Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

176721
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-29more like thismore than 2015-01-29
answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept id 7 more like this
answering dept short name Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept sort name Communities and Local Government more like this
hansard heading Housing Associations: Finance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, when the Government plans to consult on ways to increase the borrowing capacity of housing associations in relation to the valuation of properties transferred from local authorities. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 222688 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-02-03more like thismore than 2015-02-03
answer text <p>The Government intends to issue a consultation document in due course.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Great Yarmouth more like this
answering member printed Brandon Lewis more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-02-03T17:20:48.933Zmore like thismore than 2015-02-03T17:20:48.933Z
answering member
4009
label Biography information for Sir Brandon Lewis more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
176737
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-29more like thismore than 2015-01-29
answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept id 7 more like this
answering dept short name Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept sort name Communities and Local Government more like this
hansard heading Regional Planning and Development: Greater London more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, how many applicants there were for the Mayoral Development Corporation Old Oak Director position. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 222747 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-02-03more like thismore than 2015-02-03
answer text <p>The Department does not hold this information. <br><br>The Mayor of London is responsible for Mayoral Development Corporations and will be able to answer any questions relating to these bodies, including staffing matters.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Keighley more like this
answering member printed Kris Hopkins more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-02-03T16:31:08.203Zmore like thismore than 2015-02-03T16:31:08.203Z
answering member
4043
label Biography information for Kris Hopkins more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
175010
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-21more like thismore than 2015-01-21
answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept id 7 more like this
answering dept short name Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept sort name Communities and Local Government more like this
hansard heading Legal Costs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, how much the Government spent on legal fees in the case of Moore and Coates v the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, in which ruling was made on 21 January 2015. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 221613 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-02-23more like thismore than 2015-02-23
answer text <p>Planning casework is a quasi-judicial function of the Department, and as was the case under the last Administration, it attracts a high volume of legal challenges which end up in the courts. This is particularly the case in light of the long-term growth of judicial review and the growing creep of European Union directives, regulations and case law; equality law and human rights law.</p><p> </p><p>Costs to date in these two claims are £68,825 excluding VAT.</p><p> </p><p>The Government makes no apologies for seeking to safeguard Green Belt protection and trying to bring a sense of fair play to the planning system. The Government’s planning policy is clear that both temporary and permanent traveller sites are inappropriate development in the Green Belt. The judgment does not question that principle.</p><p> </p><p>Indeed, there have been a number of recent legal cases where the planning appeal decisions of the Secretary of State have succeeded in relation to traveller development in the Green Belt and awarded costs in favour of DCLG, including:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><ul><li>Mulvenna v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government</li><li>Barney-Smith v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government</li><li>Dear v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government</li><li>Connors, Connors, Sines, Lee, and Doran v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government – five separate claims heard together.</li></ul><p> </p><p>Hence, any payment of costs in Moore vs Coates needs to be seen in this context as my Department has successfully defended the eight claims above and costs are due to my Department.</p><p> </p><p>To place the Department’s spending in context more broadly, I would observe that the Department spent £1.7 million in external lawyers’ fees in 2009-10 (excluding Treasury Solicitors), in 2013-14, the figure had fallen to £699,000.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Great Yarmouth more like this
answering member printed Brandon Lewis more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-02-23T17:09:33.993Zmore like thismore than 2015-02-23T17:09:33.993Z
answering member
4009
label Biography information for Sir Brandon Lewis more like this
previous answer version
41181
answering member constituency Great Yarmouth more like this
answering member printed Brandon Lewis more like this
answering member
4009
label Biography information for Sir Brandon Lewis more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
174455
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-19more like thismore than 2015-01-19
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking to ensure that the successful bidder for Compliance and Enforcement Service Project offers value for money. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 221188 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-01-22more like thismore than 2015-01-22
answer text <p>The final bids submitted by the remaining three bidders on 5 January 2015 for the competition for Compliance and Enforcement Services are going through a robust evaluation process and HMCTS will award the contract based upon the bidder which submits the most economically advantageous tender. The evaluation criteria takes into account price and non price factors and the overall achievability and financial viability of the bids.</p><p> </p><p>In addition to this the agreement that will be put in place with the selected service provider will deliver value for money through a combination of the payment mechanism which incorporates a Payment By Results element based upon performance, Key Performance Indicators and penalties for underperformance.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-01-22T16:03:03.42Zmore like thismore than 2015-01-22T16:03:03.42Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
174247
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-16more like thismore than 2015-01-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Distress Warrants more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of distress warrants that were passed to private debt collection agencies were returned to his Department as uncollected in each of the last three years; and what proportion of those penalties were subsequently collected by the National Crime and Enforcement Service. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 221100 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-01-21more like thismore than 2015-01-21
answer text <p /> <p>This Government takes recovery and enforcement of financial impositions very seriously and remains committed to finding new ways to ensure impositions are paid and to trace those who do not pay. This is why there has been a year on year increase in the total amount of financial penalties collected over the last three years. The amount of money collected reached an all time high of £290 million at the end of 2013/14 and collections continue to rise. In 2013/14 the total outstanding balance of financial impositions reduced by £26.7m (5%) in the year.</p><p> </p><p>We do not keep data on the numbers of distress warrants returned uncollected.</p><p> </p><p>It is not possible to provide figures on the proportion of those warrants returned where the impositions were subsequently collected by the National Crime and Enforcement Service due to the constraints of the current IT system.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-01-21T16:24:55.97Zmore like thismore than 2015-01-21T16:24:55.97Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
174248
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-16more like thismore than 2015-01-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Courts: Fines more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the effect of staff of his Department having access to HM Revenue and Customs information on individuals who have defaulted and are in employment on the level of collection rates of fines and compensation set by the courts. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 221135 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-01-21more like thismore than 2015-01-21
answer text <p /> <p>This Government takes recovery and enforcement of financial impositions very seriously and remains committed to finding new ways to ensure impositions are paid and to trace those who do not pay. This is why there has been a year on year increase in the total amount of financial penalties collected over the last three years. The amount of money collected reached an all time high of £290 million at the end of 2013/14 and collections continue to rise. In 2013/14 the total outstanding balance of financial impositions reduced by £26.7m (5%) in the year.</p><p> </p><p>In July 2014 HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) started a pilot to utilise data provided by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to enforce outstanding financial impositions. While the pilot is limited to a number of specifically targeted cases, early indications are that HMRC are able to provide data that assists in the enforcement of outstanding accounts.</p><p> </p><p>So far HMCTS has sent over 124,000 accounts to HMRC who have been able to supply HMCTS with employer’s details on 40% of those accounts and self employment details on a further 22%. In addition, HMRC has been able to provide additional information, such as addresses and phone numbers, that differ from those held on the HMCTS account.</p><p> </p><p>As a result HMCTS have secured attachment of earnings orders on 66% of the accounts where HMRC have been able to supply employer’s details. Additionally, HMRC data secured on some of the accounts in the remaining 34% has enabled us to take immediate alternative enforcement action, such as the service of a further steps notice, but may also enable future enforcement by attachment of earnings should it be required.</p><p> </p><p>It is not possible to identify how much has been collected as direct result of the data received from HMRC, without checking every account in scope and establishing how many of those accounts would have been paid in full in any event. However, it is possible to confirm that use of the HMRC data has resulted in accounts that have been outstanding for a number of years suddenly being paid in full as a result of the attachment of earnings order, despite many previous attempts to enforce them.</p>
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-01-21T15:54:41.817Zmore like thismore than 2015-01-21T15:54:41.817Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
174249
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-16more like thismore than 2015-01-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Segregation of Prisoners more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people in each prison in England and Wales were segregated in each of the last three years. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 221133 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-01-22more like thismore than 2015-01-22
answer text <p /> <p>Prisoners are segregated as a last resort and for the shortest time necessary for reasons of good order and discipline or for their own protection. While segregated, prisoners are subject to a number of mandatory safeguards designed to ensure their safety and well being. Prisoners will be returned to normal location as soon as it is safe to do so.</p><p> </p><p>Figures recording the number of prisoners who have been placed in segregation are not held centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost by collating the information from records held locally at each prison.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire more like this
answering member printed Andrew Selous more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-01-22T11:40:01.117Zmore like thismore than 2015-01-22T11:40:01.117Z
answering member
1453
label Biography information for Andrew Selous more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
173787
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-14more like thismore than 2015-01-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Courts: Fines more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 13 January 2015 to Question 217822, what was the value outstanding of impositions relating to (a) fines, (b) compensation orders, (c) victim surcharge orders and (d) prosecution costs orders in each local criminal justice board area at the end of each financial year from 2009-10. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 220833 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-01-19more like thismore than 2015-01-19
answer text <p>This Government takes recovery and enforcement of financial impositions very seriously and remains committed to finding new ways to ensure impositions are paid and to trace those who do not pay. This is why there has been a year on year increase in the total amount of financial penalties collected over the last three years. The amount of money collected reached an all time high of £290 million at the end of 2013/14 and collections continue to rise. In 2013/14 the total outstanding balance of financial impositions reduced by £26.7m (5%) in the year.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The table attached shows the value outstanding at the end of March each financial year, for the impositions made in the same year, broken down into a) fines, (b) compensation orders, (c) victim surcharge orders and (d) prosecution costs. This data is only available from 2011-12 onwards.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The total value outstanding of impositions regardless of imposition date relating to (a) fines, (b) compensation orders, (c) victim surcharge orders and (d) prosecution costs orders at the end of each financial year from 2010-11, as published in the HM Courts and Tribunals Service Trust Statements, are shown in the table below. The figures for 2009-10 are not available. It is not possible to break these figures down by local criminal justice board areas without incurring disproportionate costs.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Financial Years</p></td><td><p>Fines</p></td><td><p>Compensation</p></td><td><p>Victim Surcharge</p></td><td><p>Prosecution Costs</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>£413,158,000</p></td><td><p>£70,122,000</p></td><td><p>£10,488,000</p></td><td><p>£131,427,000</p></td><td><p>£625,195,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>£388,292,000</p></td><td><p>£68,484,000</p></td><td><p>£9,877,000</p></td><td><p>£130,102,000</p></td><td><p>£596,755,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>£370,591,000</p></td><td><p>£67,564,000</p></td><td><p>£12,084,000</p></td><td><p>£128,289,000</p></td><td><p>£578,528,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>£335,377,000</p></td><td><p>£67,918,000</p></td><td><p>£21,110,000</p></td><td><p>£126,861,000</p></td><td><p>£551,266,000</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The ‘value outstanding’ figures in the table attached include accounts that were not due to be paid by the end of the period specified (either because they were imposed close to the end of the year or because they had payment timescales set by the courts for beyond the end of the financial year) and those that were being paid by instalments on agreed payment plans. These figures include fines, compensation orders, victim surcharge orders and prosecution costs orders.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>It is not possible to provide figures on the amounts outstanding on fines, compensation orders, victim surcharge orders and prosecution costs orders in exactly the same format as the answer given for Question 217822 due to the constraints of the current IT system.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-01-19T17:58:02.95Zmore like thismore than 2015-01-19T17:58:02.95Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
attachment
1
file name Outstanding balance table 2011-12 to 2013-14.xls more like this
title Outstanding balance table 2011-12 to 2013-14 more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
173788
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-14more like thismore than 2015-01-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Courts: Fines more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 13 January 2015 to Question 217822, what the total value was of outstanding financial impositions in each local criminal justice board area at the end of (a) 2009-10, (b) 2010-11, (c) 2011-12 and (d) 2012-13. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 220834 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-01-19more like thismore than 2015-01-19
answer text <p /> <p>This Government takes recovery and enforcement of financial impositions very seriously and remains committed to finding new ways to ensure impositions are paid and to trace those who do not pay. This is why there has been a year on year increase in the total amount of financial penalties collected over the last three years. The amount of money collected reached an all time high of £290 million at the end of 2013/14 and collections continue to rise. In 2013/14 the total outstanding balance of financial impositions reduced by £26.7m (5%) in the year.</p><p> </p><p>The table below shows the value of financial impositions outstanding as at the end of the financial years (a) 2009-10, (b) 2010-11, (c) 2011-12 and (d) 2012-13.</p><p> </p><p>For the financial years 2011-12 and 2012-13, the first column of figures represents the outstanding balance of the impositions made during the 2013-14 financial year and the second shows the total value outstanding regardless of imposition date. The ‘in year outstanding value’ is included within the total outstanding value figure. The figures cannot be presented in this manner prior to 2011-12.</p><p> </p><p>The ‘value outstanding’ figures includes accounts that were not due to be paid by the end of the period specified (either because they were imposed close to the end of the year or because they had payment timescales set by the courts for beyond the end of the financial year) and those that were being paid by instalments on agreed payment plans. These figures include fines, compensation orders, victim surcharge orders and prosecution costs orders.</p>
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-01-19T17:52:09.587Zmore like thismore than 2015-01-19T17:52:09.587Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
attachment
1
file name 220834 - Tables.xls more like this
title outstanding balance - local crim justice boards more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
173789
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-01-14more like thismore than 2015-01-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, who bid for the contract arising from his Department's Compliance and Environment Services Project in response to the notice published in the Official Journal of the EU; and which bidders remain in the competition. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Andy Slaughter remove filter
uin 220850 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-01-19more like thismore than 2015-01-19
answer text <p /> <p>HMCTS invited Atos, Just CD, Synnex Concentrix, BT and Capita to bid for the Compliance and Enforcement Services contract. Atos and Capita withdrew from the competition. Just CD, Synnex Concentrix and BT reached the Invitation To Negotiate stage of the competition.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-01-19T17:45:54.253Zmore like thismore than 2015-01-19T17:45:54.253Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this