To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, if he
will make an assessment of the effect of removing the export tariff on the number
of solar installations.
<p>As part of the consultation published in July on our proposal to close the Feed-in
Tariff export tariff from 1 April 2019, we included an impact assessment:</p><p><a
href="https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/feed-in-tariffs-scheme" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/feed-in-tariffs-scheme</a>.</p><p>We
are currently considering the responses to this and will publish a government response
in due course. This will include an updated impact assessment.</p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, whether his Department
is taking steps to recognise the contribution of UK citizens to the OSCE mission in
Ukraine; and if he will make a statement.
<p>The UK is a long standing supporter of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation
in Europe (OSCE) and its Special Monitoring Mission. We fully support our secondees
to the Mission and provide them with a package of benefits and remuneration for their
work. This is in addition to the allowances they receive directly from the OSCE. This
demonstrates both our commitment to the Mission and our recognition of the work of
our secondees. We continue to consider other ways to recognise our secondees’ service
to this important Mission.</p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what the average
time spent in Ukraine was of UK representatives to the OSCE’s mission to that country.
<p>Secondees are placed on contracts for one year which can be renewed on agreement,
as the mandate for the mission is renewed by the Organisation for Security and Co-operation
in Europe (OSCE). While in Ukraine they work full time and are subject to OSCE staffing
regulations. As the OSCE is an independent multilateral organisation, any UK secondees
are working for the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission and are not formally representatives
of the UK.</p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, how many UK citizens
working for the OSCE’s mission to Ukraine are employed by (a) the Government, (b)
a UK contractor and (c) the OSCE; and if he will make a statement.
<p>The UK currently provides 66 monitors to the Organisation for Security and Co-operation
in Europe (OSCE) Special Monitoring Mission (SMM), the second largest cohort of any
participating state. This includes the recent appointment of a UK secondee to the
senior position of Deputy Chief Monitor. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office funds
these secondee postings through the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF).
Since the OSCE is an independent multilateral organisation, we are unable to provide
details of other UK citizens who may be contracted or employed by the organisation
in Ukraine.</p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on how many occasions in (a) 2013 and (b)
2014 commanding officers have requested legal advice following allegations of (i)
sexual assault, (ii) exposure, (iii) voyeurism, (iv) sexual activity in a public lavatory
and (v) other forms of sexual misconduct; and if he will make a statement.
<p>The information requested is given below. No allegations of sexual activity in
a public lavatory resulted in a request for legal advice from a Commanding Officer.</p><p>
</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p><p><strong>until
24 October</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sexual Assault</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>48</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Exposure</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Voyeurism</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other
Sexual Misconduct</p></td><td><p>61</p></td><td><p>29</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>135</p></td><td><p>81</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>
</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many allegations of (a) sexual assault,
(b) exposure, (c) voyeurism, (d) sexual activity in a public lavatory, (e) rape and
(f) other forms of sexual misconduct have been recorded by the Crime Statistics and
Analysis Cell in each month since April 2014 relating to the (i) Army, (ii) Navy,
(iii) RAF and (iv) reservists; and if he will make a statement.
<p>The table shows the number of allegations of rape, sexual assault, exposure, voyeurism,
and other forms of sexual misconduct, recorded by the Service police in each month
since April 2014 up to 24 October 2014, broken down by Service.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>
</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April 2014</p></td><td><p>May
2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August 2014</p></td><td><p>September
2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><p><strong>Number
Of Rape Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British Army</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Navy</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Air Force</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number Of Sexual Assault (By Penetration) Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April
2014</p></td><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August
2014</p></td><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number Of Sexual Assault (No Penetration) Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April
2014</p></td><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August
2014</p></td><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Navy</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Air Force</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number of Exposure Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number Of Voyeurism Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April
2014</p></td><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August
2014</p></td><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Air Force</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number Of Other Sexual Offences Under The Sexual Offences Act
2003 Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April
2014</p></td><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August
2014</p></td><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes:
The table only details investigations where the appropriate Service police have jurisdiction
and investigative lead.</p><p>The allegation recorded against each Service is that
of the victim.</p><p> </p><p>No such allegations have been reported to the Service
police in respect of sexual activity in public lavatory or from any of the Reserve
Forces for the period detailed in the above tables.</p><p> </p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress his Department has made in
assessing the systems used by (a) his Department, (b) the Army, (c) the Navy and (d)
the RAF for recording service complaints; and if he will make a statement.
<p>Accurate data is clearly important for assessing the efficiency and effectiveness
of the complaints process. Service complaints data is captured by all three Services
on the Joint Personnel Administration (JPA) system. The system and the supporting
guidance for users have been refined following internal audits of JPA's effectiveness
and extent of its use in 2008 and 2012.</p><p>A third audit is being carried out to
review the adequacy and effectiveness of actions taken in response to the audit in
2012. The Service Complaints Commissioner is fully involved in the audit.</p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many reports of allegations of (a)
sexual assault, (b) exposure, (c) voyeurism, (d) sexual activity in a public lavatory
and (e) other forms of sexual misconduct were made by commanding officers to each
of the service police forces in (i) 2013 and (ii) 2014 to date; and if he will make
a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 21 October 2014
to Question 210743, when the changes to the habitation of offenders legislation came
into force; when his Department became aware of this change; and if he will make a
statement.
<p>In my answer of 21 October 2014 to Question UIN 210743 I referred to 2011 as being
the year in which changes to rehabilitation legislation came into effect. I should
clarify that this was, in fact, the year in which we first recognised the implications
of the changes, which came into effect in December 2008. My answer to your question
on 28 April 2014 (Official Report, columns 443-444W) explained that, since the implications
of the changes were recognised, no administrative action has been taken against service
personnel who received a police caution that is immediately spent. We do not comment
on individual complaints.</p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 21 October 2014
to Question 210743, what the nature is of the disciplinary action taken against the
four serving members of the armed forces who lodged complaints which were subsequently
and remain stayed; and if he will make a statement.
<p>In my answer of 21 October 2014 to Question UIN 210743 I referred to 2011 as being
the year in which changes to rehabilitation legislation came into effect. I should
clarify that this was, in fact, the year in which we first recognised the implications
of the changes, which came into effect in December 2008. My answer to your question
on 28 April 2014 (Official Report, columns 443-444W) explained that, since the implications
of the changes were recognised, no administrative action has been taken against service
personnel who received a police caution that is immediately spent. We do not comment
on individual complaints.</p>