Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

802162
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department of Health remove filter
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Radiology more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the NHS’ capacity to deliver 24-hour interventional radiology (image-guided surgery) services in each region. more like this
tabling member constituency Birmingham, Selly Oak more like this
tabling member printed
Steve McCabe more like this
uin 117849 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-11more like thismore than 2017-12-11
answer text <p>The seven day services self-assessment survey completed by trusts in March 2017 included information on the availability of clinical interventions, including interventional radiology (IR), on a seven day basis for patients admitted to hospital in an emergency. The data showed that <ins class="ministerial">72.30%</ins><del class="ministerial">73.65%</del> of hospital trusts who responded to this survey (<del class="ministerial">109 </del> <ins class="ministerial">107</ins>out of 148 trusts) stated that IR was available for these patients seven days a week.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the twice yearly collection is available on the NHS England website at:</p><p><a href="https://www.england.nhs.uk/seven-day-hospital-services/progress" target="_blank">https://www.england.nhs.uk/seven-day-hospital-services/progress</a></p><p>National Health Service regions have access to this report and will be able to consider any variation.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-11T17:57:45.17Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-11T17:57:45.17Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2018-01-26T14:08:27.71Zmore like thismore than 2018-01-26T14:08:27.71Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
previous answer version
28792
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
298
label Biography information for Steve McCabe more like this
802408
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department of Health remove filter
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord O'Shaughnessy on 5 December (HL3500), whether they will place a copy of the systematic review of serious adverse reactions following HPV vaccines, commissioned by the World Health Organisation, in the Library of the House. more like this
tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
uin HL3941 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-20more like thismore than 2017-12-20
answer text <p>The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) provides independent, authoritative, scientific advice to the World Health Organization (WHO) on vaccine safety issues. The GACVS public summary report dated 14 July 2017 states that it was presented with a draft of a systematic review of serious adverse events following human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines that had been commissioned by WHO and summarises its findings. This found no difference in rates of selected serious adverse events between those exposed and unexposed to HPV vaccine. A copy of the systematic review, <em>Serious adverse events associated with HPV vaccination</em>, is attached.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-20T16:54:10.813Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-20T16:54:10.813Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
attachment
1
file name HPV vaccination safety report _AHTA dec17.pdf more like this
title Serious adverse events associated with HPV more like this
tabling member
1861
label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this
802409
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department of Health remove filter
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Mefloquine more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Lord O'Shaughnessy on 5 December (HL3532) and 27 November (HL3227), whether they have seen the unclassified order of the US Surgeon General’s Office of the Army Special Command of 13 September 2013; whether there is any difference between the drug of the same name administered to US troops and that issued to British troops; and why it is necessary to demonstrate that the neurological damage caused by the administration of mefloquine is permanent before acknowledging the persistence of the neurotoxic effects of the drug. more like this
tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
uin HL3942 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-19more like thismore than 2017-12-19
answer text <p>We have considered this order.</p><p>There is no difference in the anti-malarial drug Mefloquine (under the brand name Lariam) currently provided to the United Kingdom and United States armed forces.</p><p>Mefloquine is effective in the prevention and treatment of malaria. Approved by the Medicines and Health products Regulatory Agency, the current product information states that neuropsychiatric adverse reactions may occur during treatment and includes warnings and precautions to minimise these risks. Some of these reactions may persist, but it has not been established whether these are permanent.</p><p>Mefloquine continues to be recommended as a safe and effective form of malaria prevention by the Advisory Committee on Malaria Prevention, the World Health Organization and other respected organisations who take account of the body of global evidence.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-19T14:14:06.92Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-19T14:14:06.92Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
1861
label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this