| answer text |
<p>The Government believes that international law on the use of military force is
absolutely clear. There must be a lawful basis for such force to be used and activities
must be conducted in accordance with the law of war or international humanitarian
law. This is as true when considering the possible use of remotely piloted aircraft
systems as it is with any other military asset or weapon. Remotely Piloted Aircraft
Systems are a relatively new military asset, and their use, whether armed or unarmed,
will continue to evolve. However, the existing international legal framework is clear
and robust; and, as with any other weapons system, it is fully capable of governing
their use. We do not need to rewrite the laws of war in order to be confident that,
when used in such lawful circumstances, remotely piloted aircraft systems operate
in the same legal environment as other military means. We have set this position out
previously including at the UN Human Rights Council in response to the report of the
Special Rapporteur.</p>
|
|
