Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1006157
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-13more like thismore than 2018-11-13
answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Data Protection: General Practitioners more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of exempting General Practices from the General Data Protection Regulation that data controllers can no longer charge for processing subject access requests. more like this
tabling member constituency Nottingham North more like this
tabling member printed
Alex Norris remove filter
uin 190964 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-19more like thismore than 2018-11-19
answer text <p>The fundamental purpose of the General Data Protection Regulation is to provide individuals with greater protection and control over their personal data.</p><p> </p><p>Allowing General Practices to charge for providing responses to subject access requests would weaken the rights of patients. General Practices can still charge for repeat or excessive requests made by data subjects and for requests made by third parties such as insurers under the Access to Medical Reports Act 1988.</p><p> </p><p>The Information Commissioner’s Office has updated its guidance on the Right to Access, which can be viewed on its website at ico.org.uk</p> more like this
answering member constituency Stourbridge more like this
answering member printed Margot James remove filter
question first answered
less than 2018-11-19T15:58:12.3Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-19T15:58:12.3Z
answering member
4115
label Biography information for Margot James more like this
tabling member
4641
label Biography information for Alex Norris more like this
910205
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-05-23more like thismore than 2018-05-23
answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Personal Injury: Compensation more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what plans he has to monitor the effectiveness of the provisions of the Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018 on the number of cold calls and text messages received for personal injury claims. more like this
tabling member constituency Nottingham North more like this
tabling member printed
Alex Norris remove filter
uin 147512 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-06-04more like thismore than 2018-06-04
answer text <p>We have included in the Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018 provision to ban cold calls relating to claims management services except where the receiver has consented to such calls being made to them.</p><p> </p><p>This measure will be implemented through the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulation (the framework underpinning electronic communications) and regulated by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), who provide monthly statistics on its website (www.ico.org.uk) on the number of reported nuisance calls. DCMS will continue to work closely with the ICO to monitor the number of cold calls and text messages received for personal injury claims, in light of the new measure.</p><p> </p><p>We have also recently published a consultation on providing the ICO with the powers it needs to hold company directors directly responsible for direct marketing breaches. If preferred, this measure would fine rogue directors up to £500,000, raising this national nuisance at boardroom level.</p>
answering member constituency Stourbridge more like this
answering member printed Margot James remove filter
question first answered
less than 2018-06-04T09:09:43.18Zmore like thismore than 2018-06-04T09:09:43.18Z
answering member
4115
label Biography information for Margot James more like this
tabling member
4641
label Biography information for Alex Norris more like this