Show Search Form

Search Results

human indexable	true false
published	true false
registered interest	true false
answer date	exactly: or between: and
date	exactly: or between: and
date tabled	exactly: or between: and
ddp created	exactly: or between: and
answering body
question status
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
ddp modified
hansard heading
house id
identifier
legislature	pref label
parliament number
question first answered
question text
session
session number
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
title
type
uin
version
written parliamentary question type
answer	answer text answering member
creator	label
publisher	pref label
tabling member	label

Search

1127721

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	21/05/2019
	date	21/05/2019
	date tabled	21/05/2019
	ddp created	21/05/2019 12:08:59
	answering body	Treasury
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	14
	answering dept short name	Treasury
	answering dept sort name	Treasury
	ddp modified	21/05/2019 12:15:11 21/05/2019 13:49:04
	hansard heading	Royal Fleet Auxiliary: Pay
	house id	1
	identifier	911019
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	21/05/2019 13:17:05
	question text	What discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Defence on the pay settlement for staff of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
	tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 911019
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	911019
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer answer text <p>Royal Fleet Auxiliary personnel are part of the civil service. Therefore, responsibility for setting their pay and terms and conditions lies with the Cabinet Office and Ministry of Defence.</p><p> </p> answering member 4097
	creator	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard
	publisher	25259 pref label House of Commons
	tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1088526

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	18/03/2019
	date	13/03/2019
	date tabled	13/03/2019
	ddp created	13/03/2019 22:07:02
	answering body	Treasury
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	14
	answering dept short name	Treasury
	answering dept sort name	Treasury
	ddp modified	13/03/2019 22:23:22 18/03/2019 17:57:09
	hansard heading	Marine Protected Areas: Ascension Island
	house id	1
	identifier	232111
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	18/03/2019 17:25:09
	question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what funding he is making available to enforce the Marine Protection Area around Ascension Island announced in the Spring Statement.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
	tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 232111
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	232111
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	NamedDay
	answer	answer answer text <p>Funding to establish a new Marine Protected Area (MPA) around Ascension Island will be made available under the Blue Belt programme, and will be consistent with funding for other MPAs. Funding for ongoing costs associated with the Ascension Island MPA will be delivered at the forthcoming Spending Review.</p> answering member 4097
	creator	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard
	publisher	25259 pref label House of Commons
	tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

997626

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	01/11/2018
	date	30/10/2018
	date tabled	30/10/2018
	ddp created	30/10/2018 19:48:35
	answering body	Treasury
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	14
	answering dept short name	Treasury
	answering dept sort name	Treasury
	ddp modified	30/10/2018 20:06:35 07/11/2018 17:07:02
	hansard heading	Railways: Dawlish
	house id	1
	identifier	185809
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	07/11/2018 16:35:06
	question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to page 67 of the Budget 2018 Red Book, what funding he has allocated for resilience work in Dawlish.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
	tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 185809
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	185809
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The government committed to £15 million of funding in November 2016. The essential improvement works are to begin in November of this year to strengthen the cliffs and protect the sea wall at Dawlish. Further plans for major improvements of the seawall at Dawlish will be published in the summer 2019.</p><p> </p><p>Overall, we are investing more than £400m in the rail network in the South West and will continue to work with Network Rail and the Peninsula Rail Task Force to explore the potential for longer-term improvements from summer 2019 onwards.</p> answering member 4320
	creator	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard
	publisher	25259 pref label House of Commons
	tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

934316

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	05/07/2018
	date	03/07/2018
	date tabled	03/07/2018
	ddp created	03/07/2018 20:00:41
	answering body	Treasury
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	14
	answering dept short name	Treasury
	answering dept sort name	Treasury
	ddp modified	03/07/2018 20:40:43 11/07/2018 15:16:02
	hansard heading	Hydrogen Fuelling Stations
	house id	1
	identifier	160385
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	11/07/2018 14:44:20
	question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he plans to include hydrogen refuelling stations in the scope of the Charging Infrastructure Investment Fund in the future.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
	tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 160385
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	160385
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>The purpose of the Charging Infrastructure Investment Fund is to catalyse private sector investment into the electric vehicle chargepoint network. There are separate interventions to support the uptake of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and roll out more cutting edge infrastructure. This includes funding which will see additional hydrogen refuelling stations being built as well as upgrades to existing refuelling infrastructure. In addition, government funding has supported the opening of the UK’s first integrated forecourt hydrogen refuelling station at the Shell Beaconsfield site, making it the first location in the country selling hydrogen fuel as well as petrol and diesel.</p> answering member 4320
	creator	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard
	publisher	25259 pref label House of Commons
	tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

914761

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	05/06/2018
	date	01/06/2018
	date tabled	01/06/2018
	ddp created	01/06/2018 16:32:39
	answering body	Treasury
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	14
	answering dept short name	Treasury
	answering dept sort name	Treasury
	ddp modified	01/06/2018 16:38:05 11/06/2018 16:54:07
	hansard heading	High Rise Flats: Insulation
	house id	1
	identifier	149092
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	11/06/2018 16:22:30
	question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will reduce the rate of VAT charged on work to reclad tower blocks resulting from the Grenfell Tower fire.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
	tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 149092
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	149092
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>On 16 May the government announced that it will fully fund the removal and replacement of potentially dangerous ACM cladding on residential social housing buildings, which are over 18 metres tall and owned by social landlords. This commitment is estimated to cost £400 million.</p><p> </p><p>In the wake of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, the government also established a comprehensive building safety programme and made it clear that aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding on buildings over 18 meters which was not compliant with building regulations guidance should be remediated by the building owners. The government has provided £1m in financial support to help local authorities identify high-rise private residential buildings with unsafe cladding. This work will ensure that hazards in high rise residential buildings are addressed and the government continues to work closely with local authorities, building owners and leaseholder groups to establish what more can be done.</p> answering member 3935
	creator	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard
	publisher	25259 pref label House of Commons
	tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

914762

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	05/06/2018
	date	01/06/2018
	date tabled	01/06/2018
	ddp created	01/06/2018 16:32:41
	answering body	Treasury
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	14
	answering dept short name	Treasury
	answering dept sort name	Treasury
	ddp modified	01/06/2018 16:38:07 11/06/2018 16:54:09
	hansard heading	High Rise Flats: Insulation
	house id	1
	identifier	149093
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	11/06/2018 16:22:30
	question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the amount of VAT which will be accrued to the public purse from the £400m allocated by the Government to renew cladding on tower blocks that have failed fire safety tests.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
	tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 149093
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	149093
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>On 16 May the government announced that it will fully fund the removal and replacement of potentially dangerous ACM cladding on residential social housing buildings, which are over 18 metres tall and owned by social landlords. This commitment is estimated to cost £400 million.</p><p> </p><p>In the wake of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, the government also established a comprehensive building safety programme and made it clear that aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding on buildings over 18 meters which was not compliant with building regulations guidance should be remediated by the building owners. The government has provided £1m in financial support to help local authorities identify high-rise private residential buildings with unsafe cladding. This work will ensure that hazards in high rise residential buildings are addressed and the government continues to work closely with local authorities, building owners and leaseholder groups to establish what more can be done.</p> answering member 3935
	creator	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard
	publisher	25259 pref label House of Commons
	tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

909223

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	23/05/2018
	date	21/05/2018
	date tabled	21/05/2018
	ddp created	21/05/2018 21:56:26
	answering body	Treasury
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	14
	answering dept short name	Treasury
	answering dept sort name	Treasury
	ddp modified	22/05/2018 15:55:30 30/05/2018 14:44:01
	hansard heading	Air Passenger Duty
	house id	1
	identifier	146352
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	30/05/2018 14:12:41
	question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has been raised for the public in each of the last five years from Air Passenger Duty by (a) reduced rate, (b) standard rate and (c) higher rate in (i) band A and (ii) band B.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
	tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 146352
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	146352
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer answer text <p>This information is not available.</p><p> </p><p>Total receipts from Air Passenger Duty are published at the following link and this also includes passenger numbers declared by traders at the various bands and rates:</p><p><a href="https://www.uktradeinfo.com/Statistics/Pages/TaxAndDutybulletins.aspx" target="_blank">https://www.uktradeinfo.com/Statistics/Pages/TaxAndDutybulletins.aspx</a></p> answering member 3935
	creator	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard
	publisher	25259 pref label House of Commons
	tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard