Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1092095
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-03-20more like thismore than 2019-03-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the maximum number of offenders is who can be tagged and monitored at any one time under the new national GPS tagging of offenders scheme. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 234706 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-03-28more like thismore than 2019-03-28
answer text <p>The current national rollout of new GPS technology, will help strengthen supervision, enforce exclusion zones and give victims greater peace of mind.</p><p> </p><p>Legislative and policy guidelines determine which offenders and subjects on bail are eligible to be tagged. Within this framework, decision makers will apply normal, reasonableness, proportionality and necessity tests, along with consideration of the practical outcome that the imposition of the tag is aiming to achieve.</p><p> </p><p>Data from the Department’s GPS pilot indicates that in steady state there will be approx 4000 location monitoring starts a year with a maximum of approx 1000 subjects on a GPS tag at any one time.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
grouped question UIN 234709 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-03-28T16:53:51.697Zmore like thismore than 2019-03-28T16:53:51.697Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this
1092099
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-03-20more like thismore than 2019-03-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what criteria will be used to determine which offenders are required to wear (a) a new GPS tag and (b) the older type of location tag. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 234709 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-03-28more like thismore than 2019-03-28
answer text <p>The current national rollout of new GPS technology, will help strengthen supervision, enforce exclusion zones and give victims greater peace of mind.</p><p> </p><p>Legislative and policy guidelines determine which offenders and subjects on bail are eligible to be tagged. Within this framework, decision makers will apply normal, reasonableness, proportionality and necessity tests, along with consideration of the practical outcome that the imposition of the tag is aiming to achieve.</p><p> </p><p>Data from the Department’s GPS pilot indicates that in steady state there will be approx 4000 location monitoring starts a year with a maximum of approx 1000 subjects on a GPS tag at any one time.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
grouped question UIN 234706 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-03-28T16:53:51.65Zmore like thismore than 2019-03-28T16:53:51.65Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this
1109971
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-05more like thismore than 2019-04-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 28 March 2019 to Question 234706 on Offenders: Electronic Tagging, how many monitoring starts under the existing monitoring scheme there have been in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 241427 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-17more like thismore than 2019-04-17
answer text <p>Information on the number of electronic monitoring starts for 2015 to 2018 is contained within the table below. Data for the year ending March 2019 will be provided in the next HMPPS Annual Digest, due to be published in July 2019. Data for 2014 is of poor quality and not available.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="16"><p><strong>Table: New electronic monitoring order notifications by order type, England and Wales, for the years ending March 2015 to March 2018 <sup>(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Numbers</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="7"><p><strong>12 months ending March</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Type of Order</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>TOTAL NOTIFICATIONS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>71,930</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>r</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>69,204</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>r</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>63,455</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>r</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>58,128</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bail</p></td><td><p>20,143</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>18,618</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>15,707</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>15,008</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Court Sentence</p></td><td><p>40,798</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>39,665</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>36,811</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>30,570</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Post Release</p></td><td><p>10,194</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>10,067</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>10,390</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>12,005</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immigration</p></td><td><p>775</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>822</p></td><td><p>r</p></td><td><p>503</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>492</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Specials</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Source: EMS Contractor data</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="13"><p>r - Figures have been revised since previous reports were published. The differences are generally small and due to the provisional nature of the data when published previously.</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="13"><p>(1) These figures are drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system.</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="13"><p>(2) Includes orders for subjects on bail, sentenced to a court order, released from custody on licence, immigration orders managed by the Home Office, and a small number of Special orders.</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="13"><p>(3) One subject may be given multiple orders over the course of the year. In these figures each is counted individually. I.e. one person with four orders counts as four.</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="13"><p>(4) Comprises notifications of new electronic monitoring orders received by the EM contractor that started between April 2014 and March 2018. In some cases the monitoring equipment may never have been installed, e.g. if the subject is taken into custody prior to installation. These cases are included in the total.</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="13"><p>(5) Figures for the year ending March 2018 are provisional</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-17T16:58:17.677Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-17T16:58:17.677Z
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
previous answer version
114070
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this
1109972
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-05more like thismore than 2019-04-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 28 March 2019 to Question 234706 on Offenders: Electronic Tagging, who the decision-makers will be that will apply the necessary reasonableness, proportionality and necessity tests for use of the 1,000 GPS tags available at any one time. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 241428 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-17more like thismore than 2019-04-17
answer text <p>GPS tags are available nationally for eligible post-custody cohorts. For Home Detention Curfew cases, the prison governor is the decision maker. We have provided prison governors with guidance about the capabilities and uses of location monitoring. For prisoners serving a Life Sentence, Imprisonment for Public Protection or Extended Determinate Sentence, the decision rests with the Parole Board. We have provided the Parole Board with information about the capabilities and uses of location monitoring.</p><p> </p><p>GPS tags are also being rolled out for use in courts, as a requirement of a Community Order, a Suspended Sentence Order or Court-imposed bail. In these cases, the decision will rest with the Judiciary. We have provided the independent Judiciary with information about the capabilities and uses of location monitoring</p> more like this
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
grouped question UIN 241429 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-17T16:54:44.163Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-17T16:54:44.163Z
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
previous answer version
114071
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this
1109973
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-05more like thismore than 2019-04-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 28 March 2019 to Question 234706 on Offenders: Electronic Tagging, whether new policy guidelines will be issued to assist decision makers on deciding which offenders will be given GPS tags. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 241429 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-17more like thismore than 2019-04-17
answer text <p>GPS tags are available nationally for eligible post-custody cohorts. For Home Detention Curfew cases, the prison governor is the decision maker. We have provided prison governors with guidance about the capabilities and uses of location monitoring. For prisoners serving a Life Sentence, Imprisonment for Public Protection or Extended Determinate Sentence, the decision rests with the Parole Board. We have provided the Parole Board with information about the capabilities and uses of location monitoring.</p><p> </p><p>GPS tags are also being rolled out for use in courts, as a requirement of a Community Order, a Suspended Sentence Order or Court-imposed bail. In these cases, the decision will rest with the Judiciary. We have provided the independent Judiciary with information about the capabilities and uses of location monitoring</p> more like this
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
grouped question UIN 241428 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-17T16:54:44.217Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-17T16:54:44.217Z
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
previous answer version
114075
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this
1109974
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-05more like thismore than 2019-04-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, , pursuant to the Answer of 28 March 2019 to Question 234706 on Offenders: Electronic Tagging, if he will place in the Library a copy of the outcome report on his Department’s GPS pilot scheme. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 241430 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-10more like thismore than 2019-04-10
answer text <p>On 16 February the Secretary of State for Justice announced the national roll out of new GPS tags providing 24/7 location monitoring of offenders and subjects on Court bail. The process evaluation of the Ministry of Justice GPS pilot was published at the same time. It can be accessed online, at <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/process-evaluation-of-the-global-positioning-system-gps-electronic-monitoring-pilot" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/process-evaluation-of-the-global-positioning-system-gps-electronic-monitoring-pilot</a></p> more like this
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-10T15:17:07.45Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-10T15:17:07.45Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this
1121446
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-11more like thismore than 2019-04-11
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 28 March 2019 to Question 234706 on Offenders: Electronic Tagging, how many offenders have taken part in each of the GPS electronic tagging pilots in each month since the pilots started. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 244087 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-29more like thismore than 2019-04-29
answer text <p>The tables below provide information on the number of individuals on a GPS tag per month during the Ministry of Justice GPS pilot. The Pilot ran in two regional police force clusters: the Midlands (Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire, Staffordshire and West Midlands) and BeNCH (Bedfordshire, Norfolk, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire). The learning from the Pilot has been incorporated into the new national location monitoring service announced by the Secretary of State on 16 February. This will help strengthen supervision, enforce exclusion zones and give victims greater peace of mind. More detail about the Pilot, including the cohorts involved, can be found here <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/process-evaluation-of-the-global-positioning-system-gps-electronic-monitoring-pilot" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/process-evaluation-of-the-global-positioning-system-gps-electronic-monitoring-pilot</a></p><p> </p><p>The numbers of new starts in the Pilot dropped to zero a few months before the end of the Pilot. This was because the Pilot was scheduled to last for 18 months, ending on 31 March 2018. As most electronic monitoring orders last several months, the MoJ imposed a cut-off date for fitting new tags three months before the Pilot was due to end. This ensured that decision makers were not, for example, ordering new tags to be fitted only a few weeks before they would have to be removed.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 shows the total number of individuals wearing a GPS tag at the end of every month.</p><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows the number of new GPS starts each month.</p>
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-29T16:39:49.173Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-29T16:39:49.173Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this
1121448
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-11more like thismore than 2019-04-11
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many offenders have been given electronic tagging orders in each month since January 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 244088 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
answer text <p>Electronic Monitoring is an effective criminal justice tool. It gives those on a tag a chance to maintain family ties and remain in work or education while providing additional safeguards.</p><p> </p><p>The table below provides details of the average number of individuals on electronic tagging orders from January 2013 to March 2018. This is Management Information, is not published and has not had the level of scrutiny and quality assurance as for Official Statistics data.</p><p> </p><p>The table below also provides information on how many notifications for new orders were issued every month from April 2014 to March 2018. The table from where the data is drawn can be found in Table 12.4 at <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/annual-hm-prison-and-probation-service-digest-2017-to-2018" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/annual-hm-prison-and-probation-service-digest-2017-to-2018</a>. Data for 2014 is of poor quality and not available. Data from April 2018 to March 2019 will be published in July 2019.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Average number of offenders on electronic tagging orders in England and Wales, in each month January 2013 - March 2018 <sup>(1)(2)(3)</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Monthly new electronic monitoring order notifications in England and Wales, in each month from April 2014 to March 2018 <sup>(1)(4)(5)</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Month</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Average number of offenders on EM order</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total notifications</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2013</p></td><td><p>14,555</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2013</p></td><td><p>14,384</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2013</p></td><td><p>14,185</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2013</p></td><td><p>14,284</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2013</p></td><td><p>14,551</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2013</p></td><td><p>14,585</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2014</p></td><td><p>14,042</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2014</p></td><td><p>14,096</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2014</p></td><td><p>14,267</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2014</p></td><td><p>14,224</p></td><td><p>5,975</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>13,987</p></td><td><p>5,753</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>13,879</p></td><td><p>5,564</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>13,940</p></td><td><p>5,982</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2014</p></td><td><p>13,912</p></td><td><p>5,635</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>13,843</p></td><td><p>5,817</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2014</p></td><td><p>13,973</p></td><td><p>6,353</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2014</p></td><td><p>14,294</p></td><td><p>6,135</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2014</p></td><td><p>14,446</p></td><td><p>6,236</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2015</p></td><td><p>13,907</p></td><td><p>6,316</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2015</p></td><td><p>13,902</p></td><td><p>5,872</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2015</p></td><td><p>13,925</p></td><td><p>6,292</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2015</p></td><td><p>13,803</p></td><td><p>5,804</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2015</p></td><td><p>13,589</p></td><td><p>5,797</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2015</p></td><td><p>13,516</p></td><td><p>6,218</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2015</p></td><td><p>13,393</p></td><td><p>6,150</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2015</p></td><td><p>13,389</p></td><td><p>5,310</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2015</p></td><td><p>13,119</p></td><td><p>5,937</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2015</p></td><td><p>13,197</p></td><td><p>5,802</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2015</p></td><td><p>13,329</p></td><td><p>5,814</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2015</p></td><td><p>13,415</p></td><td><p>5,647</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2016</p></td><td><p>12,914</p></td><td><p>5,597</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2016</p></td><td><p>12,781</p></td><td><p>5,585</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2016</p></td><td><p>12,684</p></td><td><p>5,543</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2016</p></td><td><p>12,614</p></td><td><p>5,458</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2016</p></td><td><p>12,432</p></td><td><p>5,239</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2016</p></td><td><p>12,223</p></td><td><p>5,373</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2016</p></td><td><p>11,896</p></td><td><p>5,152</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2016</p></td><td><p>11,628</p></td><td><p>5,237</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2016</p></td><td><p>11,168</p></td><td><p>5,079</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2016</p></td><td><p>11,222</p></td><td><p>5,029</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2016</p></td><td><p>11,443</p></td><td><p>5,545</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2016</p></td><td><p>11,743</p></td><td><p>5,149</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2017</p></td><td><p>11,395</p></td><td><p>5,606</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2017</p></td><td><p>11,559</p></td><td><p>4,982</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2017</p></td><td><p>11,363</p></td><td><p>5,606</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2017</p></td><td><p>11,350</p></td><td><p>4,576</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2017</p></td><td><p>11,052</p></td><td><p>5,204</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2017</p></td><td><p>10,843</p></td><td><p>4,968</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2017</p></td><td><p>10,851</p></td><td><p>4,761</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2017</p></td><td><p>10,713</p></td><td><p>4,803</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2017</p></td><td><p>10,620</p></td><td><p>4,767</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2017</p></td><td><p>10,781</p></td><td><p>4,771</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2017</p></td><td><p>10,865</p></td><td><p>5,012</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2017</p></td><td><p>10,961</p></td><td><p>4,197</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2018</p></td><td><p>10,566</p></td><td><p>5,397</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2018</p></td><td><p>10,925</p></td><td><p>4,718</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2018</p></td><td><p>11,064</p></td><td><p>4,954</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>(1) These figures are drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system.</p><p>(2) Monitored subjects are unique subjects with a live EM order and with a tag fitted and Home Monitoring Unit (HMU) installed.</p><p>(3) Note that from the 12/07/2016 the Manchester caseload definition changed to include subjects with an active EM order. Previously it only included subjects with an active EM service. This means that subjects on a break in their service are included in the Manchester figures. This was done to align the Manchester and Norwich caseload definitions.</p><p>(4) One subject may be given multiple orders over the course of the year. In these figures each is counted individually. i.e. one person with four orders counts as four.</p><p>(5) Comprises notifications of new electronic monitoring orders received by the EM contractor that started between April 2014 and March 2018. In some cases the monitoring equipment may never have been installed, e.g. if the subject is taken into custody prior to installation. These cases are included in the total.</p>
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
grouped question UIN 244089 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-24T16:36:23.867Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T16:36:23.867Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this
1121449
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-11more like thismore than 2019-04-11
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average number of offenders on electronic tagging orders has been in each month since January 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 244089 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-24more like thismore than 2019-04-24
answer text <p>Electronic Monitoring is an effective criminal justice tool. It gives those on a tag a chance to maintain family ties and remain in work or education while providing additional safeguards.</p><p> </p><p>The table below provides details of the average number of individuals on electronic tagging orders from January 2013 to March 2018. This is Management Information, is not published and has not had the level of scrutiny and quality assurance as for Official Statistics data.</p><p> </p><p>The table below also provides information on how many notifications for new orders were issued every month from April 2014 to March 2018. The table from where the data is drawn can be found in Table 12.4 at <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/annual-hm-prison-and-probation-service-digest-2017-to-2018" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/annual-hm-prison-and-probation-service-digest-2017-to-2018</a>. Data for 2014 is of poor quality and not available. Data from April 2018 to March 2019 will be published in July 2019.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Average number of offenders on electronic tagging orders in England and Wales, in each month January 2013 - March 2018 <sup>(1)(2)(3)</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Monthly new electronic monitoring order notifications in England and Wales, in each month from April 2014 to March 2018 <sup>(1)(4)(5)</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Month</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Average number of offenders on EM order</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total notifications</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2013</p></td><td><p>14,555</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2013</p></td><td><p>14,384</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2013</p></td><td><p>14,185</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2013</p></td><td><p>14,284</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2013</p></td><td><p>14,551</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2013</p></td><td><p>14,585</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2014</p></td><td><p>14,042</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2014</p></td><td><p>14,096</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2014</p></td><td><p>14,267</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2014</p></td><td><p>14,224</p></td><td><p>5,975</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>13,987</p></td><td><p>5,753</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>13,879</p></td><td><p>5,564</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>13,940</p></td><td><p>5,982</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2014</p></td><td><p>13,912</p></td><td><p>5,635</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>13,843</p></td><td><p>5,817</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2014</p></td><td><p>13,973</p></td><td><p>6,353</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2014</p></td><td><p>14,294</p></td><td><p>6,135</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2014</p></td><td><p>14,446</p></td><td><p>6,236</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2015</p></td><td><p>13,907</p></td><td><p>6,316</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2015</p></td><td><p>13,902</p></td><td><p>5,872</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2015</p></td><td><p>13,925</p></td><td><p>6,292</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2015</p></td><td><p>13,803</p></td><td><p>5,804</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2015</p></td><td><p>13,589</p></td><td><p>5,797</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2015</p></td><td><p>13,516</p></td><td><p>6,218</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2015</p></td><td><p>13,393</p></td><td><p>6,150</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2015</p></td><td><p>13,389</p></td><td><p>5,310</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2015</p></td><td><p>13,119</p></td><td><p>5,937</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2015</p></td><td><p>13,197</p></td><td><p>5,802</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2015</p></td><td><p>13,329</p></td><td><p>5,814</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2015</p></td><td><p>13,415</p></td><td><p>5,647</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2016</p></td><td><p>12,914</p></td><td><p>5,597</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2016</p></td><td><p>12,781</p></td><td><p>5,585</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2016</p></td><td><p>12,684</p></td><td><p>5,543</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2016</p></td><td><p>12,614</p></td><td><p>5,458</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2016</p></td><td><p>12,432</p></td><td><p>5,239</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2016</p></td><td><p>12,223</p></td><td><p>5,373</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2016</p></td><td><p>11,896</p></td><td><p>5,152</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2016</p></td><td><p>11,628</p></td><td><p>5,237</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2016</p></td><td><p>11,168</p></td><td><p>5,079</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2016</p></td><td><p>11,222</p></td><td><p>5,029</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2016</p></td><td><p>11,443</p></td><td><p>5,545</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2016</p></td><td><p>11,743</p></td><td><p>5,149</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2017</p></td><td><p>11,395</p></td><td><p>5,606</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2017</p></td><td><p>11,559</p></td><td><p>4,982</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2017</p></td><td><p>11,363</p></td><td><p>5,606</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2017</p></td><td><p>11,350</p></td><td><p>4,576</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2017</p></td><td><p>11,052</p></td><td><p>5,204</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2017</p></td><td><p>10,843</p></td><td><p>4,968</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2017</p></td><td><p>10,851</p></td><td><p>4,761</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2017</p></td><td><p>10,713</p></td><td><p>4,803</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2017</p></td><td><p>10,620</p></td><td><p>4,767</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2017</p></td><td><p>10,781</p></td><td><p>4,771</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2017</p></td><td><p>10,865</p></td><td><p>5,012</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2017</p></td><td><p>10,961</p></td><td><p>4,197</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2018</p></td><td><p>10,566</p></td><td><p>5,397</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2018</p></td><td><p>10,925</p></td><td><p>4,718</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2018</p></td><td><p>11,064</p></td><td><p>4,954</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>(1) These figures are drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system.</p><p>(2) Monitored subjects are unique subjects with a live EM order and with a tag fitted and Home Monitoring Unit (HMU) installed.</p><p>(3) Note that from the 12/07/2016 the Manchester caseload definition changed to include subjects with an active EM order. Previously it only included subjects with an active EM service. This means that subjects on a break in their service are included in the Manchester figures. This was done to align the Manchester and Norwich caseload definitions.</p><p>(4) One subject may be given multiple orders over the course of the year. In these figures each is counted individually. i.e. one person with four orders counts as four.</p><p>(5) Comprises notifications of new electronic monitoring orders received by the EM contractor that started between April 2014 and March 2018. In some cases the monitoring equipment may never have been installed, e.g. if the subject is taken into custody prior to installation. These cases are included in the total.</p>
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
grouped question UIN 244088 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-24T16:36:23.993Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-24T16:36:23.993Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this
1022949
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-12-10more like thismore than 2018-12-10
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Open Prisons: Conditions of Employment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the set number of profiled hours for the keyworker system is in each open prison; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency North Tyneside more like this
tabling member printed
Mary Glindon remove filter
uin 200613 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-13more like thismore than 2018-12-13
answer text <p>There are no current plans to implement key work in the open estate. Open prisons focus on the testing and reintegration of prisoners back into their communities with increased opportunities for temporary release (on licence) to undertake work, training and engage with services in their communities as well as their families and significant others.</p><p> </p><p>The introduction of key worker activity will be undertaken by Band 3 Prison Officers. As all residential officers will be key workers, there are no ‘target numbers’. Each officer will be looking after a case load of around six individuals. They will meet regularly (on average 45 minutes per prisoner, per week) and provide supportive challenge to prisoners, to motivate them to use their time in custody to best effect.</p><p> </p><p>The introduction of the key worker element of the model is being managed centrally, to allow for recruitment and training to be coordinated at a national level. Roll-out is under way with 72 prisons who have commenced delivery of key work and 18 being fully rolled out at the end of October 2018. The project to manage the implementation of the new model, both key work and case management, is now in its final phase (Implementation and evaluation). It is due to conclude in December 2019.</p>
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
grouped question UIN
200614 more like this
200615 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-13T13:47:19.12Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-13T13:47:19.12Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4126
label Biography information for Mary Glindon more like this