Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label attachment file name title
tabling member	label

Search

46400

	registered interest
	date	01/04/2014
	answering body	Home Office
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many proceedings have been brought under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 in each year since its enactment; what was the total amount pursued; and what has been the amount actually recovered.
	tabling member printed	Lord Mendelsohn
	uin	HL6497
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/04/2014 answer text <p>More money has been recovered from criminals under this Government than in any equivalent period previously. The Serious and Organised Crime Strategy sets out the steps we will take to attack criminal finances and further improve performance.<br><br>The table below details the number of cases brought under the Proceeds of Crime Act together with the amounts set on orders that the courts issued and the amounts recovered. The amounts recovered in a given year do not necessarily relate to orders made in that year.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Taylor of Holbeach question first answered 15/04/2014 12:00:00 answering member 3787 label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Holbeach attachment 1 file name HL6497 TABLE.doc title Table for PQ HL6497
	tabling member	4286 label Biography information for Lord Mendelsohn

45995

	registered interest
	date	31/03/2014
	answering body	Home Office
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the cost of the legal advice gained by the Metropolitan Police Service and Crown Prosecution Service which led to the policy of investigating the chant of "yids" by Tottenham Hotspur supporters by the Metropolitan Police Service prior to the Prime Minister's comments on the matter on 16 September 2013; and what was the cost of the advice gained after that date.
	tabling member printed	Lord Mendelsohn
	uin	HL6473
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/04/2014 answer text <p> </p><p>The Home Office does not hold the information requested. The Crown Prosecution Service has no specific policy relating to the chanting of the word &quot;yids&quot; by Tottenham Hotspur supporters and incurred no legal advice costs on this specific issue. The case against the three Tottenham Hotspur supporters was discontinued by the Crown Prosecution Service prior to the adjourned date of the hearing, without parties having to attend court, and without the associated costs being incurred. <br><br>The Crown Prosecution Service National Football lead has been consulted on a number of occasions regarding whether the use of the word &quot;yid&quot; could amount to a criminal act. The general advice given on each occasion was that each case depends on its specific facts. In relation to the case that was dropped against the three Tottenham Hotspur supporters, the police contacted the Crown Prosecution Service prior to charge. Advice was given that there was a realistic prospect of conviction. It subsequently transpired that the further evidence was not available and the case was therefore discontinued. Prior to the discontinuance a meeting took place between senior police officers and the Crown Prosecution Service officials.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Taylor of Holbeach grouped question UIN HL6474 HL6475 question first answered 15/04/2014 12:00:00 answering member 3787 label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Holbeach
	tabling member	4286 label Biography information for Lord Mendelsohn

45996

	registered interest
	date	31/03/2014
	answering body	Home Office
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what was total cost associated with the charges dropped against three Tottenham Hotspur supporters in March relating to the chant of "yids".
	tabling member printed	Lord Mendelsohn
	uin	HL6474
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/04/2014 answer text <p> </p><p>The Home Office does not hold the information requested. The Crown Prosecution Service has no specific policy relating to the chanting of the word &quot;yids&quot; by Tottenham Hotspur supporters and incurred no legal advice costs on this specific issue. The case against the three Tottenham Hotspur supporters was discontinued by the Crown Prosecution Service prior to the adjourned date of the hearing, without parties having to attend court, and without the associated costs being incurred. <br><br>The Crown Prosecution Service National Football lead has been consulted on a number of occasions regarding whether the use of the word &quot;yid&quot; could amount to a criminal act. The general advice given on each occasion was that each case depends on its specific facts. In relation to the case that was dropped against the three Tottenham Hotspur supporters, the police contacted the Crown Prosecution Service prior to charge. Advice was given that there was a realistic prospect of conviction. It subsequently transpired that the further evidence was not available and the case was therefore discontinued. Prior to the discontinuance a meeting took place between senior police officers and the Crown Prosecution Service officials.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Taylor of Holbeach grouped question UIN HL6473 HL6475 question first answered 15/04/2014 12:00:00 answering member 3787 label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Holbeach
	tabling member	4286 label Biography information for Lord Mendelsohn

45997

	registered interest
	date	31/03/2014
	answering body	Home Office
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government who first contacted (1) the Metropolitan Police Service, and (2) the Crown Prosecution Service, with the suggestion that it was unlawful for the supporters of Tottenham Hotspur to chant "yids", or that they should investigate the issue; whom they subsequently consulted; and how many meetings were held between those individuals or organisations, and at what level of seniority, to discuss the matter.
	tabling member printed	Lord Mendelsohn
	uin	HL6475
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/04/2014 answer text <p> </p><p>The Home Office does not hold the information requested. The Crown Prosecution Service has no specific policy relating to the chanting of the word &quot;yids&quot; by Tottenham Hotspur supporters and incurred no legal advice costs on this specific issue. The case against the three Tottenham Hotspur supporters was discontinued by the Crown Prosecution Service prior to the adjourned date of the hearing, without parties having to attend court, and without the associated costs being incurred. <br><br>The Crown Prosecution Service National Football lead has been consulted on a number of occasions regarding whether the use of the word &quot;yid&quot; could amount to a criminal act. The general advice given on each occasion was that each case depends on its specific facts. In relation to the case that was dropped against the three Tottenham Hotspur supporters, the police contacted the Crown Prosecution Service prior to charge. Advice was given that there was a realistic prospect of conviction. It subsequently transpired that the further evidence was not available and the case was therefore discontinued. Prior to the discontinuance a meeting took place between senior police officers and the Crown Prosecution Service officials.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Taylor of Holbeach grouped question UIN HL6473 HL6474 question first answered 15/04/2014 12:00:00 answering member 3787 label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Holbeach
	tabling member	4286 label Biography information for Lord Mendelsohn

47425

	registered interest
	date	07/04/2014
	answering body	Home Office
	answering dept id	1
	answering dept short name	Home Office
	answering dept sort name	Home Office
	house id	2
	legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the percentage cost over-run established by the management board for any budget in the Home Office to merit being tabled at the departmental management board; and how many times in the last 12 months that has occurred.
	tabling member printed	Lord Mendelsohn
	uin	HL6657
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/04/2014 answer text <p> </p><p>A report showing all Home Office expenditure, budgets and forecast is presented to the management board on a monthly basis. There is no percentage cost at which an over-run is tabled as all information is transparent to the board. There have been no overspends reported to the Board over the last 12 months.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Taylor of Holbeach question first answered 15/04/2014 12:00:00 answering member 3787 label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Holbeach
	tabling member	4286 label Biography information for Lord Mendelsohn