Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1313853
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-05-12more like thismore than 2021-05-12
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Housing: Fire Prevention more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of making payments for waking watches in buildings deemed not fire safe VAT exempt in the context of the financial effects of that matter on leaseholders. more like this
tabling member constituency Poplar and Limehouse more like this
tabling member printed
Apsana Begum more like this
uin 912 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-21more like thismore than 2021-05-21
answer text <p>The Government already maintains a zero rate for fire safety equipment when provided alongside the construction and renovation of residential or charitable buildings. There is also a relief for the cost of replacing fire cladding on buildings if it is tied to the initial construction of the building and is shown to be defective.</p><p> </p><p>Waking watch should only be in place for a short period of time and the relevant responsible person should move quickly to install a common fire alarm system as they are a more cost effective and reliable option. That is why the Government has set aside £30m to install common alarm systems in eligible buildings to replace expensive waking watch measures. No interim measures should be considered as a substitute for completing remediation as quickly as possible.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire remove filter
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-21T11:39:19.183Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-21T11:39:19.183Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4790
label Biography information for Apsana Begum more like this
1313879
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-05-12more like thismore than 2021-05-12
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Hospitality Industry and Tourism: VAT more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reasons bowling alleys are excluded from the five per cent VAT reduction for the tourism and hospitality sector. more like this
tabling member constituency St Albans more like this
tabling member printed
Daisy Cooper more like this
uin 871 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-21more like thismore than 2021-05-21
answer text <p>The temporary reduced rate of VAT for hospitality and tourism was introduced on 15 July 2020 to support the cash flow and viability of businesses in the hospitality and tourism sectors which have been severely affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Hospitality for the purposes of this relief includes the supply of food and non-alcoholic beverages from restaurants, cafes, pubs and similar establishments for consumption on the premises. It also includes the supply of hot food and non-alcoholic hot beverages to take away.</p><p> </p><p>If a ten-pin bowling business provides hospitality in this way, then it can benefit from the reduced rate. In general, admission charges that entitle a person to participate in events where the primary focus is a sporting activity will not be eligible for the reduced rate. This relief comes at a significant cost to the Exchequer, and there are no plans to extend the scope of the reduced rate. This policy will cost over £7 billion, and while some businesses in some sectors are disappointed, a boundary for eligibility had to be drawn.</p>
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire remove filter
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-21T11:37:50.067Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-21T11:37:50.067Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4769
label Biography information for Daisy Cooper more like this
1312944
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-05-11more like thismore than 2021-05-11
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Digital Technology: Taxation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of resolution 2370, entitled fighting fiscal injustice: the work of the OECD on taxation of the digital economy, passed at the Council of Europe on 20 April 2021; and whether the Government plans to take steps following the passing of that resolution. more like this
tabling member constituency Henley more like this
tabling member printed
John Howell more like this
uin 180 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-19more like thismore than 2021-05-19
answer text <p>The Government notes the resolution and welcomes the Council’s support for the work of the OECD’s Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS).</p><p> </p><p>The Government has been proactive in pressing for an international solution to the tax challenges posed by digitisation of the economy for a number of years.</p><p> </p><p>It is a Government priority to reach a comprehensive global solution this year which includes outputs on both OECD Pillars: on both reallocation of taxing rights and minimum taxation.</p><p> </p><p>Reaching agreement on this would be a major multilateral achievement that introduces stability into the international tax landscape.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire remove filter
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-19T14:12:55.923Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-19T14:12:55.923Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
1606
label Biography information for John Howell more like this
1312962
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-05-11more like thismore than 2021-05-11
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading UK Trade with EU: Customs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor o the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential effect on consumers of increases to custom charges on products sent between the EU and the UK. more like this
tabling member constituency South Leicestershire more like this
tabling member printed
Alberto Costa more like this
uin 313 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-19more like thismore than 2021-05-19
answer text The UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement seeks to reduce the costs for traders of customs processes introduced following the end of the transition period with the EU. It supports efficient customs arrangements and ensures that goods originating in the EU or UK are not subject to tariffs. For goods that do not meet requirements of the rules of origin, tariffs still apply. Products sent between the EU to the UK may also be liable for other charges such as excise duty and import VAT. The extent to which any of these charges and impacts feed through to consumer prices is based on a range of factors including individual business decisions. more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire remove filter
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-19T14:10:09.497Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-19T14:10:09.497Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4439
label Biography information for Alberto Costa more like this
1313066
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-05-11more like thismore than 2021-05-11
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading UK Infrastructure Bank more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what plans he has to ensure that the new National Infrastructure Bank has a just transition mandate. more like this
tabling member constituency Ceredigion more like this
tabling member printed
Ben Lake more like this
uin 411 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-19more like thismore than 2021-05-19
answer text <p>It is a Government priority to ensure that the shift to a green economy happens in a way that levels up across the whole country.</p><p> </p><p>As set out in the Budget, the UK Infrastructure Bank will pursue two core policy objectives through its interventions in the infrastructure market: to help tackle climate change, particularly meeting the UK’s net zero emissions target by 2050; and to support regional and local economic growth.</p><p> </p><p>The Bank will make independent investment decisions and will need to develop assessment criteria to decide which investments it will take forward in line with its objectives.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire remove filter
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-19T14:11:27.587Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-19T14:11:27.587Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4630
label Biography information for Ben Lake more like this
1313329
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-05-11more like thismore than 2021-05-11
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance: Prosecutions more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many promoters and operators of disguised remuneration schemes now subject to the Loan Charge have been prosecuted for promoting and operating those schemes to date. more like this
tabling member constituency Romford more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Rosindell more like this
uin 101 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-19more like thismore than 2021-05-19
answer text <p>I refer the Honourable Member to the answer given on 29 April 2021 to UIN 187240.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire remove filter
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-19T14:14:16.367Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-19T14:14:16.367Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
1447
label Biography information for Andrew Rosindell more like this