Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1459271
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-04-21more like thismore than 2022-04-21
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Members: Correspondence more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, when she will respond to the correspondence dated 9 March 2022 from the hon. Member for Glenrothes on delays with state pensions in summer 2021, reference PG5490. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 157411 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-04-28more like thismore than 2022-04-28
answer text <p>It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hexham more like this
answering member printed Guy Opperman more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-28T11:15:16.703Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-28T11:15:16.703Z
answering member
4142
label Biography information for Guy Opperman more like this
previous answer version
66191
answering member constituency Hexham more like this
answering member printed Guy Opperman more like this
answering member
4142
label Biography information for Guy Opperman more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1453888
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-24more like thismore than 2022-03-24
answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text What steps she has taken to implement the recommendations of the Draft Online Safety Bill Joint Committee. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 906278 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-03-24more like thismore than 2022-03-24
answer text <p>The Government introduced the Online Safety Bill on 17 March, alongside our response to the Joint Committee’s report, which has significantly influenced the final Bill.</p><p>We have taken forward over 60 recommendations, including to:</p><ul><li><p>put priority offences onto the face of the Bill</p></li><li><p>bring scam advertising into scope</p></li><li><p>include Law Commission recommendations on communications offences and cyberflashing</p></li><li><p>introduce a standalone provision to protect children from pornography on dedicated sites as well as social media.</p></li></ul><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-03-24T13:35:33.547Zmore like thismore than 2022-03-24T13:35:33.547Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1451781
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-16more like thismore than 2022-03-16
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Homes for Ukraine Scheme more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether payments to hosts in the Homes for Ukraine scheme will be treated as income for the purposes of those in receipt of universal credit and other income-related benefits. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 141227 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-03-21more like thismore than 2022-03-21
answer text <p>The Government is grateful to individuals who wish to play their part in supporting Homes for Ukraine. DWP is working at pace with DLUHC and the Home Office to ensure benefit claimants who feel they can support the scheme are able to do so, and will be no worse off.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Macclesfield more like this
answering member printed David Rutley more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-03-21T17:53:32.977Zmore like thismore than 2022-03-21T17:53:32.977Z
answering member
4033
label Biography information for David Rutley more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1437015
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-01more like thismore than 2022-03-01
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Radiation Exposure: Compensation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to his oral contribution of 21 February 2022, Official Report, column 19, what progress officials in his Department have made on revisiting the internal review on the recognition of or compensation for nuclear test veterans and their families; and if he will make a statement on the findings of that review once it has concluded. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 132301 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-03-07more like thismore than 2022-03-07
answer text <p>In relation to recognition, it is not within the Ministry of Defence's gift to award medallic recognition to the nuclear test veterans (NTVs). The Independent Advisory Military Sub-Committee (AMSC) was re-established in 2019 to offer advice to the Committee on the Grant of Honours Decorations and Medals (the HD Committee) in the Cabinet Office on historic military medals claims, including cases which may not have been previously considered or where new evidence has emerged. The HD Committee is the principal body with responsibility for making recommendations on honours, awards, and medals to Her Majesty The Queen.</p><p>The recommendation of the re-established AMSC was made in December 2020 in respect of the case of retrospective medallic recognition for all those who participated in the British Nuclear Test Programme during the period 1952 to 1991. The AMSC has an independent Chair, and independent Membership, and it has considered the case carefully, including submissions from relevant interested external parties. The AMSC's recommendation to the HD Committee was not to award a medal, and the HD Committee has accepted this advice. Any decision to revisit this decision would be a matter for the AMSC.</p><p>In relation to compensation, the Department is considering the findings of the final fourth phase of a longitudinal epidemiological study into health effects among nuclear test participants and any potential impacts on compensation policy. It remains the case that NTVs who believe they have suffered ill health due to service have the right to apply for no-fault compensation under the War Pensions Scheme, in respect of illness or injury as a result of service in the Armed Forces before 6 April 2005.</p>
answering member constituency Aldershot more like this
answering member printed Leo Docherty more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-03-07T13:40:41.417Zmore like thismore than 2022-03-07T13:40:41.417Z
answering member
4600
label Biography information for Leo Docherty more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1434148
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-22more like thismore than 2022-02-22
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Security: Licensing more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what discussions she has had with the Security Industry Authority (SIA) on the recent implementation of mandatory training and the (a) associated costs and (b) availability of that training for applicants when renewing SIA licences. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 127461 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-25more like thismore than 2022-02-25
answer text <p>Following the changes to mandatory training for Door Supervisors and Security Guards in April and October 2021, the Security Industry Authority (SIA) confirmed there continues to be record high numbers of licence holders, indicating a healthy throughput of labour into the private security industry.</p><p>To prepare for the introduction of these changes, the SIA worked closely with the industry to develop the new training requirements, following a public consultation with a wide variety of stakeholders over a period of years.</p><p>In recognition of the impact of Covid-19, the SIA delayed introducing the changes to allow the industry and training providers more time to prepare for the changes.</p><p>The SIA is responsible for ensuring that all licence holders are ‘fit and proper’ persons and have the required skillset and level of training suitable for their chosen sector, via checks made upon application. It would not therefore be appropriate on public safety grounds, to extend licences, without those licence holders being subject to the mandatory checks and training required at application and renewal.</p><p>The SIA works closely with the private security industry and with training providers to develop flexible and accessible licence-linked training for all current and prospective licence-holders across the UK. However, the SIA does not have the powers to deliver the training nor to determine the costs, scheduling, and availability of the courses being offered, this is the responsibility of the training providers.</p>
answering member constituency Redditch more like this
answering member printed Rachel Maclean more like this
grouped question UIN
127462 more like this
127463 more like this
127464 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-25T12:44:49.527Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-25T12:44:49.527Z
answering member
4668
label Biography information for Rachel Maclean more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1434151
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-22more like thismore than 2022-02-22
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Security: Scotland more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the accessibility of training providers in Scotland for the Security Industry Authority's mandatory training. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 127462 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-25more like thismore than 2022-02-25
answer text <p>Following the changes to mandatory training for Door Supervisors and Security Guards in April and October 2021, the Security Industry Authority (SIA) confirmed there continues to be record high numbers of licence holders, indicating a healthy throughput of labour into the private security industry.</p><p>To prepare for the introduction of these changes, the SIA worked closely with the industry to develop the new training requirements, following a public consultation with a wide variety of stakeholders over a period of years.</p><p>In recognition of the impact of Covid-19, the SIA delayed introducing the changes to allow the industry and training providers more time to prepare for the changes.</p><p>The SIA is responsible for ensuring that all licence holders are ‘fit and proper’ persons and have the required skillset and level of training suitable for their chosen sector, via checks made upon application. It would not therefore be appropriate on public safety grounds, to extend licences, without those licence holders being subject to the mandatory checks and training required at application and renewal.</p><p>The SIA works closely with the private security industry and with training providers to develop flexible and accessible licence-linked training for all current and prospective licence-holders across the UK. However, the SIA does not have the powers to deliver the training nor to determine the costs, scheduling, and availability of the courses being offered, this is the responsibility of the training providers.</p>
answering member constituency Redditch more like this
answering member printed Rachel Maclean more like this
grouped question UIN
127461 more like this
127463 more like this
127464 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-25T12:44:49.563Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-25T12:44:49.563Z
answering member
4668
label Biography information for Rachel Maclean more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1434152
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-22more like thismore than 2022-02-22
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Security: Training more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will make an assessment of the effectiveness of the communication of changes regarding mandatory training to Security Industry Authority licence holders by the Security Industry Authority. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 127463 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-25more like thismore than 2022-02-25
answer text <p>Following the changes to mandatory training for Door Supervisors and Security Guards in April and October 2021, the Security Industry Authority (SIA) confirmed there continues to be record high numbers of licence holders, indicating a healthy throughput of labour into the private security industry.</p><p>To prepare for the introduction of these changes, the SIA worked closely with the industry to develop the new training requirements, following a public consultation with a wide variety of stakeholders over a period of years.</p><p>In recognition of the impact of Covid-19, the SIA delayed introducing the changes to allow the industry and training providers more time to prepare for the changes.</p><p>The SIA is responsible for ensuring that all licence holders are ‘fit and proper’ persons and have the required skillset and level of training suitable for their chosen sector, via checks made upon application. It would not therefore be appropriate on public safety grounds, to extend licences, without those licence holders being subject to the mandatory checks and training required at application and renewal.</p><p>The SIA works closely with the private security industry and with training providers to develop flexible and accessible licence-linked training for all current and prospective licence-holders across the UK. However, the SIA does not have the powers to deliver the training nor to determine the costs, scheduling, and availability of the courses being offered, this is the responsibility of the training providers.</p>
answering member constituency Redditch more like this
answering member printed Rachel Maclean more like this
grouped question UIN
127461 more like this
127462 more like this
127464 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-25T12:44:49.597Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-25T12:44:49.597Z
answering member
4668
label Biography information for Rachel Maclean more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1434154
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-22more like thismore than 2022-02-22
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Security: Licensing more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what discussions she has had with the Security Industry Authority on the potential merits of extending current licences for those who have been unable to work or been limited in working during the covid-19 pandemic, to allow more time to renew their licence in response to the recent changes to the renewal process. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 127464 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-25more like thismore than 2022-02-25
answer text <p>Following the changes to mandatory training for Door Supervisors and Security Guards in April and October 2021, the Security Industry Authority (SIA) confirmed there continues to be record high numbers of licence holders, indicating a healthy throughput of labour into the private security industry.</p><p>To prepare for the introduction of these changes, the SIA worked closely with the industry to develop the new training requirements, following a public consultation with a wide variety of stakeholders over a period of years.</p><p>In recognition of the impact of Covid-19, the SIA delayed introducing the changes to allow the industry and training providers more time to prepare for the changes.</p><p>The SIA is responsible for ensuring that all licence holders are ‘fit and proper’ persons and have the required skillset and level of training suitable for their chosen sector, via checks made upon application. It would not therefore be appropriate on public safety grounds, to extend licences, without those licence holders being subject to the mandatory checks and training required at application and renewal.</p><p>The SIA works closely with the private security industry and with training providers to develop flexible and accessible licence-linked training for all current and prospective licence-holders across the UK. However, the SIA does not have the powers to deliver the training nor to determine the costs, scheduling, and availability of the courses being offered, this is the responsibility of the training providers.</p>
answering member constituency Redditch more like this
answering member printed Rachel Maclean more like this
grouped question UIN
127461 more like this
127462 more like this
127463 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-25T12:44:49.48Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-25T12:44:49.48Z
answering member
4668
label Biography information for Rachel Maclean more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1434167
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-22more like thismore than 2022-02-22
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading War Widow(er)s: Pensions more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress his Department has made in relation to war widows pensions since the Minister of State at his Department stated on 10 December 2020 that his Department was examining alternative methods to mitigate the impact on war widows who remarried or cohabited before the introduction of the pensions-for-life changes in 2015. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 127465 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-25more like thismore than 2022-02-25
answer text <p>As previously stated by my Rt. hon Friend the Defence Secretary in the House, the Ministry of Defence is examining alternative methods to see whether we can mitigate the impact of these changes, and we have been in regular discussion with the War Widows Association on the matter.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Aldershot more like this
answering member printed Leo Docherty more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-25T14:31:10.2Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-25T14:31:10.2Z
answering member
4600
label Biography information for Leo Docherty more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this
1419905
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-04more like thismore than 2022-02-04
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency: Standards more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will provide the latest performance statistics for the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency against each of the targets given in sections 1.1 to 1.4 of DVLA's Business Plan for 2021-22. more like this
tabling member constituency Glenrothes more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Grant more like this
uin 118552 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-09more like thismore than 2022-02-09
answer text <p>The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA)’s performance against business plan targets is published at the end of the financial year to account for the full year’s performance. The figures to date reflect good performance across most measures and the DVLA is on track to meet or exceed all targets relating to online services, which account for the majority of its transactions. The targets for paper transactions and correspondence in 2021-22 were set in line with pre pandemic levels of customer service and the DVLA is unlikely to meet those this year. However, the business plan made clear that the targets had been set in the context of no further disruption to service through Covid or industrial action, which has not been the case.</p><p>The information requested on the proportion of postal and online applications that have been completed within the specified timescales is not readily available. Officials from the DVLA will write to the Honourable Member when the information is available.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Copeland more like this
answering member printed Trudy Harrison more like this
grouped question UIN
118553 more like this
118554 more like this
118555 more like this
118556 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-09T09:34:06.263Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-09T09:34:06.263Z
answering member
4593
label Biography information for Trudy Harrison more like this
tabling member
4466
label Biography information for Peter Grant more like this