{ "format" : "linked-data-api", "version" : "0.2", "result" : {"_about" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?_page=0&answer.answerText=%3Cp%3EFollowing%20a%20public%20consultation,%20fees%20were%20introduced%20in%20Employment%20Tribunals%20to%20reduce%20the%20burden%20on%20the%20taxpayer%20of%20paying%20for%20Employment%20Tribunals%20and%20to%20encourage%20parties%20to%20seek%20alternative%20ways%20of%20resolving%20their%20disputes.%20%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20has%20ensured%20that%20fee%20waivers%20are%20available%20for%20those%20who%20cannot%20afford%20to%20pay,%20as%20well%20as%20diverting%20people%20away%20from%20potentially%20acrimonious%20hearings,%20where%20possible,%20through%20a%20new%20early%20conciliation%20scheme%20which%20has%20already%20been%20used%20by%20over%2060,000%20people%20in%20its%20first%20six%20months.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20is%20currently%20considering%20the%20options%20for%20a%20review%20of%20Employment%20Tribunal%20fees.%20A%20further%20announcement%20will%20be%20made%20in%20due%20course.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3E%3C/p%3E&AnsweringBody.=Ministry%20of%20Justice&_properties=answer.isMinisterialCorrection,tablingMember.label,tablingMember,answer.attachment,answeringDeptId&_sort=uin,tablingMember.label", "definition" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/meta/answeredquestions.text?answer.answerText=%3Cp%3EFollowing%20a%20public%20consultation,%20fees%20were%20introduced%20in%20Employment%20Tribunals%20to%20reduce%20the%20burden%20on%20the%20taxpayer%20of%20paying%20for%20Employment%20Tribunals%20and%20to%20encourage%20parties%20to%20seek%20alternative%20ways%20of%20resolving%20their%20disputes.%20%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20has%20ensured%20that%20fee%20waivers%20are%20available%20for%20those%20who%20cannot%20afford%20to%20pay,%20as%20well%20as%20diverting%20people%20away%20from%20potentially%20acrimonious%20hearings,%20where%20possible,%20through%20a%20new%20early%20conciliation%20scheme%20which%20has%20already%20been%20used%20by%20over%2060,000%20people%20in%20its%20first%20six%20months.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20is%20currently%20considering%20the%20options%20for%20a%20review%20of%20Employment%20Tribunal%20fees.%20A%20further%20announcement%20will%20be%20made%20in%20due%20course.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3E%3C/p%3E&AnsweringBody.=Ministry%20of%20Justice&_properties=answer.isMinisterialCorrection,tablingMember.label,tablingMember,answer.attachment,answeringDeptId&_sort=uin,tablingMember.label", "extendedMetadataVersion" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?_page=0&answer.answerText=%3Cp%3EFollowing%20a%20public%20consultation,%20fees%20were%20introduced%20in%20Employment%20Tribunals%20to%20reduce%20the%20burden%20on%20the%20taxpayer%20of%20paying%20for%20Employment%20Tribunals%20and%20to%20encourage%20parties%20to%20seek%20alternative%20ways%20of%20resolving%20their%20disputes.%20%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20has%20ensured%20that%20fee%20waivers%20are%20available%20for%20those%20who%20cannot%20afford%20to%20pay,%20as%20well%20as%20diverting%20people%20away%20from%20potentially%20acrimonious%20hearings,%20where%20possible,%20through%20a%20new%20early%20conciliation%20scheme%20which%20has%20already%20been%20used%20by%20over%2060,000%20people%20in%20its%20first%20six%20months.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20is%20currently%20considering%20the%20options%20for%20a%20review%20of%20Employment%20Tribunal%20fees.%20A%20further%20announcement%20will%20be%20made%20in%20due%20course.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3E%3C/p%3E&AnsweringBody.=Ministry%20of%20Justice&_properties=answer.isMinisterialCorrection,tablingMember.label,tablingMember,answer.attachment,answeringDeptId&_metadata=all&_sort=uin,tablingMember.label", "first" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?_page=0&answer.answerText=%3Cp%3EFollowing%20a%20public%20consultation,%20fees%20were%20introduced%20in%20Employment%20Tribunals%20to%20reduce%20the%20burden%20on%20the%20taxpayer%20of%20paying%20for%20Employment%20Tribunals%20and%20to%20encourage%20parties%20to%20seek%20alternative%20ways%20of%20resolving%20their%20disputes.%20%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20has%20ensured%20that%20fee%20waivers%20are%20available%20for%20those%20who%20cannot%20afford%20to%20pay,%20as%20well%20as%20diverting%20people%20away%20from%20potentially%20acrimonious%20hearings,%20where%20possible,%20through%20a%20new%20early%20conciliation%20scheme%20which%20has%20already%20been%20used%20by%20over%2060,000%20people%20in%20its%20first%20six%20months.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20is%20currently%20considering%20the%20options%20for%20a%20review%20of%20Employment%20Tribunal%20fees.%20A%20further%20announcement%20will%20be%20made%20in%20due%20course.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3E%3C/p%3E&AnsweringBody.=Ministry%20of%20Justice&_properties=answer.isMinisterialCorrection,tablingMember.label,tablingMember,answer.attachment,answeringDeptId&_sort=uin,tablingMember.label", "isPartOf" : {"_about" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?answer.answerText=%3Cp%3EFollowing%20a%20public%20consultation,%20fees%20were%20introduced%20in%20Employment%20Tribunals%20to%20reduce%20the%20burden%20on%20the%20taxpayer%20of%20paying%20for%20Employment%20Tribunals%20and%20to%20encourage%20parties%20to%20seek%20alternative%20ways%20of%20resolving%20their%20disputes.%20%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20has%20ensured%20that%20fee%20waivers%20are%20available%20for%20those%20who%20cannot%20afford%20to%20pay,%20as%20well%20as%20diverting%20people%20away%20from%20potentially%20acrimonious%20hearings,%20where%20possible,%20through%20a%20new%20early%20conciliation%20scheme%20which%20has%20already%20been%20used%20by%20over%2060,000%20people%20in%20its%20first%20six%20months.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20is%20currently%20considering%20the%20options%20for%20a%20review%20of%20Employment%20Tribunal%20fees.%20A%20further%20announcement%20will%20be%20made%20in%20due%20course.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3E%3C/p%3E&AnsweringBody.=Ministry%20of%20Justice&_properties=answer.isMinisterialCorrection,tablingMember.label,tablingMember,answer.attachment,answeringDeptId&_sort=uin,tablingMember.label", "definition" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/meta/answeredquestions.text?answer.answerText=%3Cp%3EFollowing%20a%20public%20consultation,%20fees%20were%20introduced%20in%20Employment%20Tribunals%20to%20reduce%20the%20burden%20on%20the%20taxpayer%20of%20paying%20for%20Employment%20Tribunals%20and%20to%20encourage%20parties%20to%20seek%20alternative%20ways%20of%20resolving%20their%20disputes.%20%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20has%20ensured%20that%20fee%20waivers%20are%20available%20for%20those%20who%20cannot%20afford%20to%20pay,%20as%20well%20as%20diverting%20people%20away%20from%20potentially%20acrimonious%20hearings,%20where%20possible,%20through%20a%20new%20early%20conciliation%20scheme%20which%20has%20already%20been%20used%20by%20over%2060,000%20people%20in%20its%20first%20six%20months.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20is%20currently%20considering%20the%20options%20for%20a%20review%20of%20Employment%20Tribunal%20fees.%20A%20further%20announcement%20will%20be%20made%20in%20due%20course.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3E%3C/p%3E&AnsweringBody.=Ministry%20of%20Justice&_properties=answer.isMinisterialCorrection,tablingMember.label,tablingMember,answer.attachment,answeringDeptId&_sort=uin,tablingMember.label", "hasPart" : "http://eldaddp.azurewebsites.net/answeredquestions.text?_page=0&answer.answerText=%3Cp%3EFollowing%20a%20public%20consultation,%20fees%20were%20introduced%20in%20Employment%20Tribunals%20to%20reduce%20the%20burden%20on%20the%20taxpayer%20of%20paying%20for%20Employment%20Tribunals%20and%20to%20encourage%20parties%20to%20seek%20alternative%20ways%20of%20resolving%20their%20disputes.%20%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20has%20ensured%20that%20fee%20waivers%20are%20available%20for%20those%20who%20cannot%20afford%20to%20pay,%20as%20well%20as%20diverting%20people%20away%20from%20potentially%20acrimonious%20hearings,%20where%20possible,%20through%20a%20new%20early%20conciliation%20scheme%20which%20has%20already%20been%20used%20by%20over%2060,000%20people%20in%20its%20first%20six%20months.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EThe%20Government%20is%20currently%20considering%20the%20options%20for%20a%20review%20of%20Employment%20Tribunal%20fees.%20A%20further%20announcement%20will%20be%20made%20in%20due%20course.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3E%3C/p%3E&AnsweringBody.=Ministry%20of%20Justice&_properties=answer.isMinisterialCorrection,tablingMember.label,tablingMember,answer.attachment,answeringDeptId&_sort=uin,tablingMember.label", "type" : "http://purl.org/linked-data/api/vocab#ListEndpoint"}
    , "items" : [{"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/resources/346934", "AnsweringBody" : [{"_value" : "Ministry of Justice"}
      ], "answer" : {"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/resources/346934/answer", "answerText" : {"_value" : "<p>Following a public consultation, fees were introduced in Employment Tribunals to reduce the burden on the taxpayer of paying for Employment Tribunals and to encourage parties to seek alternative ways of resolving their disputes. <br><br>The Government has ensured that fee waivers are available for those who cannot afford to pay, as well as diverting people away from potentially acrimonious hearings, where possible, through a new early conciliation scheme which has already been used by over 60,000 people in its first six months.<br><br>The Government is currently considering the options for a review of Employment Tribunal fees. A further announcement will be made in due course.<br><br><\/p>"}
        , "answeringMember" : {"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/members/1496", "label" : {"_value" : "Biography information for Shailesh Vara"}
        }
        , "answeringMemberConstituency" : {"_value" : "North West Cambridgeshire"}
        , "answeringMemberPrinted" : {"_value" : "Mr Shailesh Vara"}
        , "dateOfAnswer" : {"_value" : "2015-06-02", "_datatype" : "dateTime"}
        , "isMinisterialCorrection" : {"_value" : "false", "_datatype" : "boolean"}
        , "questionFirstAnswered" : [{"_value" : "2015-06-02T16:45:57.873Z", "_datatype" : "dateTime"}
        ]}
      , "answeringDeptId" : {"_value" : "54"}
      , "answeringDeptShortName" : {"_value" : "Justice"}
      , "answeringDeptSortName" : {"_value" : "Justice"}
      , "date" : {"_value" : "2015-05-27", "_datatype" : "dateTime"}
      , "hansardHeading" : {"_value" : "Employment Tribunals Service: Fees and Charges"}
      , "houseId" : {"_value" : "1"}
      , "legislature" : [{"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/terms/25259", "prefLabel" : {"_value" : "House of Commons"}
      }
      ], "questionText" : "To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when he plans to conduct a review of the effects of the introduction of employment tribunal fees.", "registeredInterest" : {"_value" : "false", "_datatype" : "boolean"}
      , "tablingMember" : {"_about" : "http://data.parliament.uk/members/3930", "label" : {"_value" : "Biography information for Caroline Lucas"}
      }
      , "tablingMemberConstituency" : {"_value" : "Brighton, Pavilion"}
      , "tablingMemberPrinted" : [{"_value" : "Caroline Lucas"}
      ], "uin" : "134"}
    ], "itemsPerPage" : 10, "page" : 0, "startIndex" : 1, "totalResults" : 1, "type" : "http://purl.org/linked-data/api/vocab#Page"}
}