Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1023913
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-12more like thismore than 2018-12-12
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Carer's Allowance: Young People more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether she has plans exempt young adult carers from the 21-hour study in relation to the carer’s allowance. more like this
tabling member constituency Bradford South more like this
tabling member printed
Judith Cummins more like this
uin 201692 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-17more like thismore than 2018-12-17
answer text <p>This Government recognises and values the vital contribution made by all carers, young or old in supporting some of the most vulnerable in society including pensioners and those with disabilities.</p><p> </p><p>The Government thinks it is important that carers can maintain links with the education system and so carers are able to undertake part-time education and still receive Carer’s Allowance. However, there are no plans to change the current 21 hour study rule as we think it is right that people in full-time education should be supported by the educational maintenance system, via its range of loans and grants, rather than the social security benefit system. That is why, as a general principle, full-time students are usually precluded from entitlement to income-related and income-maintenance benefits. Many college courses are provided on the basis of 16 hours a week supervised study so we have been working with the Learning and Work Institute and colleges to increase awareness of the Carer’s Allowance study rules.</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-17T13:57:53.557Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-17T13:57:53.557Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4391
label Biography information for Judith Cummins more like this
1023921
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-12more like thismore than 2018-12-12
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading State Retirement Pensions: Females more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many complaints of maladministration from women born in the 1950s relating to the change in their state pension age have been submitted to her Department’s Independent Case Examiner in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Ceredigion more like this
tabling member printed
Ben Lake more like this
uin 201694 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-17more like thismore than 2018-12-17
answer text <p>Individual government departments have long established complaints procedures. That approach has not changed under Labour governments 1997-2010 or successive governments. The DWP has a two tier complaints process which considers formal complaints about our service<strong>. </strong>Once a complainant has exhausted the DWP complaint process they are signposted to the Independent Case Examiner’s Office if they are dissatisfied with the final response to their complaint. The Independent Case Examiner is independent.</p><p>The table below provides information on the method by which complaints submitted to the Independent Case Examiner’s (ICE) Office, concerning changes to women’s State Pension age, were closed.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hexham more like this
answering member printed Guy Opperman more like this
grouped question UIN 201695 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-17T15:27:52.567Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-17T15:27:52.567Z
answering member
4142
label Biography information for Guy Opperman more like this
tabling member
4630
label Biography information for Ben Lake more like this
1023922
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-12more like thismore than 2018-12-12
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading State Retirement Pensions: Females more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many complaints of maladministration from women born in the 1950s relating to the change in their state pension age submitted to her Department’s Independent Case Examiner have been (a) resolved, (b) rejected, (c) closed for other reasons. more like this
tabling member constituency Ceredigion more like this
tabling member printed
Ben Lake more like this
uin 201695 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-17more like thismore than 2018-12-17
answer text <p>Individual government departments have long established complaints procedures. That approach has not changed under Labour governments 1997-2010 or successive governments. The DWP has a two tier complaints process which considers formal complaints about our service<strong>. </strong>Once a complainant has exhausted the DWP complaint process they are signposted to the Independent Case Examiner’s Office if they are dissatisfied with the final response to their complaint. The Independent Case Examiner is independent.</p><p>The table below provides information on the method by which complaints submitted to the Independent Case Examiner’s (ICE) Office, concerning changes to women’s State Pension age, were closed.</p><p><ins class="ministerial"></ins></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Reason for complaint closure</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Number</ins> <ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">(a) Resolved (we have interpreted this as meaning closed following issue of an ICE investigation report)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">192</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">(b) Rejected (the complaint failed to meet the ICE acceptance criteria)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">1,598</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">(c) Paused for other reasons (includes withdrawn complaints and those closed following a High Court decision to grant permission for a Judicial Review of the Departments handling of the change to women’s State Pension age – it is not within the ICE remit to consider issues which are, or have been, subject to legal proceedings.)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2,506</ins></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><ins class="ministerial"><strong> </strong></ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">The Independent Case Examiner’s Office received the first complaints from women relating to changes in their state pension age in October 2016. The table below provides details of the numbers received in each of the past three reporting years.</ins></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Year (April to March)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Number received</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2016/2017</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">243</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2017/2018</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2981</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2018/2019 (to 13 December 2018)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">1072</ins></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency Hexham more like this
answering member printed Guy Opperman more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-17T15:27:52.6Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-17T15:27:52.6Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2018-12-18T17:16:19.993Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-18T17:16:19.993Z
answering member
4142
label Biography information for Guy Opperman more like this
previous answer version
92203
answering member constituency Hexham more like this
answering member printed Guy Opperman more like this
answering member
4142
label Biography information for Guy Opperman more like this
tabling member
4630
label Biography information for Ben Lake more like this
1023162
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-11more like thismore than 2018-12-11
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Access to Work Programme: Autism more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the Access to Work Hidden Impairment Specialist Team in (a) advising employers on supporting employees diagnosed with autism, (b) offering autistic people an assessment of their needs at work and (c) helping to develop support plans for those people. more like this
tabling member constituency Bristol West more like this
tabling member printed
Thangam Debbonaire more like this
uin 201149 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-18more like thismore than 2018-12-18
answer text <p>Last year, the Access to Work Hidden Impairment Specialist team helped 2,150 people, which includes people with Autism. This number has been continually increasing since the team was introduced in 2014/2015, when 1,160 people were helped.</p><p> </p><p>People with hidden impairments are offered an Access to Work holistic workplace assessment to identify the type of help they require in the workplace. Following this assessment, the Access to Work adviser will work with both the employer and customer to develop support plans where appropriate</p><p> </p><p>In November, we published Access to Work: Qualitative research with applicants, employers and delivery staff, which found that workplace assessment experiences tended to be very positive. Although we don’t have separate findings for autistic people, employers and applicants felt that assessments were comprehensive and appropriate, and conducted sensitively. Many applicants talked about how the recommendations and advice given during the assessment alone had enlightened them about the support available for their condition and small changes they could make in the workplace which went a long way in improving their workplace experience. Applicants that were previously too nervous to ask their employer for (even ‘light touch’) adjustments felt the expert ‘stamp of approval’ via the assessment helped them to approach their employer and empowered them to ask for changes.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-18T15:24:02.793Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-18T15:24:02.793Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4433
label Biography information for Thangam Debbonaire more like this
1023178
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-11more like thismore than 2018-12-11
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit: Lone Parents more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many (a) male and (b) female lone parent university students have been affected by the requirement to move from claiming tax credits to universal credit. more like this
tabling member constituency Bishop Auckland more like this
tabling member printed
Helen Goodman more like this
uin 201119 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-17more like thismore than 2018-12-17
answer text <p>I refer the hon. Member to my answer to Question <a href="https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2018-07-12/163623/" target="_blank">163623</a> on 20 July 2018.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Reading West more like this
answering member printed Alok Sharma more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-17T18:26:21.08Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-17T18:26:21.08Z
answering member
4014
label Biography information for Sir Alok Sharma more like this
tabling member
1484
label Biography information for Helen Goodman more like this
1023269
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-11more like thismore than 2018-12-11
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Children: Maintenance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment her Department has made of the potential merits of enabling parents to pursue Child Support Agency arrears written off under the Child Support (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2018 through the legal system. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw more like this
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 201254 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-17more like thismore than 2018-12-17
answer text <p>I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 06 December 2018 to Question 198381.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2018-12-03/198381/" target="_blank">https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2018-12-03/198381/</a></p> more like this
answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-17T15:28:33.973Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-17T15:28:33.973Z
answering member
4105
label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1023280
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-11more like thismore than 2018-12-11
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many new personal independence payment claimants with multiple sclerosis in (a) Scotland, (b) Northern Ireland and (c) Wales did not receive an award during their initial personal independence payment assessment and subsequently received an award at (i) mandatory reconsideration and (ii) tribunal in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Airdrie and Shotts more like this
tabling member printed
Neil Gray more like this
uin 201192 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-18more like thismore than 2018-12-18
answer text <p>The Northern Irish Assembly has devolved responsibility for social security benefits including Personal Independence Payment (PIP). Information regarding PIP in Northern Ireland is therefore the responsibility of the Department for Communities in Northern Ireland.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Tables 1 and 2 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals for new claims for PIP where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the Assessment Provider (AP) due to failing the assessment, for claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 1: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 2: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Tables 3 and 4 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, MRs and appeals relating to Disability Living Allowance (DLA) claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis who have undergone a reassessment to PIP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 3: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>1,040</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>180</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>530</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 4: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>130</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>920</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>540</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.7m decisions have been made until September 2018 in Great Britain, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>We’re committed to ensuring that disabled people get the full support that they need, and under PIP 52% of people with MS receive the highest possible award, compared with 39% under the previous benefit DLA. May 2013 is chosen for comparison as this is the last month with a full DLA caseload prior to claimants being reassessed from DLA to PIP.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of people who had the mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the enhanced rate is available from internal analytical datasets, but to assess the completeness of recording and quality assure the figures to answer this PQ would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to MRs and appeals recorded up to September 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data shown in the tables is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN
201193 more like this
201194 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-18T15:02:57.847Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-18T15:02:57.847Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4365
label Biography information for Neil Gray more like this
1023281
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-11more like thismore than 2018-12-11
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with multiple sclerosis in (a) Scotland, (b) Northern Ireland and (c) Wales who were in receipt of disability living allowance and have undergone a reassessment for personal independence payments appealed the decision at tribunal and (i) had their decision overturned and (ii) had their mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the higher rate. more like this
tabling member constituency Airdrie and Shotts more like this
tabling member printed
Neil Gray more like this
uin 201193 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-18more like thismore than 2018-12-18
answer text <p>The Northern Irish Assembly has devolved responsibility for social security benefits including Personal Independence Payment (PIP). Information regarding PIP in Northern Ireland is therefore the responsibility of the Department for Communities in Northern Ireland.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Tables 1 and 2 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals for new claims for PIP where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the Assessment Provider (AP) due to failing the assessment, for claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 1: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 2: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Tables 3 and 4 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, MRs and appeals relating to Disability Living Allowance (DLA) claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis who have undergone a reassessment to PIP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 3: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>1,040</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>180</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>530</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 4: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>130</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>920</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>540</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.7m decisions have been made until September 2018 in Great Britain, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>We’re committed to ensuring that disabled people get the full support that they need, and under PIP 52% of people with MS receive the highest possible award, compared with 39% under the previous benefit DLA. May 2013 is chosen for comparison as this is the last month with a full DLA caseload prior to claimants being reassessed from DLA to PIP.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of people who had the mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the enhanced rate is available from internal analytical datasets, but to assess the completeness of recording and quality assure the figures to answer this PQ would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to MRs and appeals recorded up to September 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data shown in the tables is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN
201192 more like this
201194 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-18T15:02:57.94Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-18T15:02:57.94Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4365
label Biography information for Neil Gray more like this
1023282
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-11more like thismore than 2018-12-11
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with multiple sclerosis in (a) Scotland, (b) Northern Ireland and (c) Wales who were previously in receipt of disability living allowance and have undergone a reassessment for personal independence payment applied for mandatory reconsideration of the decision in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Airdrie and Shotts more like this
tabling member printed
Neil Gray more like this
uin 201194 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-18more like thismore than 2018-12-18
answer text <p>The Northern Irish Assembly has devolved responsibility for social security benefits including Personal Independence Payment (PIP). Information regarding PIP in Northern Ireland is therefore the responsibility of the Department for Communities in Northern Ireland.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Tables 1 and 2 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals for new claims for PIP where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the Assessment Provider (AP) due to failing the assessment, for claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 1: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Table 2: New claims decisions, MRs and appeals where the initial decision was disallowance post-referral to the AP due to failing the assessment, by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Tables 3 and 4 below show, for Scotland and Wales, the number of decisions, MRs and appeals relating to Disability Living Allowance (DLA) claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis who have undergone a reassessment to PIP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 3: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Scotland with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>1,040</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>180</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>530</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"><p><strong>Table 4: Reassessment decisions, MRs and appeals by year of initial decision - for claimants in Wales with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions maintained at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>130</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>920</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>540</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan - Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.7m decisions have been made until September 2018 in Great Britain, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>We’re committed to ensuring that disabled people get the full support that they need, and under PIP 52% of people with MS receive the highest possible award, compared with 39% under the previous benefit DLA. May 2013 is chosen for comparison as this is the last month with a full DLA caseload prior to claimants being reassessed from DLA to PIP.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of people who had the mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the enhanced rate is available from internal analytical datasets, but to assess the completeness of recording and quality assure the figures to answer this PQ would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to MRs and appeals recorded up to September 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data shown in the tables is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN
201192 more like this
201193 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-18T15:02:58.02Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-18T15:02:58.02Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4365
label Biography information for Neil Gray more like this
1023283
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-11more like thismore than 2018-12-11
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many and what proportion of people with multiple sclerosis in (a) Scotland, (b) Northern Ireland and (c) Wales are no longer eligible for the higher rate of mobility support as a result of the transition from disability living allowance in each year since the introduction of personal independence payment. more like this
tabling member constituency Airdrie and Shotts more like this
tabling member printed
Neil Gray more like this
uin 201195 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-18more like thismore than 2018-12-18
answer text <p>The Northern Irish Assembly has devolved responsibility for social security benefits including Personal Independence Payment (PIP). Information regarding PIP in Northern Ireland is therefore the responsibility of the Department for Communities in Northern Ireland.</p><p> </p><p>The table below shows, for Scotland and Wales, the number and proportion of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) claimants with a primary disability of Multiple Sclerosis who received the highest rate of Mobility under DLA but who did not receive the enhanced mobility award after reassessment to PIP. This data includes claimants who were disallowed pre-referral, who withdrew their claim and who were disallowed at assessment.</p><p> </p><p>We’re committed to ensuring that disabled people get the full support that they need, and under PIP 52% of people with MS receive the highest possible award, compared with 39% under the previous benefit DLA. May 2013 is chosen for comparison as this is the last month with a full DLA caseload prior to claimants being reassessed from DLA to PIP.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1: PIP mobility awards for reassessment claimants with Multiple Sclerosis who had previously received the highest rate of Mobility award under DLA (by year of DWP decision)</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="3"><p>Scotland</p></td><td colspan="3"><p>Wales</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>PIP Mobility Award</p></td><td><p>Enhanced</p></td><td><p>Not Enhanced</p></td><td><p>%age not Enhanced</p></td><td><p>Enhanced</p></td><td><p>Not Enhanced</p></td><td><p>%age not Enhanced</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>32%</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>27%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>110</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>38%</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>700</p></td><td><p>250</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>610</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>30%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>770</p></td><td><p>300</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td><td><p>390</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018 (to Oct 18)</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>2,010</p></td><td><p>770</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td><td><p>1,270</p></td><td><p>440</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: PIP ADS</p><p /><p><strong>Notes:</strong></p><ul><li>PIP Reassessment outcome shows the outcome of the first DWP decision on each reassessment claim (i.e. they reflect outcomes prior to any reconsideration, appeal action and award review), where that decision was made between 8<sup>th</sup> April 2013 and 31<sup>st</sup> October 2018.</li><li>Figures exclude ‘rising 16s and claimants who did not respond to the invitation. Rising 16s are claimants who reach 16 years of age and so cease to be eligible for Disability Living Allowance but may be eligible for Personal Independence Payment.</li><li>Figures include reassessment outcomes for individuals who were aged between 16 and 64 on 8<sup>th</sup> April 2013, and include both PIP Normal Rules and Special Rules for the Terminally Ill claims.</li><li>Totals have been rounded to the nearest 10 and may not sum due to rounding.</li><li>Percentages are calculated using actual figures rather than rounded figures and have been rounded to the nearest 1%</li><li>This is unpublished data. It should be used with caution and it may be subject to future revision.</li><li>Data is based on main disabling condition as recorded on the DLA computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</li></ul>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-18T15:15:43.06Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-18T15:15:43.06Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4365
label Biography information for Neil Gray more like this