victims of terrorism in the UK. more like this
tabling member constituency Strangford more like this
tabling member printed
Jim Shannon more like this
uin 2669 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-12more like thismore than 2017-07-12
answer text <p>The Government is committed to making sure that victims of terrorism and bereaved families receive the best possible support both in the immediate aftermath, and in the long term. The appalling attacks in Manchester and London, just as previous attacks such as in Sousse, Tunisia, demonstrate how vital it is that support is available to victims and their families.</p><p> </p><p>In 2017, we established a cross-HMG Victims of Terrorism unit to co-ordinate support to UK citizens directly affected by terrorist events at home or overseas. It is working across Government, the voluntary sector and with local authorities to ensure that support to victims of terrorism is comprehensive, coordinated and clearly communicated.</p><p> </p><p>We have developed gov.uk webpages</p><p>(see <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/terror-attacks-support-for-people-affected" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/terror-attacks-support-for-people-affected</a>) to provide comprehensive advice to victims and to signpost them to support services in the UK. We have also been working closely with local authorities to highlight the support available, and will make sure that payments from the We Love Manchester Emergency Fund and the UK Solidarity Fund do not affect benefits payments.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-12T15:03:05.527Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-12T15:03:05.527Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4131
label Biography information for Jim Shannon more like this
748001
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the risks to (1) the public, and (2) the environment, from the fire at the Atomic Weapons Establishment in August 2010. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer more like this
uin HL455 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-13more like thismore than 2017-07-13
answer text <p>The answer given on 21 March 2017 (HL6105) was in response to a question concerning safety improvements in the defence nuclear weapons programme. The response was in relation to radiological incidents at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), none of which have ever posed any risk to the health of the public or the environment. The incidents raised by the noble Baroness did occur; a small number of residents were evacuated in 2010 as a precautionary measure due to a fire in a non-nuclear area. I can confirm that in none of the incidents cited was it assessed that there was any radiological risk to the public.</p><p>The risk of any of these incidents recurring has been greatly reduced due to subsequent improvements to the infrastructure at AWE.</p><p>Activity at AWE sites is governed by a number of permits, authorisations, licences and consents for managing waste and discharges to the environment. AWE plc and the Ministry of Defence continuously monitor their compliance and inspections are routinely undertaken by the relevant regulatory authorities, including the Environment Agency.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
grouped question UIN
HL396 more like this
HL453 more like this
HL454 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-13T14:42:35.103Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-13T14:42:35.103Z
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
tabling member
1934
label Biography information for Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer more like this
748000
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the risks to (1) the public, and (2) the environment, from the illegal discharge of tritium into the Aldermarston Stream from the Atomic Weapons Establishment. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer more like this
uin HL454 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-13more like thismore than 2017-07-13
answer text <p>The answer given on 21 March 2017 (HL6105) was in response to a question concerning safety improvements in the defence nuclear weapons programme. The response was in relation to radiological incidents at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), none of which have ever posed any risk to the health of the public or the environment. The incidents raised by the noble Baroness did occur; a small number of residents were evacuated in 2010 as a precautionary measure due to a fire in a non-nuclear area. I can confirm that in none of the incidents cited was it assessed that there was any radiological risk to the public.</p><p>The risk of any of these incidents recurring has been greatly reduced due to subsequent improvements to the infrastructure at AWE.</p><p>Activity at AWE sites is governed by a number of permits, authorisations, licences and consents for managing waste and discharges to the environment. AWE plc and the Ministry of Defence continuously monitor their compliance and inspections are routinely undertaken by the relevant regulatory authorities, including the Environment Agency.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
grouped question UIN
HL396 more like this
HL453 more like this
HL455 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-13T14:42:35.013Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-13T14:42:35.013Z
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
tabling member
1934
label Biography information for Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer more like this
747999
registered interest false remove filter
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the risks to (1) the public, and (2) the environment, from the radioactive contamination of marshland adjacent to the Atomic Weapons Establishment following flooding in July 1989; and how that assessment has affected current policy. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer more like this
uin HL453 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-13more like thismore than 2017-07-13
answer text <p>The answer given on 21 March 2017 (HL6105) was in response to a question concerning safety improvements in the defence nuclear weapons programme. The response was in relation to radiological incidents at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), none of which have ever posed any risk to the health of the public or the environment. The incidents raised by the noble Baroness did occur; a small number of residents were evacuated in 2010 as a precautionary measure due to a fire in a non-nuclear area. I can confirm that in none of the incidents cited was it assessed that there was any radiological risk to the public.</p><p>The risk of any of these incidents recurring has been greatly reduced due to subsequent improvements to the infrastructure at AWE.</p><p>Activity at AWE sites is governed by a number of permits, authorisations, licences and consents for managing waste and discharges to the environment. AWE plc and the Ministry of Defence continuously monitor their compliance and inspections are routinely undertaken by the relevant regulatory authorities, including the Environment Agency.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
grouped question UIN
HL396 more like this
HL454 more like this
HL455 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-13T14:42:34.92Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-13T14:42:34.92Z
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
tabling member
1934
label Biography information for Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer more like this