Show Search Form
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House recognises that many people on low incomes, or in receipt of benefits, often have financial difficulties in spreading their income over a whole month, and are forced to use credit card companies or pay day lenders at very high rates of interest; expresses concern at the large number of people who end up needing to use food banks or payday lenders because they do not receive sufficient income to cover their essential costs; believes that all work should pay the real Living Wage and provide enough income to live with security and dignity; further believes that benefits paid to people who are looking for work or too ill to work should also provide sufficient income to live with dignity and without being in poverty, or needing to rely on food aid; further notes that monthly payment of benefits may be difficult for some recipients, who would find it easier to manage their finances if they could be paid weekly or fortnightly; notes that having the option to be paid at shorter timescales can be useful to people on low incomes; calls on the Department for Work and Pensions to automatically agree to every request to have benefits paid weekly or fortnightly, rather than monthly, and to make it clear to all recipients of universal credit that they have the right to request this; and calls for employers, particularly of staff on low incomes, to give their employees the option of being paid weekly, fortnightly or monthly. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | RIGHT TO RECEIVE WEEKLY PAYMENTS OF BENEFITS OR WAGES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1850 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1850 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House expresses concern at the continuing lack of justice for victims and survivors of the Marikana Massacre in South Africa in August 2012 and at the involvement of Lonmin, a London-based and listed company, in that massacre; urges the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to call on the Government of the Republic of South Africa to release the miners who are in prison as a result of the Massacre, to review the Farlam Commission and prosecute those responsible for the Massacre, and to compel Lonmin to fulfill its obligations under its Social and Labour Plan; further calls on the UK Government to ask Lonmin to publish in full the results of the audit of its Marikana operations by its primary customer BASF, and to enter into a social covenant with specific timeframes with the entire mining community, to include an apology to the South African nation and to the families of the mineworkers murdered, injured or arrested, reparations to the affected parties, including all dependents of the deceased mineworkers and the injured and arrested workers who survived the massacre, taking public responsibility for the environmental destruction at Marikana, and ensuring that people in the communities around the mine have sufficient water, proper sanitation and electricity; and calls on the Government to insist that when Lonmin is sold, any new owners must continue to fulfil this social covenant and that this is reflected in the purchase contract. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | LONMIN'S MARIKANA OPERATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1850 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1780 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1780 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House welcomes the commitment given by the Chancellor of the Exchequer that no further private finance initiatives (PFI) and public private partnerships (PPP) contracts will be entered into by the current Government; records that PFI and PPP was devised by the Treasury as an accounting mechanism to keep the capital costs of public projects off the Treasury balance sheet; recalls that this sleight of hand was embraced by the Major Government and, regrettably, continued by the Blair and Brown Governments, despite mounting evidence that it offered extremely poor value for money for taxpayers; notes that the senior Treasury official credited with devising PFI and PPP was Stephen Robson, who was rewarded with a knighthood for efforts and who, on leaving the Treasury in 2001, served as a director of Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS); and further notes that Robson was a director of RBS during the time when the Bank imploded due to mismanagement, and the taxpayer had to provide more than £45 billionn to bailout RBS's gambling debts. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | PFI AND PPP CONTRACTS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1780 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House is mindful of the approach of Bonfire Night on 5 November; calls on the Government to reconsider the current legislation regarding the sale and use of fireworks; expresses concern about distress caused to elderly people, small children and pets by fireworks being set off in residential areas, along with the potential for fireworks to cause injury to people using them or mis-using them; and urges the Government to amend the regulations to ensure that fireworks can only be sold by licenced traders, as defined by the Fireworks Regulations 2004, to licenced organisers of public displays. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | RESTRICTIONS ON THE SALE AND USE OF FIREWORKS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1771 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1771 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House expresses its concern that renewable energy subsidies for electricity generated from biomass, most of which is generated using imported wood pellets, are resulting in energy bill-payers paying for expensive, high-carbon electricity; notes that burning wood to generate electricity is a high-carbon power source; further notes that burning biomass to generate electricity damages forests and biodiversity, pollutes communities in source countries and at the point of generation and worsens climate change; notes that more than £1 billion in biomass subsidies were paid out in 2017, equivalent to more than £38 per household; notes the recent warning by the IPCC that substantial progress on comprehensive decarbonisation of the economy must be made in just a dozen years if we are to avoid catastrophic damage to the climate; calls on the Government to follow the logic of its recent decision effectively to end new subsidy for large-scale import-dependent biomass under Contracts for Difference, and to remove subsidy for biomass under the Renewable Obligation scheme; and further calls on the Government to instead direct funding towards renewable, low-carbon electricity sources including solar and wind. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | SUBSIDIES FOR BIOMASS ELECTRICITY GENERATION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1771 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House notes with disgust that TSB's outgoing chief executive, Paul Pester, is leaving with a payoff of almost £1.7m, despite being in charge during an IT disaster which caused chaos and financial problems for many customers; does not see how this aligns with TSB's principle that severance payments are paid in line with the principle off no rewards for failure; further notes that the bank is currently investigating whether Pester will receive even more compensation; believes that this money would be much better spent compensating customers for the inconvenience and stress caused by TSB's failures; calls on TSB to reconsider this payout; and urges the financial sector to cease excessive executive payouts, particularly in cases of poor performance, and to reduce the ratio between highest pay and the salaries of ordinary employees. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | FINANCIAL REWARD PAID TO TSB'S PAUL PESTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1624 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1624 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House notes with concern the ongoing huge disparities between the pay and financial support provided to male footballers, and the lack of funding for female footballers; believes that women's football is just as important as men's, and should be recompensed and financed appropriately; condemns the recent decision of Crystal Palace to ask its female reserve players to find their own sponsorship of £250 each, while offering male player Wilfried Zaha a salary of £130,000 per week; congratulates Zaha on his decision to offer a financial contribution towards the women's team, but believes that women's sports should not have to rely on charity from men who are paid many times more than women; warmly congratulates Lewes FC, which is the first and only UK club to pay its men's and women's teams equally and provide equal resources for training; and recognises and condemns the structural misogyny which views women's work as being worth less than that of men. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | GENDER GAP IN FOOTBALLERS' PAY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1624 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House does not agree with the recent decision by the Department for Education to update its advice to schools to suggest that teachers should not express political views; believes that teachers have a right and even a responsibility to raise concerns about the impact of funding cuts on its ability to provide a high-quality education, and that this is not the same as campaigning for a particular political party; condemns this attempt by the Department to gag teachers and prevent them from speaking out about issues in the UK schools system; takes note of the accounts from schools around the country that they cannot afford basic supplies, essential buildings maintenance or subject choice because of funding cuts, and that this is impacting on the standard of children's education and their chances in life; urges the Government to listen to teachers and parents who protest about the impact of funding cuts on children's education; and suggests that reversing the cuts and providing sufficient funding to schools would allow teachers to get on with the job of teaching without having to waste time implementing endless budget cuts. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | TEACHERS EXPRESSING POLITICAL VIEWS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1505 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1505 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House views with concern the problems currently experienced by many vulnerable universal credit (UC) applicants, particularly those in hostel accommodation and living with mental health problems, providing acceptable ID to banks for the purposes of establishing a bank account which is a condition of receipt of UC; notes that the Statement available on the universal credit website is proving not to be acceptable for these purposes to banks in a way that historical legacy proof of benefit letters were accepted; further notes that the Department of Work and Pensions is aware of these problems but has yet to schedule any remedy; and welcomes the existence of the Payment Exception Service to enable clients to receive cash vouchers with UC payments, but believes that this adds further unnecessary pressure and stress to those in situations who need it least. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | UNIVERSAL CREDIT AND BANKING ID | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1505 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|
human indexable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
date tabled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp created | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ddp modified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of signatures | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm number | 1142 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edm status | Tabled | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
identifier | 1142 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
legislature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
motion text | That this House expresses disgust at the Insolvency Service's decision not to ban billionaire Philip Green from serving as a company director for his disgraceful stewardship of BHS prior to selling the company for £1; notes that under Mr Green's mismanagement, that long-running British business collapsed with a pension deficit of more than £500 million; expresses concern at the impact on hardworking BHS staff of losing their jobs and having their pensions put at risk; further notes that Mr Green and other shareholders extracted £586 million from BHS, and Mr Green indulged in a grotesquely lavish lifestyle including a £150 million yacht, while the UK taxpayer had to pay £367 million in tax credits to BHS workers whose wages were not enough to live on; observes that Mr Green allowed Dominic Chappell to take over BHS despite the fact that Chappell had been bankrupt three times; notes that Green's businesses are registered in Monaco, a tax haven, in order to escape paying tax which should have gone to the UK Exchequer and been spent on essential public services; believes that Green has demonstrated that he is not a fit or proper person to run any business, and should not be permitted to do so; calls on the Insolvency Service to urgently reconsider the decision not to impose a ban; and further believes that banning Green would be good for business in the UK and would show that this kind of predatory exploitation of workers and the public purse is unacceptable. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor printed | Mr Roger Godsiff | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
session number | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
signature |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsor printed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sponsors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | INSOLVENCY SERVICE DECISION ON SIR PHILIP GREEN | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
type |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
external location | 1142 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
primary sponsor |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
publisher |
|