Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

885014
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Females more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many women are still held in prison on indeterminate public protection sentences by (a) offence and (b) original length of sentence. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 136002 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-24more like thismore than 2018-04-24
answer text <p>As of 31 December 2017<sup>1</sup>, 74 women IPPs are being held in prison. Out of these, 54 have never been released by the independent Parole Board and 20 are in prison after being recalled (and they can be released only on a direction from the parole board).</p><p> </p><p>Those unreleased are serving sentences for the following offences:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Offence Group</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Count</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence against the person</p></td><td><p>25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sexual offences</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Robbery</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Theft Offences</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal damage and arson</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>All</p></td><td><p>54</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Those unreleased received the following minimum tariffs:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Tariff Length</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Count</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Less than 2 years</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2 years to less than or equal to 4 years</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greater than 4 years to less than or equal to 6 years</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greater than 6 years to less than or equal to 10 years</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>All</p></td><td><p>54</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong>Between 2010 and 2017<sup>1</sup> a total of 40 women IPPs have been recalled.</strong></p><p>Public protection is our priority and offenders on licence must comply with a strict set of conditions. If any offender breaches his or her licence conditions, he or she is liable to be recalled immediately to prison.</p><p> </p><p>The independent Parole Board will continue to assess rigorously all tariff-expired IPP prisoners, in order to determine whether they are safe to be released.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p><sup>1</sup>By statistics code of practice, we cannot provide data for the most recent quarter as we have declared intention to publish such information next week.</p><p> </p><p>The figures provided are for offenders recalled from 2010 to 2017 whose first releases were directed by the Parole Board. Information datasets held by the department do not record the data in this format prior to 2010. The figures may include offenders recalled more than once across multiple years but not within years. The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. Recall reasons do not sum to the total number of recalls as more than one reason can be recorded against each recall.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
grouped question UIN 136005 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-24T16:41:37.593Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-24T16:41:37.593Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
885015
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prison Sentences more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what plans are in place to support women and men on indeterminate public protection sentences in meeting the requirements for their release. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 136003 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-24more like thismore than 2018-04-24
answer text <p>Our priority remains the protection of the public, and this is reflected in the work HM Prison and Probation Service undertake with IPP prisoners prior to and following their release.</p><p> </p><p>A joint action plan is in place, co-owned by Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) and the Parole Board, with the specific aim of providing opportunities for IPP prisoners to progress to safe release. A key part of the action plan is to ensure that the parole process runs as smoothly as possible, providing IPP prisoners with timely access to parole reviews. The Parole Board has effectively eliminated its backlog and is now listing more hearings than ever before.</p><p> </p><p>The release of IPP sentence prisoners is solely a matter for the Independent Parole Board, based on a thorough assessment of risk. The Board will direct the release of these prisoners only if it is satisfied that the levels of risk posed to the general public are reduced enough to be safely managed in the community under supervision by the National Probation Service and its partner agencies.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-24T17:00:03.293Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-24T17:00:03.293Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
805479
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-12more like thismore than 2017-12-12
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners on Remand: Females more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of women remanded into custody did not subsequently receive a custodial sentence in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 119150 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-20more like thismore than 2017-12-20
answer text <p>The number and proportion of women remanded into custody at the magistrates’ and Crown Court who did not subsequently receive an immediate custodial sentence in each of the last 5 years are shown in the tables below. Separate figures are provided for the magistrates’ courts and the Crown Court. These figures cannot be combined as individuals that are committed for trial or sentence from the magistrates’ courts to the Crown Court in the same year would be counted twice.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Women remanded in custody at the magistrates' and Crown Court who did not go on to receive an immediate custodial sentence, 2012 to 2016 <sup>1 2 3</sup></strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Magistrates’ Court</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total number of women remanded in custody and dealt with by magistrates' courts <sup>4 5</sup></p></td><td><p>2392</p></td><td><p>2439</p></td><td><p>2394</p></td><td><p>2045</p></td><td><p>1915</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total number of women remanded into custody and dealt with by the magistrates’ courts who do not go on to receive an immediate custodial sentence</p></td><td><p>1522</p></td><td><p>1560</p></td><td><p>1486</p></td><td><p>1300</p></td><td><p>1149</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of women remanded into custody and dealt with by the magistrates’ courts who do not go on to receive an immediate custodial sentence</p></td><td><p>64%</p></td><td><p>64%</p></td><td><p>62%</p></td><td><p>64%</p></td><td><p>60%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Crown Court <sup>6</sup></strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total number of women remanded in custody and dealt with by the Crown Court <sup>5</sup></p></td><td><p>2220</p></td><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>2295</p></td><td><p>2207</p></td><td><p>1996</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total number of women remanded in custody and dealt with by the Crown Courts who do not go on to receive an immediate custodial sentence</p></td><td><p>836</p></td><td><p>787</p></td><td><p>930</p></td><td><p>943</p></td><td><p>820</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion of women remanded in custody and dealt with by the Crown Court who do not go on to receive an immediate custodial sentence</p></td><td><p>38%</p></td><td><p>39%</p></td><td><p>41%</p></td><td><p>43%</p></td><td><p>41%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes</p><p>1) The figures for remands relate to defendants remanded in each year in each completed court case rather than to the number of remand decisions.</p><p>2) Each individual is reported against their principal remand status at that court, that is, the remand status involving the greatest degree of court control – i.e. custody if any period of the trial or sentencing was spent on custodial remand, else bail if any period was spent on bail and no period was spent in custody, else not remanded.</p><p>3) Individuals cannot be robustly tracked between courts and cases, they will be counted separately in both Crown Court and magistrates’ courts totals if their case spans both, and would be counted more than once if remanded as part of multiple completed court cases.</p><p>4) These figures exclude individuals remanded in custody at the magistrates' court that were committed to trial or sentence at the Crown Court as is not possible to determine the sentencing outcome.</p><p>5) Individuals who failed to appear at court have been excluded.</p><p>6) The Crown Court table only includes those remanded in custody at the Crown Court, regardless of an individual's remand status at the magistrates' Court. Individuals remanded in custody at the Magistrates' court may not be not be remanded in custody at the Crown Court following a committal.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>At all stages of the Criminal Justice System, consideration is being given to a number of practical ways to ensure that we are managing all offenders and defendants, including female offenders/defendants, in the most effective and efficient way in order to support their rehabilitation and reduce reoffending. This includes improving the effectiveness of the use of remand and bail, focusing in particular on those defendants currently remanded in custody, convicted, but who do not go on to receive a custodial sentence.</p><p> </p><p>We are committed to doing all we can to address the issues around female offending so we can better protect the public and deliver more effective rehabilitation. We are developing a strategy for female offenders, to improve outcomes for women in the community and in custody. This will also consider how we can improve early intervention and diversion to avoid vulnerable women entering the criminal justice system.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
grouped question UIN 119151 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-20T11:17:16.783Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-20T11:17:16.783Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
795494
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-27more like thismore than 2017-11-27
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Community Rehabilitation Companies: Females more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what services each community rehabilitation company offers to women. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 115915 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-05more like thismore than 2017-12-05
answer text <table><tbody><tr><td><p>Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) are contractually required to provide services for female offenders that they are managing in the community, and to deliver resettlement services to offenders both before and following release from prison. As part of our reforms to probation, we have given providers the flexibility to innovate, and to tailor rehabilitative support to the particular needs of offenders locally. We have not, therefore, prescribed how much of the additional funding for CRCs must be spent on services for female offenders. Records detailing the specifics of each service available in every individual CRC could only be collated at disproportionate cost, however records detailing the organisations responsible for the provision of these services are available, with the most recent dated July 2017. All 21 CRCs have arrangements in place to address the needs of female offenders. 20 of the 21 CRCs have subcontracting arrangements in place to deliver these services, with Durham Tees Valley CRC providing the service directly. Across these 20 CRCs, there are 47 locally based organisations delivering targeted support for female offenders, addressing their specific needs locally. A further seven small providers deliver services across larger, geographically remote, areas.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>We have a robust contract management and assurance process in place for CRCs, and continue to assess their performance through a range of service levels, including their delivery of Through the Gate and how they are addressing the specific needs of female offenders.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
grouped question UIN 115916 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-05T15:33:16.717Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-05T15:33:16.717Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
769743
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-10-12more like thismore than 2017-10-12
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading National Probation Service for England and Wales: Pensions more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many probation staff have been affected by the administrative error by Shared Services on pension contributions; and whether he plans to compensate staff affected by that error. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 107439 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-18more like thismore than 2017-10-18
answer text <p>There have been 2336 National Probation Staff who have been affected by the recent problems relating to pensions contributions. There are currently no plans to compensate these staff.</p><p> </p><p>There is a regular governance structure in relation to the provision of Shared Services, which reviews the service delivery of our provider, Shared Services Connected Limited to the Department. These mechanisms regularly review issues and incidents and have fully managed the recent issues in relation to pension contributions. These mechanisms have been effective in the management and closure of the defects.</p><p> </p><p>Following the migration of the departments HR and payroll data to the new cross government Single Operating Platform a small number of defects have been identified and corrected. These led to the under-collection of pension contributions for some staff. These have been corrected with the final correction being applied for inclusion in this month’s payroll and the full contributions have been paid to the pension scheme administrator. The contribution under collection only affected 4 types of overtime rate and 2 absence scheme calculations with the remaining payroll elements all being subject to the correct pensions deduction. The departments migration to the Single Operating Platform was subject to formal programme control and governance and these programme mechanisms have been used to resolve these issues.</p>
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
grouped question UIN
107440 more like this
107460 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-18T16:14:54.767Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-18T16:14:54.767Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
769744
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-10-12more like thismore than 2017-10-12
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading National Probation Service for England and Wales: Pensions more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will undertake a review of the performance of Shared Services within the probation service, including the incidence of pension contributions not being taken from probation staff. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 107440 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-18more like thismore than 2017-10-18
answer text <p>There have been 2336 National Probation Staff who have been affected by the recent problems relating to pensions contributions. There are currently no plans to compensate these staff.</p><p> </p><p>There is a regular governance structure in relation to the provision of Shared Services, which reviews the service delivery of our provider, Shared Services Connected Limited to the Department. These mechanisms regularly review issues and incidents and have fully managed the recent issues in relation to pension contributions. These mechanisms have been effective in the management and closure of the defects.</p><p> </p><p>Following the migration of the departments HR and payroll data to the new cross government Single Operating Platform a small number of defects have been identified and corrected. These led to the under-collection of pension contributions for some staff. These have been corrected with the final correction being applied for inclusion in this month’s payroll and the full contributions have been paid to the pension scheme administrator. The contribution under collection only affected 4 types of overtime rate and 2 absence scheme calculations with the remaining payroll elements all being subject to the correct pensions deduction. The departments migration to the Single Operating Platform was subject to formal programme control and governance and these programme mechanisms have been used to resolve these issues.</p>
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
grouped question UIN
107439 more like this
107460 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-18T16:14:54.83Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-18T16:14:54.83Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
769914
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-10-12more like thismore than 2017-10-12
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Probation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of recent HM Inspectorate of Probation reports which indicate that workloads in both the National Probation Service and community rehabilitation companies are dangerously high. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 107622 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-19more like thismore than 2017-10-19
answer text <p>The great majority of Quality &amp; Impact Reports by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation have commented favourably on the performance of the National Probation Service (NPS). We recognise that staff shortages in certain parts of the country have resulted in high caseloads in those areas. The NPS is addressing this via a major recruitment campaign and is on target to recruit around 500 additional trainee probation officers, and over 1000 probation service officers in 2017-18.</p><p> </p><p>Contracts with Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) require each that each CRC ensures that it employs a sufficient level of staff, and that its workforce is competent and adequately trained. We closely monitor and robustly manage providers to make sure they fulfil their contractual commitments to reduce reoffending, protect the public and provide value for money to the taxpayer.</p> more like this
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-19T11:56:42.87Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-19T11:56:42.87Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
769920
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-10-12more like thismore than 2017-10-12
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading National Probation Service for England and Wales: Pensions more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the reasons for administrative errors made by shared services which has resulted in no pension contributions being taken from the salary of probation service staff. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 107460 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-10-18more like thismore than 2017-10-18
answer text <p>There have been 2336 National Probation Staff who have been affected by the recent problems relating to pensions contributions. There are currently no plans to compensate these staff.</p><p> </p><p>There is a regular governance structure in relation to the provision of Shared Services, which reviews the service delivery of our provider, Shared Services Connected Limited to the Department. These mechanisms regularly review issues and incidents and have fully managed the recent issues in relation to pension contributions. These mechanisms have been effective in the management and closure of the defects.</p><p> </p><p>Following the migration of the departments HR and payroll data to the new cross government Single Operating Platform a small number of defects have been identified and corrected. These led to the under-collection of pension contributions for some staff. These have been corrected with the final correction being applied for inclusion in this month’s payroll and the full contributions have been paid to the pension scheme administrator. The contribution under collection only affected 4 types of overtime rate and 2 absence scheme calculations with the remaining payroll elements all being subject to the correct pensions deduction. The departments migration to the Single Operating Platform was subject to formal programme control and governance and these programme mechanisms have been used to resolve these issues.</p>
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
grouped question UIN
107439 more like this
107440 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-10-18T16:14:54.877Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-18T16:14:54.877Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
758286
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-09-06more like thismore than 2017-09-06
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Families more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking to implement the recommendations of the report by Lord Farmer, The importance of strengthening prisoners' family ties to prevent reoffending and reduce intergenerational crime, published in August 2017. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 9144 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-09-11more like thismore than 2017-09-11
answer text <p>Families can play a significant role in supporting an offender; positive family relationships have been identified as a protective factor in the desistance from crime. The Government welcomes the recommendations identified by Lord Farmer to strengthen family ties to help offenders turn their lives around and protect public safety.</p><p><br>Work has already commenced on developing a strategy which will take forward recommendations from the review. We are already taking forward some key recommendations, including giving governors the budget and flexibility to spend their resources appropriately to help prisoners keep important family ties.</p><p><br>Alongside this, we plan to pilot new family and significant relationship performance measures which will provide crucial guidance to deliver more consistent services in areas such as visitations across the entire prisons estate.</p><p><br>We will continue to hold regular meetings with Lord Farmer to update him on implementation of his recommendations.</p><p><br>The Government will ensure that Parliament is fully appraised of progress on implementation and will set out its proposals for doing so in a letter to the Chair of the Justice Select Committee in due course.</p>
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-11T16:30:10.317Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-11T16:30:10.317Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
720871
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-04-13more like thismore than 2017-04-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Appeals more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many First-tier Tribunal appeals relating to claims for personal independence payments have been adjourned for (a) additional information and (b) other reasons in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston remove filter
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 70738 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-24more like thismore than 2017-04-24
answer text <p>This information is not held centrally.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North East Hertfordshire more like this
answering member printed Sir Oliver Heald more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-24T13:22:58.087Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-24T13:22:58.087Z
answering member
69
label Biography information for Sir Oliver Heald more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this