Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1504767
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Payment Exception Service more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for what reason the maximum payment amount that can be collected in a single transaction using the Payment Exception Service at a Post Office or pay point outlet is set at £100 requiring some claimants to make multiple transactions to access the full amount of their benefits or pension. more like this
tabling member constituency Newport East more like this
tabling member printed
Jessica Morden more like this
uin 47482 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-17more like thismore than 2022-09-17
answer text <p>The most secure way to receive payment is through a bank account. For those customers who are unable to open or manage a bank, building society or credit union account, the DWP’s new Payment Exception Service has been designed as a simple service to ensure customers have access to cash. Vouchers are uploaded to a card or sent electronically via SMS text or email. A customer can print their emailed vouchers and present them to the retailer. The maximum amount of a voucher is £100 so a customer may receive more than one voucher on their payment due date. Customers must cash the full amount of the voucher but do not have to cash all of their vouchers at the same time. This is a similar process to when customers used to be issued with Order Books and Girocheques.</p><p> </p><p>Payment Exception Service vouchers can be encashed at over 26,000 PayPoint outlets nationally as well as Post Offices nationwide. The service provided by this contract meets DWP’s statutory requirement to ensure all customers can access payments, including where standard banking is not available to them.</p><p> </p><p>The £100 voucher amount represents a value that protects vulnerable customers from being required to withdraw and carry large sums and is one that the PayPoint Retailer network can support.</p>
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-17T15:42:04.127Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-17T15:42:04.127Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
1548
label Biography information for Jessica Morden more like this
1504847
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Cost of Living Payments: Universal Credit more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their estimate of the number of Universal Credit claimants who did not qualify for the first cost of living additional payment because of the way their wages were paid during the qualifying month. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
uin HL2136 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-20more like thismore than 2022-09-20
answer text <p>We do not currently hold this information. We have deliberately kept the rules for these payments as simple as possible. This is the only way we can ensure that we can develop the systems and processes required to make these payments.</p><p> </p><p>Unfortunately, it is not possible to distinguish between those that have had a permanent increase to their earnings, and those whose earnings are temporarily fluctuating. If a UC claimant’s income subsequently falls, these claimants will return to having a positive award after the cut-off date and may be eligible for the second Cost of Living Payment, worth £324.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Stedman-Scott more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-20T16:01:49.943Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-20T16:01:49.943Z
answering member
4174
label Biography information for Baroness Stedman-Scott more like this
tabling member
4234
label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
1504848
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Carers: Employment more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether, and if so when, they will publish the research on barriers to carers’ employment mentioned in the letter from the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to the Chair of the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee, dated 15 July; and if not, why not. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
uin HL2137 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-20more like thismore than 2022-09-20
answer text <p>We are currently considering the results from the research, and should we decide to publish any findings, we will of course ensure that they are made available to both Houses.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Stedman-Scott more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-20T15:58:04.49Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-20T15:58:04.49Z
answering member
4174
label Biography information for Baroness Stedman-Scott more like this
tabling member
4234
label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
1504850
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what would be the level of the benefit cap, set in 2016, if it had kept pace with (1) inflation, (2) average earnings, and (3) Universal Credit rates. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
uin HL2138 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-21more like thismore than 2022-09-21
answer text <p>There is a statutory duty to review the levels of the cap at least once in every five years and this will happen at the appropriate time. The current unusual economic period with potentially counter intuitive and shifting trends will need to be considered in the context of any decision regarding a review.</p><p> </p><p>The benefit cap provides a strong work incentive and fairness for hard-working taxpaying households and encourages people to move into work, where possible. The Government firmly believes that where possible it is in the best interests of children to be in working households and the benefit cap provides a clear incentive to move into work.</p><p> </p><p>The table below shows the weekly benefit cap level if it had kept pace with (1) inflation and (2) average earnings. To provide the levels of the benefit cap had it kept pace with Universal Credit rates is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate costs.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Inflation</p></td><td><p>Average earnings</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London couples/lone parents</p></td><td><p>£496.51</p></td><td><p>£529.06</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London single adult</p></td><td><p>£332.67</p></td><td><p>£354.47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Excluding London couples/lone parents</p></td><td><p>£431.75</p></td><td><p>£460.05</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Excluding London single adult</p></td><td><p>£289.27</p></td><td><p>£308.23</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The earnings and inflation measure used for uprating DWP benefits have been used.</p><p> </p><p>Inflation and earnings source: House of Commons, Benefit Uprating 2022/23, Table 5 (February 2022).</p>
answering member printed Baroness Stedman-Scott more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-21T14:26:13.987Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-21T14:26:13.987Z
answering member
4174
label Biography information for Baroness Stedman-Scott more like this
tabling member
4234
label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
1504890
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Energy and Food: Prices more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether she has had recent discussions with the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the potential merits of providing funding to local authorities for the provision of (a) support and (b) infrastructure for (i) food and (ii) energy costs in winter 2022. more like this
tabling member constituency York Central more like this
tabling member printed
Rachael Maskell more like this
uin 47597 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-27more like thismore than 2022-09-27
answer text <p>The government understands the pressures people are facing with the cost of living and has taken further decisive action to support people with their energy bills. The new “Energy Price Guarantee” will mean a typical UK household will now pay up to an average £2,500 a year on their energy bill for the next two years from 1 October, saving the average household in Great Britain at least £1,000 a year based on current energy prices from October. This is in addition to the over £37bn of cost-of-living support announced earlier this year which includes the £400 non-repayable discount to eligible households provided through the Energy Bills Support Scheme.</p><p> </p><p>Included within this £37bn is an additional £500 million from October 2022 to help households with the cost of essentials, bringing the total funding for this support to £1.5 billion for the period October 2021- March 2023. In England, £421 million is being provided to extend the Household Support Fund, a discretionary scheme run by Upper Tier Local Authorities, from October 2022 to March 2023.</p><p> </p><p>The fund is principally intended to be used to support households with energy, food and water costs, although support with wider essentials can also be considered under the scope of the scheme. We know energy bills may be of particular concern to low-income households and so Local Authorities are being encouraged to focus on supporting households with the cost of energy.</p><p> </p><p>Guidance and individual local authority indicative allocations for this further extension to the Household Support Fund will be published in due course. The devolved administrations will receive £79 million through the Barnett formula.</p><p />
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-27T10:14:20.323Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-27T10:14:20.323Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4471
label Biography information for Rachael Maskell more like this
1504917
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Long Covid more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the answer of 27 June 2022 to Question 21271 on Long Covid, what progress her Department has made on investigating whether COVID can be classified as an occupational disease. more like this
tabling member constituency Hornsey and Wood Green more like this
tabling member printed
Catherine West more like this
uin 47620 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-16more like thismore than 2022-09-16
answer text <p>The Industrial Injuries Advisory Council (“IIAC”) advises Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on matters related to occupational diseases which may qualify for Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit. IIAC has reviewed the evidence relating to the long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections and hopes to publish a report in the next few months focusing on those post-COVID complications arising from both COVID directly and/or treatment and for which there is sufficient evidence of loss of faculty and potential long-term disability.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-16T14:20:18.927Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-16T14:20:18.927Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4523
label Biography information for Catherine West more like this
1504927
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Cost of Living Payments: Housing Benefit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to answer of 8 July 2022 to Question 26876 on Cost of Living Payments: Housing Benefit, what assessment he has been made of (a) how many people receiving housing benefit only are not receiving the £650 cost of living payment and (b) the sufficiency of the Household Support Fund to reach all those requiring additional support. more like this
tabling member constituency Hornsey and Wood Green more like this
tabling member printed
Catherine West more like this
uin 47623 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-27more like thismore than 2022-09-27
answer text <p>(A) How many people receiving HB only are not receiving the £650 Cost Of Living payment</p><p> </p><p>Approximately 100 thousand working-age HB claimants were not in receipt of a qualifying benefit or Tax Credit and so would not receive a cost of living payment of £650 paid in two lump sums of £326 and £324.</p><p> </p><p>There are a further 370 thousand pensioner HB claimants who were also not in receipt of any qualifying benefit but will receive the £300 Cost of Living payment paid through an increase to the Winter Fuel Payment.</p><p> </p><p>(B) What assessment has been made of the sufficiency of the Household Support Fund to reach all those requiring additional support.</p><p> </p><p>£842m has already been allocated to Local Authorities in England through the Household Support Fund to support those in need for the period October 2021- September 2022. Almost 9 million awards were given to those in need between October 2021 and March 2022 alone. A further £421m is being provided to extend the Household Support Fund from October 2022 to March 2023, taking the total funding for this support to over £1.2bn.</p><p> </p><p>Local Authorities have the ties and local knowledge to best determine how this support should be provided to their local communities, and they have the discretion to design their own local schemes to best meet local need, within the parameters of the grant determination and guidance for the fund.</p><p> </p><p>The Household Support Fund is just one part of a wider package of government support for the cost of living now totalling over £37bn this year.</p><p> </p><p />
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-27T10:04:00.27Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-27T10:04:00.27Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4523
label Biography information for Catherine West more like this
1504934
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Cost of Living Payments: Universal Credit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment her Department has made of the impact of the decision taken that Universal Credit claimants will not be eligible for the cost of living payment if they had their Universal Credit award reduced to zero by the minimum income floor and did not receive a Universal Credit payment during the qualifying month; and if her Department will publish statistics to show how many claimants will be affected by that policy. more like this
tabling member constituency Belfast South more like this
tabling member printed
Claire Hanna more like this
uin 47699 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-16more like thismore than 2022-09-16
answer text <p>No assessment has been made,</p><p>We have deliberately kept the rules for these payments as simple as possible. This is the only way we can ensure that we can develop the systems and processes required to make these payments. The cost-of-living payment is being made in two payments which have different qualifying periods, this will mean that some people may not receive the first payment but may receive the second payment.</p><p> </p><p>Information showing the number of claimants that may be affected by this Policy is not readily available, and this would only be possible at a disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>Should people find that they need further support, they may wish to approach their Local Authority to ask about support under the Household Support Fund. For further information please see <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/cost-of-living-payment" target="_blank">Cost of Living Payment - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)</a></p><p> </p><p>The following PQ regarding the MIF and Universal Credit may be of interest <a href="https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-07-13/36138/" target="_blank">Written questions and answers- Written questions, answers and statements - UK Parliament</a></p>
answering member constituency Macclesfield more like this
answering member printed David Rutley more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-16T13:57:18.857Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-16T13:57:18.857Z
answering member
4033
label Biography information for David Rutley more like this
tabling member
4827
label Biography information for Claire Hanna more like this
1504935
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Cost of Living Payments: Universal Credit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment her Department made before introducing the Social Security (Additional Payments) Bill of the potential impact on Universal Credit claimants, including those working in the performing arts and entertainment industries who have fluctuating earnings, of the policy that Universal Credit claimants would not be eligible for the cost of living payment if they had their Universal Credit award reduced to zero by the minimum income floor and did not receive a Universal Credit payment during the qualifying month. more like this
tabling member constituency Belfast South more like this
tabling member printed
Claire Hanna more like this
uin 47700 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-16more like thismore than 2022-09-16
answer text <p>No assessment has been made.</p><p>We have deliberately kept the rules for these payments as simple as possible. This is the only way we can ensure that we can develop the systems and processes required to make these payments. The cost-of-living payment is being made in two payments which have different qualifying periods, this will mean that some people may not receive the first payment but may receive the second payment.</p><p> </p><p>Should people find that they need further support, they may wish to approach their Local Authority to ask about support under the Household Support Fund. For further information please see <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/cost-of-living-payment" target="_blank">Cost of Living Payment - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)</a></p><p> </p><p>The following PQ regarding the MIF and Universal Credit may be of interest <a href="https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-07-13/36138/" target="_blank">Written questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK Parliament</a></p>
answering member constituency Macclesfield more like this
answering member printed David Rutley more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-16T13:51:54.577Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-16T13:51:54.577Z
answering member
4033
label Biography information for David Rutley more like this
tabling member
4827
label Biography information for Claire Hanna more like this
1504942
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Department for Work and Pensions: Staff more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how much her Department has spent on staffing costs for (a) mandatory reconsideration and (b) appeals against Work Capability Assessment decisions for Universal Credit in each year since 2012-13. more like this
tabling member constituency Battersea more like this
tabling member printed
Marsha De Cordova more like this
uin 47642 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-23more like thismore than 2022-09-23
answer text <p>Universal Credit cost data cannot be broken down into specific case types (i.e. Work Capability Assessment) so total costs from all UC Reconsiderations and Appeals has been provided.</p><p> </p><p>The information for the financial years covered by the request are detailed in the tables below:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Universal Credit </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012-13 <br> (£m)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013-14 <br> (£m)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014-15 <br> (£m)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015-16 <br> (£m)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016-17 <br> (£m)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017-18 <br> (£m)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018-19 <br> (£m)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019-20 <br> (£m)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020-21<p><p> (£m)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2021-22<p><p> (£m)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mandatory Reconsiderations</p></td><td><p>£0.0</p></td><td><p>£0.0</p></td><td><p>£0.2</p></td><td><p>£0.8</p></td><td><p>£1.1</p></td><td><p>£4.1</p></td><td><p>£4.4</p></td><td><p>£9.3</p></td><td><p>£11.5</p></td><td><p>£14.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Appeals</p></td><td><p>£0.0</p></td><td><p>£0.0</p></td><td><p>£0.0</p></td><td><p>£0.1</p></td><td><p>£0.2</p></td><td><p>£1.1</p></td><td><p>£1.7</p></td><td><p>£5.7</p></td><td><p>£5.6</p></td><td><p>£5.4</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p /><p>Cost figures are rounded to the nearest £0.1m</p><p>Data Source: ABM</p><p>The cost figures quoted are estimated DWP level 1 operating costs, including both directdelivery staff and non-staff costs. Non-staff costs are only those costs incurred in local cost centres, relating to direct delivery staff.</p><p>Please note that the data supplied is from the Departmental Activity Based Models. This data is derived from unpublished management information, which was collected for internalDepartmental use only, and has not been quality assured to National Statistics or Official</p><p>Statistics publication standards. It should therefore be treated with caution. The Departmental Activity Based staffing models are a snapshot of how many people were identified asundertaking specified activities as assigned by line managers.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-23T10:39:30.83Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-23T10:39:30.83Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
4676
label Biography information for Marsha De Cordova more like this