Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

93103

registered interest
date	14/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Venture Capital
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps he is taking to promote investment in venture capital trusts.
tabling member constituency	Newcastle upon Tyne Central
tabling member printed	Chi Onwurah
uin	210570
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>The venture capital trust (VCT) regime was significantly expanded at Budget 2012. VCTs can now invest up to £5 million a year into each qualifying company, and larger companies (with up to 250 employees and £15 million of gross assets) can benefit from the investments.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The government believes that the VCT regime, alongside the other tax-advantaged venture capital schemes, plays a key role in facilitating access to finance for smaller businesses with growth potential. At Budget 2014 the government announced that changes would be made to enable investors to subscribe for VCT shares via nominees, to facilitate a wider range of opportunities to invest in VCTs. The government has also recently consulted on the impact of the recent expansions to the venture capital schemes and is committed to ensuring that the schemes continue to work effectively.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke question first answered 21/10/2014 15:54:56 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	4124 label Biography information for Chi Onwurah

93106

registered interest
date	14/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Stamp Duty Land Tax
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will commission research into the fiscal effects of raising the Stamp Duty Land Tax threshold.
tabling member constituency	St Albans
tabling member printed	Mrs Anne Main
uin	210340
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 20/10/2014 answer text The fiscal effect of raising the Stamp Duty Land Tax threshold is likely to be a reduction in SDLT receipts as fewer property transactions will be charged SDLT. A HMRC publication for Budget 2014 <em>(‘Direct Effects of Illustrative Tax Changes’, </em>19 March 2014) found that an increase in the £125,000 threshold by £5,000 would cost £35 million in its first year and £40 million subsequently.<p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Published research was undertaken by HMRC examining the impact of a first-time buyer’s relief that was in place between 2010 and 2012 (‘<em>Evaluating the Impact of Stamp Duty Land Tax First Time Buyers Relief</em>’, November 2011). It found that there was a substantial deadweight effect as many of the property transactions would have taken place anyway. The estimated increase in the number of transactions as a result of the introduction of the relief was between 0-1%.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke grouped question UIN 210339 question first answered 20/10/2014 15:00:26 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	1568 label Biography information for Mrs Anne Main

92963

registered interest
date	13/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Bank Services
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps he is taking to ensure that access to savings accounts is not unreasonably restricted.
tabling member constituency	Strangford
tabling member printed	Jim Shannon
uin	210240
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 20/10/2014 answer text <p>The Government is committed to encouraging and empowering individuals to save, including by improving access to banking and the transparency of financial products.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Budget 2014 announced a radical package of measures to support savers at all stages of their lives. These measures reduce taxes for the lowest income savers; reform the ISA regime to give savers greater flexibility as to where and how they save their money; and create new products to help retired savers see a better return.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Following the recommendations of the Sergeant Review of Simple Financial Products, the Government has also been driving – and will continue to drive – the financial services industry to design and bring to market further simple and transparent savings products which are fit for purpose and which consumers can more easily understand and trust, and to remove any other barriers to ensuring individuals can access an appropriate mix of financial services.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke question first answered 20/10/2014 15:32:00 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	4131 label Biography information for Jim Shannon

93039

registered interest
date	13/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Dividend Tax Credits
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will estimate the Exchequer effect of aligning the dividend tax rate with income tax rates for additional rate taxpayers.
tabling member constituency	Barnsley Central
tabling member printed	Dan Jarvis
uin	210111
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/11/2014 answer text <p>This is not current government policy.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The government keeps all taxes under review.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke question first answered 04/11/2014 16:48:25 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	4243 label Biography information for Dan Jarvis

93061

registered interest
date	13/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Business: Government Assistance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will make an assessment of the effectiveness of government financial support to business through grants and tax foregone.
tabling member constituency	Coventry South
tabling member printed	Mr Jim Cunningham
uin	210155
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 16/10/2014 answer text <p>Tax reliefs are administrated as part of the tax system and are subject to different rules to public expenditure.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) keep all aspects of the tax system under review to ensure the effectiveness of tax reliefs and to prevent abuse. HMRC has responsibility for administering and monitoring tax reliefs for abuse and, with HM Treasury, is responsible for appraising and evaluating any aspects of the tax system.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The introduction of all tax reliefs or changes to their design and scope are subject to Parliamentary spending scrutiny during the Finance Bill process.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke grouped question UIN 210154 210157 210158 question first answered 16/10/2014 16:59:27 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	308 label Biography information for Mr Jim Cunningham

93063

registered interest
date	13/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Tax Allowances: Business
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the cost to the Exchequer of tax relief to businesses since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Coventry South
tabling member printed	Mr Jim Cunningham
uin	210157
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 16/10/2014 answer text <p>Tax reliefs are administrated as part of the tax system and are subject to different rules to public expenditure.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) keep all aspects of the tax system under review to ensure the effectiveness of tax reliefs and to prevent abuse. HMRC has responsibility for administering and monitoring tax reliefs for abuse and, with HM Treasury, is responsible for appraising and evaluating any aspects of the tax system.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The introduction of all tax reliefs or changes to their design and scope are subject to Parliamentary spending scrutiny during the Finance Bill process.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke grouped question UIN 210154 210155 210158 question first answered 16/10/2014 16:59:27 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	308 label Biography information for Mr Jim Cunningham

93064

registered interest
date	13/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Business: Government Assistance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how often he reviews the cost effectiveness of corporate welfare schemes; and what the criteria are for such schemes to be continued.
tabling member constituency	Coventry South
tabling member printed	Mr Jim Cunningham
uin	210158
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 16/10/2014 answer text <p>Tax reliefs are administrated as part of the tax system and are subject to different rules to public expenditure.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) keep all aspects of the tax system under review to ensure the effectiveness of tax reliefs and to prevent abuse. HMRC has responsibility for administering and monitoring tax reliefs for abuse and, with HM Treasury, is responsible for appraising and evaluating any aspects of the tax system.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The introduction of all tax reliefs or changes to their design and scope are subject to Parliamentary spending scrutiny during the Finance Bill process.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke grouped question UIN 210154 210155 210157 question first answered 16/10/2014 16:59:27 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	308 label Biography information for Mr Jim Cunningham

93065

registered interest
date	13/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Business: Government Assistance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the total funds provided by Government for (a) corporate welfare grants and support schemes and (b) tax forgone.
tabling member constituency	Coventry South
tabling member printed	Mr Jim Cunningham
uin	210154
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 16/10/2014 answer text <p>Tax reliefs are administrated as part of the tax system and are subject to different rules to public expenditure.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury and Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) keep all aspects of the tax system under review to ensure the effectiveness of tax reliefs and to prevent abuse. HMRC has responsibility for administering and monitoring tax reliefs for abuse and, with HM Treasury, is responsible for appraising and evaluating any aspects of the tax system.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The introduction of all tax reliefs or changes to their design and scope are subject to Parliamentary spending scrutiny during the Finance Bill process.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke grouped question UIN 210155 210157 210158 question first answered 16/10/2014 16:59:27 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	308 label Biography information for Mr Jim Cunningham

92451

registered interest
date	10/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Stamp Duty Land Tax
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what proportion of total sales of residential properties fell below the threshold for one per cent stamp duty in (a) Esher and Walton constituency, (b) London, (c) the South East, (d) England and (e) the UK in each year since 2000.
tabling member constituency	Esher and Walton
tabling member printed	Mr Dominic Raab
uin	209975
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>The information requested is set out in the table below going back to 2005-06.</p><p> </p><p>Prior to this point the information requested is not held in the format required and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.</p><p>The transactions counted as falling below the one per cent stamp duty threshold are all transactions where Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have received a stamp duty return. There are numerous residential property transactions that are not required to submit a return to HMRC, most notably those where the consideration is less than £40,000. The detailed reasons for non-notification can be found at the following address.</p><p> </p><p><a title="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt/reliefs-exemptions/no-sdlt-return.htm" href="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt/reliefs-exemptions/no-sdlt-return.htm" target="_blank">http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt/reliefs-exemptions/no-sdlt-return.htm</a></p><p> </p><p>Please see our publication UK stamp tax statistics 2012 to 2013 to understand these tables further.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-stamp-tax-statistics" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-stamp-tax-statistics</a></p><p>Tables are provided in three parts:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Part A: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue by Government Office Region and Consideration Band years 2005-06 to 2013-14 Part B: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue for Esher and Walton Constituency by Consideration Band for years 2005-06 to 2013-14 Part C: Percentage of SDLT returns under £125,000 for Esher and Walton Constituency and Government Office Region for years 2005-06 to 2013-14</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Part A: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue by Government Office Region and Consideration Band years 2005-06 to 2013-14:</p><p> </p><p>This data represents estimates that have been produced for this Parliamentary Question. The data has been rounded to the nearest £5million. As such, the sum of the individual entries may not be equal to the “all” totals given in the table but the “all” totals remain consistent with the published National Statistics.</p><p> </p><p>2013-14</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>95</p></td><td><p>605</p></td><td><p>2720</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>165</p></td><td><p>545</p></td><td><p>1385</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>780</p></td><td><p>2,050</p></td><td><p>6,130</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>880</p></td><td><p>2,205</p></td><td><p>6,450</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2012-13</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>85</p></td><td><p>465</p></td><td><p>2020</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>135</p></td><td><p>415</p></td><td><p>1080</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>615</p></td><td><p>1,565</p></td><td><p>4,650</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>690</p></td><td><p>1,675</p></td><td><p>4,905</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2011-12</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p>1,640</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>375</p></td><td><p>940</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>475</p></td><td><p>1,440</p></td><td><p>3,985</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>545</p></td><td><p>1,560</p></td><td><p>4,220</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2010-11</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>380</p></td><td><p>1,345</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>400</p></td><td><p>955</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>475</p></td><td><p>1,470</p></td><td><p>3,790</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>540</p></td><td><p>1,575</p></td><td><p>4,040</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>2009-10</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>320</p></td><td><p>1,035</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>350</p></td><td><p>810</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>405</p></td><td><p>1,275</p></td><td><p>3,080</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>450</p></td><td><p>1,365</p></td><td><p>3,290</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2008-09</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>260</p></td><td><p>870</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>680</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>440</p></td><td><p>1,035</p></td><td><p>2,680</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>505</p></td><td><p>1,155</p></td><td><p>2,950</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2007-08</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>155</p></td><td><p>650</p></td><td><p>1,895</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>1,505</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>1,125</p></td><td><p>2,460</p></td><td><p>6,050</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>1,280</p></td><td><p>2,740</p></td><td><p>6,680</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2006-07</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>645</p></td><td><p>1,795</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>630</p></td><td><p>1,450</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>1,285</p></td><td><p>2,430</p></td><td><p>5,850</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>1,455</p></td><td><p>2,660</p></td><td><p>6,375</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2005-06</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>190</p></td><td><p>475</p></td><td><p>1,275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>455</p></td><td><p>1,055</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>1,080</p></td><td><p>1,745</p></td><td><p>4,240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>1,175</p></td><td><p>1,910</p></td><td><p>4,585</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Part B: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue for Esher and Walton Constituency by Consideration Band for years 2005-06 to 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><p>This data represents estimates that have been produced for this Parliamentary Question. The data for individual bands has been rounded to the nearest £1million. The data for All Bands has been rounded to the nearest £5million. As such, the sum of the individual entries may not be equal to the “all” totals given in the table but the “all” totals remain consistent with the published National Statistics.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>£120,001-250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005-06</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2006-07</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>55</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2007-08</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>59</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>35</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>38</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>56</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>81</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Part C: Estimated Percentage of SDLT returns under £125,000 for Esher and Walton Constituency and Government Office Region for years 2005-06 to 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><p>This data represents estimates that have been produced for this Parliamentary Question. Data for individual areas given to the nearest percentage point.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Esher and Walton</p></td><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>England</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005-06</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>23%</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>42%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2006-07</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2007-08</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>34%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>40%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>35%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>7%</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>33%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>7%</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td><td><p>30%</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke grouped question UIN 209973 209974 question first answered 21/10/2014 09:34:59 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	4007 label Biography information for Dominic Raab

92452

registered interest
date	10/10/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Stamp Duty Land Tax
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the total stamp duty duty yield has been from sales of residential properties of a value between £125,000 and £250,000 in (a) Esher and Walton constituency, (b) London, (c) the South East, (d) England and (e) the UK in each year since 2000.
tabling member constituency	Esher and Walton
tabling member printed	Mr Dominic Raab
uin	209974
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/10/2014 answer text <p>The information requested is set out in the table below going back to 2005-06.</p><p> </p><p>Prior to this point the information requested is not held in the format required and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.</p><p>The transactions counted as falling below the one per cent stamp duty threshold are all transactions where Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have received a stamp duty return. There are numerous residential property transactions that are not required to submit a return to HMRC, most notably those where the consideration is less than £40,000. The detailed reasons for non-notification can be found at the following address.</p><p> </p><p><a title="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt/reliefs-exemptions/no-sdlt-return.htm" href="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt/reliefs-exemptions/no-sdlt-return.htm" target="_blank">http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt/reliefs-exemptions/no-sdlt-return.htm</a></p><p> </p><p>Please see our publication UK stamp tax statistics 2012 to 2013 to understand these tables further.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-stamp-tax-statistics" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-stamp-tax-statistics</a></p><p>Tables are provided in three parts:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Part A: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue by Government Office Region and Consideration Band years 2005-06 to 2013-14 Part B: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue for Esher and Walton Constituency by Consideration Band for years 2005-06 to 2013-14 Part C: Percentage of SDLT returns under £125,000 for Esher and Walton Constituency and Government Office Region for years 2005-06 to 2013-14</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Part A: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue by Government Office Region and Consideration Band years 2005-06 to 2013-14:</p><p> </p><p>This data represents estimates that have been produced for this Parliamentary Question. The data has been rounded to the nearest £5million. As such, the sum of the individual entries may not be equal to the “all” totals given in the table but the “all” totals remain consistent with the published National Statistics.</p><p> </p><p>2013-14</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>95</p></td><td><p>605</p></td><td><p>2720</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>165</p></td><td><p>545</p></td><td><p>1385</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>780</p></td><td><p>2,050</p></td><td><p>6,130</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>880</p></td><td><p>2,205</p></td><td><p>6,450</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2012-13</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>85</p></td><td><p>465</p></td><td><p>2020</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>135</p></td><td><p>415</p></td><td><p>1080</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>615</p></td><td><p>1,565</p></td><td><p>4,650</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>690</p></td><td><p>1,675</p></td><td><p>4,905</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2011-12</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p>1,640</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>375</p></td><td><p>940</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>475</p></td><td><p>1,440</p></td><td><p>3,985</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>545</p></td><td><p>1,560</p></td><td><p>4,220</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2010-11</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>380</p></td><td><p>1,345</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>400</p></td><td><p>955</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>475</p></td><td><p>1,470</p></td><td><p>3,790</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>540</p></td><td><p>1,575</p></td><td><p>4,040</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>2009-10</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>320</p></td><td><p>1,035</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>350</p></td><td><p>810</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>405</p></td><td><p>1,275</p></td><td><p>3,080</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>450</p></td><td><p>1,365</p></td><td><p>3,290</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2008-09</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>260</p></td><td><p>870</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>680</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>440</p></td><td><p>1,035</p></td><td><p>2,680</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>505</p></td><td><p>1,155</p></td><td><p>2,950</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2007-08</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>155</p></td><td><p>650</p></td><td><p>1,895</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>1,505</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>1,125</p></td><td><p>2,460</p></td><td><p>6,050</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>1,280</p></td><td><p>2,740</p></td><td><p>6,680</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2006-07</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>645</p></td><td><p>1,795</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>630</p></td><td><p>1,450</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>1,285</p></td><td><p>2,430</p></td><td><p>5,850</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>1,455</p></td><td><p>2,660</p></td><td><p>6,375</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>2005-06</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Region</p></td><td><p>£125,001-£250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-£500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>190</p></td><td><p>475</p></td><td><p>1,275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>455</p></td><td><p>1,055</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>England</p></td><td><p>1,080</p></td><td><p>1,745</p></td><td><p>4,240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK</p></td><td><p>1,175</p></td><td><p>1,910</p></td><td><p>4,585</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Part B: Estimated Provisional Residential SDLT Revenue for Esher and Walton Constituency by Consideration Band for years 2005-06 to 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><p>This data represents estimates that have been produced for this Parliamentary Question. The data for individual bands has been rounded to the nearest £1million. The data for All Bands has been rounded to the nearest £5million. As such, the sum of the individual entries may not be equal to the “all” totals given in the table but the “all” totals remain consistent with the published National Statistics.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>£120,001-250,000</p></td><td><p>£250,001-500,000</p></td><td><p>All Bands Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005-06</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2006-07</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>55</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2007-08</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>59</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>35</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>38</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>56</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>81</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Part C: Estimated Percentage of SDLT returns under £125,000 for Esher and Walton Constituency and Government Office Region for years 2005-06 to 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><p>This data represents estimates that have been produced for this Parliamentary Question. Data for individual areas given to the nearest percentage point.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Esher and Walton</p></td><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>South East</p></td><td><p>England</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2005-06</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>23%</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>42%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2006-07</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2007-08</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>34%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td><td><p>40%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td><td><p>35%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>7%</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>33%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>7%</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td><td><p>30%</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire answering member printed Mr David Gauke grouped question UIN 209973 209975 question first answered 21/10/2014 09:34:58 answering member 1529 label Biography information for Mr David Gauke
tabling member	4007 label Biography information for Dominic Raab