{ "format" : "linked-data-api", "version" : "0.2", "result" : {"_about" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?hansardHeading=Personal+Independence+Payment%3A+Appeals&writtenParliamentaryQuestionType=Ordinary", "definition" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/meta/answeredquestions.text?hansardHeading=Personal+Independence+Payment%3A+Appeals&writtenParliamentaryQuestionType=Ordinary", "extendedMetadataVersion" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?_metadata=all&hansardHeading=Personal+Independence+Payment%3A+Appeals&writtenParliamentaryQuestionType=Ordinary", "first" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?_page=0&hansardHeading=Personal+Independence+Payment%3A+Appeals&writtenParliamentaryQuestionType=Ordinary", "hasPart" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?hansardHeading=Personal+Independence+Payment%3A+Appeals&writtenParliamentaryQuestionType=Ordinary", "isPartOf" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?hansardHeading=Personal+Independence+Payment%3A+Appeals&writtenParliamentaryQuestionType=Ordinary", "items" : [{"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/resources/1698643", "AnsweringBody" : [{"_value" : "Department for Work and Pensions"} ], "answer" : {"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/resources/1698643/answer", "answerText" : {"_value" : "

Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is not an income replacement benefit. It is paid to help with the additional costs that arise from long term health conditions or disability where they impact on the activities set out in legislation. Claimants are assessed against the legislative criteria and a decision on entitlement is made by a DWP decision maker.<\/p>

In line with the legislative requirement, applicable to most social security benefits, we continue to apply the latest decision on a PIP award until such time as a new decision is made. Payment of PIP after a claim has been disallowed, or at a rate higher than the latest decision whilst an individual is waiting for an appeal hearing could lead to inappropriate expenditure of public funds. If a subsequent first-tier tribunal decides to reinstate PIP, or give a higher award, then the Department will backdate any payments due, in line with the new decision.<\/p>"} , "answeringMember" : {"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/members/4513", "label" : {"_value" : "Biography information for Mims Davies"} } , "answeringMemberConstituency" : {"_value" : "Mid Sussex"} , "answeringMemberPrinted" : {"_value" : "Mims Davies"} , "dateOfAnswer" : {"_value" : "2024-04-19", "_datatype" : "dateTime"} , "isMinisterialCorrection" : {"_value" : "false", "_datatype" : "boolean"} , "questionFirstAnswered" : [{"_value" : "2024-04-19T12:52:45.423Z", "_datatype" : "dateTime"} ]} , "answeringDeptId" : {"_value" : "29"} , "answeringDeptShortName" : {"_value" : "Work and Pensions"} , "answeringDeptSortName" : {"_value" : "Work and Pensions"} , "date" : {"_value" : "2024-03-25", "_datatype" : "dateTime"} , "hansardHeading" : {"_value" : "Personal Independence Payment: Appeals"} , "houseId" : {"_value" : "1"} , "legislature" : [{"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/terms/25259", "prefLabel" : {"_value" : "House of Commons"} } ], "questionText" : "To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of paying people who are waiting for the outcome of their Personal Independence Payment appeal at the rate they received before their last decision.", "registeredInterest" : {"_value" : "false", "_datatype" : "boolean"} , "tablingMember" : {"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/members/4799", "label" : {"_value" : "Biography information for Charlotte Nichols"} } , "tablingMemberConstituency" : {"_value" : "Warrington North"} , "tablingMemberPrinted" : [{"_value" : "Charlotte Nichols"} ], "uin" : "20451"} , {"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/resources/1690853", "AnsweringBody" : [{"_value" : "Department for Work and Pensions"} ], "answer" : {"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/resources/1690853/answer", "answerText" : {"_value" : "

Analysis of unpublished Personal Independence Payment (PIP) data held by DWP provides data on why decisions by DWP decision makers have been overturned at a tribunal hearing between January 2014 and September 2023 and is shown annually in the tables below. This information is taken from Decision Notices and recorded on the PIP computer system.<\/p>

<\/p>

This data only provides one reason per appeal why decisions by DWP decision makers have been overturned at a tribunal hearing, and therefore may not give the full story as there may be other reasons.<\/p>

<\/p>

Appeals data is taken from the DWP PIP computer system\u2019s management information. Therefore, this appeal data may differ from that held by His Majesty\u2019s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.<\/p>

<\/p>

These figures are the result of a complex data match across a number of data sets. This data is unpublished data. It should be used with caution, and it may be subject to future revision.<\/p>

<\/p>

Learning from this information, we have made improvements to our decision-making processes to help ensure we make the right decision as early as possible in the claim journey. We have introduced a new approach to decision making at both the initial decision and the Mandatory Reconsideration stage, giving Decision Makers additional time to proactively contact customers where they think additional evidence may support the claim.<\/p>

<\/p>

Summary reason DWP decision
overturned at Tribunal hearing<\/strong><\/p><\/td>

Appeal clearance year<\/strong><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

2014<\/p><\/td>

2015<\/p><\/td>

2016<\/p><\/td>

2017<\/p><\/td>

2018<\/p><\/td>

2019<\/p><\/td>

2020<\/p><\/td>

2021<\/p><\/td>

2022<\/p><\/td>

2023 (to September)<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Cogent documentary evidence
supplied at the appeal<\/p><\/td>

100<\/p><\/td>

2,000<\/p><\/td>

6,300<\/p><\/td>

5,000<\/p><\/td>

4,400<\/p><\/td>

2,600<\/p><\/td>

1,900<\/p><\/td>

400<\/p><\/td>

200<\/p><\/td>

300<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Cogent oral evidence<\/p><\/td>

1,100<\/p><\/td>

14,700<\/p><\/td>

22,900<\/p><\/td>

26,500<\/p><\/td>

25,100<\/p><\/td>

26,200<\/p><\/td>

11,800<\/p><\/td>

8,800<\/p><\/td>

8,800<\/p><\/td>

11,800<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Reached a different conclusion on
substantially the same facts<\/p><\/td>

200<\/p><\/td>

2,900<\/p><\/td>

7,700<\/p><\/td>

13,600<\/p><\/td>

21,100<\/p><\/td>

24,600<\/p><\/td>

26,100<\/p><\/td>

16,300<\/p><\/td>

16,700<\/p><\/td>

17,500<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Other<\/p><\/td>

100<\/p><\/td>

2,300<\/p><\/td>

5,200<\/p><\/td>

8,200<\/p><\/td>

7,600<\/p><\/td>

7,100<\/p><\/td>

5,000<\/p><\/td>

1,900<\/p><\/td>

1,900<\/p><\/td>

2,000<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>

<\/p>

Summary reason DWP decision
overturned at Tribunal hearing<\/strong><\/p><\/td>

Appeal clearance year<\/strong><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

2014<\/p><\/td>

2015<\/p><\/td>

2016<\/p><\/td>

2017<\/p><\/td>

2018<\/p><\/td>

2019<\/p><\/td>

2020<\/p><\/td>

2021<\/p><\/td>

2022<\/p><\/td>

2023 (to September)<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Cogent documentary evidence
supplied at the appeal<\/p><\/td>

6%<\/p><\/td>

9%<\/p><\/td>

15%<\/p><\/td>

9%<\/p><\/td>

8%<\/p><\/td>

4%<\/p><\/td>

4%<\/p><\/td>

1%<\/p><\/td>

1%<\/p><\/td>

1%<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Cogent oral evidence<\/p><\/td>

75%<\/p><\/td>

67%<\/p><\/td>

54%<\/p><\/td>

50%<\/p><\/td>

43%<\/p><\/td>

43%<\/p><\/td>

26%<\/p><\/td>

32%<\/p><\/td>

32%<\/p><\/td>

37%<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Reached a different conclusion on
substantially the same facts<\/p><\/td>

14%<\/p><\/td>

13%<\/p><\/td>

18%<\/p><\/td>

26%<\/p><\/td>

36%<\/p><\/td>

41%<\/p><\/td>

58%<\/p><\/td>

60%<\/p><\/td>

61%<\/p><\/td>

56%<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Other<\/p><\/td>

4%<\/p><\/td>

10%<\/p><\/td>

12%<\/p><\/td>

15%<\/p><\/td>

13%<\/p><\/td>

12%<\/p><\/td>

11%<\/p><\/td>

7%<\/p><\/td>

7%<\/p><\/td>

6%<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>

<\/p>

Note:<\/p>