 |
answer text |
<p>The UK’s participation in the Conference was welcomed by many states, non-governmental
organisations and parliamentarians. At the Conference, officials listened carefully
to the participants, who expressed a very wide range of views. Some argued that the
way to achieve the goal of a world without nuclear weapons was to ban weapons now
or to fix a timetable for their elimination. This approach fails to take account of
the stability and security which nuclear weapons can help to secure. None of us would
gain from a loss of that stability. The UK believes that the UN Disarmament Machinery
and the Non-Proliferation Treaty provide the right forum for working towards a world
without nuclear weapons.</p><p>Our Ambassador to Austria restated our concern at the
humanitarian consequences which could result from the use of nuclear weapons. That
is why the UK works extremely hard to prevent the use of nuclear weapons; to prevent
the proliferation of nuclear weapons; and to keep our own nuclear weapons safe and
secure. We are also committed to working towards a world without nuclear weapons.
In our Strategic Defence and Security Review in 2010, the Government undertook to
reduce the number of warheads we have by the mid-2020s. However, we shall retain a
continuous submarine based deterrent, for as long as the global security situation
makes it necessary.</p><p>A copy of the UK intervention at the Conference has been
placed in the Library of the House and is attached to this response.</p><p> </p>
|
|
