Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1579914
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2023-02-06more like thismore than 2023-02-06
star this property date less than 2023-01-23more like thismore than 2023-01-23
star this property date tabled less than 2023-01-23more like thismore than 2023-01-23
star this property ddp created less than 2023-01-23T21:32:14.390Zmore like thismore than 2023-01-23T21:32:14.390Z
star this property answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 10 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport remove filter
star this property ddp modified
less than 2023-01-23T21:36:40.363Zmore like thismore than 2023-01-23T21:36:40.363Z
less than 2023-02-08T16:53:24.643Zmore like thismore than 2023-02-08T16:53:24.643Z
star this property hansard heading National Heritage Memorial Fund: Stonehenge more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL4977 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property parliament number 58 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2023-02-08T16:21:25.937Zmore like thismore than 2023-02-08T16:21:25.937Z
star this property question text To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay on 20 December (HL4099 and HL4100), whether the grant from the National Heritage Memorial Fund was for both (1) the buy out of the leasehold interest of the 151 acres of land already owned by the Trust in area, and (2) the purchase of the 21.6 acres of land known as Bow Tie Field; and if so, why the grant for purchase of Bow Tie Field was considered necessary to deliver the positive impact of the grant. more like this
star this property session
2022/23 more like this
star this property session number 3 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2022/23 HL4977 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
unstar this property uin HL4977 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer answer
star this property creator
4297
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
star this property publisher
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property tabling member
4297
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this