Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1277357
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Furs: Sales more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ban the sale of real fur in the UK. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Judd more like this
uin HL12224 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-02-01more like thismore than 2021-02-01
answer text <p>Fur farming has been banned in England and Wales since 2000 and since 2002 in Scotland and Northern Ireland.</p><p>There are restrictions on some skin and fur products which may never be legally imported into the UK. These include fur and products from cats and dogs, and seal skins and products from commercial hunts.</p><p>We have established controls on fur from endangered species protected by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and we do not allow imports of fur from wild animals caught using methods which are non-compliant with international humane trapping standards.</p><p>Now our future relationship with the EU has been established the government is considering any further steps it could take in relation to fur.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-02-01T14:54:16.007Zmore like thismore than 2021-02-01T14:54:16.007Z
answering member
4062
label Biography information for Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park more like this
tabling member
1660
label Biography information for Lord Judd more like this
1277437
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Pollution: Parliamentary Scrutiny more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what legislative proposals on pollution he plans to bring forward in this Parliament. more like this
tabling member constituency Ealing, Southall more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Virendra Sharma more like this
uin 138908 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-21more like thismore than 2021-01-21
answer text <p>The Environment Bill will bring forwards legislative proposals for tackling pollution.</p><p> </p><p>It will drive significant environmental improvement and tackle pollution by setting and achieving legally-binding, long-term targets in key areas including air quality, water, and resource efficiency and waste.</p><p> </p><p>Some of the leading measures in the Bill to support the delivery of targets include:</p><ul><li>Air Quality: The Bill introduces a duty on the government to set at least two air quality targets by October 2022:</li></ul><p>o To reduce the annual average level of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in ambient air</p><p>o A further target to improve air quality</p><ul><li>Water: The Bill makes drainage and sewerage management planning, through which companies develop the capacity of their networks, a statutory duty.</li><li>Resource Efficiency and Waste Reduction – The Bill will enable Government to make waste producers cover the cost of collecting and recycling packaging waste, introduce deposit returns schemes, and introduce charges for single-use plastic items.</li></ul>
answering member constituency Taunton Deane more like this
answering member printed Rebecca Pow more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-21T17:05:40.763Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-21T17:05:40.763Z
answering member
4522
label Biography information for Rebecca Pow more like this
tabling member
1604
label Biography information for Mr Virendra Sharma more like this
1277453
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Neonicotinoids more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment his Department has made of the environmental risks to allow the use of neonicotinoid thiamethoxam pesticides on sugar beet seed; and what assessment he has made of how that evidence differs from the evidence used in 2018. more like this
tabling member constituency York Central more like this
tabling member printed
Rachael Maskell more like this
uin 139058 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-21more like thismore than 2021-01-21
answer text <p>The Government considered the potential risks to the environment posed by the use of the product Cruiser SB on the basis of expert scientific assessment, and in accordance with the requirements for the grant of an emergency authorisation set out in Regulation (EC) 1107/2009. The Government concluded that, when mitigated by the strict conditions attached to the emergency authorisation, these risks were acceptably low in the circumstances and outweighed by the benefits of use. The Government remains committed to tight controls on neonicotinoids and has no intention of lifting the restrictions that were put in place in 2018.</p><p> </p><p>Each application for emergency authorisation is considered on its own merits and particular facts. The application made for use this year contained new scientific information relevant to the assessment of environmental risks and made some different proposals for conditions of use, including a reduced application rate and a longer period between sowing the treated sugar beet seed and planting any flowering crop.</p>
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-21T12:02:45.62Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-21T12:02:45.62Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4471
label Biography information for Rachael Maskell more like this
1277515
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Wholesale Trade: Coronavirus more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment he has made of the effect of the covid-19 lockdown restrictions announced on 4 January 2021 on the level of stock held by food service wholesalers. more like this
tabling member constituency Rother Valley more like this
tabling member printed
Alexander Stafford more like this
uin 139179 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-26more like thismore than 2021-01-26
answer text <p>I refer the hon. Members to the reply previously given on 25 January 2021, PQ 138473.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2021-01-15/138473" target="_blank">https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2021-01-15/138473</a></p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
grouped question UIN 138930 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T17:55:40.997Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T17:55:40.997Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4866
label Biography information for Alexander Stafford more like this
1277531
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Delivery Services: Plastic Bags more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of reinstating the waiver on the plastic bag charge for home-delivery purchases that applied during the covid-19 lockdown announced in March 2020, to help prevent virus transmission via delivery drivers through allowing the doorstep deposit of delivered goods. more like this
tabling member constituency York Outer more like this
tabling member printed
Julian Sturdy more like this
uin 138950 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-26more like thismore than 2021-01-26
answer text <p>The obligation for supermarkets to charge for single-use carrier bags (SUCBs) supplied with online deliveries was temporarily removed in response to the first Covid-19 lockdown. This change was only temporary to allow retailers time to adapt their delivery systems, and the charge was reinstated in September 2020.</p><p> </p><p>The department does not have any plans to further assess the need to reinstate the suspension of the charge for online deliveries. Since March, supermarkets have updated and improved their delivery systems to meet the increased demand due to the pandemic. They have also developed new practices to improve safety for both drivers and customers, and citizens are far more aware of the importance of social distancing. Retailers can still provide single-use carrier bags as a delivery option for customers so long as the charge is still in place.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Taunton Deane more like this
answering member printed Rebecca Pow more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T10:42:39.097Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T10:42:39.097Z
answering member
4522
label Biography information for Rebecca Pow more like this
tabling member
4079
label Biography information for Julian Sturdy more like this
1277551
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Sugar Beet more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment his Department has made of the economic effect of virus yellows on sugar beet farmers in (a) 2019 and (b) 2020. more like this
tabling member constituency Cambridge more like this
tabling member printed
Daniel Zeichner more like this
uin 139012 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-26more like thismore than 2021-01-26
answer text <p>Husbandry approaches and alternative pesticides were considered in the assessment of the application for emergency authorisation of the neonicotinoid product Cruiser SB. The evidence, including experience in 2020, suggests that these will not be adequate to protect the emerging sugar beet crop this year.</p><p>The incidence of virus yellows in sugar beet was low in 2019 and consequent production losses are estimated to have been low. Virus levels were much higher in 2020 and yields are expected to be down by around 25%, equating to an economic loss of the order of £50 million. Other factors may have contributed to this loss, but the level of virus infection was key.</p><p>At this stage, it is not possible to assess the economic impact virus yellows will have in 2021. If, as is likely, winter temperatures are not sufficiently low, the high virus reservoir legacy numbers from 2020 could mean that the incidence rate remains high in 2021. Without effective aphid control, that is likely to translate to significant economic loss. The authorisation provides that likely pest pressures for 2021 will be modelled using data on temperatures over this winter. Only if this indicates that crop infection rates are expected to exceed a 9% threshold will the seed treatment be permitted for use.</p>
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
grouped question UIN
139013 more like this
139017 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T16:09:18.867Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T16:09:18.867Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4382
label Biography information for Daniel Zeichner more like this
1277552
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Neonicotinoids more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment his Department has made of the potential economic effect of virus yellows on sugar beet farmers in 2021 in the event that neonicotinoid use (a) is permitted and (b) is not permitted. more like this
tabling member constituency Cambridge more like this
tabling member printed
Daniel Zeichner more like this
uin 139013 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-26more like thismore than 2021-01-26
answer text <p>Husbandry approaches and alternative pesticides were considered in the assessment of the application for emergency authorisation of the neonicotinoid product Cruiser SB. The evidence, including experience in 2020, suggests that these will not be adequate to protect the emerging sugar beet crop this year.</p><p>The incidence of virus yellows in sugar beet was low in 2019 and consequent production losses are estimated to have been low. Virus levels were much higher in 2020 and yields are expected to be down by around 25%, equating to an economic loss of the order of £50 million. Other factors may have contributed to this loss, but the level of virus infection was key.</p><p>At this stage, it is not possible to assess the economic impact virus yellows will have in 2021. If, as is likely, winter temperatures are not sufficiently low, the high virus reservoir legacy numbers from 2020 could mean that the incidence rate remains high in 2021. Without effective aphid control, that is likely to translate to significant economic loss. The authorisation provides that likely pest pressures for 2021 will be modelled using data on temperatures over this winter. Only if this indicates that crop infection rates are expected to exceed a 9% threshold will the seed treatment be permitted for use.</p>
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
grouped question UIN
139012 more like this
139017 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T16:09:18.933Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T16:09:18.933Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4382
label Biography information for Daniel Zeichner more like this
1277553
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Neonicotinoids more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of UK scrutiny measures for emergency authorisations of neonicotinoid use since the UK’s departure from the EU. more like this
tabling member constituency Cambridge more like this
tabling member printed
Daniel Zeichner more like this
uin 139014 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-26more like thismore than 2021-01-26
answer text <p>All applications for emergency authorisation follow the same process within the legal framework. Each application for emergency authorisation is assessed by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), with independent scientific advice from the UK Expert Committee on Pesticides. Pesticides regulation is devolved and so each of the four UK administrations may take a decision on applications for emergency authorisation within their territory or may leave the decision with HSE. There are no plans to alter these arrangements following the end of the transition period.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T14:41:05.927Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T14:41:05.927Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4382
label Biography information for Daniel Zeichner more like this
1277554
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Neonicotinoids more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps have been taken by (a) his Department and (b) the British sugar beet industry to develop alternative sustainable approaches to protect crops without the use of neonicotinoid seed treatments. more like this
tabling member constituency Cambridge more like this
tabling member printed
Daniel Zeichner more like this
uin 139015 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-26more like thismore than 2021-01-26
answer text <p>The sugar beet industry has been developing alternative approaches including improved husbandry, plant breeding to develop new varieties and potential new insecticide products. Their forward plan, included in their application for emergency authorisation, maps out the route to develop each of these areas further so that economic production is possible without neonicotinoid seed treatments.</p><p> </p><p>There is no conflict between the positions of Defra and HSE on the issue of repeat emergency authorisations. Emergency authorisations reflect special circumstances and so should not be repeated indefinitely; those seeking emergency authorisations need to formulate a clear plan to find a permanent solution. It is, however, accepted that it will not always be possible to deliver that plan in a single year.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
grouped question UIN
139016 more like this
139018 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T16:04:55.377Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T16:04:55.377Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4382
label Biography information for Daniel Zeichner more like this
1277555
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-01-18more like thismore than 2021-01-18
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Neonicotinoids more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of the British sugar beet industry’s strategy to move away from a reliance on emergency authorisations of neonicotinoid use. more like this
tabling member constituency Cambridge more like this
tabling member printed
Daniel Zeichner more like this
uin 139016 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-01-26more like thismore than 2021-01-26
answer text <p>The sugar beet industry has been developing alternative approaches including improved husbandry, plant breeding to develop new varieties and potential new insecticide products. Their forward plan, included in their application for emergency authorisation, maps out the route to develop each of these areas further so that economic production is possible without neonicotinoid seed treatments.</p><p> </p><p>There is no conflict between the positions of Defra and HSE on the issue of repeat emergency authorisations. Emergency authorisations reflect special circumstances and so should not be repeated indefinitely; those seeking emergency authorisations need to formulate a clear plan to find a permanent solution. It is, however, accepted that it will not always be possible to deliver that plan in a single year.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
grouped question UIN
139015 more like this
139018 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-01-26T16:04:55.427Zmore like thismore than 2021-01-26T16:04:55.427Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4382
label Biography information for Daniel Zeichner more like this