Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

43930
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-03-19more like thismore than 2014-03-19
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, pursuant to the Answer of 17 March 2014, Official Report, column 370W, on legal profession: industrial disputes, whether he (a) advised on the content of and (b) approved the letter that the Director of Public Prosecutions sent to members of the Independent Bar on action against cuts to legal aid. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 192879 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-03-26more like thismore than 2014-03-26
answer text <p>I neither advised on the content of, nor approved, the letter that was sent by the Crown Prosecution Service to members of the independent Bar about action against cuts to legal aid. I was however aware that the letter was to be sent. </p><p> I have said on more than one occasion that there is no justification for barristers failing to honour their professional obligations to the CPS because there is no dispute with the CPS about the level of prosecution fees. It was perfectly proper for the CPS to send this letter reminding barristers of these obligations.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Beaconsfield more like this
answering member printed Mr Dominic Grieve remove filter
question first answered
remove filter
answering member
16
label Biography information for Mr Dominic Grieve more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
43330
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-03-17more like thismore than 2014-03-17
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, what the total cost to his Department has been of challenging the decision of the Information Commissioner on the publication of letters from HRH the Prince of Wales. more like this
tabling member constituency Newport West more like this
tabling member printed
Paul Flynn more like this
uin 192074 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-03-26more like thismore than 2014-03-26
answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>This case raises issues of constitutional significance, including upholding Parliament's intentions for the Freedom of Information regime and the Government's ability to protect information in the public interest. Litigation initiated by <em>The Guardian</em> newspaper has taken place over a four year period including hearings in the Upper Tribunal, the High Court, and the Court of Appeal. Eight government departments have had to work together on the Government's response, at a total cost of £274,481.16 (exc VAT). These costs encompass all costs billed by the Treasury Solicitor, including Counsels' fees and disbursements. If we are successful in the next stage of legal proceedings the Government would seek to recover a substantial proportion of these costs from the Guardian.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Beaconsfield more like this
answering member printed Mr Dominic Grieve remove filter
question first answered
remove filter
answering member
16
label Biography information for Mr Dominic Grieve more like this
tabling member
545
label Biography information for Paul Flynn more like this
41377
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-03-05more like thismore than 2014-03-05
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, when he was first made aware of the existence of the administrative scheme for on-the-runs. more like this
tabling member constituency Belfast North more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Nigel Dodds more like this
uin 190834 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-03-26more like thismore than 2014-03-26
answer text <p>I was first made aware of the existence of the administrative scheme for on-the-runs when in opposition.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Beaconsfield more like this
answering member printed Mr Dominic Grieve remove filter
question first answered
remove filter
answering member
16
label Biography information for Mr Dominic Grieve more like this
tabling member
1388
label Biography information for Lord Dodds of Duncairn more like this