Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

988891
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-10-16more like thismore than 2018-10-16
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions remove filter
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with multiple sclerosis who were previously in receipt of disability living allowance and have undergone a reassessment for personal independence payment applied for mandatory reconsideration of the decision in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency East Ham more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Timms remove filter
uin 180081 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-10-22more like thismore than 2018-10-22
answer text <p>Table 1 below shows the number of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) reassessment decisions, mandatory reconsideration (MR) registrations, appeals cleared and decisions overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis.</p><p> </p><p><em>Table 1: Number of PIP reassessment decisions, mandatory reconsideration (MR) registrations, appeals cleared and decisions overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis by year of initial decision</em></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals cleared</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>480</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>1,950</p></td><td><p>470</p></td><td><p>220</p></td><td><p>180</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>9,840</p></td><td><p>1,960</p></td><td><p>780</p></td><td><p>640</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>10,540</p></td><td><p>1,990</p></td><td><p>660</p></td><td><p>560</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018 (January to June)</p></td><td><p>3,980</p></td><td><p>580</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Table 2 below shows the number of PIP new claims for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis who did not receive an award at the initial decision post assessment and where the decision was changed at MR or appeal.</p><p> </p><p><em>Table 2: Number of PIP new claims decisions for people who did not receive an award at the initial decision post assessment where the award was changed at mandatory reconsideration (MR) and where decisions were overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis by year of initial decision</em></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions where the award was changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals cleared</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>850</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>70</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>1,550</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>150</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>1,290</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>140</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>1,350</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>110</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018 (January to June)</p></td><td><p>810</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.5m decisions have been made until June 2018, of these 9% have been appealed and 4% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of people who had the mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the enhanced rate is available from internal analytical datasets, but to assess the completeness of recording and quality assure the figures to answer this PQ would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to MRs and appeals recorded up to June 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and is for both new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data shown in the tables is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN
180082 more like this
180083 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-10-22T17:12:58.107Zmore like thismore than 2018-10-22T17:12:58.107Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
163
label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms remove filter