Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1565235

registered interest
date	09/01/2023
answering body	Department for Transport
answering dept id	27
answering dept short name	Transport
answering dept sort name	Transport
hansard heading	A66 and A303: Construction
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask His Majesty's Government what the latest cost benefit analysis and business cases are for (1) the Stonehenge road tunnel, and (2) the A66 road improvement between Scotch Corner and the M6; and what assessment they have made as to whether these works demonstrate good value for money.
tabling member printed	Lord Berkeley
uin	HL4541
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 20/01/2023 answer text <p>The A303 Stonehenge project is being redetermined by the Secretary of State for Transport following an Order of the High Court made on 30 July 2021, the decision dated 12 November 2020, to grant development consent for the application by National Highways (formerly Highways England) was quashed. Further details on the re-determination process are published on the project page on the Planning Inspectorate’s website. As this is a live planning application, the Department for Transport cannot comment further on the application.</p><p>The A66 Trans-Pennine project is at outline business case (OBC) stage and is currently under Development Consent Order examination. The OBC gives a BCR of 0.9, which does not include the benefits of further work to develop and refine the project. As this is a live planning application, the Department for Transport cannot comment further on the application.</p> answering member printed Baroness Vere of Norbiton question first answered 20/01/2023 13:34:37 answering member 4580 label Biography information for Baroness Vere of Norbiton
tabling member	3526 label Biography information for Lord Berkeley

1565236

registered interest
date	09/01/2023
answering body	Department for Transport
answering dept id	27
answering dept short name	Transport
answering dept sort name	Transport
hansard heading	High Speed 2 Line: Leeds
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask His Majesty's Government what is the latest business case for extending HS2 to Leeds.
tabling member printed	Lord Berkeley
uin	HL4542
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/01/2023 answer text <p>The IRP included £100 million for work to look at the most effective way to run HS2 trains to Leeds, including understanding the optimal solution for capacity at Leeds station, and starting work on the West Yorkshire Mass Transit System.</p><p> </p><p>We intend to publish the terms of reference for the HS2 to Leeds Study soon, which will provide more information on the options under consideration.</p> answering member printed Baroness Vere of Norbiton grouped question UIN HL4543 question first answered 19/01/2023 12:15:00 answering member 4580 label Biography information for Baroness Vere of Norbiton
tabling member	3526 label Biography information for Lord Berkeley

1565237

registered interest
date	09/01/2023
answering body	Department for Transport
answering dept id	27
answering dept short name	Transport
answering dept sort name	Transport
hansard heading	High Speed 2 Line: Railway Stations
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask His Majesty's Government whether plans for extending HS2 to Leeds will involve HS2 and traditional passenger trains calling at the same station platforms; and if so, (1) how the differences in planned station platform heights for different trains will be accommodated, and (2) what cost benefit analysis they have made of making provisions for differing station platform heights for different types of trains.
tabling member printed	Lord Berkeley
uin	HL4543
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/01/2023 answer text <p>The IRP included £100 million for work to look at the most effective way to run HS2 trains to Leeds, including understanding the optimal solution for capacity at Leeds station, and starting work on the West Yorkshire Mass Transit System.</p><p> </p><p>We intend to publish the terms of reference for the HS2 to Leeds Study soon, which will provide more information on the options under consideration.</p> answering member printed Baroness Vere of Norbiton grouped question UIN HL4542 question first answered 19/01/2023 12:15:00 answering member 4580 label Biography information for Baroness Vere of Norbiton
tabling member	3526 label Biography information for Lord Berkeley

1565238

registered interest
date	09/01/2023
answering body	Department for Transport
answering dept id	27
answering dept short name	Transport
answering dept sort name	Transport
hansard heading	Railways: Passengers
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask His Majesty's Government what growth in rail passenger numbers along the main line between Penzance and Plymouth was achieved by the introduction of a 30-minute frequency service prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
tabling member printed	Lord Berkeley
uin	HL4544
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/01/2023 answer text <p>We do not have a complete set of data to present at this time. We have asked Great Western Railway to write to the Noble Lord when the information is available and this information will be placed in the Libraries of the House.</p> answering member printed Baroness Vere of Norbiton question first answered 23/01/2023 11:40:12 answering member 4580 label Biography information for Baroness Vere of Norbiton
tabling member	3526 label Biography information for Lord Berkeley