Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

884178
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Discipline more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the cause of the increase in the number of days added to the sentences of prisoners for misconduct between 2011 and 2016. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham more like this
uin HL6863 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>Discipline procedures are central to the maintenance of a safe, decent and rehabilitative custodial environment. They require adjudications to be conducted lawfully, fairly and justly. Only Independent Adjudicators, who are District Judges or Deputy District Judges can, in cases deemed to be sufficiently serious, make an award of additional days. Additional days cannot extend the totality of the sentence imposed by the court but, they will have the effect of extending a person’s custodial time left to serve. The most serious offences are referred to the police.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of individual prisoners who were subject to punishments for disciplinary misconduct is not routinely extracted from the adjudications database as the primary purpose is to report on the volume of punishments imposed. In order to collect this specific information on prisoners, a matching exercise using prison population and adjudication databases would be required to identify each individual prisoner who was sanctioned under the Prison Rules, as a result of which the data could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. Information on the number of occasions additional days were awarded to prisoners between 2011 and 2016 is publicly available and is published as part of the Offender Management Statistics bulletin.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below provides an extract from the published statistics, outlining the number of occasions additional days were awarded by offence during 2011-2016.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Table 1: Awards of additional days by offence 2011 - 2016, England and Wales</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Offence </strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>8,690</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,537</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,125</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10,265</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>13,000</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>16,756</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disobedience/Disrespect</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,393</p></td><td><p>1,455</p></td><td><p>1,401</p></td><td><p>1,457</p></td><td><p>1,731</p></td><td><p>2,268</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Escape/Abscond</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unauthorised transactions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>5,111</p></td><td><p>5,668</p></td><td><p>5,284</p></td><td><p>6,186</p></td><td><p>7,738</p></td><td><p>9,594</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,124</p></td><td><p>1,232</p></td><td><p>1,210</p></td><td><p>1,412</p></td><td><p>1,688</p></td><td><p>2,295</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wilful damage</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>536</p></td><td><p>611</p></td><td><p>646</p></td><td><p>471</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>740</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other offences</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>501</p></td><td><p>551</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>735</p></td><td><p>1,202</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(1) Adjudications are the procedure whereby offences against the Prison or Young Offender Institution Rules are alleged to have been committed by prisoners or young offenders (YOs). Under the Prison Rules, Governors may delegate the conduct of adjudications to any other officer of the prison or Young Offender Institution, who has passed the relevant authorised training course, has suitable operational experience and has been certified by the Governor as competent to carry out adjudication duties.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(2) The number of offences refers to the number of adjudications for which one or more punishments may be imposed onto an offender.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(3) The number of punishments refers to all proven adjudications and excludes all those that have been dismissed or not proceeded with.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The majority of punishments of added days are for unauthorised transactions, which concern illicit economies within prisons, such as possession and selling of forbidden items. We are working closely with the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to improve the response to crime in prisons and to ensure that wherever possible and appropriate those who commit serious crimes in prison are punished through the courts rather than by the internal disciplinary system. We are also reviewing and sharing best practice from prisons who have built up excellent relationships with their local police forces.</p><p> </p><p>We are also reviewing the Adjudications policy set out in Prison Service Instruction 47/2011 as part of our ongoing Prison Reform Programme. The review incorporates a study to examine the impact of disciplinary adjudication punishments on custodial misconduct and provide a better understanding of ‘what works’ in terms of behaviour change.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
grouped question UIN
HL6861 more like this
HL6862 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.977Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.977Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
724621
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-04-26more like thismore than 2017-04-26
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Slavery more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they plan to publish a list of companies that are required to report under the transparency in supply chains provisions of the Modern Slavery Act 2015. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Kennedy of Cradley more like this
uin HL6863 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2017-04-27more like thismore than 2017-04-27
answer text <p>Every year, thousands of businesses will be required to publish a statement on the action they have taken to prevent slavery in their business and supply chains. We are considering what more the Government can do to amplify the value of company statements to customers, shareholders, investors and activists.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-27T12:36:19.937Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-27T12:36:19.937Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
4303
label Biography information for Baroness Kennedy of Cradley more like this
458829
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-09more like thismore than 2016-03-09
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Asylum: France more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the rationale behind their decision to appeal the judgment in <i>R (on the application of ZAT and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Article 8 ECHR - Dublin Regulation - interface - proportionality) IJR</i> [2016] UKUT 00061 (IAC). more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Roberts of Llandudno more like this
uin HL6863 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2016-03-15more like thismore than 2016-03-15
answer text <p>The Secretary of State for the Home Department’s (SSHD) rationale for appealing the judgment is that the Tribunal erred in law in making its decision. The Tribunal accepted that the issues in dispute in the case should be considered by the Court of Appeal and so granted the SSHD permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal on 29th January 2016.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Bates more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-15T14:31:42.627Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-15T14:31:42.627Z
answering member
1091
label Biography information for Lord Bates more like this
tabling member
3691
label Biography information for Lord Roberts of Llandudno more like this
49874
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-05-06more like thismore than 2014-05-06
answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept id 7 more like this
answering dept short name Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept sort name Communities and Local Government more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether, in the light of the Forest of Dean's protection from disposal by the Forestry Act 1967, they will (1) review plans by the Homes and Communities Agency to submit a planning application for a major development of the Cinderford Northern Quarter, and (2) ensure it is subject to a public access agreement until 2032. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL6863 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2014-05-12more like thismore than 2014-05-12
answer text <p> </p><p>The application is currently being considered by Forest of Dean District Council and is still out to public consultation, which ends on 19 May 2014. It is not the policy of the Government to consider intervening in planning applications at such an early stage.</p><p> </p><p>The Secretary of State is very selective about intervening in applications and will only call in an application if it raises issues of more than local importance as a ‘call in' takes the planning decision away from the elected local council.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-05-12T12:00:00.00Zmore like thismore than 2014-05-12T12:00:00.00Z
answering member
4205
label Biography information for Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this