Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

790154
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-15more like thismore than 2017-11-15
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Females more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the effect of community-based sentencing options on reducing the numbers of mothers on the prison estate and children in care; and if he will ensure that his Department's new female offenders strategy includes measures to prevent the separation of children from their mothers in cases where a mother's sentence is for a non-violent crime and for 12 months or less. more like this
tabling member constituency Maidstone and The Weald more like this
tabling member printed
Mrs Helen Grant more like this
uin 113208 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>We are currently developing the female offender strategy and have considered the effectiveness of community sentences and custodial sentences for all women as part of that work. Custody should be the last resort and only imposed after the court has considered alternative sentences to be served in the community. We are committed to making sure that as many women as possible are effectively rehabilitated in the community to better protect the public and deliver better outcomes for female offenders and their families.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T15:54:48.473Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T15:54:48.473Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4018
label Biography information for Mrs Helen Grant more like this
788982
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Supreme Court more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he has made an assessment of changes to the operation or administration of the Supreme Court as a result of the UK leaving the EU. more like this
tabling member constituency Wellingborough more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Peter Bone more like this
uin 112993 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>There are no plans to make changes to the operation or the administration of the Supreme Court as a result of the UK leaving the EU. We are engaging with both the Supreme Court and the judiciary to ensure that our courts are prepared for any effects of leaving the EU.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Esher and Walton more like this
answering member printed Dominic Raab more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T17:36:55.563Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T17:36:55.563Z
answering member
4007
label Biography information for Dominic Raab more like this
tabling member
1581
label Biography information for Mr Peter Bone more like this
789007
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Terrorism: Greater Manchester more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much financial support has been provided to services offering support for families and victims of the Manchester terrorist attack of 2017. more like this
tabling member constituency Denton and Reddish more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Gwynne more like this
uin 112939 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Government is committed to ensuring that victims of terrorist attacks receive the help and support they need. The Ministry of Justice has allocated £96m to funding for services supporting victims of crime in 2017/18, with the majority of funding allocated to Police and Crime Commissioners and some services commissioned nationally. This includes funding for the national Homicide Service which supports families bereaved by murder including terrorism; and for the Peace Foundation which supports victims and families affected by terrorism.</p><p> </p><p>The Ministry of Justice has provided an additional £337,000 in 2017/18 to help ensure services provide the best possible support to victims of terrorist attacks, including £79,000 specifically to support services in Manchester.</p><p> </p><p>The Government has also established a cross-departmental Victims of Terrorism Unit, to help coordinate support for victims of terrorist attacks including Manchester, across the statutory and voluntary sector and at national and local level. This has included work with local schools to help ensure that children and teachers have support in coping with the attacks, ensuring that payments from charitable fundraising does not affect victims’ income related benefits, and work with local authorities to ensure that best practice is shared and adopted.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T15:53:56.633Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T15:53:56.633Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
1506
label Biography information for Andrew Gwynne more like this
789150
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Mentally Disordered Offenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many requests relating to restricted patients were made to the Mental Health Casework Section in each year since 2009-10; and of those requests in each such year how many (a) have been completed and (b) still need to be completed. more like this
tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
tabling member printed
Diana Johnson more like this
uin 112880 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (formerly known as the National Offender Management Service) has not recorded centrally all the funding allocated to of the Mental Health Casework Section (MHCS) in each year since 2009/10. Information on the number of full time equivalent staff within this unit over those years is also not recorded centrally. There is no legal or business requirement for the Department to hold such information on a separate basis.</p><p> </p><p>For 2017/18, the full time equivalent headcount for MHCS is 58, with 11 positions currently vacant, pending completion of the recruitment processes</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>The numbers of requests relating to restricted patients that were made to MHCS each year from 2009/10 are set out in the table below. It is not possible retrospectively to ascertain how many requests were completed in-year for each year. The number of current outstanding requests in 2017/18 is set out in the table below. These figures include requests received up to and including 14 November 2017. “Request” has been taken to mean any application for a decision by the Secretary of State under the Mental Health Act 1983, or application to or referral to a Tribunal, which requires the Secretary of State to submit a statement to the Tribunal. The figures given include requests that were made, but may have been withdrawn at a later stage, and include requests relating to discharged restricted patients, such as request to recall or request to vary or revoke conditions of discharge, as well as those relating to detained restricted patients.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests </strong> <strong>Made</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests</strong> <strong>Completed</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests</strong> <strong>Outstanding</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p>8,756</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p>9,073</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p>9,056</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p>10,653</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p>10,856</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p>11,364</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p>11,336</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17 </strong></p></td><td><p>11,938</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017-18 (up to 14/11/2017)</strong></p></td><td><p>6,881</p></td><td><p>5,732</p></td><td><p>1,149*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><em>*All requests received after 1/4/2017. This figure does not take into account active “critical” work which is being processed but may not have yet been completed and/or for which MHCS may be awaiting full information.</em></p><p> </p><p>MHCS has not had a backlog of cases in significant numbers, nor for any significant periods of time, prior to June 2017. There are therefore no figures relating to backlogs of</p><p>cases in earlier years from 2009/10, as no such backlogs then existed.</p><p> </p><p>The average number of calendar days between the case being logged to the final decision being made for restricted patients to (a) transfer to another hospital, (c) discharge (d) recall to hospital in each year since 2009/10 is set out in the table below. There is no power to (b) transfer to community care – a patient is either detained in hospital or discharged to the community. Recall decisions are made immediately, hence zero calendar days is recorded as the average. It should be noted that while a case is logged, it may not be ready for immediate consideration if there is further information required to enable a decision to be made.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Hospital transfers</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Conditional discharge</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Absolute discharge</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Recall</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The number of (a) backlog cases and (b) critical work cases for restricted patients that have been cleared by the MHCS in each month since June 2017 is set out below. MHCS did not develop a backlog until June 2017, therefore the backlog recovery plan was not implemented until June 2017; consequently, no such figures are held prior to June 2017.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Jun 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Jul 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Aug 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Sep 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Oct 2017</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Backlog cases</strong></p></td><td><p>249</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>151</p></td><td><p>223</p></td><td><p>240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Critical work cases</strong></p></td><td><p>424</p></td><td><p>472</p></td><td><p>433</p></td><td><p>358</p></td><td><p>441</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>These figures have been derived from an administrative IT system which, as with any large scale recording system, is subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p> </p><p>MHCS is dealing with a backlog of casework decisions and has been since June 2017. This situation is a direct result of staff vacancies which have proved difficult to fill, together with some long-term sickness absences which could not have been predicted. A recovery plan was developed in June 2017, and while MHCS has been able to continue to make critical decisions, such as prison transfers, within 24 hour targets, delays in other parts of the system are ongoing.</p><p> </p><p>We take the mental health of restricted patients very seriously, and MHCS has been working closely with NHS colleagues nationally to mitigate the impact of the delays and to understand better areas where the NHS is most concerned. While opportunities are limited until the significant number of MHCS vacancies are filled and new post-holders fully trained, MHCS has managed to adjust its backlog recovery plan to expedite certain types of cases within the backlog. MHCS continues to identify ways in which it can safely reduce delays, while continuing to protect the public.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
grouped question UIN
112879 more like this
112881 more like this
112882 more like this
113087 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T15:57:24.31Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T15:57:24.31Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
1533
label Biography information for Dame Diana Johnson more like this
789151
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Mentally Disordered Offenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the backlog of cases being processed by the Mental Health Casework Section was in each year since 2009-10; and how long on average from the case being logged to the decision being made it took to clear cases on that backlog in each of those years. more like this
tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
tabling member printed
Diana Johnson more like this
uin 112881 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (formerly known as the National Offender Management Service) has not recorded centrally all the funding allocated to of the Mental Health Casework Section (MHCS) in each year since 2009/10. Information on the number of full time equivalent staff within this unit over those years is also not recorded centrally. There is no legal or business requirement for the Department to hold such information on a separate basis.</p><p> </p><p>For 2017/18, the full time equivalent headcount for MHCS is 58, with 11 positions currently vacant, pending completion of the recruitment processes</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>The numbers of requests relating to restricted patients that were made to MHCS each year from 2009/10 are set out in the table below. It is not possible retrospectively to ascertain how many requests were completed in-year for each year. The number of current outstanding requests in 2017/18 is set out in the table below. These figures include requests received up to and including 14 November 2017. “Request” has been taken to mean any application for a decision by the Secretary of State under the Mental Health Act 1983, or application to or referral to a Tribunal, which requires the Secretary of State to submit a statement to the Tribunal. The figures given include requests that were made, but may have been withdrawn at a later stage, and include requests relating to discharged restricted patients, such as request to recall or request to vary or revoke conditions of discharge, as well as those relating to detained restricted patients.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests </strong> <strong>Made</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests</strong> <strong>Completed</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests</strong> <strong>Outstanding</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p>8,756</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p>9,073</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p>9,056</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p>10,653</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p>10,856</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p>11,364</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p>11,336</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17 </strong></p></td><td><p>11,938</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017-18 (up to 14/11/2017)</strong></p></td><td><p>6,881</p></td><td><p>5,732</p></td><td><p>1,149*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><em>*All requests received after 1/4/2017. This figure does not take into account active “critical” work which is being processed but may not have yet been completed and/or for which MHCS may be awaiting full information.</em></p><p> </p><p>MHCS has not had a backlog of cases in significant numbers, nor for any significant periods of time, prior to June 2017. There are therefore no figures relating to backlogs of</p><p>cases in earlier years from 2009/10, as no such backlogs then existed.</p><p> </p><p>The average number of calendar days between the case being logged to the final decision being made for restricted patients to (a) transfer to another hospital, (c) discharge (d) recall to hospital in each year since 2009/10 is set out in the table below. There is no power to (b) transfer to community care – a patient is either detained in hospital or discharged to the community. Recall decisions are made immediately, hence zero calendar days is recorded as the average. It should be noted that while a case is logged, it may not be ready for immediate consideration if there is further information required to enable a decision to be made.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Hospital transfers</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Conditional discharge</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Absolute discharge</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Recall</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The number of (a) backlog cases and (b) critical work cases for restricted patients that have been cleared by the MHCS in each month since June 2017 is set out below. MHCS did not develop a backlog until June 2017, therefore the backlog recovery plan was not implemented until June 2017; consequently, no such figures are held prior to June 2017.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Jun 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Jul 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Aug 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Sep 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Oct 2017</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Backlog cases</strong></p></td><td><p>249</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>151</p></td><td><p>223</p></td><td><p>240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Critical work cases</strong></p></td><td><p>424</p></td><td><p>472</p></td><td><p>433</p></td><td><p>358</p></td><td><p>441</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>These figures have been derived from an administrative IT system which, as with any large scale recording system, is subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p> </p><p>MHCS is dealing with a backlog of casework decisions and has been since June 2017. This situation is a direct result of staff vacancies which have proved difficult to fill, together with some long-term sickness absences which could not have been predicted. A recovery plan was developed in June 2017, and while MHCS has been able to continue to make critical decisions, such as prison transfers, within 24 hour targets, delays in other parts of the system are ongoing.</p><p> </p><p>We take the mental health of restricted patients very seriously, and MHCS has been working closely with NHS colleagues nationally to mitigate the impact of the delays and to understand better areas where the NHS is most concerned. While opportunities are limited until the significant number of MHCS vacancies are filled and new post-holders fully trained, MHCS has managed to adjust its backlog recovery plan to expedite certain types of cases within the backlog. MHCS continues to identify ways in which it can safely reduce delays, while continuing to protect the public.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
grouped question UIN
112879 more like this
112880 more like this
112882 more like this
113087 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T15:57:24.437Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T15:57:24.437Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
1533
label Biography information for Dame Diana Johnson more like this
789152
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Mentally Disordered Offenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average number of calendar days was from the case being logged to the final decision being made for the Mental Health Casework Section to progress requests for restricted patients to (a) transfer to another hospital, (b) transfer to community care, (c) discharge and (d) recall to hospital in each year since 2009-10. more like this
tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
tabling member printed
Diana Johnson more like this
uin 112882 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (formerly known as the National Offender Management Service) has not recorded centrally all the funding allocated to of the Mental Health Casework Section (MHCS) in each year since 2009/10. Information on the number of full time equivalent staff within this unit over those years is also not recorded centrally. There is no legal or business requirement for the Department to hold such information on a separate basis.</p><p> </p><p>For 2017/18, the full time equivalent headcount for MHCS is 58, with 11 positions currently vacant, pending completion of the recruitment processes</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>The numbers of requests relating to restricted patients that were made to MHCS each year from 2009/10 are set out in the table below. It is not possible retrospectively to ascertain how many requests were completed in-year for each year. The number of current outstanding requests in 2017/18 is set out in the table below. These figures include requests received up to and including 14 November 2017. “Request” has been taken to mean any application for a decision by the Secretary of State under the Mental Health Act 1983, or application to or referral to a Tribunal, which requires the Secretary of State to submit a statement to the Tribunal. The figures given include requests that were made, but may have been withdrawn at a later stage, and include requests relating to discharged restricted patients, such as request to recall or request to vary or revoke conditions of discharge, as well as those relating to detained restricted patients.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests </strong> <strong>Made</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests</strong> <strong>Completed</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests</strong> <strong>Outstanding</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p>8,756</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p>9,073</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p>9,056</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p>10,653</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p>10,856</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p>11,364</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p>11,336</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17 </strong></p></td><td><p>11,938</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017-18 (up to 14/11/2017)</strong></p></td><td><p>6,881</p></td><td><p>5,732</p></td><td><p>1,149*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><em>*All requests received after 1/4/2017. This figure does not take into account active “critical” work which is being processed but may not have yet been completed and/or for which MHCS may be awaiting full information.</em></p><p> </p><p>MHCS has not had a backlog of cases in significant numbers, nor for any significant periods of time, prior to June 2017. There are therefore no figures relating to backlogs of</p><p>cases in earlier years from 2009/10, as no such backlogs then existed.</p><p> </p><p>The average number of calendar days between the case being logged to the final decision being made for restricted patients to (a) transfer to another hospital, (c) discharge (d) recall to hospital in each year since 2009/10 is set out in the table below. There is no power to (b) transfer to community care – a patient is either detained in hospital or discharged to the community. Recall decisions are made immediately, hence zero calendar days is recorded as the average. It should be noted that while a case is logged, it may not be ready for immediate consideration if there is further information required to enable a decision to be made.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Hospital transfers</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Conditional discharge</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Absolute discharge</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Recall</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The number of (a) backlog cases and (b) critical work cases for restricted patients that have been cleared by the MHCS in each month since June 2017 is set out below. MHCS did not develop a backlog until June 2017, therefore the backlog recovery plan was not implemented until June 2017; consequently, no such figures are held prior to June 2017.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Jun 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Jul 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Aug 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Sep 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Oct 2017</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Backlog cases</strong></p></td><td><p>249</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>151</p></td><td><p>223</p></td><td><p>240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Critical work cases</strong></p></td><td><p>424</p></td><td><p>472</p></td><td><p>433</p></td><td><p>358</p></td><td><p>441</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>These figures have been derived from an administrative IT system which, as with any large scale recording system, is subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p> </p><p>MHCS is dealing with a backlog of casework decisions and has been since June 2017. This situation is a direct result of staff vacancies which have proved difficult to fill, together with some long-term sickness absences which could not have been predicted. A recovery plan was developed in June 2017, and while MHCS has been able to continue to make critical decisions, such as prison transfers, within 24 hour targets, delays in other parts of the system are ongoing.</p><p> </p><p>We take the mental health of restricted patients very seriously, and MHCS has been working closely with NHS colleagues nationally to mitigate the impact of the delays and to understand better areas where the NHS is most concerned. While opportunities are limited until the significant number of MHCS vacancies are filled and new post-holders fully trained, MHCS has managed to adjust its backlog recovery plan to expedite certain types of cases within the backlog. MHCS continues to identify ways in which it can safely reduce delays, while continuing to protect the public.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
grouped question UIN
112879 more like this
112880 more like this
112881 more like this
113087 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T15:57:24.547Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T15:57:24.547Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
1533
label Biography information for Dame Diana Johnson more like this
789153
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Mentally Disordered Offenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much funding has been allocated to the Mental Health Casework Section in each year since 2009-10; and how many full-time equivalent staff have been employed by that section in each of those years. more like this
tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
tabling member printed
Diana Johnson more like this
uin 112879 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (formerly known as the National Offender Management Service) has not recorded centrally all the funding allocated to of the Mental Health Casework Section (MHCS) in each year since 2009/10. Information on the number of full time equivalent staff within this unit over those years is also not recorded centrally. There is no legal or business requirement for the Department to hold such information on a separate basis.</p><p> </p><p>For 2017/18, the full time equivalent headcount for MHCS is 58, with 11 positions currently vacant, pending completion of the recruitment processes</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>The numbers of requests relating to restricted patients that were made to MHCS each year from 2009/10 are set out in the table below. It is not possible retrospectively to ascertain how many requests were completed in-year for each year. The number of current outstanding requests in 2017/18 is set out in the table below. These figures include requests received up to and including 14 November 2017. “Request” has been taken to mean any application for a decision by the Secretary of State under the Mental Health Act 1983, or application to or referral to a Tribunal, which requires the Secretary of State to submit a statement to the Tribunal. The figures given include requests that were made, but may have been withdrawn at a later stage, and include requests relating to discharged restricted patients, such as request to recall or request to vary or revoke conditions of discharge, as well as those relating to detained restricted patients.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests </strong> <strong>Made</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests</strong> <strong>Completed</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Requests</strong> <strong>Outstanding</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p>8,756</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p>9,073</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p>9,056</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p>10,653</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p>10,856</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p>11,364</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p>11,336</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17 </strong></p></td><td><p>11,938</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017-18 (up to 14/11/2017)</strong></p></td><td><p>6,881</p></td><td><p>5,732</p></td><td><p>1,149*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><em>*All requests received after 1/4/2017. This figure does not take into account active “critical” work which is being processed but may not have yet been completed and/or for which MHCS may be awaiting full information.</em></p><p> </p><p>MHCS has not had a backlog of cases in significant numbers, nor for any significant periods of time, prior to June 2017. There are therefore no figures relating to backlogs of</p><p>cases in earlier years from 2009/10, as no such backlogs then existed.</p><p> </p><p>The average number of calendar days between the case being logged to the final decision being made for restricted patients to (a) transfer to another hospital, (c) discharge (d) recall to hospital in each year since 2009/10 is set out in the table below. There is no power to (b) transfer to community care – a patient is either detained in hospital or discharged to the community. Recall decisions are made immediately, hence zero calendar days is recorded as the average. It should be noted that while a case is logged, it may not be ready for immediate consideration if there is further information required to enable a decision to be made.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Hospital transfers</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Conditional discharge</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Absolute discharge</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Recall</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The number of (a) backlog cases and (b) critical work cases for restricted patients that have been cleared by the MHCS in each month since June 2017 is set out below. MHCS did not develop a backlog until June 2017, therefore the backlog recovery plan was not implemented until June 2017; consequently, no such figures are held prior to June 2017.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Jun 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Jul 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Aug 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Sep 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Oct 2017</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Backlog cases</strong></p></td><td><p>249</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>151</p></td><td><p>223</p></td><td><p>240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Critical work cases</strong></p></td><td><p>424</p></td><td><p>472</p></td><td><p>433</p></td><td><p>358</p></td><td><p>441</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>These figures have been derived from an administrative IT system which, as with any large scale recording system, is subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p> </p><p>MHCS is dealing with a backlog of casework decisions and has been since June 2017. This situation is a direct result of staff vacancies which have proved difficult to fill, together with some long-term sickness absences which could not have been predicted. A recovery plan was developed in June 2017, and while MHCS has been able to continue to make critical decisions, such as prison transfers, within 24 hour targets, delays in other parts of the system are ongoing.</p><p> </p><p>We take the mental health of restricted patients very seriously, and MHCS has been working closely with NHS colleagues nationally to mitigate the impact of the delays and to understand better areas where the NHS is most concerned. While opportunities are limited until the significant number of MHCS vacancies are filled and new post-holders fully trained, MHCS has managed to adjust its backlog recovery plan to expedite certain types of cases within the backlog. MHCS continues to identify ways in which it can safely reduce delays, while continuing to protect the public.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
grouped question UIN
112880 more like this
112881 more like this
112882 more like this
113087 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T15:57:24.2Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T15:57:24.2Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
1533
label Biography information for Dame Diana Johnson more like this
789154
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Civil Proceedings: Legal Costs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of litigants having to turn to third-party funders to meet the cost of issuing proceedings. more like this
tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
uin 112801 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>A variety of products have been available for some time to assist different types of litigant with the costs of claims, including court fees, such as after the event insurance.</p><p>Third party litigation funding is typically used as a form of funding in very high value commercial litigation.</p><p>Support for paying court fees is available for people bringing courts and tribunals proceedings through the Help with Fees scheme, subject to meeting the capital and income tests. Under this scheme, those who qualify may have their court fees remitted in part or in full.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Esher and Walton more like this
answering member printed Dominic Raab more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T17:37:44.853Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T17:37:44.853Z
answering member
4007
label Biography information for Dominic Raab more like this
tabling member
4493
label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
789293
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Construction more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what is the Government's estimate of (a) baseline certified normal accommodation and (b) operational capacity in England and Wales following the completion of the new for old prison regeneration and building plan. more like this
tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
uin 113124 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Following completion of the population build up at HMP Berwyn and delivery of a new houseblock at HMP Stocken, the capacity of the prison estate is currently forecast to remain stable at approximately 80,300 certified normal accommodation and 88,300 operational capacity from 2019 onwards.</p><p> </p><p>The Government set out its ambition for a reformed prison estate in the November 2016 Prison Safety and Reform White Paper. Our reforms will close down ageing and ineffective prisons and replace them with buildings fit for today’s demands. The new prison estate will create the physical conditions for Governors to achieve better educational, training and rehabilitation outcomes.</p><p> </p><p>The delivery dates for this programme have not yet been set, so the impact is not yet included in capacity forecasts.</p> more like this
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T16:27:37.027Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T16:27:37.027Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4493
label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
789295
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Community Rehabilitation Companies: Staff more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 13 November 2017 to Question 122018, on Community Rehabilitation Companies; staff, whether any community rehabilitation company contract contains an obligation to employ a specified minimum number of staff. more like this
tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
uin 113122 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>As per the answer to Question 122018, none of the Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) contracts specify that CRCs must maintain staffing numbers at a particular level. Public protection is our top priority and CRCs must ensure they have sufficient levels of competent and appropriately trained staff to deliver their contractual obligations.</p><p> </p><p>We continue to closely monitor CRCs as part of our robust contract management and assurance process.</p> more like this
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-20T16:24:08.623Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-20T16:24:08.623Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4493
label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this