Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1694677
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-07more like thismore than 2024-03-07
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Ministers: Defamation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the cost to the public purse is for settling claims for (a) defamation and (b) libel by Ministers since 19 December 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 17706 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-12more like thismore than 2024-03-12
answer text <p>In line with the established practice under multiple administrations of all political colours, Ministers are provided with legal support and representation where matters relate to their conduct and responsibilities as a Minister.</p><p> </p><p>Statistics relating to costs of settling claims, costs of legal support, and the number of times the provision of legal support has been authorised or declined are not maintained by the Cabinet Office. Funding for appropriate legal costs, including any out-of-court settlements, would be met by the relevant department's budget.</p><p> </p><p>As set out in Chapter 6 of the Cabinet Manual, Ministers are indemnified by the Crown for any actions taken against them for things done or decisions made in the course of their ministerial duties. The indemnity covers the cost of defending the proceedings, as well as any costs or damages awarded against the minister. Decisions about whether to provide legal support are made by the relevant department’s Accounting Officer.</p><p> </p><p>This reflects an important principle that Ministers should be able to carry out their official duties, supported by official advice, in a way which they see fit, without the risk of personal liability constraining their ability to take those official actions. Of course, Ministers remain accountable to Parliament and the wider public for their actions as a Minister.</p><p> </p><p>It would have a chilling effect on public life if Ministers faced the prospect of personal financial harm from those seeking to pressure the Government through vexatious or hostile litigation (or the threat thereof).</p><p> </p><p>More broadly, the principle of legal support from the public purse for official duties is not confined to government. I would observe that there is insurance available to MPs provided by the House at taxpayers’ expense, designed to protect hon. Members when carrying out parliamentary and constituency duties. This includes professional indemnity insurance that covers defamation. I also note that the House of Lords Commission is due this week to discuss the provision of professional indemnity insurance to peers.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Brentwood and Ongar more like this
answering member printed Alex Burghart more like this
grouped question UIN
17339 more like this
17407 more like this
17708 more like this
17709 more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-12T11:53:51.65Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-12T11:53:51.65Z
answering member
4613
label Biography information for Alex Burghart more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this
1694679
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-07more like thismore than 2024-03-07
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Ministers: Defamation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the total cost to the public purse was of legal support provided to Ministers of the Crown in relation to claims for (a) defamation and (b) libel connected with their official duties since 19 December 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 17708 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-12more like thismore than 2024-03-12
answer text <p>In line with the established practice under multiple administrations of all political colours, Ministers are provided with legal support and representation where matters relate to their conduct and responsibilities as a Minister.</p><p> </p><p>Statistics relating to costs of settling claims, costs of legal support, and the number of times the provision of legal support has been authorised or declined are not maintained by the Cabinet Office. Funding for appropriate legal costs, including any out-of-court settlements, would be met by the relevant department's budget.</p><p> </p><p>As set out in Chapter 6 of the Cabinet Manual, Ministers are indemnified by the Crown for any actions taken against them for things done or decisions made in the course of their ministerial duties. The indemnity covers the cost of defending the proceedings, as well as any costs or damages awarded against the minister. Decisions about whether to provide legal support are made by the relevant department’s Accounting Officer.</p><p> </p><p>This reflects an important principle that Ministers should be able to carry out their official duties, supported by official advice, in a way which they see fit, without the risk of personal liability constraining their ability to take those official actions. Of course, Ministers remain accountable to Parliament and the wider public for their actions as a Minister.</p><p> </p><p>It would have a chilling effect on public life if Ministers faced the prospect of personal financial harm from those seeking to pressure the Government through vexatious or hostile litigation (or the threat thereof).</p><p> </p><p>More broadly, the principle of legal support from the public purse for official duties is not confined to government. I would observe that there is insurance available to MPs provided by the House at taxpayers’ expense, designed to protect hon. Members when carrying out parliamentary and constituency duties. This includes professional indemnity insurance that covers defamation. I also note that the House of Lords Commission is due this week to discuss the provision of professional indemnity insurance to peers.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Brentwood and Ongar more like this
answering member printed Alex Burghart more like this
grouped question UIN
17339 more like this
17407 more like this
17706 more like this
17709 more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-12T11:53:51.493Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-12T11:53:51.493Z
answering member
4613
label Biography information for Alex Burghart more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this
1694680
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-07more like thismore than 2024-03-07
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Ministers: Defamation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, on how many individual occasions the provision of legal support has been (a) authorised and (b) declined on claims for (i) defamation and (ii) libel connected with the official duties of Ministers of the Crown since 19 December 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 17709 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-12more like thismore than 2024-03-12
answer text <p>In line with the established practice under multiple administrations of all political colours, Ministers are provided with legal support and representation where matters relate to their conduct and responsibilities as a Minister.</p><p> </p><p>Statistics relating to costs of settling claims, costs of legal support, and the number of times the provision of legal support has been authorised or declined are not maintained by the Cabinet Office. Funding for appropriate legal costs, including any out-of-court settlements, would be met by the relevant department's budget.</p><p> </p><p>As set out in Chapter 6 of the Cabinet Manual, Ministers are indemnified by the Crown for any actions taken against them for things done or decisions made in the course of their ministerial duties. The indemnity covers the cost of defending the proceedings, as well as any costs or damages awarded against the minister. Decisions about whether to provide legal support are made by the relevant department’s Accounting Officer.</p><p> </p><p>This reflects an important principle that Ministers should be able to carry out their official duties, supported by official advice, in a way which they see fit, without the risk of personal liability constraining their ability to take those official actions. Of course, Ministers remain accountable to Parliament and the wider public for their actions as a Minister.</p><p> </p><p>It would have a chilling effect on public life if Ministers faced the prospect of personal financial harm from those seeking to pressure the Government through vexatious or hostile litigation (or the threat thereof).</p><p> </p><p>More broadly, the principle of legal support from the public purse for official duties is not confined to government. I would observe that there is insurance available to MPs provided by the House at taxpayers’ expense, designed to protect hon. Members when carrying out parliamentary and constituency duties. This includes professional indemnity insurance that covers defamation. I also note that the House of Lords Commission is due this week to discuss the provision of professional indemnity insurance to peers.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Brentwood and Ongar more like this
answering member printed Alex Burghart more like this
grouped question UIN
17339 more like this
17407 more like this
17706 more like this
17708 more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-12T11:53:51.697Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-12T11:53:51.697Z
answering member
4613
label Biography information for Alex Burghart more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this
1624313
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-04-27more like thismore than 2023-04-27
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Civil Service: Recruitment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the Answer of 26 April 2023 to Question 182177 on Civil Service: Recruitment, if he will bring forward proposals to amend the Civil Service Nationality Rules to allow British Nationals (Overseas) visa holders with at least one British Nationals (Overseas) parent but who are not themselves British Nationals (Overseas) to be employed within the Civil Service. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 183156 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-05-03more like thismore than 2023-05-03
answer text <p>There are currently no plans to amend the Civil Service Nationality Rules. They reflect a long standing legislative framework present under successive governments.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham more like this
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-05-03T14:44:41.84Zmore like thismore than 2023-05-03T14:44:41.84Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this
1613113
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-04-21more like thismore than 2023-04-21
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Civil Service: Recruitment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether persons with at least one British Nationals (Overseas) parent but who are not themselves British Nationals (Overseas) are eligible to be employed in the Civil Service. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 182177 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-04-26more like thismore than 2023-04-26
answer text <p>The Civil Service Nationality Rules reflect a long-standing legislative framework that has existed under successive governments and govern eligibility for employment in the Civil Service on the grounds of nationality.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Whether or not an individual is eligible to work in the Civil Service under the nationality rules is dependent on their nationality only.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>An individual who had at least one British National (Overseas) parent, but who themselves was not a British National (Overseas), may still be eligible to work in the Civil Service if they meet the nationality rules in their own right.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham more like this
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-04-26T16:14:40.133Zmore like thismore than 2023-04-26T16:14:40.133Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this
1421810
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-10more like thismore than 2022-02-10
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Prime Minister: Information Officers more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, on what date the current Downing Street Director of Communications received Enhanced Developed Vetting and STRAP clearance. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 122763 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-21more like thismore than 2022-02-21
answer text <p>Civil servants, including special advisers, are subject to National Security Vetting. Vetting requirements are determined for each role on a case by case basis.</p><p> </p><p>It would not be appropriate to confirm which specific posts within the Department are the subject of vetting. Confirmation of which posts are subject to vetting at what level would highlight who within the Department has access to sensitive material and could be used for targeting purposes which would undermine national security.</p><p> </p><p>In line with the practice followed by successive administrations, the Government does not otherwise comment on security matters.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North more like this
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
grouped question UIN
122764 more like this
122765 more like this
122766 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-21T18:01:14.8Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-21T18:01:14.8Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this
1421811
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-10more like thismore than 2022-02-10
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Prime Minister: Information Officers more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, on what date the current Downing Street Director of Communications applied for Enhanced Developed Vetting and STRAP clearance. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 122764 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-21more like thismore than 2022-02-21
answer text <p>Civil servants, including special advisers, are subject to National Security Vetting. Vetting requirements are determined for each role on a case by case basis.</p><p> </p><p>It would not be appropriate to confirm which specific posts within the Department are the subject of vetting. Confirmation of which posts are subject to vetting at what level would highlight who within the Department has access to sensitive material and could be used for targeting purposes which would undermine national security.</p><p> </p><p>In line with the practice followed by successive administrations, the Government does not otherwise comment on security matters.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North more like this
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
grouped question UIN
122763 more like this
122765 more like this
122766 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-21T18:01:14.863Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-21T18:01:14.863Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this
1421812
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-10more like thismore than 2022-02-10
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Cabinet Office and Prime Minister: Vetting more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish a list of all positions in (a) his Department and (b) 10 Downing Street that require Enhanced Developed Vetting and STRAP clearance. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 122765 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-21more like thismore than 2022-02-21
answer text <p>Civil servants, including special advisers, are subject to National Security Vetting. Vetting requirements are determined for each role on a case by case basis.</p><p> </p><p>It would not be appropriate to confirm which specific posts within the Department are the subject of vetting. Confirmation of which posts are subject to vetting at what level would highlight who within the Department has access to sensitive material and could be used for targeting purposes which would undermine national security.</p><p> </p><p>In line with the practice followed by successive administrations, the Government does not otherwise comment on security matters.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North more like this
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
grouped question UIN
122763 more like this
122764 more like this
122766 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-21T18:01:14.92Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-21T18:01:14.92Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this
1421813
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-10more like thismore than 2022-02-10
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Cabinet Office and Prime Minister: Vetting more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, what is the average length of time for personnel in (a) his Department and (b) 10 Downing Street to pass the requisite checks to be granted Enhanced Developed Vetting and STRAP clearance. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 122766 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-21more like thismore than 2022-02-21
answer text <p>Civil servants, including special advisers, are subject to National Security Vetting. Vetting requirements are determined for each role on a case by case basis.</p><p> </p><p>It would not be appropriate to confirm which specific posts within the Department are the subject of vetting. Confirmation of which posts are subject to vetting at what level would highlight who within the Department has access to sensitive material and could be used for targeting purposes which would undermine national security.</p><p> </p><p>In line with the practice followed by successive administrations, the Government does not otherwise comment on security matters.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North more like this
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
grouped question UIN
122763 more like this
122764 more like this
122765 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-21T18:01:14.983Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-21T18:01:14.983Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this
1246259
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-10-22more like thismore than 2020-10-22
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office remove filter
hansard heading Climate Action Strategy Committee more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many meetings of the Cabinet's Climate Action Strategy Committee the Prime Minister has chaired since its establishment on 17 October 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency Greenwich and Woolwich more like this
tabling member printed
Matthew Pennycook remove filter
uin 107708 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-11-03more like thismore than 2020-11-03
answer text <p>It is a long-established precedent that information about the discussions that have taken place in Cabinet and its Committees, and how often they have met, is not normally shared publicly.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hornchurch and Upminster more like this
answering member printed Julia Lopez more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-11-03T17:31:57.063Zmore like thismore than 2020-11-03T17:31:57.063Z
answering member
4647
label Biography information for Julia Lopez more like this
tabling member
4520
label Biography information for Matthew Pennycook more like this