answer text |
<p>The statutory role of Director of Legal Aid Casework was created under section
4 of the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO). The primary
role of the Director is to make determinations about eligibility for legal aid funding
in individual cases. In making individual determinations the Director must act independently
of Ministers, applying the relevant statutory framework.</p><p>Under s.5(3) of LASPO
the functions of the Director may be exercised by employees of, or a person authorised
by, the Director for that purpose. This would include civil servants employed by the
Legal Aid Agency (LAA) for the purposes of determining applications for funding.</p><p>Determinations
about eligibility for legal aid, including whether to exercise discretion under Regulation
31(b) of the Civil Legal Aid (Financial Resources and Payment for Services) Regulations
2013, are generally made by LAA staff under delegated authority from the Director,
applying the guidance set out in the Lord Chancellor’s Guidance on determining financial
eligibility for certificated work.</p><p>Any decision to refer a determination about
eligibility for legal aid upwards to the Director is taken by caseworkers and managers
based on the information in individual applications.</p><p>Typically, applications
for civil legal aid are submitted to the LAA on behalf of applicants by a legal representative
using the LAA’s Client and Cost Management System (CCMS). The legal representative
would provide initial advice regarding financial eligibility and would include any
submissions regarding the exercise of discretion under s.31(b) of the Civil Legal
Aid (Financial Resources and Payment for Services) Regulations 2013 within the application
submitted to the LAA, where applicable.</p><p>LAA call handlers would not generally
be expected, or required, to ask legal aid applicants about their financial eligibility.
Call handlers are not responsible for determining financial eligibility for legal
aid. Financial eligibility for legal aid can only be determined by the Director or
LAA staff upon submission of a fully completed application for legal aid.</p><p>However,
LAA call handlers are aware of the guidance regarding the Director’s discretion under
s.31(b) of the Civil Legal Aid (Financial Resources and Payment for Services) Regulations
2013, as set out at section 6.3 of the Lord Chancellor’s guidance on determining financial
eligibility for certificated work. In particular, section 6.3 makes clear the outcome
of the judgment in the case of R(GR) v DLAC [2020] EWHC 3140 (Admin) and how this
should be applied when determining financial eligibility. Call handlers will direct
individuals to this published guidance where they receive calls enquiring about financial
eligibility. Call handlers undertake regular training in all areas of legal aid work
and any changes to regulations and guidance are cascaded to LAA staff, including call
handlers.</p><p>Under s.4 of LASPO the Lord Chancellor may provide directions or guidance
about the carrying out of the Director’s functions. The Director must comply with
the directions given by the Lord Chancellor and must have regard to guidance given
by the Lord Chancellor about the carrying out of those functions.</p><p>However, the
Lord Chancellor must not give a direction or guidance about the carrying out of the
Director’s functions in relation to an individual legal aid application. In addition,
the Lord Chancellor must ensure the Director acts independently of the Lord Chancellor
when applying a direction or guidance to an individual case.</p><p>Any directions
or guidance given by the Lord Chancellor must be published. In this case the Lord
Chancellor has, following the judgment in R(GR) v DLAC [2020] EWHC 3140 (Admin), published
guidance regarding the exercise of discretion under s.31(b) of the Civil Legal Aid
(Financial Resources and Payment for Services) Regulations 2013, at section 6.3 of
the Lord Chancellor’s guidance on determining financial eligibility for certificated
work.</p><p>Any steps to disseminate guidance to LAA staff, including call handlers
and means assessors, or to organise relevant training, is properly the responsibility
of the LAA’s Chief Executive (currently the role of Chief Executive and the Director
are held by the same individual) and not the Lord Chancellor.</p><p>However, I understand
all LAA staff who are responsible for making determinations on financial eligibility
undertake comprehensive training, are provided with relevant guidance materials, and
follow defined processes to ensure they are able to make reasonable and consistent
decisions.</p><p> </p>
|
|