Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

515696

registered interest
date	26/04/2016
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	First-tier Tribunal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what provision has been made for moving the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) from Chichester Magistrates' Court when that Court is closed.
tabling member constituency	Chichester
tabling member printed	Mr Andrew Tyrie
uin	35498
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/05/2016 answer text <p>HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service is committed to ensuring that adequate provision will be secured for the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) which will relocate from Chichester Magistrates’ Court when it closes. Options are currently being evaluated.</p> answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara question first answered 04/05/2016 11:44:35 answering member 1496 label Biography information for Shailesh Vara
tabling member	112 label Biography information for Lord Tyrie

515697

registered interest
date	26/04/2016
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Chichester
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment his Department has made of the potential effect of closing the Chichester Combined Court Centre and Chichester Magistrates' Court on the work of (a) Chichester constabulary, (b) Chichester District Council and (c) other local services.
tabling member constituency	Chichester
tabling member printed	Mr Andrew Tyrie
uin	35499
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/05/2016 answer text <p>All responses to the consultation were carefully considered before the decision was made to close the courts in Chichester. This included evaluating the impact on the police, the District Council and other local services. In recognition of the particular circumstances of court users in Chichester, the Combined Court Centre will not close until suitable local alternative provision is in place.</p> answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara question first answered 04/05/2016 11:48:31 answering member 1496 label Biography information for Shailesh Vara
tabling member	112 label Biography information for Lord Tyrie

515698

registered interest
date	26/04/2016
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Administration of Justice: Chichester
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment his Department has made of the effect on demand for justice services of future growth in the population of Chichester.
tabling member constituency	Chichester
tabling member printed	Mr Andrew Tyrie
uin	35500
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/05/2016 answer text <p>The demand for justice services may change in future due to many factors including, but not limited to, demographic changes. The decision to close the courts in Chichester was made on the basis that the receiving courts have capacity to accommodate current and future projected workloads. The improvements which will be delivered by the reform of HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service will enable court services to be delivered flexibly and provide greater resilience to changes in demand.</p> answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara question first answered 04/05/2016 11:52:54 answering member 1496 label Biography information for Shailesh Vara
tabling member	112 label Biography information for Lord Tyrie

515974

registered interest
date	26/04/2016
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Taxis: Assistance Animals
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent discussions he has had with the Sentencing Council on the offence of refusing carriage to an assistance dog.
tabling member constituency	Hampstead and Kilburn
tabling member printed	Tulip Siddiq
uin	35672
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/05/2016 answer text <p>It is an offence under section 168 of the Equalities Act 2010 to refuse to take an assistance dog in a taxi or private hire vehicle. The maximum penalty is up to £1,000. Sentencing is a matter for the independent courts. There is no evidence that courts are finding their sentencing powers insufficient. The Sentencing Council considers the case for guidelines on the basis of a number of factors, including where data suggests there may be inconsistency in sentencing.</p> answering member constituency Esher and Walton answering member printed Dominic Raab question first answered 04/05/2016 11:31:38 answering member 4007 label Biography information for Dominic Raab
tabling member	4518 label Biography information for Tulip Siddiq